The source says not to restart the symmetric quotient, top counts alone, aggregate deletion summaries alone, or a search keyed only by the 197 union count. Enumerate unlabeled eight-edge graphs G_B for universal type 0, retain structural-class data and exact deletion correlations, and emit exact certificates; then extend to the other universal types and the broad positive degree-six class.
Route status · Narrowed routeAnalysis of Boolean functions and query complexity
Sensitivity versus Degree for Boolean Multilinear Polynomials
Collaboration betaFind one Boolean polynomial whose number of sensitive coordinates grows faster relative to its degree than the best explicit construction currently recorded. The packet has sharply reduced one finite search, but no qualifying polynomial is known.

Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
Construct a normalized 18-variable integer multilinear polynomial P with P(0)=0, P(e_i)=1, P({0,1}^{18}) contained in {0,1}, degree at most 6, and the top-one condition for the complement-extension lemma. Such a polynomial extends to a 19-variable sextic and would strictly exceed the exponent log(6)/log(3).
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on Sensitivity versus Degree for Boolean Multilinear Polynomials stands
Selected route highlights from the mathematical source. This is not yet a complete mathematical inventory.
A retained leaf must specify (H,C,G_B) and the structural class, modulo the stated symmetry group.
Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteWe corrected the cited passages. We removed a duplicate or outdated task or route step. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchangedWork mapped so far
Sensitivity versus Degree for Boolean Multilinear Polynomials in numbers
- Argument development
- 4,003 · 83%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 81 · 2%
- Computational analysis
- 424 · 9%
- Open obligations
- 156 · 3%
- Definitions and setup
- 141 · 3%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Classify the full type-0 eight-edge graph lifts without losing structural-leaf information.
Suggested move: Enumerate G_B up to automorphism, bind every surviving structural class, and retain exact orbit accounting and certificates.
What would count as progress
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
Explored alternatives
Other routes
The source says not to restart the symmetric quotient, top counts alone, aggregate deletion summaries alone, or a search keyed only by the 197 union count. Enumerate unlabeled eight-edge graphs G_B for universal type 0, retain structural-class data and exact deletion correlations, and emit exact certificates; then extend to the other universal types and the broad positive degree-six class.
Route status · Narrowed routeReported deletion summaries are route memory, not exact source-replayed exclusion evidence; a sixteenth fixed assignment remained. Enumerate unlabeled eight-edge graphs G_B for universal type 0, retain structural-class data and exact deletion correlations, and emit exact certificates; then extend to the other universal types and the broad positive degree-six class.
Route status · Narrowed routeMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
The active target is an 18-variable top-one Boolean sextic that would extend to 19 variables and beat log(6)/log(3).
Suggested move: Resolve the exact source-reported obligation without treating it as an established negative result.Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
The explicit construction task remains open: the maintained problem page records the log(6)/log(3) construction and asks for an improvement. This is not the solved Sensitivity Conjecture.
[1]What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
Authoritative summaryEpoch AI lists improving the explicit log(6)/log(3) construction exponent as an open problem.[1] Peer reviewedLaplante, Naserasr, and Sunny proved the stronger bound deg(f) <= s_0(f)s_1(f), refining the general upper-bound side.[3] Peer reviewedHuang proved the Sensitivity Conjecture, establishing a polynomial relation and the quadratic degree upper-bound scale; this is distinct from optimizing explicit lower-bound separations.[2]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
Formalization opportunities
Lean work can make these reusable foundations precise without being presented as a proof of the core problem.
- Formalization targetNo current public formalization of this exact construction task was identified in the bounded official-source review.
- Formalization targetA claimed improved polynomial would still require exact cube-value, degree, normalization, and sensitivity checking.
Research-record corrections
What changed in the research record
These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.
- theorem candidate
1 of 7 1 - reduction
3 of 7 3 - lemma
2 of 7 2 - computational claim
1 of 7 1
Current research mapThe conjecture, retained reductions, explored limitations, and open questions represented in this overview.23 displayed rows · 2 routes included
- retained route statementSensitivity versus Degree for Boolean Multilinear Polynomials
- retained route statementCurrent reductionintermediate
- retained route statementClosing targetintermediate
- retained route statementFinite Frontierintermediate
- retained route statementStructural Leavesintermediate
- retained route statementFull Graph Liftintermediate
- retained route statementEvidence Boundaryintermediate
- Recorded relationshipThe source reports this as a route toward the conjecture; missing or unaudited premises remain and the reduction does not itself prove the target.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- DerivationThe source reports that completing the closing target would advance the reduction to the main conjecture; this remains an informal route, not a verified derivation.proposed
- Useful failureSource-reported closed or invalid routereported failure
- Useful failureSecond source-reported limitationreported failure
- Research targetClassify the full type-0 eight-edge graph lifts without losing structural-leaf information.open
- Research targetTest rooted deletion and pair-deletion compatibility on each retained lift.open
- Research targetResolve the broad positive pure-degree-six structural class.open
- Research targetNormalized Targetopen
- Research targetNo Candidatesuperseded
- ComputationThe source reports exact rational certificate counts and a canonical finite frontier; ProofAtlas did not execute the current work's verification code.Source-reported result: 36,084 to 1,093 to 197 branch incidences, 51 canonical types, nine universal types; attachment execution was deliberately not performed. · reported unreproduced
- Narrowed routeSource-reported closed or invalid routeThe source says not to restart the symmetric quotient, top counts alone, aggregate deletion summaries alone, or a search keyed only by the 197 union count. Enumerate unlabeled eight-edge graphs G_B for universal type 0, retain structural-class data and exact deletion correlations, and emit exact certificates; then extend to the other universal types and the broad positive degree-six class.
- Narrowed routeSecond source-reported limitationReported deletion summaries are route memory, not exact source-replayed exclusion evidence; a sixteenth fixed assignment remained. Enumerate unlabeled eight-edge graphs G_B for universal type 0, retain structural-class data and exact deletion correlations, and emit exact certificates; then extend to the other universal types and the broad positive degree-six class.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
2 approaches have already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
Sensitivity versus Degree for Boolean Multilinear Polynomials · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
Find one Boolean polynomial whose number of sensitive coordinates grows faster relative to its degree than the best explicit construction currently recorded. The current work has sharply reduced one finite search, but no qualifying polynomial is known.
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references3 cited works · next context review by Nov 15, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Aug 15, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1Sensitivity versus Degree for Boolean Multilinear Polynomialsmaintained problem list · Epoch AI · Epoch AI · 2026 · accessed Aug 15, 2026
- 2Induced subgraphs of hypercubes and a proof of the Sensitivity Conjecturepeer reviewed result · Hao Huang · Annals of Mathematics · 2019-10-28 · DOI 10.4007/annals.2019.190.3.6 · MR MR4024566 · accessed Aug 15, 2026
- 3Sensitivity Lower Bounds from Linear Dependenciespeer reviewed result · Sophie Laplante, Reza Naserasr, Anupa Sunny · Schloss Dagstuhl — Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik · 2020-08-18 · DOI 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.62 · accessed Aug 15, 2026
Important qualifications
- This was a bounded current-status check, not an exhaustive priority or attribution review.
- Preprints remain labeled as preprints and were not upgraded to peer-reviewed posture.
- Current open status was cross-checked against recent official or primary sources where available.
- No source-package attachment was executed or rendered, and no URL copied from a submitted packet was fetched.
- Metadata has no proof, review, acceptance, credit, publication, or deployment effect.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces