A polylogarithmic progression modulus does not decouple the Möbius factor from the shifted prime, so Siegel–Walfisz alone cannot prove the needed correlation. Prove a signed one-sided bound for the combined prime–composite and composite–composite false-pair modes that leaves a fixed positive reserve below the hyperbolic main term.
Route status · Narrowed routeAnalytic number theory and prime gaps
Twin Prime Conjecture
Collaboration betaDo infinitely many primes occur two apart? Bounded-gap theorems show infinitely many prime pairs within a fixed finite distance, but the exact gap two remains unproved.
Known results and sources
Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
There are infinitely many primes p such that p+2 is also prime. Equivalently in the source's smooth squarefree von Mangoldt formulation, T_sf,w(X)>0 for arbitrarily large X.
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on Twin Prime Conjecture stands
Selected route highlights from the mathematical source. This is not yet a complete mathematical inventory.
Split the signed false-pair term into prime–composite, composite–prime, and composite–composite parts; preserve Möbius signs and couple the principal modes before applying absolute-value inequalities.
Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteWe corrected the cited passages. We removed a duplicate or outdated task or route step. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchangedWork mapped so far
Twin Prime Conjecture in numbers
- Argument development
- 4,394 · 88%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 109 · 2%
- Computational analysis
- 54 · 1%
- Open obligations
- 215 · 4%
- Definitions and setup
- 248 · 5%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Bound the signed prime–composite correlation.
Suggested move: Preserve the Möbius factor, coprimality, transition cutoff, shifted prime indicator, and both orientations through an explicit Type I/II decomposition.
What would count as progress
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
Explored alternatives
Other routes
A polylogarithmic progression modulus does not decouple the Möbius factor from the shifted prime, so Siegel–Walfisz alone cannot prove the needed correlation. Prove a signed one-sided bound for the combined prime–composite and composite–composite false-pair modes that leaves a fixed positive reserve below the hyperbolic main term.
Route status · Narrowed routeThe composite–composite support product bound does not make either complementary factor polylogarithmic, and rank shells cannot be estimated separately before terminal Möbius summation. Prove a signed one-sided bound for the combined prime–composite and composite–composite false-pair modes that leaves a fixed positive reserve below the hyperbolic main term.
Route status · Narrowed routeMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
The conjecture asserts that infinitely many primes p have p+2 prime.
Suggested move: Resolve the exact source-reported obligation without treating it as an established negative result.Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
The exact gap-two conjecture remains open in the dated sources retained here. Bennett Chow's 2023 AMS monograph treats twin primes in Chapter 1 as an excursion into the unknown, and a 2025 heuristic arXiv preprint describes their quantitative distribution as a central open problem. The preprint is contemporary status context only. The peer-reviewed bounded-gap result H_1 <= 246 remains strictly weaker than H_1=2.
[4][5][2]What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
Peer reviewedMaynard proved bounded intervals containing multiple primes and an unconditional consecutive-gap bound of 600 in the published paper.[3] Peer reviewedPolymath8b obtained the unconditional bound H_1 <= 246; H_1=2 is the twin-prime target, so bounded gaps remain a weaker result.[2] Peer reviewedZhang proved that the liminf of consecutive prime gaps is finite, initially below 70,000,000; this does not establish gap 2.[1]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
Formalization opportunities
Lean work can make these reusable foundations precise without being presented as a proof of the core problem.
- Formalization targetNo proof of infinitely many exact gap-two prime pairs was identified in this bounded dated-source correction; no separate official or primary 2026 status update was located.
- Formalization targetAny use of the current work's signed detector route must independently verify its standard analytic interfaces and prove the two unresolved false-pair estimates.
Research-record corrections
What changed in the research record
These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.
- theorem candidate
1 of 7 1 - reduction
3 of 7 3 - lemma
1 of 7 1 - equivalence
1 of 7 1 - negative result
1 of 7 1
Current research mapThe conjecture, retained reductions, explored limitations, and open questions represented in this overview.22 displayed rows · 2 routes included
- retained route statementThere are infinitely many primes p such that p+2 is also prime. Equivalently in the source's smooth squarefree von Mangoldt formulation, T_sf,w(X)>0 for arbitrarily large X.
- retained route statementCurrent reductionintermediate
- retained route statementClosing targetintermediate
- retained route statementSmooth Detectorintermediate
- retained route statementSigned Decompositionintermediate
- retained route statementThree False Pair Typesintermediate
- retained route statementNo Overclaimintermediate
- Recorded relationshipThe source reports this as a route toward the conjecture; missing or unaudited premises remain and the reduction does not itself prove the target.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- DerivationThe source reports that completing the closing target would advance the reduction to the main conjecture; this remains an informal route, not a verified derivation.proposed
- Useful failureSource-reported closed or invalid routereported failure
- Useful failureSecond source-reported limitationreported failure
- Research targetBound the signed prime–composite correlation.open
- Research targetPut the composite–composite tail in a common bilinear form.open
- Research targetCouple the two false-pair principal modes with a strict reserve.open
- Research targetExact Conjectureopen
- Research targetOpen Correlationssuperseded
- ComputationThe source proposes exact factorization experiments for B_Z and the two false-pair decompositions; ProofAtlas did not run any packet code or computation.No numerical experiment is treated as mathematical progress or as evidence for infinitely many twin primes. · reported unreproduced
- Narrowed routeSource-reported closed or invalid routeA polylogarithmic progression modulus does not decouple the Möbius factor from the shifted prime, so Siegel–Walfisz alone cannot prove the needed correlation. Prove a signed one-sided bound for the combined prime–composite and composite–composite false-pair modes that leaves a fixed positive reserve below the hyperbolic main term.
- Narrowed routeSecond source-reported limitationThe composite–composite support product bound does not make either complementary factor polylogarithmic, and rank shells cannot be estimated separately before terminal Möbius summation. Prove a signed one-sided bound for the combined prime–composite and composite–composite false-pair modes that leaves a fixed positive reserve below the hyperbolic main term.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
2 approaches have already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
Twin Prime Conjecture · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
Do infinitely many primes occur two apart? Bounded-gap theorems show infinitely many prime pairs within a fixed finite distance, but the exact gap two remains unproved.
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references5 cited works · next context review by Nov 15, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Aug 15, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1Bounded gaps between primespeer reviewed result · Yitang Zhang · Annals of Mathematics · 2014-05-01 · DOI 10.4007/annals.2014.179.3.7 · MR MR3171761 · accessed Aug 15, 2026
- 2Variants of the Selberg sieve, and bounded intervals containing many primespeer reviewed result · D. H. J. Polymath · Research in the Mathematical Sciences · 2014-10-17 · ARXIV 1407.4897 · DOI 10.1186/s40687-014-0012-7 · MR MR3374754 · accessed Aug 15, 2026
- 3Small gaps between primespeer reviewed result · James Maynard · Annals of Mathematics · 2015-01-01 · DOI 10.4007/annals.2015.181.1.7 · MR MR3272929 · accessed Aug 15, 2026
- 4Introduction to Proof Through Number Theorysurvey or monograph · Bennett Chow · American Mathematical Society · 2023 · accessed Aug 15, 2026
- 5A Constructive Heuristic Sieve for the Twin Prime Problempreprint · Yuhang Shi · arXiv · 2025-07-10 · ARXIV 2507.03107 · DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2507.03107 · accessed Aug 15, 2026
Important qualifications
- This was a bounded correction and current-status check, not an exhaustive priority or attribution review.
- Bennett Chow's Introduction to Proof Through Number Theory is an AMS monograph published in 2023; Chapter 1 is the relevant source context, not a 2026 webpage.
- The 2025 arXiv source is a heuristic preprint used only as contemporary primary-source status context; it is not peer-reviewed evidence and none of its mathematical claims were upgraded.
- The bounded search did not identify a separate official or primary source published in 2026 that updates the exact conjecture's status; the as-of-2026 statement is therefore limited to the dated sources recorded here and does not claim an exhaustive literature review.
- No source-package attachment was executed or rendered, and no URL copied from a submitted packet was fetched.
- Metadata has no proof, review, acceptance, credit, publication, or deployment effect.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces