Analytic number theory · complex analysis · zero geometry

Riemann Hypothesis

Collaboration beta

Does every zero of the completed zeta function lie on the critical line with real part one half?

ξ(ρ)=0Reρ=12
Clay Millennium Prize ProblemHilbert's Eighth Problem — Riemann-hypothesis component
Known results and sources
A dark mathematical landscape shows a vertical critical strip with two precise boundaries, a brighter central critical line, mirrored analytic contours, and hollow unresolved spectral apertures; no off-line zero or completed proof is asserted.
The critical line sits exactly midway across the strip where the Riemann Hypothesis predicts every nontrivial zero must lie.

Research problem

Exact mathematical statement

Define the completed zeta function

ξ(s)=12s(s-1)π-s/2Γ(s/2)ζ(s).\xi(s)=\tfrac12s(s-1)\pi^{-s/2}\Gamma(s/2)\zeta(s).

The Riemann Hypothesis asks whether

ξ(ρ)=0Reρ=12.\xi(\rho)=0\quad\Longrightarrow\quad\operatorname{Re}\rho=\tfrac12.

The current source centers this function without dividing by its value at one half:

X(w)=ξ(12+w),X(w)=0Rew=0.X(w)=\xi(\tfrac12+w),\qquad X(w)=0\Longrightarrow\operatorname{Re}w=0.

By reflection and conjugation, it is enough to exclude zeros with 0<Rew<1/20<\operatorname{Re}w<1/2 and Imw>0\operatorname{Im}w>0. Multiplicities remain part of the zero problem.

This page highlights the energy, fixed-reference, and theta-contact questions in the current research. The stated reductions are source-reported mathematics; no proof of RH is claimed.

Problem infographic

Problem at a glance

Illustration: Two coordinate diagrams show the critical line Re(s)=½ and its image Re(w)=0 under w=s−½. The centered function is X(w)=ξ(½+w), matching the incoming source without normalization. The Riemann Hypothesis remains open; the diagrams plot no individual zeros.
Illustration: Centering at one half moves the critical line to the imaginary axis. With X(w)=ξ(½+w), the Riemann Hypothesis asks whether every zero lies on the indicated line. This schematic coordinate picture is not proof evidence.

Current mathematical picture

Where work on Riemann Hypothesis stands

Open problem

RH remains open. The current source records exact sparse-energy and simultaneous-reference interfaces, actual arithmetic/signed-transform endpoints, and a phase-zero fixed-witness route with separate NC and CR gaps. Historical normalized definitions and U=0 geometry remain explicitly scoped; no attachment proof or computation is independently reproduced.

Strongest supported footholdBoundary geometry and portal law

The current work reports the boundary circle, canonical phase, Wronskian formulas, boundary jets, portal law, regular-edge phase monotonicity, and multiplicity-safe rectangle accounting.

Evidence posture · Reported result
Leading routeCurrent energy route

An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Route status · Active route
Useful failureHeight-growing Pick/Padé hierarchy

Narrowed backup: interpolation order must grow with height and provide explicit complex-domain error below the completed-xi scale together with exact conditioning control.

Route status · Narrowed route
Main reductionProper components and classified ends

Historical Revision 6 reports that connected components of U=0 in 0<Re(w)<1/2 and Im(w)>0 are proper, have no bottom, origin, or compact-component endpoints, and can end only at imaginary-boundary portals, right-edge intersections, or infinity; regular infinity edges are phase-safe. The current source instead studies regular Θ=0 arcs with U increasing; its exclusions of the imaginary axis, real bottom, and infinity apply to a fixed nonzero-U witness.

Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement
Completed special caseAnalytic zero-free band through 39/10

The current work reports a Pick-based analytic off-line exclusion through absolute height 39/10 without relying on a finite-height numerical zero certificate.

Evidence posture · Reported special case
Priority open bridgeCritical stationary-contact exclusion

10.4 Critical contacts and the remaining assembly distinction At a critical contact, Q(w)=r>0\mathcal Q(w)=r>0, H'(w)=0\mathcal H'(w)=0, and L(-z)+rL(z)L(-z)+rL(z) has a zero of multiplicity at least two at ww. Its associated normalized positive two-sided density has characteristic nulls EeiγX=E[XeiγX]=0.(CR1)\mathbb E e^{i\gamma X}=\mathbb E[Xe^{i\gamma X}]=0. \tag{CR1} The exact scalar inequality y2(π2/2)(1-cosy)-2ysinyy^2\ge(\pi^2/2)(1-\cos y)-2y\sin y gives VarXπ2/(2γ2)\operatorname{Var}X\ge\pi^2/(2\gamma^2), strictly for the continuous theta law. This bound decays with height and does not close CR. A separate positive-convolution moment obstruction is γ2EX2>12\gamma^2\mathbb E X^2>12; its exact three-point ceiling is below 12.04, so optimizing only that constant cannot solve the high-height problem. These are different probability laws and different moments. The order-dd local normal form H-H(w0)=ζd\mathcal H-\mathcal H(w_0)=\zeta^d supplies 2d2d rays, including a smaller-aa ray. That does not force a selected source-to-sink path to use a compatible pair of rays. R21-11.2 is a finite resolved-graph dichotomy with explicit path-class and leaf hypotheses. The unresolved global replacement must prove compatibility under splicing, attainment or stable limiting selection, and every boundary/infinite-height continuation. The fixed-witness theorem above does not supply family-wise compactness. A direct proof of CR would bypass those additional obligations.

Task status · Ready to work on
Research-record correctionResearch-record correction

We corrected supporting details in the research record. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchanged

Work mapped so far

Riemann Hypothesis in numbers

4.9kretained lines of mathematical investigation1,235 in the current working snapshot
Argument development
4,169 · 86%
Explored or eliminated routes
108 · 2%
Computational analysis
162 · 3%
Open obligations
186 · 4%
Definitions and setup
249 · 5%
48selected mapped statements13routes investigated6reported milestones18open questions16contribution-ready tasks
How this is measured

This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.

Argument map and routes

How the current approaches connect

Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.

Visible working map

Research route map

28 selected steps

Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.

28 selected steps

Scroll horizontally to explore the route

Working route overview for Riemann HypothesisA selected map of recorded claims, active routes, useful failures, open questions, and their explicit relationships. Search, filter, zoom, or pan within this page.Riemann hypothesis — Depends on missing premiseRiemann hypothesisZero-phase singular exclusion — Depends on missing premiseZero-phase singularexclusionGlobal endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate — Depends on missing premiseGlobal endpoint-incidenceand same-sign pairing gateProper components and classified ends — ActiveProper components andclassified endsA26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds — ActiveA26-01–05 exact prime-powerjumps, continuous F,downward…A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss — ActiveA26-12–15 clipped slope,nonnegative jumps andessential…A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption. — ActiveA26-BARRIER/SLACK requiresstated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 andeventual…A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution. — ActiveA26-CUBIC equivalence atevery N>=2 with exactendpoint…A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension — ActiveA28-01–03 whole spectralextension differs from zeroextensionA28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma — ActiveA28-04 fixed sigma in(1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1and…A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros — ActiveA28-05–07 positive compactfilters and finiteodd-harmonic…A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge — ActiveA28-08–13 every-late-windowexceptional blocks withoutattained…Current energy route — activeCurrent energy routeCurrent fixed-function route — activeCurrent fixed-function routeCurrent reference route — activeCurrent reference routeCurrent arithmetic route — activeCurrent arithmetic routeGlobal fixed sign of the boundary Wronskian — stoppedGlobal fixed sign of theboundary WronskianFixed finite distinct-node Pick interpolation with polynomial margin — stoppedFixed finite distinct-nodePick interpolation withpolynomial…R30-01/02/03 independent prime signs; exact squarefree moment and fixed-bias/coherence failures only for the stated classes. — stoppedR30-01/02/03 independentprime signs; exactsquarefree…R32-05 fixed theta in (1/2,1), exact small-prime sigma-field and conditional means; extra independence needed for asymptotic equality, no uniform q to -1. — stoppedR32-05 fixed theta in(1/2,1), exact small-primesigma-field…Build the global endpoint-incidence atlas — OpenBuild the globalendpoint-incidence atlasProve directed same-sign endpoint pairing — OpenProve directed same-signendpoint pairingExclude zero-phase singular vertices — OpenExclude zero-phase singularverticesDetermine portal and right-edge phase signs — OpenDetermine portal andright-edge phase signsOpen energy work with exact source conditions — OpenOpen energy work with exactsource conditionsOpen overview work with exact source conditions — OpenOpen overview work withexact source conditionsOpen reference work with exact source conditions — OpenOpen reference work withexact source conditionsOpen fixed-function work with exact source conditions — OpenOpen fixed-function workwith exact source conditions
Working claimActive routeOpen, active, or blocked questionUseful failure

Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.

Active routeCurrent energy route

An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Route status · Active route
Active routeCurrent fixed-function route

An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Route status · Active route
Active routeCurrent reference route

An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Route status · Active route
Active routeCurrent arithmetic route

An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Route status · Active route
Active routeCurrent signed-kernels route

An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Route status · Active route
Active routeCurrent theta route

An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Route status · Active route
Active routeActual Liouville sine, exponential and triangular-source bounds

Current actual Liouville sine, exponential and triangular-source lower-bound routes remain open. The sine condition is required for every sufficiently large k; positivity of selected characters or comparison models does not supply actual Liouville signs.

Route status · Active route

Explored alternatives

Other routes

6 recorded
Narrowed routeHeight-growing Pick/Padé hierarchy

Narrowed backup: interpolation order must grow with height and provide explicit complex-domain error below the completed-xi scale together with exact conditioning control.

Route status · Narrowed route
Narrowed routeTheta-density localization

Narrowed backup: generic moment positivity is sharp, so a closure must use a quantitative property of the actual theta density that excludes the forced zero data.

Route status · Narrowed route
Route held in reserveHistorical Revision 6 reflection-profile and scalar-growth backups

Revision 6 retained reflection-profile Fourier decay and scalar subexponential growth as secondary backups to its directed reflection graph. That priority ordering is historical. The current actual-Liouville sine, real exponential and triangular Möbius-source lower-bound routes are separate open tasks; the sine condition requires every sufficiently large integer k.

Route status · Route held in reserve
Browse 3 more explored routes
Narrowed routeDirected nodal graph and endpoint pairing

Retained Revision 6 modulus-one U=0 boundary-graph route with increasing phase V. Its source-scoped local results and open pairing obligations remain historical mathematics. The current packet instead uses phase-zero Theta=0 fixed witnesses with increasing U; neither chart is silently substituted for the other.

Route status · Narrowed route
Narrowed routeEndpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

Retained Revision 6 modulus-one U=0 boundary-graph route with increasing phase V. Its source-scoped local results and open pairing obligations remain historical mathematics. The current packet instead uses phase-zero Theta=0 fixed witnesses with increasing U; neither chart is silently substituted for the other.

Route status · Narrowed route
Narrowed routeMissing-reference and phase-gate status

The current source states that reference existence and upper bounds remain missing. T32-01 restricts PFX, while NC and CR remain separate. The seven topic files are cited for full proofs; those attachments have not been inspected here. This is a current route-status record, not a newly proposed existence theorem or attachment verification.

Route status · Narrowed route

Route statements and reductions

Statements the next route can inspect and build on

Route statementRiemann hypothesis

Every zero of the usual completed xi function has real part 1/2. Here X(w)=xi(1/2+w) is unnormalized; the older normalized function differs by the nonzero constant xi(1/2).

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete

More ways to contribute

Open questions

Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.

18 featured tasks
01
Critical stationary-contact exclusion

10.4 Critical contacts and the remaining assembly distinction At a critical contact, Q(w)=r>0\mathcal Q(w)=r>0, H'(w)=0\mathcal H'(w)=0, and L(-z)+rL(z)L(-z)+rL(z) has a zero of multiplicity at least two at ww. Its associated normalized positive two-sided density has characteristic nulls EeiγX=E[XeiγX]=0.(CR1)\mathbb E e^{i\gamma X}=\mathbb E[Xe^{i\gamma X}]=0. \tag{CR1} The exact scalar inequality y2(π2/2)(1-cosy)-2ysinyy^2\ge(\pi^2/2)(1-\cos y)-2y\sin y gives VarXπ2/(2γ2)\operatorname{Var}X\ge\pi^2/(2\gamma^2), strictly for the continuous theta law. This bound decays with height and does not close CR. A separate positive-convolution moment obstruction is γ2EX2>12\gamma^2\mathbb E X^2>12; its exact three-point ceiling is below 12.04, so optimizing only that constant cannot solve the high-height problem. These are different probability laws and different moments. The order-dd local normal form H-H(w0)=ζd\mathcal H-\mathcal H(w_0)=\zeta^d supplies 2d2d rays, including a smaller-aa ray. That does not force a selected source-to-sink path to use a compatible pair of rays. R21-11.2 is a finite resolved-graph dichotomy with explicit path-class and leaf hypotheses. The unresolved global replacement must prove compatibility under splicing, attainment or stable limiting selection, and every boundary/infinite-height continuation. The fixed-witness theorem above does not supply family-wise compactness. A direct proof of CR would bypass those additional obligations.

Suggested move: Establish this exact source interface with all of its displayed hypotheses. NC and CR remain separate; compact-profile alone closes neither.
Ready to work on
02
Noncritical stationary-fold exclusion

13. Positive curvature pencil and the bad-fold interface Detailed proofs: active_proof_curvature_profile.txt (R21-7 and inherited pencil IDs). For x+y=t, d=x-y, z=ad, define ηc(u)=q(u)-2cu20\eta_c(u)=\mathfrak q(u)-2cu^2\ge0 for 0<=c<=C_th, and Fc,a(t)=0tΦ(x)Φ(y){cd2(coshz-sinhz/z)+(ηc(x)+ηc(y))coshz}dx.\mathcal F_{c,a}(t)=\int_0^t\Phi(x)\Phi(y) \{cd^2(\cosh z-\sinh z/z)+(\eta_c(x)+\eta_c(y))\cosh z\}\,dx. It is strictly positive for t>0. Put Ga=t2ka+a-1aka\mathcal G_a=t^2k_a+a^{-1}\partial_a k_a, with continuous a=0 extension. Exact integration by parts gives Fc,a=F0,a-cGa=ka-ttka-ct2ka+(a-c/a)aka,\mathcal F_{c,a}=\mathcal F_{0,a}-c\mathcal G_a =k_a-t\partial_tk_a-ct^2k_a+(a-c/a)\partial_ak_a, Fˆc,a=2K+γKγ+cKγγ+(a-c/a)Ka.(PENCIL)\widehat{\mathcal F}_{c,a}=2K+\gamma K_\gamma+cK_{\gamma\gamma}+(a-c/a)K_a. \tag{PENCIL} At a stationary negative-axis contact K=K_gamma=0, Fˆ0,a=aKa\widehat{\mathcal F}_{0,a}=aK_a, Fˆa2,a=a2Kγγ\widehat{\mathcal F}_{a^2,a}=a^2K_{\gamma\gamma}. For noncritical K_a!=0, favorable NC orientation is equivalent to nonvanishing of the affine transform for every c in the closed interval [0,a²]. A flat K_gammagamma=0 is a bad endpoint, not excluded by strict-minimum language. Critical K_a=0 is the separate CR gate.

Suggested move: Establish this exact source interface with all of its displayed hypotheses. NC and CR remain separate; compact-profile alone closes neither.
Ready to work on
03
Uniform compact-profile rectangle

15. Compact profile gate: exact target and stopping rule The missing finite-domain inequality is D(a,t)=tκa'(t)t2>0,0a1/2,0t8/5,(COMPACT-PROFILE)D(a,t)=\frac{t\kappa_a'(t)}{t^2}>0, \quad 0\le a\le1/2,\quad 0\le t\le8/5, \tag{COMPACT-PROFILE} with removable values at t=0. The front expansion is κa(t)=Cth+(q4+a2q2)t2/80+O(t4),D(a,0)=(q4+a2q2)/40>0.\kappa_a(t)=C_{\rm th}+(q_4+a^2q_2)t^2/80+O(t^4),\quad D(a,0)=(q_4+a^2q_2)/40>0. A uniform finite-width remainder has not been certified. A pointwise Taylor expansion does not fill a rectangle. The retained quadrature contract allows two overlapping boxes [0,1/2] and [9/20,8/5] in t, with the full a strip. It requires outward arithmetic, positive denominator enclosures, all theta-atom tails and derivative tails, removable singularities, and an explicit seam. The production/covariance formula is preferable to finite-differencing kappa. The analytic large-t theorem already handles t>=8/5; do not recertify the infinite tail merely to postpone the compact interior. The observed minimum D≈4.78752 near (a,t)≈(1/2,.9059) and covariance diagnostic≈.07815 are not interval certificates. They motivate a finite target but do not satisfy it. data/V25_QUADRATURE_CONTRACT.json, the existing diagnostic scripts, and the complete topic proof specify the integrands and regularizations. A legitimate completion needs a new certificate plus a checker that fails when any domain, tail, seam or denominator bound is removed. No such certificate is present. Completing this gate plus the inherited tail gives full-profile varrho'<0. The dependency is then full-profile + PFX -> NC, followed by NC + CR -> exclusion of the hypothetical witness. Compact profile alone is not a full RH route, and the dependency checker rejects that promotion. T32-01 is an additional stopping rule: finishing this physical compact certificate does not cure the exponentially large prefix-to-terminal ratio at hypothetical high stationary contacts. An independent high-contact exclusion or signed transform argument is needed before PFX can be used there.

Suggested move: Establish this exact source interface with all of its displayed hypotheses. NC and CR remain separate; compact-profile alone closes neither.
Ready to work on
04
Open arithmetic work with exact source conditions

A28-TARGET all-scale exceptional-count endpoint; A28 sparse count and good-window endpoint; A28 decisive arithmetic work order

Suggested move: Follow the exact source work quoted in these anchors, preserving every stated hypothesis, quantifier, source measure and exclusion.
Ready to work on
05
Open energy work with exact source conditions

Q30-TARGET; Q30-06 same-cutoff reference target; Q30/Q32 decisive energy work order

Suggested move: Follow the exact source work quoted in these anchors, preserving every stated hypothesis, quantifier, source measure and exclusion.
Ready to work on
06
Open fixed-function work with exact source conditions

B32-TARGET fixed-function construction; B32 decisive fixed-function work order

Suggested move: Follow the exact source work quoted in these anchors, preserving every stated hypothesis, quantifier, source measure and exclusion.
Ready to work on
07
Open reference work with exact source conditions

Q32-07 residual-energy warning; R32 centered-energy missing estimate; R32 decisive centered-reference work order

Suggested move: Follow the exact source work quoted in these anchors, preserving every stated hypothesis, quantifier, source measure and exclusion.
Ready to work on
08
Open signed-kernels work with exact source conditions

O28-10 triangular-source endpoint; L30 logarithmic and subexponential all-k endpoints; S30 actual exponential endpoint; L28 selected-character matching and sign bridge; L30/S30/O28 decisive signed-transform work order

Suggested move: Follow the exact source work quoted in these anchors, preserving every stated hypothesis, quantifier, source measure and exclusion.
Ready to work on
09
Open theta work with exact source conditions

flat stationary-fold and critical alternatives; compatible higher-order local-ray selection gap; support-disc noniteration boundary; NC and CR closed-pencil targets; PFX and T32-01 high-contact stopping rule; COMPACT-PROFILE finite rectangle and full-theta closure; Theta decisive NC/CR work order

Suggested move: Follow the exact source work quoted in these anchors, preserving every stated hypothesis, quantifier, source measure and exclusion.
Ready to work on
10
Build the global endpoint-incidence atlas

Determine which portal, right-edge, singular-vertex, top-cut, and infinity ends belong to each global component of the proper directed nodal graph.

Suggested move: Use growing generic rectangles, label every truncated edge endpoint, pass through singular vertices with the alternating flow rule, and give a locally finite direct-limit argument.
Ready to work on
11
Determine portal and right-edge phase signs

Obtain theta-specific phase-sign and incidence information at imaginary-boundary portals and right-edge intersections.

Suggested move: Retain the theta lattice before absolute values and focus signed Stokes analysis on incidence and finite endpoint signs rather than re-proving safety of an already identified escaping edge.
Ready to work on
12
A28 all-scale exceptional-count bound

Establish the all-scale bound E_h(X)=O_ε(X^(1/2+ε)) for every ε>0 in the source-defined actual exceptional-count problem. The source gives this as a sufficient RH interface and does not establish it. The stronger polylogarithmic count is a separate, unproved target.

Suggested move: Prove a uniform eventual count estimate for the actual E_h and each positive ε, preserving the source definition and its all-scale quantifier.
Ready to work on
13
S30 actual exponential lower bound

Prove, for the actual Liouville coefficients, the source-defined B_exp(x)=Σ λ(n)n^−2(1−e^(−nx)) lower bound B_exp(x)≥−C_η x^(3/2−η) eventually for every η>0. The source reports this family as equivalent to RH and does not obtain the signed-coefficient cancellation merely from a nonoscillatory kernel.

Suggested move: Control the signed actual exponential sum with the stated η-dependent lower bound in the limiting regime of the source.
Ready to work on
14
Selected-character matching and sign together

For every sufficiently large k, produce the selected prime character required by L28-05 with both its Liouville-prefix matching and its signed finite-sum lower bound at that same scale. The characters may change with k. The source does not provide one fixed character with arbitrarily long Liouville prefixes, and it excludes universal positivity.

Suggested move: Prove the selected-family matching and sign estimates jointly with the precise modulus, parity, prefix and error conditions in L28-05.
Ready to work on
15
Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure

Either quantify a height-growing Pick/Padé hierarchy below the completed-xi scale or prove a theta-density inequality excluding the exact forced moments.

Suggested move: For interpolation, quantify m(gamma), feasible-region diameter, and conditioning; for density, isolate a genuine property of the explicit theta density rather than generic positivity.
Ready to work on
16
Open overview work with exact source conditions

opening missing-reference and theta-gate status; alternative endpoint availability

Suggested move: Follow the exact source work quoted in these anchors, preserving every stated hypothesis, quantifier, source measure and exclusion.
Ready to work on
17
Prove directed same-sign endpoint pairing

Prove that no connected component of the target nodal graph has a phase image containing zero.

Suggested move: Record portal and right-edge phase signs and combine the directed graph with a planar-flow, argument-principle, or multiplicity-safe rectangle-winding identity.
Prerequisites still open
18
Exclude zero-phase singular vertices

Eliminate the simultaneous target-strip system U=0, V=0, and h'=0, or produce an exact solution.

Suggested move: Test whether the two exact L-equations force an impossible positive-measure covariance identity, while keeping every Stieltjes/Pick input within its stated scope.
Prerequisites still open

Sourced mathematical context

The known mathematical landscape

Context collected Aug 4, 2026
Current statusOpen problem

The classical Riemann Hypothesis remains open: every nontrivial zero of the Riemann zeta function is conjectured to have real part 1/2. Rigorous computation verifies the claim only through finite height 3×10^12, and unconditional theory places slightly more than five-twelfths of the zeros on the critical line. Neither result extends to every zero. No reviewed proof or counterexample currently changes this status.

[3][5][8]
External progress

What the literature has established

Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.

  1. Computational resultPlatt and Trudgian rigorously verified with interval arithmetic that every zero through height 3×10^12 lies on the critical line and is simple. A finite-height result cannot settle the all-heights hypothesis.[8]
  2. Peer reviewedRodgers and Tao proved that the de Bruijn–Newman constant is nonnegative. Since the Riemann Hypothesis is equivalent to the complementary inequality Λ≤0, it is now equivalent to Λ=0.[7]
  3. Peer reviewedPratt, Robles, Zaharescu, and Zeindler proved unconditionally that more than five-twelfths of the nontrivial zeros lie on the critical line.[6]
  4. Authoritative summaryHardy proved that infinitely many nontrivial zeros lie on the critical line. This establishes infinitely many instances, not that every nontrivial zero lies there.[4]
15 cited sources7 related results or reductionsReferences

Mathematical neighborhood

Related results and reusable starting points

Current focusRiemann Hypothesis
Equivalent formulationsquare-root-scale error in the prime number theorem

The hypothesis is equivalent to the near-optimal prime-counting error estimate π(x)=Li(x)+O(sqrt(x) log x).

[4]
Equivalent formulationLagarias divisor-sum and harmonic-number criterion

Lagarias gave an elementary equivalent involving the divisor-sum function and harmonic numbers, converting the analytic zero-location claim into inequalities for every positive integer.

[9]
Equivalent formulationLi positivity criterion

Li's criterion reformulates the hypothesis as positivity of an infinite sequence of coefficients derived from logarithmic derivatives of the completed zeta function.

[10]
Equivalent formulationde Bruijn–Newman constant Λ=0

After the nonnegative lower bound for the de Bruijn–Newman constant, the Riemann Hypothesis is equivalent to the exact equality Λ=0.

[7]
Stronger or generalized formgeneralized Riemann hypotheses

Generalized Riemann hypotheses extend critical-line predictions to broader families of Dirichlet, Dedekind, automorphic, and other L-functions. They must not be conflated with the classical statement.

[4]
Related problemRiemann hypotheses over finite fields

The corresponding Riemann hypotheses for zeta functions of varieties over finite fields were proved through the work of Weil and Deligne. These geometric analogues strongly influence strategy but do not prove the classical hypothesis.

[4]
Related problemHilbert–Pólya spectral program

The Hilbert–Pólya program seeks a self-adjoint operator whose spectral data encode zeta zeros; such an operator with the needed properties would force the relevant spectral parameters to be real.

[4]

Formal and computational footholds

Existing statements, libraries, computations, and datasets that can shorten the next serious attempt.

  • formal statement · statement onlyMathlib.RiemannHypothesis

    Mathlib defines the classical Riemann Hypothesis as a Lean proposition: a nontrivial zero of riemannZeta, excluding the pole at 1, has real part 1/2. The declaration is a statement, not a proof.

    [11]
  • formal library support · source linked; not reproduced by ProofAtlasMathlib Riemann zeta and zero-set infrastructure

    Mathlib develops the Riemann zeta function, completed zeta constructions, functional equations, analytic properties, and a discrete closed set of zeta zeros. This is reusable infrastructure for formal attempts but does not close the hypothesis.

    [11][12]
  • computation · not independently reproducedPlatt–Trudgian rigorous finite-height verification

    The peer-reviewed interval-arithmetic computation verifies the hypothesis and simplicity of the zeros through height 3×10^12. ProofAtlas has not independently rerun it, and the finite computation does not establish the infinite theorem.

    [8]
  • dataset · source linked; not reproduced by ProofAtlasLMFDB Riemann zeta zeros dataset

    LMFDB links a 1.32 TB auxiliary dataset containing the first 10^11 Riemann zeta zeros. It is a computational resource for experiments and checking finite phenomena, not theorem evidence for all zeros.

    [13]

Formalization opportunities

Lean work can make these reusable foundations precise without being presented as a proof of the core problem.

  • Formalization targetA checked proof term for Mathlib.RiemannHypothesis is not present in the verified public library material.
  • Formalization targetAny selected packet route must be translated into exact Lean definitions and connected by statement-aligned lemmas to Mathlib.RiemannHypothesis.
  • Formalization targetRoute-specific advanced analytic machinery may still be absent even where Mathlib supplies the zeta function and its canonical statement.

Later mathematical changes

What changed after the initial research map

Later recorded changes to statements, routes, tasks and references.

Current arithmetic route

Revised open work

Source-reported subject: Current arithmetic route. An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Current arithmetic route · After this update

Open arithmetic work with exact source conditions · After this update

Current arithmetic route

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Current arithmetic route

Record in this revision

  • Route disposition: active

Related mathematics: Open arithmetic work with exact source conditions

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Current energy route

Revised open work

Source-reported subject: Current energy route. An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Current energy route · After this update

Open energy work with exact source conditions · After this update

Current energy route

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Current energy route

Record in this revision

  • Route disposition: active

Related mathematics: Open energy work with exact source conditions

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Missing-reference and phase-gate status

Revised open work

Source-reported subject: Missing-reference and phase-gate status. The current source states that reference existence and upper bounds remain missing. T32-01 restricts PFX, while NC and CR remain separate. The seven topic files are cited for full proofs; those attachments have not been inspected here. This is a current route-status record, not a newly proposed existence theorem or attachment verification.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Missing-reference and phase-gate status · After this update

Current energy route · After this update

Current reference route · After this update

Current theta route · After this update

Missing-reference and phase-gate status

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Missing-reference and phase-gate status

Record in this revision

  • Route disposition: narrowed

Related mathematics: Current energy route; Current reference route; Current theta route

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Current reference route

Revised open work

Source-reported subject: Current reference route. An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Current reference route · After this update

Open reference work with exact source conditions · After this update

Current reference route

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Current reference route

Record in this revision

  • Route disposition: active

Related mathematics: Open reference work with exact source conditions

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Current theta route

Revised open work

Source-reported subject: Current theta route. An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Current theta route · After this update

Open theta work with exact source conditions · After this update

Noncritical stationary-fold exclusion · After this update

Critical stationary-contact exclusion · After this update

Uniform compact-profile rectangle · After this update

Current theta route

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Current theta route

Record in this revision

  • Route disposition: active

Related mathematics: Open theta work with exact source conditions; Noncritical stationary-fold exclusion; Critical stationary-contact exclusion; Uniform compact-profile rectangle

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing

Revised open work

Source-reported subject: Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing. Leading route: use the source-reported proper analytic nodal graph, strict phase flow, singular normal forms, and classified ends to determine global incidence and prove component-wise phase avoidance.

Source-reported subject: Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing. Retained Revision 6 modulus-one U=0 boundary-graph route with increasing phase V. Its source-scoped local results and open pairing obligations remain historical mathematics. The current packet instead uses phase-zero Theta=0 fixed witnesses with increasing U; neither chart is silently substituted for the other.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing · Before this update

Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate · Before this update · After this update

Build the global endpoint-incidence atlas · Before this update · After this update

Prove directed same-sign endpoint pairing · Before this update · After this update

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing · After this update

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing · After this update

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing

Route disposition: active → paused.

Before this update: Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing

Record in this revision

  • Route disposition: active

Related mathematics: Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Build the global endpoint-incidence atlas; Prove directed same-sign endpoint pairing

After this update: Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing

Record in this revision

  • Route disposition: paused

Related mathematics: Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Build the global endpoint-incidence atlas; Prove directed same-sign endpoint pairing

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing

Record in this revision

  • Route disposition: narrowed

Related mathematics: Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Build the global endpoint-incidence atlas; Prove directed same-sign endpoint pairing

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Fourier-decay and scalar-growth closures

Revised open work

Source-reported subject: Fourier-decay and scalar-growth closures. Current actual Liouville sine, exponential and triangular-source lower-bound routes remain open. The sine condition is required for every sufficiently large k; positivity of selected characters or comparison models does not supply actual Liouville signs.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Fourier-decay and scalar-growth closures · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Open signed-kernels work with exact source conditions · After this update

Fourier-decay and scalar-growth closures

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Fourier-decay and scalar-growth closures

Record in this revision

  • Route disposition: active

Related mathematics: Riemann hypothesis; Open signed-kernels work with exact source conditions

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Current fixed-function route

Revised open work

Source-reported subject: Current fixed-function route. An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Current fixed-function route · After this update

Open fixed-function work with exact source conditions · After this update

Current fixed-function route

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Current fixed-function route

Record in this revision

  • Route disposition: active

Related mathematics: Open fixed-function work with exact source conditions

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

Revised open work

Source-reported subject: Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance. Active companion route: determine portal and right-edge phase signs and combine them with multiplicity-safe rectangle accounting to forbid opposite-sign pairing.

Source-reported subject: Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance. Retained Revision 6 modulus-one U=0 boundary-graph route with increasing phase V. Its source-scoped local results and open pairing obligations remain historical mathematics. The current packet instead uses phase-zero Theta=0 fixed witnesses with increasing U; neither chart is silently substituted for the other.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance · Before this update

Prove directed same-sign endpoint pairing · Before this update · After this update

Determine portal and right-edge phase signs · Before this update · After this update

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance · After this update

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance · After this update

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

Route disposition: active → paused.

Before this update: Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

Record in this revision

  • Route disposition: active

Related mathematics: Prove directed same-sign endpoint pairing; Determine portal and right-edge phase signs

After this update: Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

Record in this revision

  • Route disposition: paused

Related mathematics: Prove directed same-sign endpoint pairing; Determine portal and right-edge phase signs

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

Record in this revision

  • Route disposition: narrowed

Related mathematics: Prove directed same-sign endpoint pairing; Determine portal and right-edge phase signs

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Current signed-kernels route

Revised open work

Source-reported subject: Current signed-kernels route. An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Current signed-kernels route · After this update

Open signed-kernels work with exact source conditions · After this update

Current signed-kernels route

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Current signed-kernels route

Record in this revision

  • Route disposition: active

Related mathematics: Open signed-kernels work with exact source conditions

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Uniform compact-profile rectangle

Open work

Source-reported subject: Uniform compact-profile rectangle. ## 15. Compact profile gate: exact target and stopping rule

The missing finite-domain inequality is

D(a,t)=tκa'(t)t2>0,0a1/2,0t8/5,(COMPACT-PROFILE)D(a,t)=\frac{t\kappa_a'(t)}{t^2}>0, \quad 0\le a\le1/2,\quad 0\le t\le8/5, \tag{COMPACT-PROFILE}

with removable values at t=0. The front expansion is

κa(t)=Cth+(q4+a2q2)t2/80+O(t4),D(a,0)=(q4+a2q2)/40>0.\kappa_a(t)=C_{\rm th}+(q_4+a^2q_2)t^2/80+O(t^4),\quad D(a,0)=(q_4+a^2q_2)/40>0.

A uniform finite-width remainder has not been certified. A pointwise Taylor expansion does not fill a rectangle.

The retained quadrature contract allows two overlapping boxes [0,1/2] and [9/20,8/5] in t, with the full a strip. It requires outward arithmetic, positive denominator enclosures, all theta-atom tails and derivative tails, removable singularities, and an explicit seam. The production/covariance formula is preferable to finite-differencing kappa. The analytic large-t theorem already handles t>=8/5; do not recertify the infinite tail merely to postpone the compact interior.

The observed minimum D≈4.78752 near (a,t)≈(1/2,.9059) and covariance diagnostic≈.07815 are not interval certificates. They motivate a finite target but do not satisfy it. data/V25_QUADRATURE_CONTRACT.json, the existing diagnostic scripts, and the complete topic proof specify the integrands and regularizations. A legitimate completion needs a new certificate plus a checker that fails when any domain, tail, seam or denominator bound is removed. No such certificate is present.

Completing this gate plus the inherited tail gives full-profile varrho'<0. The dependency is then full-profile + PFX -> NC, followed by NC + CR -> exclusion of the hypothetical witness. Compact profile alone is not a full RH route, and the dependency checker rejects that promotion.

T32-01 is an additional stopping rule: finishing this physical compact certificate does not cure the exponentially large prefix-to-terminal ratio at hypothetical high stationary contacts. An independent high-contact exclusion or signed transform argument is needed before PFX can be used there.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Uniform compact-profile rectangle · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Uniform compact-profile rectangle

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Uniform compact-profile rectangle

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: open

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure

Referenced context changed

The referenced context changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown below.

Historical subject: Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure. Either quantify a height-growing Pick/Padé hierarchy below the completed-xi scale or prove a theta-density inequality excluding the exact forced moments.

Source-reported subject: Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure. Either quantify a height-growing Pick/Padé hierarchy below the completed-xi scale or prove a theta-density inequality excluding the exact forced moments.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure · Before this update · After this update

Fixed-distinct-node interpolation blindness · Before this update · After this update

Riemann Hypothesis · Before this update

Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure · After this update · Historical record

Riemann Hypothesis · After this update · Historical record

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure

The historical record for Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure retains its own mathematical text.

The referenced context for Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

Before this update: Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: open

Related claims: Fixed-distinct-node interpolation blindness; Riemann Hypothesis

After this update: Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure

Historical record

  • Reported status: open
  • Record status: superseded

Related claims: Fixed-distinct-node interpolation blindness; Riemann Hypothesis

Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure

Included in this source revision.

The new record for Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure retains the earlier parent record's own mathematical text and reported status.

The referenced context for Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

After this update: Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: open

Related claims: Fixed-distinct-node interpolation blindness; Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Open fixed-function work with exact source conditions

Open work

Source-reported subject: Open fixed-function work with exact source conditions. B32-TARGET fixed-function construction; B32 decisive fixed-function work order

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Open fixed-function work with exact source conditions · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Open fixed-function work with exact source conditions

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Open fixed-function work with exact source conditions

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: open

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Open energy work with exact source conditions

Open work

Source-reported subject: Open energy work with exact source conditions. Q30-TARGET; Q30-06 same-cutoff reference target; Q30/Q32 decisive energy work order

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Open energy work with exact source conditions · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Open energy work with exact source conditions

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Open energy work with exact source conditions

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: open

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Open overview work with exact source conditions

Open work

Source-reported subject: Open overview work with exact source conditions. opening missing-reference and theta-gate status; alternative endpoint availability

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Open overview work with exact source conditions · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Open overview work with exact source conditions

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Open overview work with exact source conditions

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: open

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Critical stationary-contact exclusion

Open work

Source-reported subject: Critical stationary-contact exclusion. ### 10.4 Critical contacts and the remaining assembly distinction

At a critical contact, Q(w)=r>0\mathcal Q(w)=r>0, H'(w)=0\mathcal H'(w)=0, and L(-z)+rL(z)L(-z)+rL(z) has a zero of multiplicity at least two at ww. Its associated normalized positive two-sided density has characteristic nulls

EeiγX=E[XeiγX]=0.(CR1)\mathbb E e^{i\gamma X}=\mathbb E[Xe^{i\gamma X}]=0. \tag{CR1}

The exact scalar inequality y2(π2/2)(1-cosy)-2ysinyy^2\ge(\pi^2/2)(1-\cos y)-2y\sin y gives VarXπ2/(2γ2)\operatorname{Var}X\ge\pi^2/(2\gamma^2), strictly for the continuous theta law. This bound decays with height and does not close CR. A separate positive-convolution moment obstruction is γ2EX2>12\gamma^2\mathbb E X^2>12; its exact three-point ceiling is below 12.04, so optimizing only that constant cannot solve the high-height problem. These are different probability laws and different moments.

The order-dd local normal form H-H(w0)=ζd\mathcal H-\mathcal H(w_0)=\zeta^d supplies 2d2d rays, including a smaller-aa ray. That does not force a selected source-to-sink path to use a compatible pair of rays. R21-11.2 is a finite resolved-graph dichotomy with explicit path-class and leaf hypotheses. The unresolved global replacement must prove compatibility under splicing, attainment or stable limiting selection, and every boundary/infinite-height continuation. The fixed-witness theorem above does not supply family-wise compactness. A direct proof of CR would bypass those additional obligations.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Critical stationary-contact exclusion · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Critical stationary-contact exclusion

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Critical stationary-contact exclusion

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: open

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Noncritical stationary-fold exclusion

Open work

Source-reported subject: Noncritical stationary-fold exclusion. ## 13. Positive curvature pencil and the bad-fold interface

Detailed proofs: active_proof_curvature_profile.txt (R21-7 and inherited pencil IDs). For x+y=t, d=x-y, z=ad, define ηc(u)=q(u)-2cu20\eta_c(u)=\mathfrak q(u)-2cu^2\ge0 for 0<=c<=C_th, and

Fc,a(t)=0tΦ(x)Φ(y){cd2(coshz-sinhz/z)+(ηc(x)+ηc(y))coshz}dx.\mathcal F_{c,a}(t)=\int_0^t\Phi(x)\Phi(y) \{cd^2(\cosh z-\sinh z/z)+(\eta_c(x)+\eta_c(y))\cosh z\}\,dx.

It is strictly positive for t>0. Put Ga=t2ka+a-1aka\mathcal G_a=t^2k_a+a^{-1}\partial_a k_a, with continuous a=0 extension. Exact integration by parts gives

Fc,a=F0,a-cGa=ka-ttka-ct2ka+(a-c/a)aka,\mathcal F_{c,a}=\mathcal F_{0,a}-c\mathcal G_a =k_a-t\partial_tk_a-ct^2k_a+(a-c/a)\partial_ak_a,
Fˆc,a=2K+γKγ+cKγγ+(a-c/a)Ka.(PENCIL)\widehat{\mathcal F}_{c,a}=2K+\gamma K_\gamma+cK_{\gamma\gamma}+(a-c/a)K_a. \tag{PENCIL}

At a stationary negative-axis contact K=K_gamma=0, Fˆ0,a=aKa\widehat{\mathcal F}_{0,a}=aK_a, Fˆa2,a=a2Kγγ\widehat{\mathcal F}_{a^2,a}=a^2K_{\gamma\gamma}. For noncritical K_a!=0, favorable NC orientation is equivalent to nonvanishing of the affine transform for every c in the closed interval [0,a²]. A flat K_gammagamma=0 is a bad endpoint, not excluded by strict-minimum language. Critical K_a=0 is the separate CR gate.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Noncritical stationary-fold exclusion · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Noncritical stationary-fold exclusion

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Noncritical stationary-fold exclusion

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: open

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Open reference work with exact source conditions

Open work

Source-reported subject: Open reference work with exact source conditions. Q32-07 residual-energy warning; R32 centered-energy missing estimate; R32 decisive centered-reference work order

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Open reference work with exact source conditions · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Open reference work with exact source conditions

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Open reference work with exact source conditions

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: open

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Open arithmetic work with exact source conditions

Open work

Source-reported subject: Open arithmetic work with exact source conditions. A28-TARGET all-scale exceptional-count endpoint; A28 sparse count and good-window endpoint; A28 decisive arithmetic work order

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Open arithmetic work with exact source conditions · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Open arithmetic work with exact source conditions

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Open arithmetic work with exact source conditions

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: open

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
S30 actual exponential lower bound

Open work

Source-reported subject: S30 actual exponential lower bound. Prove, for the actual Liouville coefficients, the source-defined B_exp(x)=Σ λ(n)n^−2(1−e^(−nx)) lower bound B_exp(x)≥−C_η x^(3/2−η) eventually for every η>0. The source reports this family as equivalent to RH and does not obtain the signed-coefficient cancellation merely from a nonoscillatory kernel.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

S30 actual exponential lower bound · After this update

L28-01/02 and L30-01–03 actual Liouville sine series, k^3 truncation, x=k^-2 · After this update

S30 actual exponential lower bound

Included in this source revision.

After this update: S30 actual exponential lower bound

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: open

Related claims: L28-01/02 and L30-01–03 actual Liouville sine series, k^3 truncation, x=k^-2

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Open signed-kernels work with exact source conditions

Open work

Source-reported subject: Open signed-kernels work with exact source conditions. O28-10 triangular-source endpoint; L30 logarithmic and subexponential all-k endpoints; S30 actual exponential endpoint; L28 selected-character matching and sign bridge; L30/S30/O28 decisive signed-transform work order

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Open signed-kernels work with exact source conditions · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Open signed-kernels work with exact source conditions

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Open signed-kernels work with exact source conditions

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: open

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A28 all-scale exceptional-count bound

Open work

Source-reported subject: A28 all-scale exceptional-count bound. Establish the all-scale bound E_h(X)=O_ε(X^(1/2+ε)) for every ε>0 in the source-defined actual exceptional-count problem. The source gives this as a sufficient RH interface and does not establish it. The stronger polylogarithmic count is a separate, unproved target.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A28 all-scale exceptional-count bound · After this update

A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension · After this update

A28 all-scale exceptional-count bound

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A28 all-scale exceptional-count bound

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: open

Related claims: A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Open theta work with exact source conditions

Open work

Source-reported subject: Open theta work with exact source conditions. flat stationary-fold and critical alternatives; compatible higher-order local-ray selection gap; support-disc noniteration boundary; NC and CR closed-pencil targets; PFX and T32-01 high-contact stopping rule; COMPACT-PROFILE finite rectangle and full-theta closure; Theta decisive NC/CR work order

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Open theta work with exact source conditions · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Open theta work with exact source conditions

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Open theta work with exact source conditions

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: open

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Selected-character matching and sign together

Open work

Source-reported subject: Selected-character matching and sign together. For every sufficiently large k, produce the selected prime character required by L28-05 with both its Liouville-prefix matching and its signed finite-sum lower bound at that same scale. The characters may change with k. The source does not provide one fixed character with arbitrarily long Liouville prefixes, and it excludes universal positivity.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Selected-character matching and sign together · After this update

L28-01/02 and L30-01–03 actual Liouville sine series, k^3 truncation, x=k^-2 · After this update

Selected-character matching and sign together

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Selected-character matching and sign together

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: open

Related claims: L28-01/02 and L30-01–03 actual Liouville sine series, k^3 truncation, x=k^-2

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Separate arithmetic, energy and theta endpoints remain open

Revised open work

Source-reported subject: Separate arithmetic, energy and theta endpoints remain open. The source adds sparse energy, same-function reference, arithmetic and signed-transform endpoints. The newer phase-zero fixed-witness route is distinct from the retained modulus-one boundary graph.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Separate arithmetic, energy and theta endpoints remain open · After this update

Open energy work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open overview work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open reference work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open fixed-function work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open arithmetic work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open signed-kernels work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open theta work with exact source conditions · After this update

Noncritical stationary-fold exclusion · After this update

Critical stationary-contact exclusion · After this update

Uniform compact-profile rectangle · After this update

Current energy route · After this update

Current fixed-function route · After this update

Current reference route · After this update

Current arithmetic route · After this update

Current signed-kernels route · After this update

Current theta route · After this update

Separate arithmetic, energy and theta endpoints remain open

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Separate arithmetic, energy and theta endpoints remain open

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported

Related mathematics: Open energy work with exact source conditions; Open overview work with exact source conditions; Open reference work with exact source conditions; Open fixed-function work with exact source conditions; Open arithmetic work with exact source conditions; Open signed-kernels work with exact source conditions; Open theta work with exact source conditions; Noncritical stationary-fold exclusion; Critical stationary-contact exclusion; Uniform compact-profile rectangle

Related routes: Current energy route; Current fixed-function route; Current reference route; Current arithmetic route; Current signed-kernels route; Current theta route

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Boundary geometry and portal law

Referenced context changed

The referenced context changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown below.

Historical subject: Boundary geometry and portal law. The packet reports the boundary circle, canonical phase, Wronskian formulas, boundary jets, portal law, regular-edge phase monotonicity, and multiplicity-safe rectangle accounting.

Source-reported subject: Boundary geometry and portal law. The packet reports the boundary circle, canonical phase, Wronskian formulas, boundary jets, portal law, regular-edge phase monotonicity, and multiplicity-safe rectangle accounting.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Boundary geometry and portal law · Before this update · After this update

Strict phase flow on regular nodal edges · Before this update · After this update

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing · Before this update

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance · Before this update

Boundary geometry and portal law · After this update · Historical record

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing · After this update

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance · After this update

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing · After this update

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance · After this update

Boundary geometry and portal law

The historical record for Boundary geometry and portal law retains its own mathematical text.

The referenced context for Boundary geometry and portal law changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

Reported status: reported → superseded.

Before this update: Boundary geometry and portal law

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported

Related mathematics: Strict phase flow on regular nodal edges

Related routes: Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing; Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

After this update: Boundary geometry and portal law

Historical record

  • Reported status: superseded

Related mathematics: Strict phase flow on regular nodal edges

Related routes: Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing; Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

Boundary geometry and portal law

Included in this source revision.

The new record for Boundary geometry and portal law retains the earlier parent record's own mathematical text and reported status.

The referenced context for Boundary geometry and portal law changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

After this update: Boundary geometry and portal law

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported

Related mathematics: Strict phase flow on regular nodal edges

Related routes: Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing; Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Directed nodal graph frontier

Referenced context changed

The referenced context changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown below.

Historical subject: Directed nodal graph frontier. Revision 6 adds singular geometry, endpoint exclusions, properness and end classification, compact-component exclusion, infinity/right-edge safety, and recasts the root gate as global directed endpoint pairing.

Source-reported subject: Directed nodal graph frontier. Revision 6 adds singular geometry, endpoint exclusions, properness and end classification, compact-component exclusion, infinity/right-edge safety, and recasts the root gate as global directed endpoint pairing.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Directed nodal graph frontier · Before this update · After this update

Exact local singular normal form · Before this update · After this update

Proper components and classified ends · Before this update · After this update

Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate · Before this update · After this update

Zero-phase singular exclusion · Before this update · After this update

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing · Before this update

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance · Before this update

Directed nodal graph frontier · After this update · Historical record

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing · After this update

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance · After this update

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing · After this update

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance · After this update

Directed nodal graph frontier

The historical record for Directed nodal graph frontier retains its own mathematical text.

The referenced context for Directed nodal graph frontier changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

Reported status: reported → superseded.

Before this update: Directed nodal graph frontier

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported

Related mathematics: Exact local singular normal form; Proper components and classified ends; Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion

Related routes: Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing; Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

After this update: Directed nodal graph frontier

Historical record

  • Reported status: superseded

Related mathematics: Exact local singular normal form; Proper components and classified ends; Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion

Related routes: Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing; Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

Directed nodal graph frontier

Included in this source revision.

The new record for Directed nodal graph frontier retains the earlier parent record's own mathematical text and reported status.

The referenced context for Directed nodal graph frontier changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

After this update: Directed nodal graph frontier

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported

Related mathematics: Exact local singular normal form; Proper components and classified ends; Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion

Related routes: Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing; Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-16 — Finite scopes. C103, C163, D26-BAND and profile diagnostics concern different domains; their finite coverage cannot be merged.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-16 — Finite scopes. C103, C163, D26-BAND and profile diagnostics concern different domains; their finite coverage cannot be merged.. NR-16 — Finite scopes. C103, C163, D26-BAND and profile diagnostics concern different domains; their finite coverage cannot be merged.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-16 — Finite scopes. C103, C163, D26-BAND and profile diagnostics concern different domains; their finite coverage cannot be merged. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-16 — Finite scopes. C103, C163, D26-BAND and profile diagnostics concern different domains; their finite coverage cannot be merged.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-16 — Finite scopes. C103, C163, D26-BAND and profile diagnostics concern different domains; their finite coverage cannot be merged.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-14 — Local rays. An available left ray need not splice to the fixed witness. Admissibility, endpoints and attained extrema remain separate.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-14 — Local rays. An available left ray need not splice to the fixed witness. Admissibility, endpoints and attained extrema remain separate.. NR-14 — Local rays. An available left ray need not splice to the fixed witness. Admissibility, endpoints and attained extrema remain separate.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-14 — Local rays. An available left ray need not splice to the fixed witness. Admissibility, endpoints and attained extrema remain separate. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-14 — Local rays. An available left ray need not splice to the fixed witness. Admissibility, endpoints and attained extrema remain separate.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-14 — Local rays. An available left ray need not splice to the fixed witness. Admissibility, endpoints and attained extrema remain separate.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
K26 zero-replacement and prescribed-fold constructions have different retained hypotheses; E26 loses exact arithmetic/functional equation; no counterexample to actual zeta.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: K26 zero-replacement and prescribed-fold constructions have different retained hypotheses; E26 loses exact arithmetic/functional equation; no counterexample to actual zeta.. ## 17. Same-kernel and Euler-data stress tests

Full constructions are in active_proof_contact_geometry.txt, with K26/E26 stable IDs. These are precise scope tests, not counterexamples to the actual zeta function.

K26-01–03: common-kernel zero replacement. Choose simple critical-line pairs at T±delta and write

P(w)=(w2+(T-δ)2)(w2+(T+δ)2),Q(w)=((w-δ)2+T2)((w+δ)2+T2).P(w)=(w^2+(T-\delta)^2)(w^2+(T+\delta)^2),\quad Q(w)=((w-\delta)^2+T^2)((w+\delta)^2+T^2).

Then Q-P=4delta²(T²-w²) and X˜=XQ/P\widetilde X=XQ/P replaces those pairs with an off-axis quartet while preserving the full prescribed zero strip. Resolvents realize this through a single common positive even analytic superexponentially decreasing kernel, preserving the listed finite open curvature/shape bounds for sufficiently late choices. The supply of suitable simple pairs uses the cited positive-proportion theorem; that external analytic premise was not independently reproved in the first audit.

K26-04–05: prescribed regular wrong fold. A separate six-jet common-kernel perturbation fixes a0=1/4, high w_tau and epsilon=e^-tau, prescribing the quotient perturbation T(w)=epsilon,T'=i*epsilon,T''=i*epsilon. The resulting actual contact for that perturbed kernel has K_a<0, K_gammagamma>0, radial second derivative 1, and pencil root c=1/20. This construction does not assert that every zero stays in the original strip. Never combine its fold conclusion with the strip-preservation claim from the other family without a new simultaneous construction.

K26-06: lost exact arithmetic. The first deformation gives ζ˜(σ)=1-4δ2/σ2+O(σ-3)\widetilde\zeta(\sigma)=1-4\delta^2/\sigma^2+O(\sigma^{-3}), inconsistent with the exponentially small right-half-plane tail of the exact ordinary Dirichlet series. Generic positive-kernel and finite-jet conditions thus do not replace exact zeta arithmetic.

E26-01: positive Euler data are also insufficient. The model Zmod(s)=ζ(s)/[ζ(s+1/4+i/4)ζ(s+1/4-i/4)]Z_{\rm mod}(s)=\zeta(s)/[\zeta(s+1/4+i/4)\zeta(s+1/4-i/4)] with the specified small-prime corrections through 13 has positive ordinary and logarithmic-derivative coefficients, the leading PNT scale, and zeros at 3/4±i/4. It loses the exact coefficients and completed functional equation. The O28 inverse perturbations in §5 preserve a different list (integer forcing, jumps, moments) but lose the exact between-jump ODE. These lists cannot be merged into a stronger countermodel than was actually built.

A reopened generic route must name an exact additional hypothesis excluding the relevant retained model. Replacing 'positive kernel' by 'very regular positive kernel' or positive coefficients by 'Euler-positive' does not do so.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

K26 zero-replacement and prescribed-fold constructions have different retained hypotheses; E26 loses exact arithmetic/functional equation; no counterexample to actual zeta. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

K26 zero-replacement and prescribed-fold constructions have different retained hypotheses; E26 loses exact arithmetic/functional equation; no counterexample to actual zeta.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: K26 zero-replacement and prescribed-fold constructions have different retained hypotheses; E26 loses exact arithmetic/functional equation; no counterexample to actual zeta.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
S30-01–05 actual exponential endpoint remains open; positive squarefree average, squared inverse and smoothing obstructions do not refute the actual Liouville lower bound.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: S30-01–05 actual exponential endpoint remains open; positive squarefree average, squared inverse and smoothing obstructions do not refute the actual Liouville lower bound.. ### 6.2 Exact real-kernel identities and sign obstructions — S30-01–05

Let Bexp(x)=λ(n)n-2(1-e-nx)B_{\exp}(x)=\sum\lambda(n)n^{-2}(1-e^{-nx}). Its Mellin factor is Γ(s)/(1-s)\Gamma(s)/(1-s) times the same zeta quotient. The family Bexp(x)-Cηx3/2-ηB_{\exp}(x)\ge-C_\eta x^{3/2-\eta} eventually for every eta>0 is equivalent to RH. A nonoscillatory kernel still requires signed-coefficient cancellation.

For bounded continuous phi and Hφ=λ(n)n-2φ(nx)H_\phi=\sum\lambda(n)n^{-2}\phi(nx), define Dwf=w(d)d-2f(dx)D_wf=\sum w(d)d^{-2}f(dx). Then

DwHφ=(w*λ)(n)n-2φ(nx),λ*μ2=δ1,Dμ2Hφ=φ.(S30-02)D_wH_\phi=\sum(w*\lambda)(n)n^{-2}\phi(nx),\quad \lambda*\mu^2=\delta_1,\quad D_{\mu^2}H_\phi=\phi. \tag{S30-02}

If w(1)=1 and w*lambda is coefficientwise nonnegative, then w=μ2*(w*λ)μ2w=\mu^2*(w*\lambda)\ge\mu^2, also on a finite positive prefix. The critical absolute norm is therefore at least 12M/π2-O(logM)12\sqrt M/\pi^2-O(\log M). The positive average cancels the detecting poles, not the inverse sign problem.

For the actual coefficients,

Vexp(x)=2Bexp(x)-Bexp(2x),Dμ2Vexp=(1-e-x)2>0,Vexp(log(4/3))<-1/50.(S30-03)V_{\exp}(x)=2B_{\exp}(x)-B_{\exp}(2x),\quad D_{\mu^2}V_{\exp}=(1-e^{-x})^2>0, \quad V_{\exp}(\log(4/3))<-1/50. \tag{S30-03}

A positive increasing source (1-e-x)+5(1-e-x)2(1-e^{-x})+5(1-e^{-x})^2 also has a negative inverse below -1/100 there; the same certificate has Bexp(log(4/3))<9/100B_{\exp}(\log(4/3))<9/100. CK056 stores the exact rational finite sums and tails once. These examples do not show that B_exp or the actual sine series is negative.

For bounded continuous nonzero phi>=0 satisfying φ(x)=O(xq)\phi(x)=O(x^q), q>3/2,

liminfx0Hφ(x)x3/2rφ:=12ζ(1/2)0φ(u)u-5/2du<0.(S30-04)\liminf_{x\downarrow0}\frac{H_\phi(x)}{x^{3/2}}\le r_\phi:=\frac1{2\zeta(1/2)}\int_0^\infty\phi(u)u^{-5/2}du<0. \tag{S30-04}

The negative real residue and Landau positivity prove the statement. More positive smoothing can create unavoidable negative values. Subtracting a zero linear term is not the same operation as replacing the original kernel by its square.

For a finite-support normalized filter, (w*λ)(p)=-1(w*\lambda)(p)=-1 beyond support. At x=1/X the absolute prime contribution in (X,2X] is of order 1/(XlogX)1/(X\log X), larger than X-3/2+o(1)X^{-3/2+o(1)}. An absolute far-tail estimate needs support at least X3/2-o(1)X^{3/2-o(1)}, hence positive-prefix critical norm at least X3/4-o(1)X^{3/4-o(1)}. This limits absolute estimation; it does not determine the complete signed sum.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

S30-01–05 actual exponential endpoint remains open; positive squarefree average, squared inverse and smoothing obstructions do not refute the actual Liouville lower bound. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

S30-01–05 actual exponential endpoint remains open; positive squarefree average, squared inverse and smoothing obstructions do not refute the actual Liouville lower bound.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: S30-01–05 actual exponential endpoint remains open; positive squarefree average, squared inverse and smoothing obstructions do not refute the actual Liouville lower bound.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-11 — Endpoint jets. All finite algebraic odd-sine endpoint jets vanish. More fixed-order integration by parts does not recover the sign.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-11 — Endpoint jets. All finite algebraic odd-sine endpoint jets vanish. More fixed-order integration by parts does not recover the sign.. NR-11 — Endpoint jets. All finite algebraic odd-sine endpoint jets vanish. More fixed-order integration by parts does not recover the sign.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-11 — Endpoint jets. All finite algebraic odd-sine endpoint jets vanish. More fixed-order integration by parts does not recover the sign. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-11 — Endpoint jets. All finite algebraic odd-sine endpoint jets vanish. More fixed-order integration by parts does not recover the sign.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-11 — Endpoint jets. All finite algebraic odd-sine endpoint jets vanish. More fixed-order integration by parts does not recover the sign.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-20 — Positive Euler data. E26 has positive ordinary/prime-power data and PNT leading behavior but off-line zeros; exact arithmetic is missing.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-20 — Positive Euler data. E26 has positive ordinary/prime-power data and PNT leading behavior but off-line zeros; exact arithmetic is missing.. NR-20 — Positive Euler data. E26 has positive ordinary/prime-power data and PNT leading behavior but off-line zeros; exact arithmetic is missing.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-20 — Positive Euler data. E26 has positive ordinary/prime-power data and PNT leading behavior but off-line zeros; exact arithmetic is missing. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-20 — Positive Euler data. E26 has positive ordinary/prime-power data and PNT leading behavior but off-line zeros; exact arithmetic is missing.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-20 — Positive Euler data. E26 has positive ordinary/prime-power data and PNT leading behavior but off-line zeros; exact arithmetic is missing.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-36 — Two different costs. Critical finite W has coefficient Z; the coarse prime-local product has e^gamma_E Z. Keep finite cutoffs in asymptotics.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-36 — Two different costs. Critical finite W has coefficient Z; the coarse prime-local product has e^gamma_E Z. Keep finite cutoffs in asymptotics.. NR-36 — Two different costs. Critical finite W has coefficient Z; the coarse prime-local product has e^gamma_E Z. Keep finite cutoffs in asymptotics.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-36 — Two different costs. Critical finite W has coefficient Z; the coarse prime-local product has e^gamma_E Z. Keep finite cutoffs in asymptotics. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-36 — Two different costs. Critical finite W has coefficient Z; the coarse prime-local product has e^gamma_E Z. Keep finite cutoffs in asymptotics.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-36 — Two different costs. Critical finite W has coefficient Z; the coarse prime-local product has e^gamma_E Z. Keep finite cutoffs in asymptotics.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-42 — Threshold example. The ternary reference has nonnegative sums but cost~(2sqrt3/pi)sqrt X. Big-O cost does not imply the little-o terminal condition.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-42 — Threshold example. The ternary reference has nonnegative sums but cost~(2sqrt3/pi)sqrt X. Big-O cost does not imply the little-o terminal condition.. NR-42 — Threshold example. The ternary reference has nonnegative sums but cost~(2sqrt3/pi)sqrt X. Big-O cost does not imply the little-o terminal condition.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-42 — Threshold example. The ternary reference has nonnegative sums but cost~(2sqrt3/pi)sqrt X. Big-O cost does not imply the little-o terminal condition. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-42 — Threshold example. The ternary reference has nonnegative sums but cost~(2sqrt3/pi)sqrt X. Big-O cost does not imply the little-o terminal condition.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-42 — Threshold example. The ternary reference has nonnegative sums but cost~(2sqrt3/pi)sqrt X. Big-O cost does not imply the little-o terminal condition.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
B32-05 finite seven-frequency constant obstruction >1.0057; CK062/067 are source-reported and share interval backend.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: B32-05 finite seven-frequency constant obstruction >1.0057; CK062/067 are source-reported and share interval backend.. ### 2.8 A finite spectral obstruction and the exact threshold example

Let ρ0=1/2+iγ0\rho_0=1/2+i\gamma_0 be the simple zero certified near γ0=14.13472514173469379046\gamma_0=14.13472514173469379046, and put

c0=-1/ζ(1/2),a0=ζ(2ρ0)/(ρ0ζ'(ρ0)),d0=2cos(π/8)|a0|.c_0=-1/\zeta(1/2),\quad a_0=\zeta(2\rho_0)/(\rho_0\zeta'(\rho_0)), \quad d_0=2\cos(\pi/8)|a_0|.

CK062 proves nonvanishing of ζ(1/2+ijγ0)\zeta(1/2+ij\gamma_0) for j=2,,6j=2,\ldots,6, and c0>d0c_0>d_0. Under an eventual lower barrier ug-Cu_g\ge-C and weak cost, a seven-frequency positivity matrix gives

Cc0Mg+2cos(π/8)|a0Hg(ρ0)|c0Mg+d0/Mgc0+d0>1.0057.(B32-05)C\ge c_0M_g+2\cos(\pi/8)|a_0H_g(\rho_0)| \ge c_0M_g+d_0/M_g\ge c_0+d_0>1.0057. \tag{B32-05}

Thus every such weak-cost reference has liminfSg(x)/x-(c0+d0)\liminf S_g(x)/\sqrt x\le-(c_0+d_0). The matrix is tridiagonal because the five harmonics are nonzeros. This does not assume rational independence of ordinates or an infinite residue expansion.

Independent finite recheck: CK067 uses a separate explicit-derivative Euler–Maclaurin implementation (192 terms, 18 Bernoulli corrections and a radius-10-1210^{-12} root disk). It certifies 1.0057490559<c0+d0<1.00574905691.0057490559<c_0+d_0<1.0057490569, inside the repaired CK062 enclosure. Both use the same directed-interval library, so this is implementation independence, not backend independence. Exact rational endpoints govern, and the stable conclusion remains >1.0057. Neither program is an all-height zero check.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

B32-05 finite seven-frequency constant obstruction >1.0057; CK062/067 are source-reported and share interval backend. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

B32-05 finite seven-frequency constant obstruction >1.0057; CK062/067 are source-reported and share interval backend.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: B32-05 finite seven-frequency constant obstruction >1.0057; CK062/067 are source-reported and share interval backend.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-25 — Universal characters. Genuine characters violate universal positivity even with any fixed matching prefix. No negative actual Liouville value is inferred.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-25 — Universal characters. Genuine characters violate universal positivity even with any fixed matching prefix. No negative actual Liouville value is inferred.. NR-25 — Universal characters. Genuine characters violate universal positivity even with any fixed matching prefix. No negative actual Liouville value is inferred.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-25 — Universal characters. Genuine characters violate universal positivity even with any fixed matching prefix. No negative actual Liouville value is inferred. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-25 — Universal characters. Genuine characters violate universal positivity even with any fixed matching prefix. No negative actual Liouville value is inferred.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-25 — Universal characters. Genuine characters violate universal positivity even with any fixed matching prefix. No negative actual Liouville value is inferred.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-37 — Moving alpha. Use the finite uniform energy sandwich, not fixed-alpha sample asymptotics with alpha_X substituted.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-37 — Moving alpha. Use the finite uniform energy sandwich, not fixed-alpha sample asymptotics with alpha_X substituted.. NR-37 — Moving alpha. Use the finite uniform energy sandwich, not fixed-alpha sample asymptotics with alpha_X substituted.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-37 — Moving alpha. Use the finite uniform energy sandwich, not fixed-alpha sample asymptotics with alpha_X substituted. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-37 — Moving alpha. Use the finite uniform energy sandwich, not fixed-alpha sample asymptotics with alpha_X substituted.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-37 — Moving alpha. Use the finite uniform energy sandwich, not fixed-alpha sample asymptotics with alpha_X substituted.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-35 — Sparse independence. Logarithmic cost does not bound the hard deterministic mean. Expected energy is comparable to it; exceptional correlations are not excluded.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-35 — Sparse independence. Logarithmic cost does not bound the hard deterministic mean. Expected energy is comparable to it; exceptional correlations are not excluded.. NR-35 — Sparse independence. Logarithmic cost does not bound the hard deterministic mean. Expected energy is comparable to it; exceptional correlations are not excluded.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-35 — Sparse independence. Logarithmic cost does not bound the hard deterministic mean. Expected energy is comparable to it; exceptional correlations are not excluded. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-35 — Sparse independence. Logarithmic cost does not bound the hard deterministic mean. Expected energy is comparable to it; exceptional correlations are not excluded.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-35 — Sparse independence. Logarithmic cost does not bound the hard deterministic mean. Expected energy is comparable to it; exceptional correlations are not excluded.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-33 — Fair/block-first references. Low fair energy comes with high cost; fixing a late block forces many positive signs under the stated conditioning.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-33 — Fair/block-first references. Low fair energy comes with high cost; fixing a late block forces many positive signs under the stated conditioning.. NR-33 — Fair/block-first references. Low fair energy comes with high cost; fixing a late block forces many positive signs under the stated conditioning.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-33 — Fair/block-first references. Low fair energy comes with high cost; fixing a late block forces many positive signs under the stated conditioning. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-33 — Fair/block-first references. Low fair energy comes with high cost; fixing a late block forces many positive signs under the stated conditioning.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-33 — Fair/block-first references. Low fair energy comes with high cost; fixing a late block forces many positive signs under the stated conditioning.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-26 — Finite square samples. T_100>0 does not prove eventual control. Matching characters supplies approximation, not a nonnegative sign.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-26 — Finite square samples. T_100>0 does not prove eventual control. Matching characters supplies approximation, not a nonnegative sign.. NR-26 — Finite square samples. T_100>0 does not prove eventual control. Matching characters supplies approximation, not a nonnegative sign.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-26 — Finite square samples. T_100>0 does not prove eventual control. Matching characters supplies approximation, not a nonnegative sign. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-26 — Finite square samples. T_100>0 does not prove eventual control. Matching characters supplies approximation, not a nonnegative sign.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-26 — Finite square samples. T_100>0 does not prove eventual control. Matching characters supplies approximation, not a nonnegative sign.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-18 — Common-kernel stress. K26 full-strip replacement and prescribed wrong-fold constructions are different families, not one combined countermodel.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-18 — Common-kernel stress. K26 full-strip replacement and prescribed wrong-fold constructions are different families, not one combined countermodel.. NR-18 — Common-kernel stress. K26 full-strip replacement and prescribed wrong-fold constructions are different families, not one combined countermodel.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-18 — Common-kernel stress. K26 full-strip replacement and prescribed wrong-fold constructions are different families, not one combined countermodel. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-18 — Common-kernel stress. K26 full-strip replacement and prescribed wrong-fold constructions are different families, not one combined countermodel.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-18 — Common-kernel stress. K26 full-strip replacement and prescribed wrong-fold constructions are different families, not one combined countermodel.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-02 — Stieltjes order. A5–A6 retains positive measures, decreasing tail ratios, both nulls and negative contact, but the wrong J3 sign.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-02 — Stieltjes order. A5–A6 retains positive measures, decreasing tail ratios, both nulls and negative contact, but the wrong J3 sign.. NR-02 — Stieltjes order. A5–A6 retains positive measures, decreasing tail ratios, both nulls and negative contact, but the wrong J3 sign.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-02 — Stieltjes order. A5–A6 retains positive measures, decreasing tail ratios, both nulls and negative contact, but the wrong J3 sign. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-02 — Stieltjes order. A5–A6 retains positive measures, decreasing tail ratios, both nulls and negative contact, but the wrong J3 sign.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-02 — Stieltjes order. A5–A6 retains positive measures, decreasing tail ratios, both nulls and negative contact, but the wrong J3 sign.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-21 — Finite sampling. No exception through two million is not tail control. The summable half N^-3/2 sampling loss must be retained.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-21 — Finite sampling. No exception through two million is not tail control. The summable half N^-3/2 sampling loss must be retained.. NR-21 — Finite sampling. No exception through two million is not tail control. The summable half N^-3/2 sampling loss must be retained.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-21 — Finite sampling. No exception through two million is not tail control. The summable half N^-3/2 sampling loss must be retained. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-21 — Finite sampling. No exception through two million is not tail control. The summable half N^-3/2 sampling loss must be retained.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-21 — Finite sampling. No exception through two million is not tail control. The summable half N^-3/2 sampling loss must be retained.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-28 — Fourier overreach. B=0 fixed-log Fourier bounds force simplicity and derivative-residue bounds. Use L30-03 for the RH-equivalent target.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-28 — Fourier overreach. B=0 fixed-log Fourier bounds force simplicity and derivative-residue bounds. Use L30-03 for the RH-equivalent target.. NR-28 — Fourier overreach. B=0 fixed-log Fourier bounds force simplicity and derivative-residue bounds. Use L30-03 for the RH-equivalent target.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-28 — Fourier overreach. B=0 fixed-log Fourier bounds force simplicity and derivative-residue bounds. Use L30-03 for the RH-equivalent target. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-28 — Fourier overreach. B=0 fixed-log Fourier bounds force simplicity and derivative-residue bounds. Use L30-03 for the RH-equivalent target.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-28 — Fourier overreach. B=0 fixed-log Fourier bounds force simplicity and derivative-residue bounds. Use L30-03 for the RH-equivalent target.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
B32-06 ternary reference has bounded energy and big-O sqrt-cost; little-o cannot be replaced by big-O. Composite feedback and finite tests are limited.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: B32-06 ternary reference has bounded energy and big-O sqrt-cost; little-o cannot be replaced by big-O. Composite feedback and finite tests are limited.. For the threshold example, define g3(3am)=χ3(m)g_3(3^a m)=\chi_3(m) for 3m3\nmid m, where χ3\chi_3 is the nonprincipal real character modulo 3. Then

Sg3(N)=#{base-3 digits ofNequal to 1},Eg3()1+2/log3+2/(log3)2,S_{g_3}(N)=\#\{\text{base-3 digits of }N\text{ equal to 1}\},\quad \mathcal E_{g_3}(\infty)\le1+2/\log3+2/(\log3)^2,
Wg3(X)=23πX+O((logX)3).(B32-06)W_{g_3}(X)=\frac{2\sqrt3}{\pi}\sqrt X+O((\log X)^3). \tag{B32-06}

This disproves replacing little-o by big-O in the cost-improvement conclusion, not RH itself. A bounded-energy, one-sided reference is not enough without the specified cost.

CK064 independently replays exact energies at 10610^6, the feedback reference and its cost, the conditional mean at 10510^5, and the digit identity through 10510^5. The feedback rule changes a prime only if the previous sum is below -p-\sqrt p; it already fails the literal barrier at the composite integer 32. Its energy is about 5.85805 at 10610^6, but its cost is about 17.1570, giving a transferred upper bound over 1700 rather than the actual energy about 6.20034. These finite facts neither prove nor disprove all possible adaptive constructions.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

B32-06 ternary reference has bounded energy and big-O sqrt-cost; little-o cannot be replaced by big-O. Composite feedback and finite tests are limited. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

B32-06 ternary reference has bounded energy and big-O sqrt-cost; little-o cannot be replaced by big-O. Composite feedback and finite tests are limited.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: B32-06 ternary reference has bounded energy and big-O sqrt-cost; little-o cannot be replaced by big-O. Composite feedback and finite tests are limited.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height

Referenced context changed

The referenced context changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown below.

Historical subject: Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height. The source reports oscillation along every positive-slope ray.

Source-reported subject: Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height. The source reports oscillation along every positive-slope ray.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height · Before this update · After this update

Riemann Hypothesis · Before this update

Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height · After this update · Historical record

Riemann Hypothesis · After this update · Historical record

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height

The historical record for Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height retains its own mathematical text.

The referenced context for Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

Before this update: Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann Hypothesis

After this update: Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height

Historical record

  • Reported status: reported failure
  • Record status: superseded

Related claims: Riemann Hypothesis

Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height

Included in this source revision.

The new record for Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height retains the earlier parent record's own mathematical text and reported status.

The referenced context for Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

After this update: Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure

Referenced context changed

The referenced context changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown below.

Historical subject: Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure. The source reports a sharp positive two-atomic realization of the generic moment barrier.

Source-reported subject: Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure. The source reports a sharp positive two-atomic realization of the generic moment barrier.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure · Before this update · After this update

Riemann Hypothesis · Before this update

Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure · After this update · Historical record

Riemann Hypothesis · After this update · Historical record

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure

The historical record for Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure retains its own mathematical text.

The referenced context for Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

Before this update: Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann Hypothesis

After this update: Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure

Historical record

  • Reported status: reported failure
  • Record status: superseded

Related claims: Riemann Hypothesis

Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure

Included in this source revision.

The new record for Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure retains the earlier parent record's own mathematical text and reported status.

The referenced context for Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

After this update: Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-43 — Prefix overshoot. T32-01 forces high-contact overshoot regardless of curvature orientation. PFX would already exclude those contacts; existence is not asserted.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-43 — Prefix overshoot. T32-01 forces high-contact overshoot regardless of curvature orientation. PFX would already exclude those contacts; existence is not asserted.. NR-43 — Prefix overshoot. T32-01 forces high-contact overshoot regardless of curvature orientation. PFX would already exclude those contacts; existence is not asserted.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-43 — Prefix overshoot. T32-01 forces high-contact overshoot regardless of curvature orientation. PFX would already exclude those contacts; existence is not asserted. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-43 — Prefix overshoot. T32-01 forces high-contact overshoot regardless of curvature orientation. PFX would already exclude those contacts; existence is not asserted.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-43 — Prefix overshoot. T32-01 forces high-contact overshoot regardless of curvature orientation. PFX would already exclude those contacts; existence is not asserted.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-41 — Fixed barrier. The eventual -sqrt x barrier is impossible in B32 weak-cost references. Prime feedback alone does not control composite descendants.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-41 — Fixed barrier. The eventual -sqrt x barrier is impossible in B32 weak-cost references. Prime feedback alone does not control composite descendants.. NR-41 — Fixed barrier. The eventual -sqrt x barrier is impossible in B32 weak-cost references. Prime feedback alone does not control composite descendants.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-41 — Fixed barrier. The eventual -sqrt x barrier is impossible in B32 weak-cost references. Prime feedback alone does not control composite descendants. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-41 — Fixed barrier. The eventual -sqrt x barrier is impossible in B32 weak-cost references. Prime feedback alone does not control composite descendants.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-41 — Fixed barrier. The eventual -sqrt x barrier is impossible in B32 weak-cost references. Prime feedback alone does not control composite descendants.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-34 — Fixed bias limit. Fixed bias has a polynomial mean-energy term. Its nonuniform near-Liouville remainder cannot be discarded at the endpoint.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-34 — Fixed bias limit. Fixed bias has a polynomial mean-energy term. Its nonuniform near-Liouville remainder cannot be discarded at the endpoint.. NR-34 — Fixed bias limit. Fixed bias has a polynomial mean-energy term. Its nonuniform near-Liouville remainder cannot be discarded at the endpoint.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-34 — Fixed bias limit. Fixed bias has a polynomial mean-energy term. Its nonuniform near-Liouville remainder cannot be discarded at the endpoint. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-34 — Fixed bias limit. Fixed bias has a polynomial mean-energy term. Its nonuniform near-Liouville remainder cannot be discarded at the endpoint.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-34 — Fixed bias limit. Fixed bias has a polynomial mean-energy term. Its nonuniform near-Liouville remainder cannot be discarded at the endpoint.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
O28-04–08 smooth/diagonal countermodels retain enumerated moments, jumps and decay but lose exact between-jump ODE; hypothetical off-line growth stays conditional.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: O28-04–08 smooth/diagonal countermodels retain enumerated moments, jumps and decay but lose exact between-jump ODE; hypothetical off-line growth stays conditional.. O28-04–05, resonance limitation. For a smooth cutoff chi=0 below1 and chi=1 above2,

Dar(χxλ)=ζ(λ+1/2)xλ+OK(x-K),λ<1/2,\mathcal D_{\rm ar}(\chi x^\lambda)=\zeta(\lambda+1/2)x^\lambda+O_K(x^{-K}), \quad\Re\lambda<1/2,

locally uniformly with parameter derivatives. A hypothetical off-line zero allows a power-growing oscillation whose image is smaller than every power; this is not an exhibited off-line zero or an exactly homogeneous solution. An actual critical-line zero also gives an unconditional loglog-growing oscillation with image tending to zero. A compact moment correction and the stated baseline retain negative forcing and its limit, defeating a bounded inverse rule. This alone does not defeat every subpower rule.

O28-06–08, arbitrary small negative sources. The exact inverse for h zero below1 is

(Rh)(x)=nμ(n)n-1/2h(x/n),TRh=h.(\mathcal Rh)(x)=\sum_n\mu(n)n^{-1/2}h(x/n),\qquad\mathcal T\mathcal Rh=h.

For smooth h supported in (Y,2Y), the unconditional Mertens estimate gives Rh(x)A,Yx(logx)-AVY(h)\mathcal Rh(x)\ll_{A,Y}\sqrt x(\log x)^{-A}\mathcal V_Y(h), where VY(h)=12|h|y-3/2+|h'|y-1/2\mathcal V_Y(h)=\frac12\int|h|y^{-3/2}+\int|h'|y^{-1/2}. The moment is absolutely convergent and zero, so DarRh=h\mathcal D_{\rm ar}\mathcal Rh=h.

Negative narrow bumps at P/n for μ(n)=1\mu(n)=1, avoiding integers and all other sample points, produce

Rh(P)-c+εP/Y,c+=6π2(1-1/2)>0.\mathcal Rh(P)\sim-c_+\epsilon\sqrt{P/Y},\quad c_+=\frac6{\pi^2}(1-1/\sqrt2)>0.

A locally finite diagonal choice makes the source h nonpositive, arbitrarily small in sup norm, zero near every integer, and OK(x-K)O_K(x^{-K}) for every fixed K. The perturbed solution g=F_0+u agrees initially, has the same derivative jumps and moment, and satisfies

g(Pj)-Pj1/2-1/j,g=o(x),Darg=Gar+h-κ0,|u|x-3/2<η.(O28-08)g(P_j)\le-P_j^{1/2-1/j},\quad g=o(\sqrt x),\quad \mathcal D_{\rm ar}g=\mathcal G_{\rm ar}+h\le-\kappa_0, \quad\int|u|x^{-3/2}<\eta. \tag{O28-08}

Thus exact forcing near integers, pointwise asymptotics to every order and a strict negative margin still do not give a generic subpower inverse theorem. Width choices are made after a variation-controlled tail cutoff; pointwise source decay is not derivative decay.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

O28-04–08 smooth/diagonal countermodels retain enumerated moments, jumps and decay but lose exact between-jump ODE; hypothetical off-line growth stays conditional. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

O28-04–08 smooth/diagonal countermodels retain enumerated moments, jumps and decay but lose exact between-jump ODE; hypothetical off-line growth stays conditional.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: O28-04–08 smooth/diagonal countermodels retain enumerated moments, jumps and decay but lose exact between-jump ODE; hypothetical off-line growth stays conditional.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-01 — Generic positivity. Positive analytic/log-concave kernels admit off-axis zeros and wrong folds; an additional exact assumption is necessary.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-01 — Generic positivity. Positive analytic/log-concave kernels admit off-axis zeros and wrong folds; an additional exact assumption is necessary.. NR-01 — Generic positivity. Positive analytic/log-concave kernels admit off-axis zeros and wrong folds; an additional exact assumption is necessary.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-01 — Generic positivity. Positive analytic/log-concave kernels admit off-axis zeros and wrong folds; an additional exact assumption is necessary. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-01 — Generic positivity. Positive analytic/log-concave kernels admit off-axis zeros and wrong folds; an additional exact assumption is necessary.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-01 — Generic positivity. Positive analytic/log-concave kernels admit off-axis zeros and wrong folds; an additional exact assumption is necessary.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-07 — Canceled channel. J4 already cancels the full sin(gamma r) channel. Bounding pieces first loses the relevant cancellation.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-07 — Canceled channel. J4 already cancels the full sin(gamma r) channel. Bounding pieces first loses the relevant cancellation.. NR-07 — Canceled channel. J4 already cancels the full sin(gamma r) channel. Bounding pieces first loses the relevant cancellation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-07 — Canceled channel. J4 already cancels the full sin(gamma r) channel. Bounding pieces first loses the relevant cancellation. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-07 — Canceled channel. J4 already cancels the full sin(gamma r) channel. Bounding pieces first loses the relevant cancellation.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-07 — Canceled channel. J4 already cancels the full sin(gamma r) channel. Bounding pieces first loses the relevant cancellation.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-30 — Extra smoothing. A nonnegative kernel vanishing faster than x^1.5 has negative real residue. Subtracting a zero linear term is not squaring the kernel.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-30 — Extra smoothing. A nonnegative kernel vanishing faster than x^1.5 has negative real residue. Subtracting a zero linear term is not squaring the kernel.. NR-30 — Extra smoothing. A nonnegative kernel vanishing faster than x^1.5 has negative real residue. Subtracting a zero linear term is not squaring the kernel.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-30 — Extra smoothing. A nonnegative kernel vanishing faster than x^1.5 has negative real residue. Subtracting a zero linear term is not squaring the kernel. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-30 — Extra smoothing. A nonnegative kernel vanishing faster than x^1.5 has negative real residue. Subtracting a zero linear term is not squaring the kernel.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-30 — Extra smoothing. A nonnegative kernel vanishing faster than x^1.5 has negative real residue. Subtracting a zero linear term is not squaring the kernel.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-15 — Moment ceiling. The stationary-moment method has an exact constant ceiling near12; improving it cannot cover unbounded height.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-15 — Moment ceiling. The stationary-moment method has an exact constant ceiling near12; improving it cannot cover unbounded height.. NR-15 — Moment ceiling. The stationary-moment method has an exact constant ceiling near12; improving it cannot cover unbounded height.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-15 — Moment ceiling. The stationary-moment method has an exact constant ceiling near12; improving it cannot cover unbounded height. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-15 — Moment ceiling. The stationary-moment method has an exact constant ceiling near12; improving it cannot cover unbounded height.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-15 — Moment ceiling. The stationary-moment method has an exact constant ceiling near12; improving it cannot cover unbounded height.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
R30-01/02/03 independent prime signs; exact squarefree moment and fixed-bias/coherence failures only for the stated classes.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: R30-01/02/03 independent prime signs; exact squarefree moment and fixed-bias/coherence failures only for the stated classes.. For independent prime signs, write mp=Eg(p)m_p=\mathbb E g(p), vp=1-mp2v_p=1-m_p^2, and a(n)=Eg(n)a(n)=\mathbb E g(n). The mean is multiplicative but generally not completely multiplicative: its even prime-power values are 1, its odd values are mpm_p. If ada_d sets odd means to zero at primes dividing squarefree dd, then

EEg(X)=d squarefree,dXpdvpdEad(X/d).(R30-01)\mathbb E\mathcal E_g(X)=\sum_{d\ \mathrm{squarefree},d\le X} \frac{\prod_{p\mid d}v_p}{d}\,\mathcal E_{a_d}(X/d). \tag{R30-01}

It follows that EaEEgRm(X)Ea\mathcal E_a\le\mathbb E\mathcal E_g\le R_m(X)\mathcal E_a, where

Rm(X)=pX(1+1-mp2p(1-|mp|/p)2)pXpp-1=O(logX).(R30-02)R_m(X)=\prod_{p\le X}\left(1+\frac{1-m_p^2}{p(1-|m_p|/\sqrt p)^2}\right) \le\prod_{p\le X}\frac p{p-1}=O(\log X). \tag{R30-02}

The local inequality is the square (p|mp|-1)20(\sqrt p\,|m_p|-1)^2\ge0. Fair signs have square-indicator mean, EEg(X)=3(logX)2/π2+O(logX)\mathbb E\mathcal E_g(X)=3(\log X)^2/\pi^2+O(\log X), and almost surely a polylogarithmic prefix-maximum Qg*Q_g^* bound; their comparison cost is not subpower. The order-log mean-energy factor is genuine (R30-03).

Q30-07–09 record precise failed shortcuts: coherent high-prime translations have norm of order X/logX\sqrt X/\log X; a prime-13 change lowers Q(13)Q(13) by exactly 8/138/13; block-first fair conditioning forces about half the block positive to preserve low mean energy; and fixed negative bias has a polynomial-size Selberg–Delange mean. None proves a universal impossibility for carefully coordinated references. Each counterexample's retained and lost hypotheses are recorded in §18 and the proof topic.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

R30-01/02/03 independent prime signs; exact squarefree moment and fixed-bias/coherence failures only for the stated classes. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

R30-01/02/03 independent prime signs; exact squarefree moment and fixed-bias/coherence failures only for the stated classes.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: R30-01/02/03 independent prime signs; exact squarefree moment and fixed-bias/coherence failures only for the stated classes.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-03 — Fixed ballot sign. Actual theta germs near heights 82.9 and 84.7 force both proposed J signs; the exact live-ballot check excludes the gate.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-03 — Fixed ballot sign. Actual theta germs near heights 82.9 and 84.7 force both proposed J signs; the exact live-ballot check excludes the gate.. NR-03 — Fixed ballot sign. Actual theta germs near heights 82.9 and 84.7 force both proposed J signs; the exact live-ballot check excludes the gate.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-03 — Fixed ballot sign. Actual theta germs near heights 82.9 and 84.7 force both proposed J signs; the exact live-ballot check excludes the gate. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-03 — Fixed ballot sign. Actual theta germs near heights 82.9 and 84.7 force both proposed J signs; the exact live-ballot check excludes the gate.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-03 — Fixed ballot sign. Actual theta germs near heights 82.9 and 84.7 force both proposed J signs; the exact live-ballot check excludes the gate.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-39 — Auxiliary cancellation. Quarter-power control is for c, not lambda or g. Affine subtraction and decaying source retain hypothetical off-line poles.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-39 — Auxiliary cancellation. Quarter-power control is for c, not lambda or g. Affine subtraction and decaying source retain hypothetical off-line poles.. NR-39 — Auxiliary cancellation. Quarter-power control is for c, not lambda or g. Affine subtraction and decaying source retain hypothetical off-line poles.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-39 — Auxiliary cancellation. Quarter-power control is for c, not lambda or g. Affine subtraction and decaying source retain hypothetical off-line poles. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-39 — Auxiliary cancellation. Quarter-power control is for c, not lambda or g. Affine subtraction and decaying source retain hypothetical off-line poles.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-39 — Auxiliary cancellation. Quarter-power control is for c, not lambda or g. Affine subtraction and decaying source retain hypothetical off-line poles.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
L28-03–06 finite altered g and CRT-selected characters only; reported external Conrey v1 counterexample needs separate review, no fixed-character or Liouville-sign inference.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: L28-03–06 finite altered g and CRT-selected characters only; reported external Conrey v1 counterexample needs separate review, no fixed-character or Liouville-sign inference.. ### 6.3 Genuine-character obstruction and its precise scope — L28-03–06

Take g completely multiplicative, +1 on primes 5000<p<10000 and -1 otherwise. Independent fixed-point and Fraction engines certify at N=10^6, x=10^-4:

-4956/109<nNg(n)sin(2πnx)/n2<-4953/109,8755/109<T100<8757/109.(L28-CERT)-4956/10^9<\sum_{n\le N}g(n)\sin(2\pi nx)/n^2<-4953/10^9, \quad8755/10^9<T_{100}<8757/10^9. \tag{L28-CERT}

The absolute 1/N tails imply a negative infinite g series and a positive actual Liouville series. For each odd p<=N, prescribe (q/p)=g(p)(-1)(p-1)/2(q/p)=g(p)(-1)^{(p-1)/2} and q=3 mod8. Reciprocity, CRT and Dirichlet give infinitely many prime conductors q>N realizing the entire finite sign pattern; mod8 supplies the sign at2. Thus these are genuine prime quadratic characters, not relabelled arbitrary sequences. No explicit conductor was computed.

This contradicts the universal positivity statement of Conrey's arXiv:2404.19647v1, Conjecture1, as stated there, but not his conditional implication or the actual Liouville inequality. No novelty-priority assertion is made. Finite exact logs and the two engines are retained; optimized Python cannot silently skip assertions.

Arbitrary fixed-prefix agreement does not restore universality. The unconditional Mertens bound and the zero harmonic sum give L(x)Ax/(log(1/x))A\mathscr L(x)\ll_A x/(\log(1/x))^A. On [2/3,5/6], a first-term and tail estimate gives L(y)-c0\mathscr L(y)\le-c_0, c0=1+3/2-π2/6>0c_0=1+\sqrt3/2-\pi^2/6>0. For small x, flip only primes 2/(3x)<p<5/(6x)2/(3x)<p<5/(6x). Then g_x agrees with lambda through 2/(3x), but the positive convolution identity yields

Sgx(x)L(x)-2c0Sx+O(Sx2)-cx/log(1/x),Sx(3/10)x/log(1/x).(L28-04/06)\mathscr S_{g_x}(x)\le\mathscr L(x)-2c_0S_x+O(S_x^2) \le-cx/\log(1/x),\quad S_x\sim(3/10)x/\log(1/x). \tag{L28-04/06}

Longer finite CRT matching and an absolute tail transfer the negative value to genuine characters at each scale. Characters change with x; no one fixed character has arbitrarily long Liouville prefixes.

The remaining selected-family possibility L28-05 is: for every sufficiently large k find one prime character q_k=3 mod8 matching through k^3 and with Sχqk(k-2)0\mathscr S_{\chi_{q_k}}(k^{-2})\ge0. It would give T_k>=-k^-3, hence RH and simplicity. CRT supplies matching, not the required sign. This optional gate must control scale, match length and sign together and has not been proved.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

L28-03–06 finite altered g and CRT-selected characters only; reported external Conrey v1 counterexample needs separate review, no fixed-character or Liouville-sign inference. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

L28-03–06 finite altered g and CRT-selected characters only; reported external Conrey v1 counterexample needs separate review, no fixed-character or Liouville-sign inference.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: L28-03–06 finite altered g and CRT-selected characters only; reported external Conrey v1 counterexample needs separate review, no fixed-character or Liouville-sign inference.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-12 — Nearest-zero model. Support-pole models may violate stationarity or the sign. Actual nulls and background terms must be retained.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-12 — Nearest-zero model. Support-pole models may violate stationarity or the sign. Actual nulls and background terms must be retained.. NR-12 — Nearest-zero model. Support-pole models may violate stationarity or the sign. Actual nulls and background terms must be retained.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-12 — Nearest-zero model. Support-pole models may violate stationarity or the sign. Actual nulls and background terms must be retained. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-12 — Nearest-zero model. Support-pole models may violate stationarity or the sign. Actual nulls and background terms must be retained.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-12 — Nearest-zero model. Support-pole models may violate stationarity or the sign. Actual nulls and background terms must be retained.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-22 — Count quantifiers. All-window blocks give exponent1 without attainment. Positive lower density requires attainment; o(X) is not enough generally.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-22 — Count quantifiers. All-window blocks give exponent1 without attainment. Positive lower density requires attainment; o(X) is not enough generally.. NR-22 — Count quantifiers. All-window blocks give exponent1 without attainment. Positive lower density requires attainment; o(X) is not enough generally.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-22 — Count quantifiers. All-window blocks give exponent1 without attainment. Positive lower density requires attainment; o(X) is not enough generally. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-22 — Count quantifiers. All-window blocks give exponent1 without attainment. Positive lower density requires attainment; o(X) is not enough generally.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-22 — Count quantifiers. All-window blocks give exponent1 without attainment. Positive lower density requires attainment; o(X) is not enough generally.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-13 — Boundary collar. Multiplicity-safe local collars depend on height and do not provide a uniform all-height collar.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-13 — Boundary collar. Multiplicity-safe local collars depend on height and do not provide a uniform all-height collar.. NR-13 — Boundary collar. Multiplicity-safe local collars depend on height and do not provide a uniform all-height collar.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-13 — Boundary collar. Multiplicity-safe local collars depend on height and do not provide a uniform all-height collar. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-13 — Boundary collar. Multiplicity-safe local collars depend on height and do not provide a uniform all-height collar.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-13 — Boundary collar. Multiplicity-safe local collars depend on height and do not provide a uniform all-height collar.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-31 — Energy minimizer. A single prime13 flip decreases Q(13) by8/13. Liouville is not the minimizer; this alone says nothing about every mean comparison.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-31 — Energy minimizer. A single prime13 flip decreases Q(13) by8/13. Liouville is not the minimizer; this alone says nothing about every mean comparison.. NR-31 — Energy minimizer. A single prime13 flip decreases Q(13) by8/13. Liouville is not the minimizer; this alone says nothing about every mean comparison.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-31 — Energy minimizer. A single prime13 flip decreases Q(13) by8/13. Liouville is not the minimizer; this alone says nothing about every mean comparison. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-31 — Energy minimizer. A single prime13 flip decreases Q(13) by8/13. Liouville is not the minimizer; this alone says nothing about every mean comparison.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-31 — Energy minimizer. A single prime13 flip decreases Q(13) by8/13. Liouville is not the minimizer; this alone says nothing about every mean comparison.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-08 — Moving divisor scale. J6 fixed-scale TP2 does not persist under changing physical scale or removal of incomplete causal tails.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-08 — Moving divisor scale. J6 fixed-scale TP2 does not persist under changing physical scale or removal of incomplete causal tails.. NR-08 — Moving divisor scale. J6 fixed-scale TP2 does not persist under changing physical scale or removal of incomplete causal tails.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-08 — Moving divisor scale. J6 fixed-scale TP2 does not persist under changing physical scale or removal of incomplete causal tails. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-08 — Moving divisor scale. J6 fixed-scale TP2 does not persist under changing physical scale or removal of incomplete causal tails.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-08 — Moving divisor scale. J6 fixed-scale TP2 does not persist under changing physical scale or removal of incomplete causal tails.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-19 — Cubic recursion. The cubic increment is not monotone; fixed ratio slack is already PNT-scale. Absolute inversion loses sqrt x.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-19 — Cubic recursion. The cubic increment is not monotone; fixed ratio slack is already PNT-scale. Absolute inversion loses sqrt x.. NR-19 — Cubic recursion. The cubic increment is not monotone; fixed ratio slack is already PNT-scale. Absolute inversion loses sqrt x.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-19 — Cubic recursion. The cubic increment is not monotone; fixed ratio slack is already PNT-scale. Absolute inversion loses sqrt x. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-19 — Cubic recursion. The cubic increment is not monotone; fixed ratio slack is already PNT-scale. Absolute inversion loses sqrt x.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-19 — Cubic recursion. The cubic increment is not monotone; fixed ratio slack is already PNT-scale. Absolute inversion loses sqrt x.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-24 — Negative source. O28 defeats generic inverse bounds while losing exact between-jump evolution. Pointwise source decay is not derivative decay.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-24 — Negative source. O28 defeats generic inverse bounds while losing exact between-jump evolution. Pointwise source decay is not derivative decay.. NR-24 — Negative source. O28 defeats generic inverse bounds while losing exact between-jump evolution. Pointwise source decay is not derivative decay.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-24 — Negative source. O28 defeats generic inverse bounds while losing exact between-jump evolution. Pointwise source decay is not derivative decay. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-24 — Negative source. O28 defeats generic inverse bounds while losing exact between-jump evolution. Pointwise source decay is not derivative decay.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-24 — Negative source. O28 defeats generic inverse bounds while losing exact between-jump evolution. Pointwise source decay is not derivative decay.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-29 — Positive averages. The squarefree average cancels zeta poles but has a negative actual squared-exponential inverse. Positive-source inversion is not sign-preserving.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-29 — Positive averages. The squarefree average cancels zeta poles but has a negative actual squared-exponential inverse. Positive-source inversion is not sign-preserving.. NR-29 — Positive averages. The squarefree average cancels zeta poles but has a negative actual squared-exponential inverse. Positive-source inversion is not sign-preserving.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-29 — Positive averages. The squarefree average cancels zeta poles but has a negative actual squared-exponential inverse. Positive-source inversion is not sign-preserving. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-29 — Positive averages. The squarefree average cancels zeta poles but has a negative actual squared-exponential inverse. Positive-source inversion is not sign-preserving.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-29 — Positive averages. The squarefree average cancels zeta poles but has a negative actual squared-exponential inverse. Positive-source inversion is not sign-preserving.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-17 — Denominator sign. D26 locates supporting zeros, not new stationary contacts. D26-POLY defeats orientation from that sign alone.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-17 — Denominator sign. D26 locates supporting zeros, not new stationary contacts. D26-POLY defeats orientation from that sign alone.. NR-17 — Denominator sign. D26 locates supporting zeros, not new stationary contacts. D26-POLY defeats orientation from that sign alone.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-17 — Denominator sign. D26 locates supporting zeros, not new stationary contacts. D26-POLY defeats orientation from that sign alone. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-17 — Denominator sign. D26 locates supporting zeros, not new stationary contacts. D26-POLY defeats orientation from that sign alone.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-17 — Denominator sign. D26 locates supporting zeros, not new stationary contacts. D26-POLY defeats orientation from that sign alone.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-04 — Old envelope. At a=.01 the old ratio t²k/(k−tk′) turns near t=.5–.72. It is not the current varrho profile.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-04 — Old envelope. At a=.01 the old ratio t²k/(k−tk′) turns near t=.5–.72. It is not the current varrho profile.. NR-04 — Old envelope. At a=.01 the old ratio t²k/(k−tk′) turns near t=.5–.72. It is not the current varrho profile.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-04 — Old envelope. At a=.01 the old ratio t²k/(k−tk′) turns near t=.5–.72. It is not the current varrho profile. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-04 — Old envelope. At a=.01 the old ratio t²k/(k−tk′) turns near t=.5–.72. It is not the current varrho profile.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-04 — Old envelope. At a=.01 the old ratio t²k/(k−tk′) turns near t=.5–.72. It is not the current varrho profile.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-40 — Covariance-only repair. R32-05 conditional means produce a same-sign x/log²x drift despite arbitrary large-prime correlations. Other means are outside scope.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-40 — Covariance-only repair. R32-05 conditional means produce a same-sign x/log²x drift despite arbitrary large-prime correlations. Other means are outside scope.. NR-40 — Covariance-only repair. R32-05 conditional means produce a same-sign x/log²x drift despite arbitrary large-prime correlations. Other means are outside scope.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-40 — Covariance-only repair. R32-05 conditional means produce a same-sign x/log²x drift despite arbitrary large-prime correlations. Other means are outside scope. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-40 — Covariance-only repair. R32-05 conditional means produce a same-sign x/log²x drift despite arbitrary large-prime correlations. Other means are outside scope.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-40 — Covariance-only repair. R32-05 conditional means produce a same-sign x/log²x drift despite arbitrary large-prime correlations. Other means are outside scope.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-32 — Generic operator norm. Coherent large-prime translations have squared norm of order X/log²X. A smaller norm for actual inputs needs arithmetic proof.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-32 — Generic operator norm. Coherent large-prime translations have squared norm of order X/log²X. A smaller norm for actual inputs needs arithmetic proof.. NR-32 — Generic operator norm. Coherent large-prime translations have squared norm of order X/log²X. A smaller norm for actual inputs needs arithmetic proof.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-32 — Generic operator norm. Coherent large-prime translations have squared norm of order X/log²X. A smaller norm for actual inputs needs arithmetic proof. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-32 — Generic operator norm. Coherent large-prime translations have squared norm of order X/log²X. A smaller norm for actual inputs needs arithmetic proof.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-32 — Generic operator norm. Coherent large-prime translations have squared norm of order X/log²X. A smaller norm for actual inputs needs arithmetic proof.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-23 — Spectral filters. A zero-dependent filter proves oscillation, not an arithmetic count upper bound. Omitting its resonance repair kills selected modes.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-23 — Spectral filters. A zero-dependent filter proves oscillation, not an arithmetic count upper bound. Omitting its resonance repair kills selected modes.. NR-23 — Spectral filters. A zero-dependent filter proves oscillation, not an arithmetic count upper bound. Omitting its resonance repair kills selected modes.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-23 — Spectral filters. A zero-dependent filter proves oscillation, not an arithmetic count upper bound. Omitting its resonance repair kills selected modes. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-23 — Spectral filters. A zero-dependent filter proves oscillation, not an arithmetic count upper bound. Omitting its resonance repair kills selected modes.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-23 — Spectral filters. A zero-dependent filter proves oscillation, not an arithmetic count upper bound. Omitting its resonance repair kills selected modes.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-38 — Sparse multiplicity. Q32-06 now permits sparse logarithmic energy cutoffs. It does not permit sparse Fourier sampling.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-38 — Sparse multiplicity. Q32-06 now permits sparse logarithmic energy cutoffs. It does not permit sparse Fourier sampling.. NR-38 — Sparse multiplicity. Q32-06 now permits sparse logarithmic energy cutoffs. It does not permit sparse Fourier sampling.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-38 — Sparse multiplicity. Q32-06 now permits sparse logarithmic energy cutoffs. It does not permit sparse Fourier sampling. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-38 — Sparse multiplicity. Q32-06 now permits sparse logarithmic energy cutoffs. It does not permit sparse Fourier sampling.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-38 — Sparse multiplicity. Q32-06 now permits sparse logarithmic energy cutoffs. It does not permit sparse Fourier sampling.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-05 — Unweighted prefix. The z cot z=y prefix fails at y=4/5. Central-range estimates do not extend through y=1 or all y<1.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-05 — Unweighted prefix. The z cot z=y prefix fails at y=4/5. Central-range estimates do not extend through y=1 or all y<1.. NR-05 — Unweighted prefix. The z cot z=y prefix fails at y=4/5. Central-range estimates do not extend through y=1 or all y<1.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-05 — Unweighted prefix. The z cot z=y prefix fails at y=4/5. Central-range estimates do not extend through y=1 or all y<1. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-05 — Unweighted prefix. The z cot z=y prefix fails at y=4/5. Central-range estimates do not extend through y=1 or all y<1.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-05 — Unweighted prefix. The z cot z=y prefix fails at y=4/5. Central-range estimates do not extend through y=1 or all y<1.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-06 — Positive polynomial. Positive physical amplitudes and pencils can have opposite leading sine signs. Positivity is not P6.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-06 — Positive polynomial. Positive physical amplitudes and pencils can have opposite leading sine signs. Positivity is not P6.. NR-06 — Positive polynomial. Positive physical amplitudes and pencils can have opposite leading sine signs. Positivity is not P6.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-06 — Positive polynomial. Positive physical amplitudes and pencils can have opposite leading sine signs. Positivity is not P6. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-06 — Positive polynomial. Positive physical amplitudes and pencils can have opposite leading sine signs. Positivity is not P6.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-06 — Positive polynomial. Positive physical amplitudes and pencils can have opposite leading sine signs. Positivity is not P6.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
R32-05 fixed theta in (1/2,1), exact small-prime sigma-field and conditional means; extra independence needed for asymptotic equality, no uniform q to -1.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: R32-05 fixed theta in (1/2,1), exact small-prime sigma-field and conditional means; extra independence needed for asymptotic equality, no uniform q to -1.. R32-05 addresses a correlated class. Fix 1/2<θ<11/2<\theta<1, y=Xθy=X^\theta, Y=(logX)2Y=(\log X)^2. Change an arbitrary random subset SS of primes at most YY, keep all other primes at most yy negative, and allow arbitrary dependence among primes above yy, subject to conditional mean zero given SS. With RS=pS(p+1)/(p-1)R_S=\prod_{p\in S}(p+1)/(p-1), the exact conditional mean satisfies uniformly for X/(logX)6xXX/(\log X)^6\le x\le X,

E[Sg(x)S]=MS,y(x)=-(ζ(2)RS+o(RS))x/(logx)2.\mathbb E[S_g(x)\mid S]=M_{S,y}(x) =-(\zeta(2)R_S+o(R_S))x/(\log x)^2.

Conditional Jensen gives

EEg(X)(1-o(1))ζ(2)2E[RS2]X(logX)4.(R32-05)\mathbb E\mathcal E_g(X)\ge(1-o(1))\zeta(2)^2\mathbb E[R_S^2] \frac X{(\log X)^4}. \tag{R32-05}

Conditional independence upgrades this to an asymptotic. A fixed common conditional mean q>-1q>-1 multiplies the lower coefficient by (1+q)2(1+q)^2. No uniform q-1q\to-1 assertion is made. Only the small-prime cost is automatically subpower; the full reference need not have low cost. The obstruction is to the exact stated marginals and range, not arbitrary prime-dependent means.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

R32-05 fixed theta in (1/2,1), exact small-prime sigma-field and conditional means; extra independence needed for asymptotic equality, no uniform q to -1. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

R32-05 fixed theta in (1/2,1), exact small-prime sigma-field and conditional means; extra independence needed for asymptotic equality, no uniform q to -1.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: R32-05 fixed theta in (1/2,1), exact small-prime sigma-field and conditional means; extra independence needed for asymptotic equality, no uniform q to -1.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-44 — Outward intervals. Count16 decimal endpoints rounded inward. CK062 repairs them; independent CK067 encloses the same constant more tightly. Old residual tables remain diagnostic.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-44 — Outward intervals. Count16 decimal endpoints rounded inward. CK062 repairs them; independent CK067 encloses the same constant more tightly. Old residual tables remain diagnostic.. NR-44 — Outward intervals. Count16 decimal endpoints rounded inward. CK062 repairs them; independent CK067 encloses the same constant more tightly. Old residual tables remain diagnostic.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-44 — Outward intervals. Count16 decimal endpoints rounded inward. CK062 repairs them; independent CK067 encloses the same constant more tightly. Old residual tables remain diagnostic. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-44 — Outward intervals. Count16 decimal endpoints rounded inward. CK062 repairs them; independent CK067 encloses the same constant more tightly. Old residual tables remain diagnostic.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-44 — Outward intervals. Count16 decimal endpoints rounded inward. CK062 repairs them; independent CK067 encloses the same constant more tightly. Old residual tables remain diagnostic.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-09 — Componentwise completion. Low Jacobi products defeat completion positivity and constant repair; the wedge defect need not decrease.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-09 — Componentwise completion. Low Jacobi products defeat completion positivity and constant repair; the wedge defect need not decrease.. NR-09 — Componentwise completion. Low Jacobi products defeat completion positivity and constant repair; the wedge defect need not decrease.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-09 — Componentwise completion. Low Jacobi products defeat completion positivity and constant repair; the wedge defect need not decrease. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-09 — Componentwise completion. Low Jacobi products defeat completion positivity and constant repair; the wedge defect need not decrease.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-09 — Componentwise completion. Low Jacobi products defeat completion positivity and constant repair; the wedge defect need not decrease.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-45 — Fixed-function gate. B32 requires one fixed g, all-scale lower bounds and a sparse weak-cost sequence. Different g at each cutoff needs the R30 same-pair route.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-45 — Fixed-function gate. B32 requires one fixed g, all-scale lower bounds and a sparse weak-cost sequence. Different g at each cutoff needs the R30 same-pair route.. NR-45 — Fixed-function gate. B32 requires one fixed g, all-scale lower bounds and a sparse weak-cost sequence. Different g at each cutoff needs the R30 same-pair route.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-45 — Fixed-function gate. B32 requires one fixed g, all-scale lower bounds and a sparse weak-cost sequence. Different g at each cutoff needs the R30 same-pair route. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-45 — Fixed-function gate. B32 requires one fixed g, all-scale lower bounds and a sparse weak-cost sequence. Different g at each cutoff needs the R30 same-pair route.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-45 — Fixed-function gate. B32 requires one fixed g, all-scale lower bounds and a sparse weak-cost sequence. Different g at each cutoff needs the R30 same-pair route.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-27 — Audit scope. Both current audits have stated analytic and executable scopes, not formal verification. Hashes and finite checks do not prove infinite gates; optimized assertions are forbidden.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-27 — Audit scope. Both current audits have stated analytic and executable scopes, not formal verification. Hashes and finite checks do not prove infinite gates; optimized assertions are forbidden.. NR-27 — Audit scope. Both current audits have stated analytic and executable scopes, not formal verification. Hashes and finite checks do not prove infinite gates; optimized assertions are forbidden.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-27 — Audit scope. Both current audits have stated analytic and executable scopes, not formal verification. Hashes and finite checks do not prove infinite gates; optimized assertions are forbidden. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-27 — Audit scope. Both current audits have stated analytic and executable scopes, not formal verification. Hashes and finite checks do not prove infinite gates; optimized assertions are forbidden.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-27 — Audit scope. Both current audits have stated analytic and executable scopes, not formal verification. Hashes and finite checks do not prove infinite gates; optimized assertions are forbidden.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
NR-10 — Unmatched cones. Hyperbola-Abel and inner-score positivity need a proved intertwiner matching all normalizations and nulls.

Source-reported route limitation

Source-reported subject: NR-10 — Unmatched cones. Hyperbola-Abel and inner-score positivity need a proved intertwiner matching all normalizations and nulls.. NR-10 — Unmatched cones. Hyperbola-Abel and inner-score positivity need a proved intertwiner matching all normalizations and nulls.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

NR-10 — Unmatched cones. Hyperbola-Abel and inner-score positivity need a proved intertwiner matching all normalizations and nulls. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

NR-10 — Unmatched cones. Hyperbola-Abel and inner-score positivity need a proved intertwiner matching all normalizations and nulls.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: NR-10 — Unmatched cones. Hyperbola-Abel and inner-score positivity need a proved intertwiner matching all normalizations and nulls.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported failure

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X → Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X → Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X → Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ · After this update

Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X · After this update

Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ · After this update

Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X → Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X → Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X

Conclusion: Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Reflection-quotient phase gate; Riemann Hypothesis → Reflection-quotient phase gate; Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion → Reflection-quotient phase gate

Referenced context changed

The referenced context changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown below.

Historical subject: Reflection-quotient phase gate. In the target half-strip, RH is equivalent to the implication U(w)=0 implies V(w) is nonzero for the principal logarithm h=U+iV of the reflection quotient.

Historical subject: Riemann Hypothesis → Reflection-quotient phase gate. The source reports the completed-zeta zero condition and the reflection-quotient phase gate as exact reformulations of the same problem.

Historical subject: Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion → Reflection-quotient phase gate. A component-wise phase-avoidance theorem, including singular vertices, would establish the exact quotient gate.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Reflection-quotient phase gate · Before this update

Reflection-quotient phase gate · After this update · Historical record

Riemann Hypothesis → Reflection-quotient phase gate · Before this update

Riemann Hypothesis · Before this update

Riemann Hypothesis → Reflection-quotient phase gate · After this update · Historical record

Riemann Hypothesis · After this update · Historical record

Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion → Reflection-quotient phase gate · Before this update

Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate · Before this update · After this update

Zero-phase singular exclusion · Before this update · After this update

Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion → Reflection-quotient phase gate · After this update · Historical record

Reflection-quotient phase gate

The earlier record is now historical.

Source-reported logical status: standing → superseded.

Before this update: Reflection-quotient phase gate

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: general
After this update: Reflection-quotient phase gate

Historical record

  • Source-reported logical status: superseded
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: general

Riemann Hypothesis → Reflection-quotient phase gate

The earlier record is now historical.

The referenced context for Riemann Hypothesis → Reflection-quotient phase gate changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

Before this update: Riemann Hypothesis → Reflection-quotient phase gate

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Riemann Hypothesis

Conclusion: Reflection-quotient phase gate

After this update: Riemann Hypothesis → Reflection-quotient phase gate

Historical record

  • Reported status: reported by source
  • Record status: superseded

Premises: Riemann Hypothesis

Conclusion: Reflection-quotient phase gate

Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion → Reflection-quotient phase gate

The earlier record is now historical.

The referenced context for Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion → Reflection-quotient phase gate changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

Before this update: Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion → Reflection-quotient phase gate

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion

Conclusion: Reflection-quotient phase gate

After this update: Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion → Reflection-quotient phase gate

Historical record

  • Reported status: reported by source
  • Record status: superseded

Premises: Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion

Conclusion: Reflection-quotient phase gate

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption.

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption.. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption. · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds · After this update

A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption. · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds

Conclusion: A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption.

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] → D_theta chart valid at X=0

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] → D_theta chart valid at X=0. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] → D_theta chart valid at X=0 · After this update

C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] · After this update

D_theta chart valid at X=0 · After this update

C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] → D_theta chart valid at X=0

Included in this source revision.

After this update: C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] → D_theta chart valid at X=0

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90]

Conclusion: D_theta chart valid at X=0

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input.

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input.. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input. · After this update

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering · After this update

Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input. · After this update

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering

Conclusion: Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input.

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing → O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing → O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing → O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source · After this update

O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing · After this update

O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source · After this update

O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing → O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source

Included in this source revision.

After this update: O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing → O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing

Conclusion: O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d → R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d → R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d → R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference · After this update

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d · After this update

R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference · After this update

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d → R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d → R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d

Conclusion: R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss → A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss → A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss → A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension · After this update

A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss · After this update

A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension · After this update

A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss → A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss → A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss

Conclusion: A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption. → A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption. → A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption. → A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss · After this update

A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption. · After this update

A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss · After this update

A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption. → A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption. → A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption.

Conclusion: A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR → Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR → Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR → Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR · After this update

Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR · After this update

Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR · After this update

Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR → Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR → Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR

Conclusion: Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m · After this update

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering · After this update

Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m · After this update

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering

Conclusion: Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion.

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion.. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion. · After this update

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering · After this update

Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion. · After this update

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering

Conclusion: Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion.

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros → A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros → A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros → A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge · After this update

A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros · After this update

A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge · After this update

A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros → A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros → A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros

Conclusion: A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d → R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d → R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d → R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes · After this update

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d · After this update

R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes · After this update

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d → R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d → R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d

Conclusion: R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof · After this update

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term · After this update

Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof · After this update

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term

Conclusion: Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X → J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis.

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X → J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis.. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X → J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis. · After this update

Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X · After this update

J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis. · After this update

Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X → J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X → J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X

Conclusion: J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis.

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds · After this update

O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds

Conclusion: O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma → A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma → A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma → A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros · After this update

A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma · After this update

A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros · After this update

A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma → A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma → A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma

Conclusion: A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d · After this update

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term · After this update

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d · After this update

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term

Conclusion: Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] → Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] → Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] → Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0 · After this update

C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] · After this update

Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0 · After this update

C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] → Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0

Included in this source revision.

After this update: C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] → Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90]

Conclusion: Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering · After this update

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term · After this update

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering · After this update

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term

Conclusion: Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → B32-01–04 same fixed sign function

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → B32-01–04 same fixed sign function. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → B32-01–04 same fixed sign function · After this update

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d · After this update

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering · After this update

B32-01–04 same fixed sign function · After this update

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → B32-01–04 same fixed sign function

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → B32-01–04 same fixed sign function

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering

Conclusion: B32-01–04 same fixed sign function

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution.

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution.. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution. · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds · After this update

A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution. · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution.

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds

Conclusion: A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution.

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds · After this update

A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds

Conclusion: A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds · After this update

O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds

Conclusion: O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Actual theta curvature facts → A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: Actual theta curvature facts → A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Actual theta curvature facts → A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term · After this update

Actual theta curvature facts · After this update

A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term · After this update

Actual theta curvature facts → A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Actual theta curvature facts → A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Actual theta curvature facts

Conclusion: A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error · After this update

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term · After this update

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering · After this update

Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error · After this update

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering

Conclusion: Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference → R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference → R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference → R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay · After this update

R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference · After this update

R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay · After this update

R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference → R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay

Included in this source revision.

After this update: R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference → R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference

Conclusion: R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0; Actual theta curvature facts → Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0; Actual theta curvature facts → Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0; Actual theta curvature facts → Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR · After this update

Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0 · After this update

Actual theta curvature facts · After this update

Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR · After this update

Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0; Actual theta curvature facts → Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0; Actual theta curvature facts → Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0; Actual theta curvature facts

Conclusion: Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof; Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m → Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity

Mathematical connections updated

Source-reported subject: Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof; Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m → Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity. Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof; Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m → Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity · After this update

Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof · After this update

Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m · After this update

Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity · After this update

Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof; Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m → Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof; Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m → Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity

Record in this revision

  • Reported status: reported by source

Premises: Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof; Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m

Conclusion: Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A26 exact finite N<=2e6 diagnostics, extrema and counts; U<0 makes the tested implication branch vacuous. No payload replay.

Source-reported computation

Source-reported subject: A26 exact finite N<=2e6 diagnostics, extrema and counts; U<0 makes the tested implication branch vacuous. No payload replay.. ## 7. Exact finite arithmetic and Fourier state

A26-COMP certifies for every integer 2<=N<=2,000,000:

12BN-(AN+7/4)3>1/2.12B_N-(A_N+7/4)^3>1/2.

On the full real interval [1,2,000,000], Uar<-49/25U_{\rm ar}<-49/25 and 11/4-Far>1/2511/4-F_{\rm ar}>1/25. The unique extremizers are 24,137 and 319,391, respectively. Exactly 362,547 integers N>=100 have U>-5/2 and each has V>1/6; the shifted exceptional set is empty. The unshifted U>0 branch is only vacuously tested. All 5,161 actual interior gap minima have F>7/3, with explicit gap-membership and truncated-last-gap checks.

The scale-10^36 outward logarithm/square-root engine, event counts and bounds are in data/V26_ARITHMETIC_CERTIFICATE.json. Its registered checks were rerun; diagnostic decimals are not substitutes. L28-CERT separately covers k=100 and one altered prime-sign pattern, not all k or an explicit conductor. CK064 adds exact finite energy/cost and digit tests. Full commands, scope and fresh logs are in CHECK_REGISTRY.json and data/V33_RUN_SUMMARY.json. None is an infinite count or energy upper bound.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A26 exact finite N<=2e6 diagnostics, extrema and counts; U<0 makes the tested implication branch vacuous. No payload replay. · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

A26 exact finite N<=2e6 diagnostics, extrema and counts; U<0 makes the tested implication branch vacuous. No payload replay.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A26 exact finite N<=2e6 diagnostics, extrema and counts; U<0 makes the tested implication branch vacuous. No payload replay.

Record in this revision

  • Computation evidence: reported unreproduced

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50.

Referenced context changed

The referenced context changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown below.

Historical subject: Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50.. The packet reports finite-height exclusion candidates, but directed-rounding and implementation seams remain unresolved and no candidate is promoted to theorem status.

Source-reported subject: Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50.. The packet reports finite-height exclusion candidates, but directed-rounding and implementation seams remain unresolved and no candidate is promoted to theorem status.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50. · Before this update · After this update

Riemann Hypothesis · Before this update

Analytic off-line zero-free band · Before this update · After this update

Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50. · After this update · Historical record

Riemann Hypothesis · After this update · Historical record

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50.

The historical record for Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50. retains its own mathematical text.

The referenced context for Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50. changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

Before this update: Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50.

Record in this revision

  • Computation evidence: reported unreproduced

Related claims: Riemann Hypothesis; Analytic off-line zero-free band

After this update: Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50.

Historical record

  • Record status: superseded
  • Computation evidence: reported unreproduced

Related claims: Riemann Hypothesis; Analytic off-line zero-free band

Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50.

Included in this source revision.

The new record for Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50. retains the earlier parent record's own mathematical text and reported status.

The referenced context for Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50. changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

After this update: Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50.

Record in this revision

  • Computation evidence: reported unreproduced

Related claims: Riemann hypothesis; Analytic off-line zero-free band

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Narrowed alternative closures; Retained obstacles and current Fourier/scalar endpoints

Referenced context changed

The referenced context changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown below.

Historical subject: Narrowed alternative closures. Height-growing interpolation, theta-density localization, and retained Fourier/scalar backups after scoped route eliminations.

Source-reported subject: Retained obstacles and current Fourier/scalar endpoints. Retained fixed-order obstacles and the open alternative-closure task, alongside current actual-arithmetic Fourier/scalar endpoints. The historical Pick/Padé and theta-density route records remain separately source-scoped.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Narrowed alternative closures · Before this update

Fixed-distinct-node interpolation blindness · Before this update · After this update

Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure · Before this update · After this update

Fixed finite distinct-node Pick interpolation with polynomial margin · Before this update · After this update

Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height · Before this update · After this update

Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure · Before this update · After this update

Height-growing Pick/Padé hierarchy · Before this update · After this update

Theta-density localization · Before this update · After this update

Fourier-decay and scalar-growth closures · Before this update · After this update

Narrowed alternative closures · After this update · Historical record

Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure · After this update · Historical record

Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height · After this update · Historical record

Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure · After this update · Historical record

Retained obstacles and current Fourier/scalar endpoints · After this update

Fourier-decay and scalar-growth closures · After this update

Narrowed alternative closures

The earlier record is now historical.

The referenced context for Narrowed alternative closures changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

Before this update: Narrowed alternative closures

Record in this revision

Related mathematics: Fixed-distinct-node interpolation blindness; Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure; Fixed finite distinct-node Pick interpolation with polynomial margin; Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height; Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure

Related routes: Height-growing Pick/Padé hierarchy; Theta-density localization; Fourier-decay and scalar-growth closures

After this update: Narrowed alternative closures

Historical record

  • Record status: superseded

Related mathematics: Fixed-distinct-node interpolation blindness; Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure; Fixed finite distinct-node Pick interpolation with polynomial margin; Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height; Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure

Related routes: Height-growing Pick/Padé hierarchy; Theta-density localization; Fourier-decay and scalar-growth closures

Retained obstacles and current Fourier/scalar endpoints

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Retained obstacles and current Fourier/scalar endpoints

Record in this revision

  • Record status: active

Related mathematics: Fixed-distinct-node interpolation blindness; Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure; Fixed finite distinct-node Pick interpolation with polynomial margin; Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height; Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure

Related routes: Fourier-decay and scalar-growth closures

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Directed nodal graph frontier; Retained modulus-one boundary geometry

Referenced context changed

The referenced context changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown below.

Historical subject: Directed nodal graph frontier. Local phase geometry and classified ends reduce the leading program to global incidence, same-sign pairing, and singular exclusion.

Source-reported subject: Retained modulus-one boundary geometry. Revision 6 U=0 geometry and its still-open pairing/singularity obligations remain separately scoped historical mathematics; current Theta=0 fixed-witness arguments do not replace these hypotheses.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Directed nodal graph frontier · Before this update

Strict phase flow on regular nodal edges · Before this update · After this update

Exact local singular normal form · Before this update · After this update

Proper components and classified ends · Before this update · After this update

Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate · Before this update · After this update

Zero-phase singular exclusion · Before this update · After this update

Build the global endpoint-incidence atlas · Before this update · After this update

Prove directed same-sign endpoint pairing · Before this update · After this update

Exclude zero-phase singular vertices · Before this update · After this update

Determine portal and right-edge phase signs · Before this update · After this update

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing · Before this update

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance · Before this update

Directed nodal graph frontier · After this update · Historical record

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing · After this update

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance · After this update

Retained modulus-one boundary geometry · After this update

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing · After this update

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance · After this update

Directed nodal graph frontier

The earlier record is now historical.

The referenced context for Directed nodal graph frontier changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

Before this update: Directed nodal graph frontier

Record in this revision

Related mathematics: Strict phase flow on regular nodal edges; Exact local singular normal form; Proper components and classified ends; Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion; Build the global endpoint-incidence atlas; Prove directed same-sign endpoint pairing; Exclude zero-phase singular vertices; Determine portal and right-edge phase signs

Related routes: Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing; Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

After this update: Directed nodal graph frontier

Historical record

  • Record status: superseded

Related mathematics: Strict phase flow on regular nodal edges; Exact local singular normal form; Proper components and classified ends; Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion; Build the global endpoint-incidence atlas; Prove directed same-sign endpoint pairing; Exclude zero-phase singular vertices; Determine portal and right-edge phase signs

Related routes: Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing; Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

Retained modulus-one boundary geometry

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Retained modulus-one boundary geometry

Record in this revision

  • Record status: active

Related mathematics: Strict phase flow on regular nodal edges; Exact local singular normal form; Proper components and classified ends; Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion; Build the global endpoint-incidence atlas; Prove directed same-sign endpoint pairing; Exclude zero-phase singular vertices; Determine portal and right-edge phase signs

Related routes: Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing; Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Exact zero-location formulations; Completed-zeta target and current phase-zero chart

Referenced context changed

The referenced context changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown below.

Historical subject: Exact zero-location formulations. The completed-zeta statement, centered entire function, and reflection-quotient phase gate.

Source-reported subject: Completed-zeta target and current phase-zero chart. The completed-zeta target and the prescribed upper-strip phase-zero chart K=0, R<0. The current fixed-witness record keeps its regular, flat and critical cases separate; the older U=0/V presentation remains source-local history.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Exact zero-location formulations · Before this update

Riemann Hypothesis · Before this update

Reflection-quotient phase gate · Before this update

Exact zero-location formulations · After this update · Historical record

Riemann Hypothesis · After this update · Historical record

Reflection-quotient phase gate · After this update · Historical record

Completed-zeta target and current phase-zero chart · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0 · After this update

Exact zero-location formulations

The earlier record is now historical.

The referenced context for Exact zero-location formulations changed. The complete target statements, qualifications and statuses before and after this update are shown here.

Before this update: Exact zero-location formulations

Record in this revision

Related mathematics: Riemann Hypothesis; Reflection-quotient phase gate

After this update: Exact zero-location formulations

Historical record

  • Record status: superseded

Related mathematics: Riemann Hypothesis; Reflection-quotient phase gate

Completed-zeta target and current phase-zero chart

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Completed-zeta target and current phase-zero chart

Record in this revision

  • Record status: active

Related mathematics: Riemann hypothesis; Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Current source frontier

Revised open work

Source-reported subject: Current source frontier. Separate energy, arithmetic, signed-transform and theta interfaces; no endpoint or NC/CR closure is proved here.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Current source frontier · After this update

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term · After this update

Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof · After this update

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering · After this update

Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion. · After this update

Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error · After this update

Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m · After this update

Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity · After this update

Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input. · After this update

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d · After this update

R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference · After this update

R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay · After this update

R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes · After this update

B32-01–04 same fixed sign function · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds · After this update

A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution. · After this update

A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption. · After this update

A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss · After this update

A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension · After this update

A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma · After this update

A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros · After this update

A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge · After this update

O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing · After this update

O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall · After this update

O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source · After this update

L28-01/02 and L30-01–03 actual Liouville sine series, k^3 truncation, x=k^-2 · After this update

A26 exact finite N<=2e6 diagnostics, extrema and counts; U<0 makes the tested implication branch vacuous. No payload replay. · After this update

C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] · After this update

Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0 · After this update

Arbitrary finite multiplicity yields local critical-line collar with zero- and height-dependent radius · After this update

Y/G6 includes X=0; g/G7 requires its nonzero, noncritical domain · After this update

Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X · After this update

Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ · After this update

D_theta chart valid at X=0 · After this update

Actual theta curvature facts · After this update

Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR · After this update

Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR · After this update

A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term · After this update

J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis. · After this update

Open energy work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open overview work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open reference work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open fixed-function work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open arithmetic work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open signed-kernels work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open theta work with exact source conditions · After this update

Noncritical stationary-fold exclusion · After this update

Critical stationary-contact exclusion · After this update

Uniform compact-profile rectangle · After this update

Current energy route · After this update

Current fixed-function route · After this update

Current reference route · After this update

Current arithmetic route · After this update

Current signed-kernels route · After this update

Current theta route · After this update

Current source frontier

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Current source frontier

Record in this revision

  • Record status: active

Related mathematics: Riemann hypothesis; Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term; Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering; Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion.; Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error; Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m; Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity; Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input.; Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d; R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference; R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay; R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes; B32-01–04 same fixed sign function; A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds; A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution.; A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption.; A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss; A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension; A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma; A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros; A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge; O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing; O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall; O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source; L28-01/02 and L30-01–03 actual Liouville sine series, k^3 truncation, x=k^-2; A26 exact finite N<=2e6 diagnostics, extrema and counts; U<0 makes the tested implication branch vacuous. No payload replay.; C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90]; Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0; Arbitrary finite multiplicity yields local critical-line collar with zero- and height-dependent radius; Y/G6 includes X=0; g/G7 requires its nonzero, noncritical domain; Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X; Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ; D_theta chart valid at X=0; Actual theta curvature facts; Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR; Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR; A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term; J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis.; Open energy work with exact source conditions; Open overview work with exact source conditions; Open reference work with exact source conditions; Open fixed-function work with exact source conditions; Open arithmetic work with exact source conditions; Open signed-kernels work with exact source conditions; Open theta work with exact source conditions; Noncritical stationary-fold exclusion; Critical stationary-contact exclusion; Uniform compact-profile rectangle

Related routes: Current energy route; Current fixed-function route; Current reference route; Current arithmetic route; Current signed-kernels route; Current theta route

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion.

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion.. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

The same kernel gives an unconditional baseline

Eλ(X)logX-C0ζ(1/2)2,C0=283+(82-4)(1-γE).(Q32-03)\mathcal E_\lambda(X)\ge\frac{\log X-C_0}{\zeta(1/2)^2},\qquad C_0=\frac{28}{3}+(8\sqrt2-4)(1-\gamma_E). \tag{Q32-03}

It follows from |kL|1=-(2/3)ζ(1/2)\|k_L\|_1=-(2/3)\zeta(1/2) and an explicit L1L^1 bound for aL+2/3a_L+2/3. This is not an energy asymptotic; other modes may contribute more.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion. · After this update

Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion.

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

5. Exact divisor forcing and inverse obstructions

The full O28 proofs are in active_proof_arithmetic.txt, SEG-v28-divisor-forcing and SEG-v28-mobius-inverse. Their distinction between actual arithmetic evolution and general smooth perturbations remains controlling.

For g zero below 1, with absolutely convergent moment when used, define

(Tg)(x)=m1m-1/2g(x/m),Cg=0g(y)y-3/2dy,Darg=Tg-Cgx.(\mathcal Tg)(x)=\sum_{m\ge1}m^{-1/2}g(x/m),\quad C_g=\int_0^\infty g(y)y^{-3/2}dy,\quad \mathcal D_{\rm ar}g=\mathcal Tg-C_g\sqrt x.

The actual zero extension F_0 has moment Car=32/9+4γE/3C_{\rm ar}=32/9+4\gamma_E/3. Its exact forcing is

Gar(x)=43xHx-nxlognn(1-n/x)-Carx-κ0<-2(x1).(O28-01--02)\mathcal G_{\rm ar}(x)=\tfrac43\sqrt x H_{\lfloor x\rfloor} -\sum_{n\le x}\frac{\log n}{\sqrt n}(1-n/x)-C_{\rm ar}\sqrt x \le-\kappa_0< -2\quad(x\ge1). \tag{O28-01--02}

Below 1 it equals -Carx-C_{\rm ar}\sqrt x. The proof uses exact trapezoidal and between-integer covariance bounds. Uniformly at real x, Gar=ζ'(1/2)-ζ'(-1/2)/x+O(x-1/2)\mathcal G_{\rm ar}=\zeta'(1/2)-\zeta'(-1/2)/x+O(x^{-1/2}); finer integer expansions cannot be transferred without fractional-part terms.

For smooth compact g, on -1/2<s<1/2-1/2<\Re s<1/2,

M(Darg)(s)=ζ(s+1/2)Mg(s).(O28-03)\mathcal M(\mathcal D_{\rm ar}g)(s)=\zeta(s+1/2)\mathcal Mg(s). \tag{O28-03}

The subtraction is essential. The exact source transform on 0<s<1/20<\Re s<1/2 is

MGar(s)=4ζ(s+1/2)3(s-1/2)+ζ'(s+1/2)s(s+1).\mathcal M\mathcal G_{\rm ar}(s)= \frac{4\zeta(s+1/2)}{3(s-1/2)}+ \frac{\zeta'(s+1/2)}{s(s+1)}.

At a hypothetical zero of multiplicity m, the source vanishes to order m-1, not m. Negative forcing does not cancel the inverse pole.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing · After this update

O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing

Included in this source revision.

After this update: O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

2.1 Exact energies, cutoff conventions, and inherited detector

For real arithmetic coefficients cc, define Sc(x)=nxc(n)S_c(x)=\sum_{n\le x}c(n), uc(t)=e-t/2Sc(et)u_c(t)=e^{-t/2}S_c(e^t), and Ec(X)=1X|Sc(x)|2x-2dx\mathcal E_c(X)=\int_1^X|S_c(x)|^2x^{-2}dx. Set the energy to zero for X1X\le1 and extend ucu_c by zero for t<0t<0. All endpoints have full right-continuous weights. At X=N+θX=N+\theta, add Sc(N)2(1/N-1/X)S_c(N)^2(1/N-1/X) to the sum through N-1N-1; internal cutoffs such as X/dX/d must not be silently rounded down.

For Pc,N(s)=nNc(n)n-sP_{c,N}(s)=\sum_{n\le N}c(n)n^{-s},

Qc(N)=m,nNc(m)c(n)max(m,n)=Ec(N)+Sc(N)2N=12π|Pc,N(1/2+it)|21/4+t2dt.(Q30-01)Q_c(N)=\sum_{m,n\le N}\frac{c(m)c(n)}{\max(m,n)} =\mathcal E_c(N)+\frac{S_c(N)^2}{N} =\frac1{2\pi}\int_{\mathbb R}\frac{|P_{c,N}(1/2+it)|^2}{1/4+t^2}\,dt. \tag{Q30-01}

The energy is monotone, whereas the endpoint term in QQ must be handled separately. These Gram identities require no multiplicativity. Also |Pc,N(s)||s|Qc(N)/(2s-1)|P_{c,N}(s)|\le|s|\sqrt{Q_c(N)/(2\Re s-1)} for s>1/2\Re s>1/2.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term · After this update

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

4.3 Compact positive filters and fixed-window oscillation — A28-05–07

For a shifted zero dj+iγjd_j+i\gamma_j, a positive two-point measure at 0,π/γj0,\pi/\gamma_j, with weights proportional to edjπ/γje^{d_j\pi/\gamma_j} and 1, annihilates the pair. Summability of reciprocal heights makes the infinite convolution compactly supported. To retain a selected pair d0+iγ0d_0+i\gamma_0, omit its factor and repair every accidental resonance. An unmodified factor also kills the selected pair precisely when dj=d0d_j=d_0 and γ0/γj\gamma_0/\gamma_j is an odd integer at least 3. There are only finitely many such factors; replace them by normalized positive densities

e-d0u(1+12cosγ0u)1[0,2π/γj](u).e^{-d_0u}(1+\tfrac12\cos\gamma_0u)\,1_{[0,2\pi/\gamma_j]}(u).

The replacement cancels the unwanted frequency and retains the chosen one. The remaining nonzero factors have summable deviations from 1. Hence a fixed compactly supported probability measure satisfies

f(t+u)dμ(u)=2(C0e(d0+iγ0)t)+O(e(σ-1/2)t), C00.(A28-06)\int f(t+u)d\mu(u)=2\Re(C_0e^{(d_0+i\gamma_0)t})+O(e^{(\sigma-1/2)t}),\ C_0\ne0. \tag{A28-06}

Every sufficiently late interval of a fixed logarithmic length therefore contains both signs of f with magnitude comparable to ed0te^{d_0t}. Other zeros farther right have been canceled, not assumed absent. This hypothetical-spectrum-dependent measure supplies no arithmetic upper bound.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros · After this update

A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

3.4 The clipped potential and sparse exceptions — A26-12–15

For η0\eta\ge0, define

Pη(x)=[(Uar(x)+h)+-(Var(x))+-η]+.P_\eta(x)=\big[(U_{\rm ar}(x)+h)_+-(V_{\rm ar}(x))_+-\eta\big]_+.

It has nonnegative arithmetic jumps. Where positive and Var>0V_{\rm ar}>0, its derivative is Var/x0V_{\rm ar}/x\ge0. Where positive and Var<0V_{\rm ar}<0, it is -x-1/2-x^{-1/2}. Let IN=1Eh(N)I_N=1_{\mathcal E_h}(N) and dN=2(N+1-N)d_N=2(\sqrt{N+1}-\sqrt N). For dNηd_N\le\eta, the exact sampling estimate is

Pη(N)-Pη(N+1)dN(IN+IN+1)+12N3/2.(A26-SAMPLING)P_\eta(N)-P_\eta(N+1) \le d_N(I_N+I_{N+1})+\frac1{2N^{3/2}}. \tag{A26-SAMPLING}

The last summable term is essential. On a cell whose endpoints are not exceptional, a negative dip of VarV_{\rm ar} is bounded using Var(x)-(x-N)/xV_{\rm ar}(x)\ge-(x-N)/\sqrt x; its contribution integrates to at most 1/(2N3/2)1/(2N^{3/2}). Charging O(N-1/2)O(N^{-1/2}) at every cell would destroy the claimed sparse theorem. Full endpoints and the final cell must be retained.

The old exact criterion is still valid:

RHNEhN-1/2<.(A26-TARGET)\mathrm{RH}\iff\sum_{N\in\mathcal E_h}N^{-1/2}<\infty. \tag{A26-TARGET}

A sufficient dyadic budget is jej2-j/2<\sum_j e_j2^{-j/2}<\infty, where eje_j counts shifted exceptions in the jth dyadic interval. For example ej2j/2/j1+ϵe_j\ll2^{j/2}/j^{1+\varepsilon} suffices. For consecutive prime powers with right-continuous A_j,B_j, the exact real bad-gap cost is

Cj=2[min(qj+1,(Aj+h)/2)-max(qj,(3Bj/2)1/3)]+.(A26-GAP-COST)C_j=2[\min(\sqrt{q_{j+1}},(A_j+h)/2)-\max(\sqrt{q_j},(3B_j/2)^{1/3})]_+. \tag{A26-GAP-COST}

Summability of these clipped costs also suffices; without clipping the interval may not belong to the actual gap. The newer local return argument and all-scale unshifted blocks weaken the needed count hypothesis. Do not keep treating summability or a square-root global count as the only sufficient arithmetic endpoint.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss · After this update

A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

3. Exact arithmetic foundation and inherited criteria

3.1 Dynamics, explicit formula and Mellin positivity — A26-01–05

At a prime power qq, both UarU_{\rm ar} and VarV_{\rm ar} jump upward by Λ(q)/q\Lambda(q)/\sqrt q. Their difference FarF_{\rm ar} is continuous. Between jumps,

U'ar=-x-1/2,V'ar=-Var/x-x-1/2,F'ar=-Var/x.(A26-DYN)U'_{\rm ar}=-x^{-1/2},\quad V'_{\rm ar}=-V_{\rm ar}/x-x^{-1/2},\quad F'_{\rm ar}=-V_{\rm ar}/x. \tag{A26-DYN}

Thus v=f'+v=f'_+ has only downward jumps, and increases smoothly between them. A minimum of ff cannot occur at a genuine downward derivative jump; at an interior minimum v=0v=0. A first upward crossing of a slope threshold is continuous. These facts are used instead of applying a differentiable theorem at a prime-power corner.

For s>1/2\Re s>1/2, direct integration gives

MF(s)=1Far(x)x-s-1dx=4/3s-1/2+(ζ'/ζ)(s+1/2)s(s+1).(A26-MELLIN)M_F(s)=\int_1^\infty F_{\rm ar}(x)x^{-s-1}\,dx =\frac{4/3}{s-1/2}+\frac{(\zeta'/\zeta)(s+1/2)}{s(s+1)}. \tag{A26-MELLIN}

The real pole at 1/21/2 cancels. The meromorphic expression is analytic on the positive real axis. A nontrivial zero ρ\rho of multiplicity mρm_\rho gives a simple pole at s=ρ-1/2s=\rho-1/2, with nonzero residue mρ/[(ρ-1/2)(ρ+1/2)]m_\rho/[(\rho-1/2)(\rho+1/2)]. Landau's theorem applied to a nonnegative tail of Far+CxrF_{\rm ar}+C x^r shows that an eventual lower bound Far-CxrF_{\rm ar}\ge-Cx^r, r0r\ge0, excludes ρ>1/2+r\Re\rho>1/2+r. In particular, an eventual constant lower bound, or a subpower lower bound for every positive exponent, suffices for RH. Analytic continuation alone is not substituted for integral convergence; positivity forces the real convergence boundary to the permitted location.

The absolutely convergent smoothed explicit formula is

Far(x)=α-bζ/x+ρmρxρ-1/2(ρ-1/2)(ρ+1/2)+Ttriv(x),x1,F_{\rm ar}(x)=\alpha-b_\zeta/x+ \sum_\rho\frac{m_\rho x^{\rho-1/2}}{(\rho-1/2)(\rho+1/2)} +T_{\rm triv}(x),\qquad x\ge1,
Ttriv(x)=j1x-2j-1/24j2-1/4>0.(A26-EXPLICIT)T_{\rm triv}(x)=\sum_{j\ge1}\frac{x^{-2j-1/2}}{4j^2-1/4}>0. \tag{A26-EXPLICIT}

The endpoint weights match the smoothed formula; its quadratic denominator is summable. PNT gives the required absolute moment at exponent1/2.

Under RH, the sum Sξ=ρmρ/[ρ(1-ρ)]=2+γE-log(4π)<1/20S_\xi=\sum_\rho m_\rho/[\rho(1-\rho)]=2+\gamma_E-\log(4\pi)<1/20 is positive termwise and bounds the absolute oscillatory sum above. Together with the recorded rational constants and the trivial-zero correction this gives the inherited margins Far>17/20F_{\rm ar}>17/20 on [1,)[1,\infty), Far>2.61F_{\rm ar}>2.61 on [100,)[100,\infty), and asymptotically Farα-Sξ-o(1)>2.6399-o(1)F_{\rm ar}\ge\alpha-S_\xi-o(1)>2.6399-o(1). These are conditional-on-RH margins. They make both exceptional sets eventually empty under RH; they are not unconditional bounds hidden in the argument.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

4. Theta annihilation, zero isolation and all-scale bad blocks

The A28 family is a separate arithmetic route. Full proofs and the v31 endpoint/filter audit are in active_proof_arithmetic.txt, notably SEG-v28-excursions and SEG-v31-perron-filter-audit. The implications below are inherited written analysis; the first v32 audit reran their finite checks but did not independently reprove this entire infinite spectral argument.

4.1 Exact annihilation and returns — A28-01–03

The whole-line spectral extension is

Gspec(t)=α+ρmρe(ρ-1/2)t(ρ-1/2)(ρ+1/2).G_{\rm spec}(t)=\alpha+\sum_\rho\frac{m_\rho e^{(\rho-1/2)t}}{(\rho-1/2)(\rho+1/2)}.

Its series is locally uniformly absolutely convergent, with growth at most |α|+Ce|t|/2|\alpha|+Ce^{|t|/2}. It is not the zero extension used in the divisor operator, and it does not extend the trivial-zero series to negative t. For the even probability density p=Φ/X(0)p=\Phi/X(0),

p(u)Gspec(t+u)du=α.(A28-01)\int_{\mathbb R}p(u)G_{\rm spec}(t+u)du=\alpha. \tag{A28-01}

Each shifted-zero exponential is annihilated by the exact theta transform; exponential moments justify interchange. The theta-tail estimate yields the constructive return

supxyY(x)Far(y)α-O((logx)-9/4),Y(x)=xπ(12logx+4loglogx).(A28-02)\sup_{x\le y\le Y(x)}F_{\rm ar}(y)\ge\alpha-O((\log x)^{-9/4}),\quad Y(x)=\frac{x}{\pi}(\tfrac12\log x+4\log\log x). \tag{A28-02}

The center factor eR/2e^{R/2} is retained in the tail calculation. A cell maximum is at an integer endpoint. Combining these returns with the clipped potential gives

(h-Far(x))+3NEhx/(3logx)N3xlogxN-1/2+O(logx/x).(A28-03)(h-F_{\rm ar}(x))_+\le 3\!\sum_{\substack{N\in\mathcal E_h\\x/(3\log x)\le N\le3x\log x}}N^{-1/2} +O(\sqrt{\log x/x}). \tag{A28-03}

Thus a proved all-scale bound Eh(X)=Oϵ(X1/2+ϵ)E_h(X)=O_\varepsilon(X^{1/2+\varepsilon}) for every positive epsilon would imply RH. The stronger polylogarithmic version gives a polylogarithmic lower bound for F. Neither count upper bound is established.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension · After this update

A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

4.4 Forced consecutive blocks and count gates — A28-08–13

Under failure of RH, fix epsilon>0, choose σ<Θζ\sigma<\Theta_\zeta, an admissible kappa, eta=epsilon/2, and an actual zero β>max(σ,Θζ-ηκ)\beta>\max(\sigma,\Theta_\zeta-\eta\kappa). Attainment of the supremum is not required. The oscillation traps a negative minimum. The first actual continuous crossing into large positive v, not a left-limit touch at a downward jump, is used. On a following logarithmic interval of length e-ηte^{-\eta t}, the Holder and Perron errors are smaller than the trapped depth. Both v>0 and f+v<0 persist, including prime-power endpoints.

Consequently every sufficiently large X has a consecutive block

[N,N+N1-ϵ][X,CϵX]entirely inE0.(A28-08)[N,N+\lfloor N^{1-\varepsilon}\rfloor]\subset[X,C_\varepsilon X] \quad\text{entirely in }\mathcal E_0. \tag{A28-08}

The margins in Uar>0U_{\rm ar}>0 and -Var>0-V_{\rm ar}>0 are positive powers of N. Constants depend on the selected zero and epsilon; no effective universal C is supplied. It follows at every sufficiently large cutoff that

E0(X)ϵX1-ϵ,limlog(1+E0(X))logX=1E_0(X)\gg_\varepsilon X^{1-\varepsilon},\qquad \lim\frac{\log(1+E_0(X))}{\log X}=1

under failure of RH, whereas E_0 is bounded under RH. Therefore any fixed power saving on an unbounded sequence suffices (A28-TARGET). So does one good point in every late interval of length MθM^\theta, fixed theta<1, or a good point at every sufficiently large dth power for fixed integer d>=1. A good point means Uar0U_{\rm ar}\le0 or Var0V_{\rm ar}\ge0.

If the rightmost real part Θζ>1/2\Theta_\zeta>1/2 is attained, normalized almost-periodic edge profiles additionally give liminfE0(X)/X>0\liminf E_0(X)/X>0 (A28-11). Without attainment the profiles can vanish and that stronger statement is not available: an o(X) count, even on a sequence, is not the general endpoint. A28-12 gives an unconditional existential fixed-C return Far>5/2F_{\rm ar}>5/2 in every late [x,Cx], by an RH/failure case split, not an effective value of C. Independently, each off-line zero gives

liminfFar(x)x1/2-β-|mρ(ρ-1/2)(ρ+1/2)|.(A28-13)\liminf F_{\rm ar}(x)x^{1/2-\beta}\le- \left|\frac{m_\rho}{(\rho-1/2)(\rho+1/2)}\right|. \tag{A28-13}

The weaker Mellin oscillation is not a replacement proof for the all-window block theorem.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge · After this update

A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

4.2 The right-hand zero part — A28-04

For fixed 1/2<σ<11/2<\sigma<1, Ingham's estimate is

N(σ,T)σTqσ(logT)5,qσ=3(1-σ)/(2-σ)<1.N(\sigma,T)\ll_\sigma T^{q_\sigma}(\log T)^5, \qquad q_\sigma=3(1-\sigma)/(2-\sigma)<1.

It makes the sums over ρ>σ\Re\rho>\sigma with weights (1+|ρ|)-1(1+|\Im\rho|)^{-1} and (1+|ρ|)κ-1(1+|\Im\rho|)^{\kappa-1} summable for 0<κ<1-qσ0<\kappa<1-q_\sigma. Put

Jσ(t)=ρ>σmρe(ρ-1/2)t(ρ-1/2)(ρ+1/2),Hσ(t)=ρ>σmρe(ρ-1/2)tρ+1/2.J_\sigma(t)=\sum_{\Re\rho>\sigma}\frac{m_\rho e^{(\rho-1/2)t}}{(\rho-1/2)(\rho+1/2)},\quad H_\sigma(t)=\sum_{\Re\rho>\sigma}\frac{m_\rho e^{(\rho-1/2)t}}{\rho+1/2}.

The derivative relation and actual arithmetic approximations are

J'σ=Hσ,f=Jσ+O(e(σ-1/2)t),v=Hσ+O((1+t)2e(σ-1/2)t).(A28-04)J'_\sigma=H_\sigma,\quad f=J_\sigma+O(e^{(\sigma-1/2)t}),\quad v=H_\sigma+O((1+t)^2e^{(\sigma-1/2)t}). \tag{A28-04}

The second estimate uses safe-height truncated Perron for B/x, including the nearest-integer endpoint error. It is not obtained by differentiating a discontinuous all-zero remainder. For 0u10\le u\le1,

|Hσ(t+u)-Hσ(t)|e(Θζ-1/2)tuκ.|H_\sigma(t+u)-H_\sigma(t)|\ll e^{(\Theta_\zeta-1/2)t}u^\kappa.

The complete error partition is A29-AUDIT-01/A31-PERRON.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma · After this update

A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

Consequently, even on an arbitrarily sparse unbounded sequence,

Eλ(Xj)C(logXj)B RHandmρB+12.(Q32-06)\mathcal E_\lambda(X_j)\le C(\log X_j)^B \ \Longrightarrow\ \mathrm{RH}\text{ and } m_\rho\le\left\lfloor\frac{B+1}{2}\right\rfloor. \tag{Q32-06}

This supersedes the scope restriction attached to Q30-04, whose old proof used all cutoffs. It does not change that older proof retroactively. A sparse O(logX)O(\log X) bound additionally supplies simplicity and the global nonnegative residue budget cλ2+2γ>0|aρ|2Cc_\lambda^2+2\sum_{\gamma>0}|a_\rho|^2\le C. Such logarithmic objectives are stronger than the subpower RH endpoint; do not impose them without need. The all-k Fourier requirement in L30-03 is unaffected.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity · After this update

Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

10.4 Critical contacts and the remaining assembly distinction

At a critical contact, Q(w)=r>0\mathcal Q(w)=r>0, H'(w)=0\mathcal H'(w)=0, and L(-z)+rL(z)L(-z)+rL(z) has a zero of multiplicity at least two at ww. Its associated normalized positive two-sided density has characteristic nulls

EeiγX=E[XeiγX]=0.(CR1)\mathbb E e^{i\gamma X}=\mathbb E[Xe^{i\gamma X}]=0. \tag{CR1}

The exact scalar inequality y2(π2/2)(1-cosy)-2ysinyy^2\ge(\pi^2/2)(1-\cos y)-2y\sin y gives VarXπ2/(2γ2)\operatorname{Var}X\ge\pi^2/(2\gamma^2), strictly for the continuous theta law. This bound decays with height and does not close CR. A separate positive-convolution moment obstruction is γ2EX2>12\gamma^2\mathbb E X^2>12; its exact three-point ceiling is below 12.04, so optimizing only that constant cannot solve the high-height problem. These are different probability laws and different moments.

The order-dd local normal form H-H(w0)=ζd\mathcal H-\mathcal H(w_0)=\zeta^d supplies 2d2d rays, including a smaller-aa ray. That does not force a selected source-to-sink path to use a compatible pair of rays. R21-11.2 is a finite resolved-graph dichotomy with explicit path-class and leaf hypotheses. The unresolved global replacement must prove compatibility under splicing, attainment or stable limiting selection, and every boundary/infinite-height continuation. The fixed-witness theorem above does not supply family-wise compactness. A direct proof of CR would bypass those additional obligations.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ · After this update

Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

2.3 Critical-line modes add, and sparse logarithmic cutoffs constrain multiplicity

For a simple critical-line zero ρ=1/2+iγ\rho=1/2+i\gamma, define

aρ=ζ(2ρ)ρζ'(ρ),cλ=1/ζ(1/2).a_\rho=\frac{\zeta(2\rho)}{\rho\zeta'(\rho)},\qquad c_\lambda=1/\zeta(1/2).

For any finite set Γ\Gamma of positive ordinates of simple zeros,

Eλ(eT)(cλ2+2γΓ|aρ|2)T-OΓ(T+1).(Q32-04)\mathcal E_\lambda(e^T)\ge \left(c_\lambda^2+2\sum_{\gamma\in\Gamma}|a_\rho|^2\right)T -O_\Gamma(\sqrt T+1). \tag{Q32-04}

The proof subtracts the constant baseline, uses the decaying filter at each selected zero to extract a finite-cutoff Fourier coefficient, then applies the Gram inequality to finitely many distinct frequencies. The Fourier-coefficient error contains Eλ(eT)\sqrt{\mathcal E_\lambda(e^T)}; it is absorbed algebraically, not assumed bounded in advance. Other zeros need not be excluded. No linear-independence conjecture on ordinates is used.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error · After this update

Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution.

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution.. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

3.2 Cubic, additive gap, jump and divisor interfaces — A26-06–08

The full cubic criterion is

RHAN312BNfor every integerN2.(A26-CUBIC)\mathrm{RH}\iff A_N^3\le12B_N\quad\text{for every integer }N\ge2. \tag{A26-CUBIC}

The equivalent root-gap condition is eventual lower boundedness of GN=(12BN)1/3-ANG_N=(12B_N)^{1/3}-A_N. The exact decomposition

12B-A3=12xFar-Uar2(6x+Uar)(A26-DECOMP)12B-A^3=12xF_{\rm ar}-U_{\rm ar}^2(6\sqrt x+U_{\rm ar}) \tag{A26-DECOMP}

and the prime-power increment, with aq=Λ(q)/qa_q=\Lambda(q)/\sqrt q and AA the pre-jump value,

Δ(12B-A3)=aq(12q-3A2-3Aaq-aq2),(A26-JUMP)\Delta(12B-A^3)=a_q(12q-3A^2-3Aa_q-a_q^2), \tag{A26-JUMP}

remain exact. Do not confuse a formal prefix minimizer with a minimum in its actual gap. The inherited proof uses the gap membership test and finite initial range where required.

For Rsm=A-B/xR_{\rm sm}=A-B/x, divisor convolution gives

mm-1/2Rsm(x/m)=nxlognn(1-n/x).(A26-DIVISOR)\sum_m m^{-1/2}R_{\rm sm}(x/m) =\sum_{n\le x}\frac{\log n}{\sqrt n}(1-n/x). \tag{A26-DIVISOR}

The shifted zeta quotient has coefficients dω(n)=nω-1/2pn(1-p-2ω)d_\omega(n)=n^{\omega-1/2}\prod_{p\mid n}(1-p^{-2\omega}), with derivative at zero d'0(n)=2Λ(n)/nd'_0(n)=2\Lambda(n)/\sqrt n. These exact coefficients are more restrictive than an arbitrary positive Euler product. Section 5 makes the operator inversion issue explicit rather than presuming that restriction already controls the needed sign.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution. · After this update

A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution.

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

O28-10, one fixed test source. Put

K(x)=logx&1x2,log(4/x)&2x4,0&otherwise,Qμ=-RK.K_\triangle(x)=\begin{cases}\log x&1\le x\le2,\\\log(4/x)&2\le x\le4,\\0&\text{otherwise},\end{cases} \qquad Q_\mu=-\mathcal R K_\triangle.

Then CQμ=0C_{Q_\mu}=0, DarQμ=-K0\mathcal D_{\rm ar}Q_\mu=-K_\triangle\le0, and

Qˆμ(s)=-(1-2-s)2s2ζ(s+1/2),RHQμ(x)-Cϵxϵeventually for everyϵ>0.\widehat Q_\mu(s)=-\frac{(1-2^{-s})^2}{s^2\zeta(s+1/2)},\qquad \mathrm{RH}\iff Q_\mu(x)\ge-C_\varepsilon x^\varepsilon \text{ eventually for every }\varepsilon>0.

The numerator has no right-half-plane zero. Landau positivity proves sufficiency; the RH-conditional Mertens bound proves necessity. The unconditional estimate remains only x/(logx)A\sqrt x/(\log x)^A for each fixed A. This exact fixed-source test exposes, but does not solve, the required Möbius cancellation.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source · After this update

O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source

Included in this source revision.

After this update: O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

2.4 Same-cutoff reference comparison and independent means

For Dirichlet convolution,

Ec*w(X)dX|w(d)|dEc(X/d).(Q30-CONV)\sqrt{\mathcal E_{c*w}(X)}\le \sum_{d\le X}\frac{|w(d)|}{\sqrt d}\sqrt{\mathcal E_c(X/d)}. \tag{Q30-CONV}

For completely multiplicative sign functions differing on primes in SS, let

WS(X)=nXpnpS2ω(n)n.W_S(X)=\sum_{\substack{n\le X\\p\mid n\Rightarrow p\in S}}\frac{2^{\omega(n)}}{\sqrt n}.

Then WS(X)-2Eg(X)Ef(X)WS(X)2Eg(X)W_S(X)^{-2}\mathcal E_g(X)\le\mathcal E_f(X)\le W_S(X)^2\mathcal E_g(X) (Q30-06). If every changed prime exceeds X\sqrt X, exactly WS(X)=1+2pS,pXp-1/2W_S(X)=1+2\sum_{p\in S,p\le X}p^{-1/2}. The product over all powers of primes through XX is a coarser bound and may be much larger. Universally WS(X)2X(1+logX)W_S(X)\le2\sqrt X(1+\log X).

The original construction gate R30-CONSTRUCTION asks for the same pair (gj,Nj)(g_j,N_j) with NjN_j\to\infty, Egj(Nj)=Njo(1)\mathcal E_{g_j}(N_j)=N_j^{o(1)} and W{p:gj(p)=+1}(Nj)=Njo(1)W_{\{p:g_j(p)=+1\}}(N_j)=N_j^{o(1)}. References are allowed to vary here, unlike B32-TARGET. Separate low-energy and low-cost examples do not suffice.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d · After this update

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

14. Exact profile decomposition and completed tail

Complete formulas, covariance proof and interval constants: active_proof_curvature_profile.txt. Write C=C_th, eta=eta_C, and integrate in x+y=t with the common positive theta weight. Let

Aa=(x2+y2)Φ(x)Φ(y)cosh(ad)dx, Eaprof=(η(x)+η(y))Φ(x)Φ(y)cosh(ad)dx,A_a=\int(x^2+y^2)\Phi(x)\Phi(y)\cosh(ad)dx, \ E_a^{\rm prof}=\int(\eta(x)+\eta(y))\Phi(x)\Phi(y)\cosh(ad)dx,
Baprof=d2(cosh(ad)-sinh(ad)/(ad))Φ(x)Φ(y)dx.B_a^{\rm prof}=\int d^2(\cosh(ad)-\sinh(ad)/(ad))\Phi(x)\Phi(y)dx.

Then F0=2CAa+Eaprof\mathcal F_0=2CA_a+E_a^{\rm prof}, G=2Aa-Baprof\mathcal G=2A_a-B_a^{\rm prof}, and FC=Eaprof+CBaprof>0\mathcal F_C=E_a^{\rm prof}+CB_a^{\rm prof}>0. Put R_prof=E_prof/(2A), epsilon=B_prof/(2A). The exact ratio is

ϱ=(1-ε)/(C+Rprof).\varrho=(1-\epsilon)/(C+R_{\rm prof}).

R_prof'>0 is proved by differentiating its normalized expectation: a strictly positive covariance plus a nonnegative moving-endpoint term. Strict stochastic ordering alone would not establish a strictly positive derivative at every t; A33-PROFILE supplies the missing argument. Epsilon=0 at a=0, so varrho_0'<0 follows. For the full strip, 0εa2/[3(C-a2)]<1/1050\le\epsilon\le a^2/[3(C-a^2)]<1/105 and E_prof>16C B_prof. Neither value inequality proves derivative domination. The old decimal .00915 is not an extra certified bound.

For the covariance representation use r in [0,1], x_±=t(1±r)/2, z=atr, W=Phi(x_-)Phi(x_+)cosh z, Q=mathfrakq(x_-)+mathfrakq(x_+), and Pw=1+r2thc(z)P_w=1+r^2\operatorname{thc}(z), thc(z)=tanh(z)/z with its removable value at zero. Under density mu proportional to W P_w,

Λ=Q/(t2Pw),κ=EμΛ,T=-r2zthc'(z)/Pw0,\Lambda=Q/(t^2P_w),\quad\kappa=\mathbb E_\mu\Lambda, \quad T=-r^2z\operatorname{thc}'(z)/P_w\ge0,
Λ˙=p(x-)+p(x+)t2Pw+ΛT>0,p(u)=uq'(u)-2q(u),\dot\Lambda=\frac{\mathfrak p(x_-)+\mathfrak p(x_+)}{t^2P_w}+\Lambda T>0, \quad \mathfrak p(u)=u\mathfrak q'(u)-2\mathfrak q(u),
S=-Q+ztanhz+r2zthc'(z)/Pw,tκ'=EΛ˙+Cov(Λ,S).(PROFILE-SCORE)S=-Q+z\tanh z+r^2z\operatorname{thc}'(z)/P_w, \qquad t\kappa'=\mathbb E\dot\Lambda+\operatorname{Cov}(\Lambda,S). \tag{PROFILE-SCORE}

Here dot means t*d/dt at fixed r. Lambda_r>0 and S_r<0 for r>0, so the covariance is unfavorable. Positive pointwise production alone is not enough.

The resolvent covariance bound uses the even sector with its correct endpoint conditions; it is not a full-space spectral claim. With Vc=V(t/2)V_c=V(t/2), on t>=8/5 and 0<=a<=1/2,

Vc>4πet,m=t2(Vc/2-a2)-2>0,V_c>4\pi e^t,\qquad m=t^2(V_c/2-a^2)-2>0,
EΛ˙>Vc4t(t-tanht),-Srctt2Nr,ct=1+1/(8t2),\mathbb E\dot\Lambda>\frac{V_c}{4t}(t-\tanh t), \quad -S_r\le c_t t^2N_r,\quad c_t=1+1/(8t^2),

where Nr=Qr/t2r(1+t/2)VceαttrN_r=Q_r/t^2\le r(1+t/2)V_ce^{\alpha_ttr}, αt=1+1/(t+2)\alpha_t=1+1/(t+2). The absolute unfavorable covariance is bounded above by

2.32ctt2(1+t/2)2Vc2m2.\frac{2.3}{2}\,c_t t^2(1+t/2)^2\frac{V_c^2}{m^2}.

At the endpoint production exceeds 6.57588 and the covariance bound is below 6.53237; the certified margin exceeds .0435. The stored monotonic envelopes extend the comparison to infinity. Therefore kappa_a'(t)>0 on t>=8/5, uniformly on the closed a strip, is an inherited proved theorem. The second audit rederives the even-sector boundary conditions, hyperbolic derivative bounds and monotone tail envelopes; CK066 independently checks the endpoint margin with rational arithmetic. The older C1 curvature theorem remains an explicitly named supplying result, not a newly formalized theorem.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term · After this update

A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

13. Positive curvature pencil and the bad-fold interface

Detailed proofs: active_proof_curvature_profile.txt (R21-7 and inherited pencil IDs). For x+y=t, d=x-y, z=ad, define ηc(u)=q(u)-2cu20\eta_c(u)=\mathfrak q(u)-2cu^2\ge0 for 0<=c<=C_th, and

Fc,a(t)=0tΦ(x)Φ(y){cd2(coshz-sinhz/z)+(ηc(x)+ηc(y))coshz}dx.\mathcal F_{c,a}(t)=\int_0^t\Phi(x)\Phi(y) \{cd^2(\cosh z-\sinh z/z)+(\eta_c(x)+\eta_c(y))\cosh z\}\,dx.

It is strictly positive for t>0. Put Ga=t2ka+a-1aka\mathcal G_a=t^2k_a+a^{-1}\partial_a k_a, with continuous a=0 extension. Exact integration by parts gives

Fc,a=F0,a-cGa=ka-ttka-ct2ka+(a-c/a)aka,\mathcal F_{c,a}=\mathcal F_{0,a}-c\mathcal G_a =k_a-t\partial_tk_a-ct^2k_a+(a-c/a)\partial_ak_a,
Fˆc,a=2K+γKγ+cKγγ+(a-c/a)Ka.(PENCIL)\widehat{\mathcal F}_{c,a}=2K+\gamma K_\gamma+cK_{\gamma\gamma}+(a-c/a)K_a. \tag{PENCIL}

At a stationary negative-axis contact K=K_gamma=0, Fˆ0,a=aKa\widehat{\mathcal F}_{0,a}=aK_a, Fˆa2,a=a2Kγγ\widehat{\mathcal F}_{a^2,a}=a^2K_{\gamma\gamma}. For noncritical K_a!=0, favorable NC orientation is equivalent to nonvanishing of the affine transform for every c in the closed interval [0,a²]. A flat K_gammagamma=0 is a bad endpoint, not excluded by strict-minimum language. Critical K_a=0 is the separate CR gate.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR · After this update

Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

10.3 Root-locus moment chart — R21-3

For real λ\lambda, let

Fλ(w)=e-λL(-w)+eλL(w)=20Φ(x)cosh(wx-λ)dx.F_\lambda(w)=e^{-\lambda}L(-w)+e^\lambda L(w) =2\int_0^\infty\Phi(x)\cosh(wx-\lambda)\,dx.

Every negative-axis contact has a unique λ\lambda for which Fλ(w)=0F_\lambda(w)=0. Define

Cj=0xjΦ(x)cosh(wx-λ)dx,Sj=0xjΦ(x)sinh(wx-λ)dx.\mathcal C_j=\int_0^\infty x^j\Phi(x)\cosh(wx-\lambda)\,dx, \quad \mathcal S_j=\int_0^\infty x^j\Phi(x)\sinh(wx-\lambda)\,dx.

At the contact,

C0=0,S00,P=-|S0|2.\mathcal C_0=0,\quad\mathcal S_0\ne0,\quad P=-|\mathcal S_0|^2.

The exact area formulas are

Ka=2(S0S1¯),Kγ=-2(S0S1¯),K_a=2\Im(\mathcal S_0\overline{\mathcal S_1}),\qquad K_\gamma=-2\Re(\mathcal S_0\overline{\mathcal S_1}),
Kγγ=2(C2S0¯+2C1S1¯).(G8)K_{\gamma\gamma}=2\Im\left(\mathcal C_2\overline{\mathcal S_0} +2\mathcal C_1\overline{\mathcal S_1}\right). \tag{G8}

Thus the old determinant D1D2>0D_1D_2>0 is exactly one quarter of the current fold-product inequality. At a stationary contact, Ka=0S1=0H'=0K_a=0\iff\mathcal S_1=0\iff\mathcal H'=0.

At a simple root,

wλ=S0/S1,wλλ=S0(2S1C1-S0C2)S13.w_\lambda=\mathcal S_0/\mathcal S_1,\qquad w_{\lambda\lambda}= \frac{\mathcal S_0(2\mathcal S_1\mathcal C_1-\mathcal S_0\mathcal C_2)}{\mathcal S_1^3}.

Stationarity is wλ=0\Re w_\lambda=0; the desired fold sign is equivalently wλλ<0\Re w_{\lambda\lambda}<0. This provides an independent sign/orientation cross-check without dividing by XX.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X · After this update

Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90]

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90]. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

8. Inherited finite theorems and their separate scopes

C163: no negative-axis contact for 0a1/2,0<γ25/40\le a\le1/2,0<\gamma\le25/4. C103: no off-axis zero of ξ for |γ|82.40=412/5|\gamma|\le82.40=412/5. R22.52: profile theorem for physical t8/5t\ge8/5, not a zero-height statement. D26-BAND separately excludes stationary contacts only on [64,81.90][64,81.90]. A witness through a higher zero may have a stationary contact below its zero's height; C103 does not replace C163 in the fold or critical-contact gate.

8.1 Shift-two and Stieltjes supplying theorems — F1–F2

The proved shifted sine positivity is

Sσ(γ)=0eσuΦ(u)sinγudu>0,0σ2, γ>0.(F1)S_\sigma(\gamma)=\int_0^\infty e^{\sigma u}\Phi(u)\sin\gamma u\,du>0, \quad0\le\sigma\le2,\ \gamma>0.\tag{F1}

For σ≤0 it follows from strict decrease by adjacent half-period pairing. Thus L has no zero for Re z≥−2 and maps the upper part of that half-plane into the lower half-plane. The low-frequency proof uses decrease beyond u=1/8 and explicit front/shift comparisons. For γ≥10, the bounds Φ(0)>7/8 and sup0σ2|(eσuΦ(u))''|1<8\sup_{0\le\sigma\le2}\|(e^{\sigma u}\Phi(u))''\|_1<8 give Sσ>(7γ-64)/(8γ2)>0S_\sigma>(7\gamma-64)/(8\gamma^2)>0. The derivative-minimum cubic, rational root brackets and tails are in active_proof_theta_foundation.txt; the regression checks their finite witnesses, not the full analytic proof formally.

For 0<A20<A\le2, the principal square root gives

GA(z)=L(z-A)=0dνA(t)z+t,dνAdt=π-1SA(t)>0.(F2)G_A(z)=L(\sqrt z-A)=\int_0^\infty\frac{d\nu_A(t)}{z+t},\quad \frac{d\nu_A}{dt}=\pi^{-1}S_A(\sqrt t)>0.\tag{F2}

Decay excludes an affine term and finiteness at zero excludes an atom there. For |Re w|<A, L(±w)=GA((A±w)2)L(\pm w)=G_A((A\pm w)^2). Branch choice is essential. This Pick-function input supports finite exclusion, not a generic fold theorem.

8.2 Julia contact certificate — C163

Take A=2, P(z)=-L(z-2)\mathcal P(z)=-L(\sqrt z-2), expand at z=4. The Taylor coefficients through degree five are determined by mj=ujΦ(u)dum_j=\int u^j\Phi(u)du; initially p0=−m0,p1=m1/4. Julia boundary disks and inverse reductions give interval-safe angular bounds. The analytic first stage covers through 233/50 using M/N>23/4; second Julia covers [233/50,297/50]; third covers [297/50,25/4]. At a contact the two half-angle tangents have product one, while the certificate makes them exceed r(a)=1+a/2+7a2/100r(a)=1+a/2+7a^2/100 and 1/r(a), a contradiction.

The third stage uses 2^220-scale integer intervals, first two atoms, 4,000-panel Simpson enclosures with fourth-derivative and omitted-tail remainders, and 2,326 accepted boxes after 326 splits (maximum depth 3). The shared exact engine and scripts/rh_second_julia_contact_exact_checker.py, scripts/rh_third_julia_contact_exact_checker.py are delivered. Full formulas and the first-stage proof are in active_proof_finite_certificates.txt. The older moment bound for Re X>0 only excludes X=0, not stationary nonzero-X contacts, and is not substituted for C163.

8.3 Off-axis zero certificate — C103

The analytic front plus successive finite bands through 10.04,15.53,50,59.13,82.40 exclude simultaneous vanishing of the two normalized off-axis zero equations. Parameter variation, quadrature remainders and tails are enclosed. All three stages of scripts/rh_height_82_40_exact_extension.py were rerun; the late extension covers 234 height boxes. Older high-precision exploratory programs remain diagnostics only.

The corrected canonical right-edge checker also proves

-(L'/L)(1/2+iγ)>12/(25γ2),γ82.40,-\Re(L'/L)(1/2+i\gamma)>12/(25\gamma^2),\quad\gamma\ge82.40,

with its associated phase comparison. The older byte version is superseded in the relocation record. Exact programs establish their own named finite assertions; none establishes an unlimited-height zero or fold statement.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] · After this update

C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90]

Included in this source revision.

After this update: C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90]

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
L28-01/02 and L30-01–03 actual Liouville sine series, k^3 truncation, x=k^-2

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: L28-01/02 and L30-01–03 actual Liouville sine series, k^3 truncation, x=k^-2. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

6. Actual Liouville Fourier estimates, real smoothing, and characters

All controlling proofs are in active_proof_fourier_arithmetic.txt, especially SEG-v28-fourier, SEG-v30-fourier and SEG-v30-smoothing. Actual Liouville coefficients, an arbitrary sign model and a prime quadratic character are distinct inputs.

6.1 Sampling and the correct quantifier — L28-01–02; L30-01–03

Define

L(x)=n1λ(n)n-2sin(2πnx),Tk=nk3λ(n)n-2sin(2πn/k2).\mathscr L(x)=\sum_{n\ge1}\lambda(n)n^{-2}\sin(2\pi nx),\quad T_k=\sum_{n\le k^3}\lambda(n)n^{-2}\sin(2\pi n/k^2).

Davenport's uniform additive-twist estimate, with partial summation, gives uniform convergence of G=λ(n)n-1cos(2πnx)G=\sum\lambda(n)n^{-1}\cos(2\pi nx), L'=2πG\mathscr L'=2\pi G, G(0)=0G(0)=0, and

L(x)=Tk+OA(k-3(logk)-A),(k+1)-2xk-2.(L30-01)\mathscr L(x)=T_k+O_A(k^{-3}(\log k)^{-A}), \quad(k+1)^{-2}\le x\le k^{-2}. \tag{L30-01}

A fixed logarithmic loss transfers with the same exponent B, improving the older bounded-coefficient modulus. At B=0 the continuous lower constant may be C+eta. These unconditional logarithmic savings do not supply the missing power of k.

For 0<s<10<\Re s<1,

0L(x)xs-2dx=Asin(s)ζ(2s+2)ζ(s+1),Asin(s)=(2π)1-sΓ(s)cos(πs/2)1-s.(L28-01)\int_0^\infty\mathscr L(x)x^{s-2}dx= \mathcal A_{\sin}(s)\frac{\zeta(2s+2)}{\zeta(s+1)},\quad \mathcal A_{\sin}(s)=\frac{(2\pi)^{1-s}\Gamma(s)\cos(\pi s/2)}{1-s}. \tag{L28-01}

The real boundary pole at s=-1/2 has residue a0=-4π2/(3ζ(1/2))>0a_0=-4\pi^2/(3\zeta(1/2))>0. A fixed bound Tk-Ck-3(logk)BT_k\ge-Ck^{-3}(\log k)^B, B>=0, for every sufficiently large k gives RH and

mρB+1.(L30-02)m_\rho\le\lfloor B\rfloor+1. \tag{L30-02}

The nonreal boundary numerator does not cancel, and the added logarithmic Mellin term is locally holomorphic there, including nonintegral B. For B=0 this forces simplicity and |Asin(ρ-1)ζ(2ρ)/ζ'(ρ)|a0+C|\mathcal A_{\sin}(\rho-1)\zeta(2\rho)/\zeta'(\rho)|\le a_0+C. Do not call fixed-log estimates automatic consequences of RH.

The non-overshooting target is instead

RHTk-k-3exp((logk)2/3)for every sufficiently large integerk.(L30-03)\mathrm{RH}\iff T_k\ge-k^{-3}\exp((\log k)^{2/3}) \quad\text{for every sufficiently large integer }k. \tag{L30-03}

Sufficiency uses the subpower loss and nonnegative Mellin argument. Necessity uses R-MOBIUS-RH, not the unconditional source, followed by the square-divisor identity and subtraction of the zero linear sine term. The lower-bound quantifier remains all-k. The new Q32 sparse-energy theorem does not authorize sparse Fourier sampling.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

L28-01/02 and L30-01–03 actual Liouville sine series, k^3 truncation, x=k^-2 · After this update

L28-01/02 and L30-01–03 actual Liouville sine series, k^3 truncation, x=k^-2

Included in this source revision.

After this update: L28-01/02 and L30-01–03 actual Liouville sine series, k^3 truncation, x=k^-2

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Riemann Hypothesis; Riemann hypothesis

Proposed statement

Historical subject: Riemann Hypothesis. Every zero rho of the completed zeta function xi has real part one half.

Source-reported subject: Riemann hypothesis. Every zero of the usual completed xi function has real part 1/2. Here X(w)=xi(1/2+w) is unnormalized; the older normalized function differs by the nonzero constant xi(1/2).

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Riemann Hypothesis · Before this update

Riemann Hypothesis · After this update · Historical record

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Riemann Hypothesis

The earlier record is now historical.

Source-reported logical status: proposed → superseded.

Before this update: Riemann Hypothesis

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: proposed
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: missing premise
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: general
After this update: Riemann Hypothesis

Historical record

  • Source-reported logical status: superseded
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: missing premise
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: general

Riemann hypothesis

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Riemann hypothesis

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: proposed
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: missing premise
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: general

Earlier claim: Riemann Hypothesis

Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
D_theta chart valid at X=0

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: D_theta chart valid at X=0. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

11. Antisymmetric high-height normalization and support discs

Define

D(w)=L(-w)-L(w),T(w)=X(w)/D(w).D(w)=L(-w)-L(w),\qquad\mathcal T(w)=X(w)/D(w).

At every negative-axis contact D0D\ne0, since D=0D=0 would imply R=|L|20R=|L|^2\ge0. Direct algebra gives

R=14|D|2(|T|2-1),K=-12|D|2T,T=Q-1Q+1=tanh(H/2).(D26-CHART)R=\tfrac14|D|^2(|\mathcal T|^2-1),\quad K=-\tfrac12|D|^2\Im\mathcal T, \quad\mathcal T=\frac{\mathcal Q-1}{\mathcal Q+1}=\tanh(\mathcal H/2). \tag{D26-CHART}

Thus contact means T(-1,1)\mathcal T\in(-1,1), and stationarity means T'=0\Re\mathcal T'=0. At a stationary contact,

Ka=-12|D|2T',Kγγ=12|D|2T''.(D26-FOLD)K_a=-\tfrac12|D|^2\Im\mathcal T',\qquad K_{\gamma\gamma}=\tfrac12|D|^2\Im\mathcal T''. \tag{D26-FOLD}

These formulas remain valid at X=0X=0. If X0X\ne0, stationarity implies X'/X=D'/D\Re X'/X=\Re D'/D, including at critical stationary contacts. Do not divide by XX at its zero.

11.1 Uniform estimate, including arbitrarily small positive aa

The exact finite norm certificate supplies

Φ(0)>7/8,|Φ''(0)|<35/2,Mj=0ujcosh(u/2)|Φ(4)(u)|du,(M0,M1,M2)<(290,90,40).\Phi(0)>7/8,\quad|\Phi''(0)|<35/2,\quad M_j=\int_0^\infty u^j\cosh(u/2)|\Phi^{(4)}(u)|du, \quad(M_0,M_1,M_2)<(290,90,40).

It uses a closed 4096-cell cover, not sampled quadrature, and explicit spatial/omitted-atom tails. The complete contract is in active_proof_theta_foundation.txt; its script regenerates data/V26_ANTISYMMETRIC_CERTIFICATE.json.

With φ0=Φ(0)\phi_0=\Phi(0), four integrations by parts give

D=-2φ0/w-2Φ''(0)/w3+DΦ(4)/w4.D=-2\phi_0/w-2\Phi''(0)/w^3+D_{\Phi^{(4)}}/w^4.

For B=-wD/(2φ0)\mathcal B=-wD/(2\phi_0), the norm bounds imply, uniformly in |a|1/2|a|\le1/2,

|B-1|E0=20/γ2+(2320/7)/γ3,|\mathcal B-1|\le E_0=20/\gamma^2+(2320/7)/\gamma^3,
|B'|E1=(40+720/7)/γ3+(6960/7)/γ4,|\mathcal B'|\le E_1=(40+720/7)/\gamma^3+(6960/7)/\gamma^4,
|B''|E2=(320/7)/γ3+(120+4320/7)/γ4+(27840/7)/γ5.|\mathcal B''|\le E_2=(320/7)/\gamma^3+(120+4320/7)/\gamma^4+(27840/7)/\gamma^5.

For γ64\gamma\ge64, E0<1/100E_0<1/100, so D0D\ne0. Since

(D'/D)'=w-2+B''/B-(B'/B)2,(D'/D)'=w^{-2}+\mathcal B''/\mathcal B-(\mathcal B'/\mathcal B)^2,

the scaled negative leading term at 64 exceeds 999/1000999/1000 and the scaled error is below 917/1000917/1000, with the former increasing and latter decreasing in height. Hence

(D'/D)'<-1/(16γ2).\Re(D'/D)'<-1/(16\gamma^2).

Odd reflection gives exactly (D'/D)(iγ)=0\Re(D'/D)(i\gamma)=0. Integrating horizontally proves

(D'/D)(a+iγ)<-a/(16γ2),0<a1/2, γ64.(D26-SIGN)\boxed{\Re(D'/D)(a+i\gamma)<-a/(16\gamma^2),\quad0<a\le1/2,\ \gamma\ge64.} \tag{D26-SIGN}

There is no additive remainder independent of aa. At a=0a=0, the real part itself is zero, not strictly negative. The old Z6/Z7 small-aa exception for the LL chart is superseded for this localization question, not silently assumed away for every other argument.

11.2 Canonical zero grouping and the new implication

The paired Hadamard logarithmic derivative is

X'X(w)=ρ/±mρ(1w-ρ+1w+ρ).(Z1)\frac{X'}X(w)=\sum_{\rho/\pm}m_\rho\left(\frac1{w-\rho}+\frac1{w+\rho}\right). \tag{Z1}

An off-axis quartet ±b±iτ\pm b\pm i\tau contributes mρ[Fa,b(γ-τ)+Fa,b(γ+τ)]m_\rho[F_{a,b}(\gamma-\tau)+F_{a,b}(\gamma+\tau)], where

Fa,b(d)=2a(d2+a2-b2)(d2+(a-b)2)(d2+(a+b)2).(Z2)F_{a,b}(d)=\frac{2a(d^2+a^2-b^2)}{(d^2+(a-b)^2)(d^2+(a+b)^2)}. \tag{Z2}

A critical-line pair contributes

mρ(aa2+(γ-τ)2+aa2+(γ+τ)2)>0.(Z3)m_\rho\left(\frac a{a^2+(\gamma-\tau)^2}+\frac a{a^2+(\gamma+\tau)^2}\right)>0. \tag{Z3}

This is half the expression obtained by mechanically collapsing a quartet at b=0b=0. The paired sums converge locally normally away from zeros; do not unpair them arbitrarily.

For γ64\gamma\ge64, the reflected-height quartet term is positive. Therefore at any stationary contact with X0X\ne0, D26-SIGN forces an off-axis zero b+iτb+i\tau with

b>a,a2+(γ-τ)2<b2.(D26-CONE)\boxed{b>a,\qquad a^2+(\gamma-\tau)^2<b^2.} \tag{D26-CONE}

This includes critical stationary contacts with X0X\ne0. Outside the union of these open half-discs, and away from X=0X=0, X'/X0\Re X'/X\ge0, giving

(T'/T)>a/(16γ2),|Θγ|>a|T|8γ2(1-T2),sgnΘγ=sgnT\Re(\mathcal T'/\mathcal T)>a/(16\gamma^2),\qquad |\Theta_\gamma|>\frac{a|\mathcal T|}{8\gamma^2(1-\mathcal T^2)},\quad \operatorname{sgn}\Theta_\gamma=\operatorname{sgn}\mathcal T

at a negative-axis contact. This is a transverse margin outside support discs, not a fold-sign statement inside them.

A supporting zero is not known to be a stationary contact. There is no proved iteration producing an infinite strictly rightward chain, and a closest-pole slogan does not enforce the real stationary equation. A meromorphic polynomial countermodel has the favorable denominator sign and an exact wrong fold. The stronger same-kernel countermodels below preserve additional assumptions but still are not the exact theta function.

11.3 Finite certificate transfer: the thresholds stay distinct

If an off-axis-zero exclusion theorem holds through height H64.5H\ge64.5, there are no stationary negative-axis contacts at 64γH-1/264\le\gamma\le H-1/2. It excludes X=0X=0 directly and all other stationary contacts by D26-CONE. Using C103 gives

no stationary negative-axis contact for64γ81.90.(D26-BAND)\boxed{\text{no stationary negative-axis contact for }64\le\gamma\le81.90.} \tag{D26-BAND}

This does not assert there are no ordinary contacts in that band, and does not fill the interval from 25/425/4 to 64. The inherited contact-free theorem through 25/425/4, zero-exclusion theorem through 82.40, and this stationary-contact band are different mathematical statements.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

D_theta chart valid at X=0 · After this update

D_theta chart valid at X=0

Included in this source revision.

After this update: D_theta chart valid at X=0

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input.

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input.. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

Finite subtraction is exact: for PΓ=cλ+(aρeiγt+aρ¯e-iγt)P_\Gamma=c_\lambda+\sum(a_\rho e^{i\gamma t}+\overline{a_\rho}e^{-i\gamma t}), the residual uλ-PΓu_\lambda-P_\Gamma has an exponentially decaying convolution source whose transform vanishes at the selected simple zeros (Q32-07). No bound on the residual input follows merely from this source decay. The residue-energy table in count 14 remains a diagnostic, not an infinite explicit formula.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input. · After this update

Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input.

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

9. Global phase geometry and the witness reduction

9.1 Legal phase and directed graph — C121

For -1/2σ1/2-1/2\le\sigma\le1/2, put Fσ(γ)=0Φ(u)eσueiγudu=|Fσ|eiφσF_\sigma(\gamma)=\int_0^\infty\Phi(u)e^{\sigma u}e^{i\gamma u}du =|F_\sigma|e^{i\phi_\sigma}. Shifted sine positivity gives 0<φσ<π0<\phi_\sigma<\pi, not merely a numerical branch choice. Then

L(-w)=Fa(γ),L(w)=F-a(γ)¯,Θ=φa+φ-a-π.(G2)L(-w)=F_a(\gamma),\quad L(w)=\overline{F_{-a}(\gamma)},\quad \Theta=\phi_a+\phi_{-a}-\pi.\tag{G2}

The phase-zero set is exactly K=0,R<0K=0,R<0; X=0X=0 means H=0H=0. At a regular phase-zero point orient the tangent by U\nabla U. Cauchy–Riemann gives

UΘ=0,dU/ds=|H'|2>0.(G3)\nabla U\cdot\nabla\Theta=0,\qquad dU/ds=|H'|^2>0.\tag{G3}

At a critical point a conformal coordinate gives H-H(w0)=ζmH-H(w_0)=\zeta^m, with m incoming and m outgoing level rays. A genuine closed level curve would force the harmonic phase to vanish inside and H to be constant; hence no cycles. This alone is not global compactness.

9.2 Fixed-witness boundary exclusion — C122/C123

At an off-axis zero choose a local positive-U ray forward and a negative-U ray backward; continue through critical vertices in the corresponding orientation. After a ray reaches a fixed nonzero U value it stays bounded away from zero. It cannot approach a=0, where phase-zero points have U=0, or the real bottom, whose phase tends to −π. Nor can it escape to infinity: uniformly for 0a1/20\le a\le1/2,

Y=X/L0,H=Log(1-Y)0(γ).Y=X/L\longrightarrow0,\qquad H=\Log(1-Y)\longrightarrow0 \quad(\gamma\to\infty).

The estimate uses exponential gamma-factor decay, a polynomial zeta bound in the fixed strip and L(w)=Φ(0)/w+O(|w|-2)L(w)=\Phi(0)/w+O(|w|^{-2}). This controls a fixed nonzero-U witness, not every changing family of near-zero components.

After these exclusions the ray lies in a compact region with finitely many critical points. Local analytic continuation rules out a finite interior endpoint; strict U orientation and absence of cycles rule out indefinite recurrence. The ray reaches a=1/2. The two rays give a compact source-to-sink witness through the zero with an interior leftmost coordinate. Multiplicity gives at least m incoming/outgoing endpoint germs; existence of one witness suffices.

At a right endpoint Y is real and less than 1: sources have U<0 and 0<Y<1; sinks have U>0 and Y<0. These labels apply at all heights. The high-boundary atlas, with Y=ρeiϑY=\rho e^{i\vartheta}, 0<ρ<10<\rho<1, ϑ'>0\vartheta'>0, provides alternating labels on complete turns but does not automatically specify a global pairing.

9.3 Weak stationary obstruction — C126/C127

At a regular leftmost point, K_a is nonzero and the curve is a=a(γ)a=a(\gamma). Thus

K=Kγ=0,a''=-Kγγ/Ka0,KaKγγ0.(G4)K=K_\gamma=0,\qquad a''=-K_{\gamma\gamma}/K_a\ge0, \qquad\boxed{K_aK_{\gamma\gamma}\le0.}\tag{G4}

Strict negativity requires a nondegenerate minimum. Flat folds are included in the obstruction and force the closed pencil endpoint c=a² to be tested. At a critical minimum K_a=K_γ=0, this regular formula is unavailable and CR is a separate obligation. The older C127 nondegenerate statement remains valid; its extension to every regular witness with a strict negative sign is not used.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0 · After this update

Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

For a finite set Γm\Gamma_m of positive ordinates of zeros of the same exact multiplicity mm, the weighted version is

liminfXEλ(X)(logX)2m-122m-1γΓm|mζ(2ρ)ρζ(m)(ρ)|2.(Q32-05)\liminf_{X\to\infty}\frac{\mathcal E_\lambda(X)}{(\log X)^{2m-1}} \ge\frac2{2m-1}\sum_{\gamma\in\Gamma_m} \left|\frac{m\zeta(2\rho)}{\rho\zeta^{(m)}(\rho)}\right|^2. \tag{Q32-05}

The factor 2m-12m-1 comes from integrating t2m-2t^{2m-2}. The proof does not infer infinite-series orthogonality or uniformity for growing zero sets.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m · After this update

Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Arbitrary finite multiplicity yields local critical-line collar with zero- and height-dependent radius

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Arbitrary finite multiplicity yields local critical-line collar with zero- and height-dependent radius. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

10. Boundary collars, critical contacts, and root charts

10.1 Arbitrary-multiplicity critical-line collar — R23-3

Let X(iγ0)=0X(i\gamma_0)=0 have finite multiplicity mm. Using the even/reality symmetries, the nonvanishing of LL, and a local coordinate with radial displacement aa and height displacement δ=γ-γ0\delta=\gamma-\gamma_0, the common-contact equations have leading forms

K=c(δ+ia)m+O((a2+δ2)(m+1)/2),K=c\Re(\delta+ia)^m+O((a^2+\delta^2)^{(m+1)/2}),
Kγ=cm(δ+ia)m-1+O((a2+δ2)m/2),c0.(G5)K_\gamma=cm\Re(\delta+ia)^{m-1}+O((a^2+\delta^2)^{m/2}), \qquad c\ne0. \tag{G5}

The two leading homogeneous terms cannot vanish simultaneously on the relevant unit semicircle: cos(mθ)\cos(m\theta) and cos((m-1)θ)\cos((m-1)\theta) have no common zero there. Compactness of that semicircle yields a punctured neighborhood, on the live side, free of simultaneous K=Kγ=0K=K_\gamma=0. The argument handles all finite multiplicities at once and does not assume simplicity of critical-line zeros.

The collar radius depends on the zero and its local coefficients. It is not a uniform collar in γ\gamma, and it does not exclude contacts approaching a=0a=0 while γ\gamma\to\infty. It also does not justify extending the interior fold sign to the boundary: the boundary determinant can have the opposite sign.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Arbitrary finite multiplicity yields local critical-line collar with zero- and height-dependent radius · After this update

Arbitrary finite multiplicity yields local critical-line collar with zero- and height-dependent radius

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Arbitrary finite multiplicity yields local critical-line collar with zero- and height-dependent radius

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

Set ϱa=Ga/F0,a\varrho_a=\mathcal G_a/\mathcal F_{0,a}, κa=1/ϱa\kappa_a=1/\varrho_a. Then 0<varrho<1/C_th; its front limit is 4/q2=1/C_th and tail limit is 0. The physical perturbation c*varrho is less than 1/36 for c<=a²<=1/4. Small positive physical perturbation does not imply stability of a canceled Fourier value.

The prefix interface is exact. Let Aγ(T)=0TF0,a(t)sin(γt)dtA_\gamma(T)=\int_0^T\mathcal F_{0,a}(t)\sin(\gamma t)dt. If full-profile varrho'<0 is proved, the positive measure nu=-dvarrho has mass 4/q2. A noncritical bad-fold pencil root c0 in (0,a²] would force

Aγ()=c0Aγ(T)dν(T),supT|Aγ(T)|q24c0|Aγ()|>q2|Aγ()|>36|Aγ()|.(PFX-NECESSARY)A_\gamma(\infty)=c_0\int A_\gamma(T)d\nu(T),\quad \sup_T|A_\gamma(T)|\ge\frac{q_2}{4c_0}|A_\gamma(\infty)| >q_2|A_\gamma(\infty)|>36|A_\gamma(\infty)|. \tag{PFX-NECESSARY}

The missing actual-theta gate PFX is a bound no larger than q2 times the terminal modulus at those noncritical stationary contacts. Full profile + PFX formally implies NC, still requiring CR. Its current status is substantially stronger than a routine weighted-prefix problem:

T32-01, high-contact obstruction. Put f_a=F_{0,a} and M_a=max f_a. Uniform theta decay and two integrations by parts give

supT|Aγ(T)|=Ma/γ+O(γ-2),inf0a1/2Ma>0.\sup_T|A_\gamma(T)|=M_a/\gamma+O(\gamma^{-2}),\qquad\inf_{0\le a\le1/2}M_a>0.

The complete transform is 2K+gamma K_gamma+aK_a. The completed-zeta gamma factor makes K and its first two a derivatives exponentially small; K is even in a. At a noncritical stationary contact,

|Aγ()|=|aKa|Cηa2e-ηγ,supT|Aγ(T)||Aγ()|cηeηγa2γ,0<η<π/4.(T32-01)|A_\gamma(\infty)|=|aK_a|\le C_\eta a^2e^{-\eta\gamma},\qquad \frac{\sup_T|A_\gamma(T)|}{|A_\gamma(\infty)|} \ge c_\eta\frac{e^{\eta\gamma}}{a^2\gamma},\quad0<\eta<\pi/4. \tag{T32-01}

Thus any sufficiently high noncritical stationary contact would violate PFX. This is not a proof such a contact exists, nor unconditional falsity of PFX. The large overshoot required by a bad-fold root is automatic at high stationary contacts and does not distinguish the bad sign. A replacement must retain the signed identity

Aγ(T)dν(T)=-Kγγ+Ka/a,\int A_\gamma(T)d\nu(T)=-K_{\gamma\gamma}+K_a/a,

rather than its bound by total mass times a prefix supremum. Complete proof: SEG-v32-prefix-obstruction.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR · After this update

Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

2.2 An elementary positive-kernel detector and the real-pole floor

Use the explicitly nonnegative Liouville kernel

kL(t)=e-3t/2et(1-{et}),0kL(t)e-t/2,KL(s)=(s-1)ζ(s)s(s+1).(Q32-01)k_L(t)=e^{-3t/2}\lfloor e^t\rfloor(1-\{e^t\}),\quad 0\le k_L(t)\le e^{-t/2}, \quad K_L(s)=\frac{(s-1)\zeta(s)}{s(s+1)}. \tag{Q32-01}

Here KLK_L is a shifted Laplace transform, not the theta contact function KK. Put vλ(t)=e-t/2et/2v_\lambda(t)=e^{-t/2}\lfloor e^{t/2}\rfloor, ψ(t)=-e-t/2+2e-3t/2\psi(t)=-e^{-t/2}+2e^{-3t/2}. Then

kL*uλ=aL:=ψ*vλ,aL(t)=-2/3+O((1+t)e-t/2),AL(s)=(s-1)ζ(2s)s2(s+1).k_L*u_\lambda=a_L:=\psi*v_\lambda,\quad a_L(t)=-2/3+O((1+t)e^{-t/2}),\quad A_L(s)=\frac{(s-1)\zeta(2s)}{s^2(s+1)}.

The identities are established in an absolutely convergent half-plane before transform uniqueness is used. The proof never assumes convergence of the transform of uλu_\lambda at a prospective zero.

For an off-line zero of multiplicity mm, convolving kLk_L with tm-1e(ρ-1/2)t/(m-1)!t^{m-1}e^{(\rho-1/2)t}/(m-1)! produces a decaying filter \ell: zero moments change the integral to a tail, so |(t)|β-me-t/2|\ell(t)|\le\beta^{-m}e^{-t/2} and ||12β-m\|\ell\|_1\le2\beta^{-m}. Its response to the source retains a nonzero growing coefficient. Young's inequality proves the independent bound

liminfXEλ(X)X2β-1(logX)2m-2β2m|AL(ρ)|24(2β-1)((m-1)!)2>0.(Q32-02)\liminf_{X\to\infty} \frac{\mathcal E_\lambda(X)}{X^{2\beta-1}(\log X)^{2m-2}} \ge\frac{\beta^{2m}|A_L(\rho)|^2}{4(2\beta-1)((m-1)!)^2}>0. \tag{Q32-02}

This constant differs from Q30-02 and is an asymptotic liminf constant. Neither is claimed uniform over unknown zeros. No rightmost-zero, simplicity, or separation assumption is used.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering · After this update

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Actual theta curvature facts

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Actual theta curvature facts. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

12. Theta curvature theorem and supplying bounds

The inherited exact theorem C1 and its variants are in active_proof_curvature_profile.txt. With V=-log(Phi)'', for u>=0,

V''-4V>32/(π2e4u)>0,2V-V'>11/(πe2u)>0,V(0)>18,V'(0)=0.V''-4V>32/(\pi^2e^{4u})>0,\quad 2V-V'>11/(\pi e^{2u})>0, \quad V(0)>18,\quad V'(0)=0.

Consequently V'>0 for u>0 and 2tanh(2u)<V'/V<22\tanh(2u)<V'/V<2. For q(u)=-u(logΦ)'(u)\mathfrak q(u)=-u(\log\Phi)'(u),

q''>36,q2=2V(0)>36,Cth=q2/4>9,q4=4V''(0)>8q2.(C1)\mathfrak q''>36,\quad q_2=2V(0)>36,\quad C_{\rm th}=q_2/4>9,\quad q_4=4V''(0)>8q_2. \tag{C1}

These are actual-theta results, not general consequences of positive kernels.

The proof isolates two Jacobi atoms and bounds the rest on a complex disc of radius 1/50 before logarithmic differentiation. The controlling repaired tail is H<=T/(1-r2-T), not T/(1-r2). The stored rational enclosures r2<1/220, T<6.2e-9 yield H<6.3e-9. The one-atom tail comparison uses monotonicity of lambda*T_n; the abandoned inequality 6/lambda>0.7 was not uniform. The independent live-strip proof splits a first sine half-period and an integration-by-parts tail. These repairs remain in the proof topic and finite regressions. Regressions were rerun; analysis is not formally verified.

These curvature bounds do not sign oscillatory transforms.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Actual theta curvature facts · After this update

Actual theta curvature facts

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Actual theta curvature facts

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

O28-09, arithmetic firewall. The actual logarithmic function obeys

f''+f'=et/2-n2Λ(n)nδlogn.f''+f'=e^{t/2}-\sum_{n\ge2}\frac{\Lambda(n)}{\sqrt n}\delta_{\log n}.

The diagonal perturbation loses this exact between-jump equation. Preserving it and initial data would force the smooth perturbation to vanish. These constructions are not counterexamples for the actual coefficients.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall · After this update

O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall

Included in this source revision.

After this update: O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

2.5 Critical sparse references: the cost is solved, the centered input is not

Independently choose Ip=1I_p=1 with probability 1/(2p)1/(2\sqrt p), set g(p)=2Ip-1g(p)=2I_p-1, and let hh encode its positive primes. R30-04–07 give a logarithmic coarse comparison product, an exact mean-energy comparison with factor below 6, and equivalence up to squared harmonic factors with bmean=λ*(n-1/2)b_{\rm mean}=\lambda*(n^{-1/2}). The rational product certificate establishing the factor below 6 is CK059, with its explicit prime tail. The deterministic mean retains every hypothetical off-line pole.

The sharper sample-path factorization is

H(s)=h(n)n-s=ζ(s+1/2)C(s),C(s)=c(n)n-s.H(s)=\sum h(n)n^{-s}=\zeta(s+1/2)C(s),\qquad C(s)=\sum c(n)n^{-s}.

For r=p-1/2r=p^{-1/2}, c(p)=2Ip-rc(p)=2I_p-r and c(pk)=2Ip(1-r)c(p^k)=2I_p(1-r) for k2k\ge2. Prime coefficients are centered; higher powers are not. Nonnegative cross second moments and a dyadic maximal inequality give, almost surely,

nXc(n)=Oω,ϵ(X1/4+ϵ),nX|c(n)|=Oω,ϵ(X1/2+ϵ).(R32-06)\sum_{n\le X}c(n)=O_{\omega,\varepsilon}(X^{1/4+\varepsilon}),\qquad \sum_{n\le X}|c(n)|=O_{\omega,\varepsilon}(X^{1/2+\varepsilon}). \tag{R32-06}

These are auxiliary-coefficient estimates, not estimates for gg or λ\lambda.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference · After this update

R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference

Included in this source revision.

After this update: R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

Define the almost-sure constants

Z=C(1/2)=p(1-p-1)(p+1p-1)Ip>0,D=C'(1/2)Z=plogpp-1(1-2Ipp).Z=C(1/2)=\prod_p(1-p^{-1}) \left(\frac{\sqrt p+1}{\sqrt p-1}\right)^{I_p}>0, \quad D=\frac{C'(1/2)}Z=\sum_p\frac{\log p}{p-1}(1-2I_p\sqrt p).

Their logarithmic/centered series have summable variances. Two exact hyperbola decompositions give

nXh(n)=2ZX+Oω,ϵ(X3/10+ϵ),Wg(X)=Z(logX+γE+D)+Oω,ϵ(X-1/5+ϵ),(R32-07)\sum_{n\le X}h(n)=2Z\sqrt X+O_{\omega,\varepsilon}(X^{3/10+\varepsilon}), \quad W_g(X)=Z(\log X+\gamma_E+D)+O_{\omega,\varepsilon}(X^{-1/5+\varepsilon}), \tag{R32-07}
nX(g*1)(n)=ZX(logX+D+3γE-2)+Oω,ϵ(X5/14+ϵ).(R32-08)\sum_{n\le X}(g*\mathbf1)(n) =Z\sqrt X(\log X+D+3\gamma_E-2) +O_{\omega,\varepsilon}(X^{5/14+\varepsilon}). \tag{R32-08}

The positive source is g*1=h*1squaresg*\mathbf1=h*\mathbf1_{\rm squares}. These rates are proved, not asserted optimal. The coarse prime product has leading coefficient eγEZe^{\gamma_E}Z, while the finite cost has leading coefficient ZZ; they are not interchangeable.

Convolution with ψ\psi supplies an affine source and the unconditional lower bound

Eg(X)Z23ζ(1/2)2(logX)3-Oω((logX)2+1).(R32-09)\mathcal E_g(X)\ge\frac{Z^2}{3\zeta(1/2)^2}(\log X)^3-O_\omega((\log X)^2+1). \tag{R32-09}

Moreover EZ=ζ(3/2)/ζ(3)\mathbb EZ=\zeta(3/2)/\zeta(3), EZ2=p(1+4p-3/2+3p-2)\mathbb EZ^2=\prod_p(1+4p^{-3/2}+3p^{-2}), and Fatou gives the corresponding expected-energy lower coefficient EZ2/[3ζ(1/2)2]\mathbb EZ^2/[3\zeta(1/2)^2]. Cubic logarithmic energy is still compatible with the desired subpower bound.

Remove the real pole explicitly by

wω(t)=ug(t)-Zζ(1/2)t-Zζ(1/2)(D+3γE-2-ζ'ζ(1/2)).w_\omega(t)=u_g(t)-\frac Z{\zeta(1/2)}t -\frac Z{\zeta(1/2)}\left(D+3\gamma_E-2-\frac{\zeta'}\zeta(1/2)\right).

Then kL*wω=Oω,ϵ(e-(1/7-ϵ)t)k_L*w_\omega=O_{\omega,\varepsilon}(e^{-(1/7-\varepsilon)t}), and

Eλ(eT)Cω[(1+T2)0T|wω(t)|2dt+1+T5].(R32-10)\mathcal E_\lambda(e^T)\le C_\omega\left[ (1+T^2)\int_0^T|w_\omega(t)|^2dt+1+T^5\right]. \tag{R32-10}

The missing statement is subexponential residual energy along a sequence for one fixed realization. Exponential source decay does not establish it; at any hypothetical off-line zero, the residual source transform is nonzero and the detector still forces growth.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay · After this update

R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay

Included in this source revision.

After this update: R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Y/G6 includes X=0; g/G7 requires its nonzero, noncritical domain

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Y/G6 includes X=0; g/G7 requires its nonzero, noncritical domain. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

10.2 Nonzero quotient chart and its restrictions

At a stationary contact, the identity

P=|L|2(Y-1)P=|L|^2(Y-1)

gives YY\in\mathbb R, Y<1Y<1, and Y'=0\Re Y'=0. Direct differentiation, with the first contact equations imposed before simplification, yields

KaKγγ>0Y'Y''<0.(G6)K_aK_{\gamma\gamma}>0 \iff \Im Y'\,\Im Y''<0. \tag{G6}

This formulation is valid even at Y=0Y=0, but still requires the stated stationary-contact equations. For Y0Y\ne0, define

g=Y'Y=X'X-L'L.g=\frac{Y'}Y=\frac{X'}X-\frac{L'}L.

At a noncritical stationary contact g=iβg=i\beta, β{0}\beta\in\mathbb R\setminus\{0\}, and

KaKγγ>0βg'<0.(G7)\boxed{K_aK_{\gamma\gamma}>0\iff \beta\,\Im g'<0.} \tag{G7}

The precise domain of the old R23.36 target is therefore

0<a<1/2, γ>25/4,Y{0},Y<1,g=0,g0.0<a<1/2,\ \gamma>25/4,\quad Y\in\mathbb R\setminus\{0\},\quad Y<1,\quad\Re g=0,\quad\Im g\ne0.

At X=0X=0, gg is undefined; use G6 or the root-locus moment chart below. At a critical stationary contact, g=0g=0 when Y0Y\ne0, and G7 is not the noncritical sign theorem. These are separate cases, not removable notational inconveniences.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Y/G6 includes X=0; g/G7 requires its nonzero, noncritical domain · After this update

Y/G6 includes X=0; g/G7 requires its nonzero, noncritical domain

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Y/G6 includes X=0; g/G7 requires its nonzero, noncritical domain

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
B32-01–04 same fixed sign function

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: B32-01–04 same fixed sign function. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

2.7 One-sided references: a positive primitive gives a genuine cost upper bound

For any fixed reference gg, define b+=(e-t/2-e-3t/2)*vλb_+=(e^{-t/2}-e^{-3t/2})*v_\lambda, the nonnegative measure dμg=hg(n)n-1/2δlognd\mu_g=\sum h_g(n)n^{-1/2}\delta_{\log n}, and Yg=b+*μgY_g=b_+*\mu_g. Then

0b+(t)4/3,b+(t)4/3,b+(t)4/3-(t+1)e-t/2-e-3t/2/3,0\le b_+(t)\le4/3,\quad b_+(t)\to4/3,\quad b_+(t)\ge4/3-(t+1)e^{-t/2}-e^{-3t/2}/3,
0Yg(t)43Wg(et),Yg'(t)-12Yg(t)=(kL*ug)(t).(B32-01)0\le Y_g(t)\le\tfrac43 W_g(e^t),\qquad Y_g'(t)-\tfrac12Y_g(t)=(k_L*u_g)(t). \tag{B32-01}

There is an exact finite arithmetic form:

Yg(t)=e-t/2net(g*1)(n)[t-logn-1+ne-t],Y_g(t)=e^{-t/2}\sum_{n\le e^t}(g*\mathbf1)(n) [t-\log n-1+ne^{-t}],

whose coefficients and brackets are nonnegative. This positivity is not an assumed property of a zeta inverse.

Let B=(ug)-B=(u_g)_-, F=kL*BF=k_L*B. The differential inequality gives, for TtT\ge t,

Yg(t)e-(T-t)/2Yg(T)+tTe-(v-t)/2F(v)dv.(B32-02)Y_g(t)\le e^{-(T-t)/2}Y_g(T) +\int_t^T e^{-(v-t)/2}F(v)dv. \tag{B32-02}

If the same fixed gg has B(t)=Oϵ(eϵt)B(t)=O_\varepsilon(e^{\varepsilon t}) for every ϵ>0\varepsilon>0 and liminfWg(X)/X=0\liminf W_g(X)/\sqrt X=0, the terminal term vanishes on a sequence. Therefore

Yg(t)ZB(t):=0e-w/2(kL*B)(t+w)dw=Oϵ(eϵt).Y_g(t)\le Z_B(t):=\int_0^\infty e^{-w/2}(k_L*B)(t+w)dw =O_\varepsilon(e^{\varepsilon t}).

For a fixed large LL, mL=infvLb+(v)>0m_L=\inf_{v\ge L}b_+(v)>0 and mLWg(et)Yg(t+L)m_LW_g(e^t)\le Y_g(t+L). This proves global Wg(X)=Xo(1)W_g(X)=X^{o(1)}. Conversely, any one-time strict deficit Yg(t)>ZB(t)Y_g(t)>Z_B(t) forces

Wg(eT)34e(T-t)/2(Yg(t)-ZB(t))(Tt).W_g(e^T)\ge\tfrac34 e^{(T-t)/2}(Y_g(t)-Z_B(t))\quad(T\ge t).

It is a square-root-cost barrier, not a numerical finite-cutoff heuristic.

B32-03 then proves RH under B32-TARGET. Subpower cost makes HgH_g absolutely convergent and nonzero for s>1/2\Re s>1/2. Apply Landau's nonnegative-Laplace theorem to (ug)+(u_g)_+, adding back the holomorphic transform of (ug)-(u_g)_-. The continued transform has no positive-real singularity, so its integral converges for every positive real Laplace parameter. An off-line zeta zero would then give a noncanceling pole in ζ(2s)Hg(s)/(sζ(s))\zeta(2s)H_g(s)/(s\zeta(s)), a contradiction. No upper bound on positive summatory excursions is presumed. The existence of the reference is still missing.

If instead ug(t)-(C+o(1))tru_g(t)\ge-(C+o(1))t^r, r0r\ge0, and the weak cost condition holds, the sharp leading budget is

limsupXWg(X)(logX)rC|ζ(1/2)|.(B32-04)\limsup_{X\to\infty}\frac{W_g(X)}{(\log X)^r}\le C|\zeta(1/2)|. \tag{B32-04}

For a constant barrier this implies Mg=Wg()C|ζ(1/2)|M_g=W_g(\infty)\le C|\zeta(1/2)| and g(p)=+1p-1/2<\sum_{g(p)=+1}p^{-1/2}<\infty. If the total comparison mass is infinite but the weak cost condition holds, liminfSg(x)/x=-\liminf S_g(x)/\sqrt x=-\infty. The statement is deterministic and includes dependent prime choices.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

B32-01–04 same fixed sign function · After this update

B32-01–04 same fixed sign function

Included in this source revision.

After this update: B32-01–04 same fixed sign function

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

Q30-02 remains the inherited all-cutoff Hardy detector. Set

IX(s)=1XSλ(x)x-s-1dx,RH(s)=(s-1)(2s-1)(s+1)4,FX(s)=Xs-1/2{RH(s)ζ(2s)-RH(s)sζ(s)IX(s)}.I_X(s)=\int_1^X S_\lambda(x)x^{-s-1}dx,\quad R_H(s)=\frac{(s-1)(2s-1)}{(s+1)^4},\quad F_X(s)=X^{s-1/2}\{R_H(s)\zeta(2s)-R_H(s)s\zeta(s)I_X(s)\}.

The written proof separately establishes FXH2(s>1/2)F_X\in H^2(\Re s>1/2) and |FX|H2<10Eλ(X)\|F_X\|_{H^2}<10\sqrt{\mathcal E_\lambda(X)}, using the 1/(2π)1/(2\pi) boundary norm. Membership is not inferred from boundary integrability: bounded vertical strips use the finite Laplace integral, and the far right uses the absolutely convergent Euler tail. At an off-line zero it gives, for all X2X\ge2,

Eλ(X)2β-1100|(ρ-1)(2ρ-1)ζ(2ρ)(ρ+1)4|2X2β-1.(Q30-02)\mathcal E_\lambda(X)\ge\frac{2\beta-1}{100} \left|\frac{(\rho-1)(2\rho-1)\zeta(2\rho)}{(\rho+1)^4}\right|^2X^{2\beta-1}. \tag{Q30-02}

Derivative evaluation gives the multiplicity factor at all sufficiently large cutoffs. Q30-03 is the equivalence in §0; Q30-05 retains the weaker three-lines bound Qλ(N)ρ,ϵN2β-1-ϵQ_\lambda(N)\gg_{\rho,\varepsilon}N^{2\beta-1-\varepsilon} as an independent checkpoint. No unconditional subpower upper bound has been supplied.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof · After this update

Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof

Included in this source revision.

After this update: Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis.

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis.. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

16. Other live theta interfaces and their exact scope

These interfaces remain active components in active_proof_contact_geometry.txt; none is an omitted finished closure.

J1–J7; R21-4 (Jacobi/divisor structure). Individual atoms satisfy Φn(u)=n-1/2φ(u+logn)\Phi_n(u)=n^{-1/2}\phi(u+\log n). Grouping pairs by k=nm and imbalance log(m/n) yields a common physical kernel, with half weight at square diagonals. For T=2*pi*exp(Sigma),

GΣ(q)=4π2e5Σ/2(T2-6Tcoshq+9)e-TcoshqG_\Sigma(q)=4\pi^2e^{5\Sigma/2}(T^2-6T\cosh q+9)e^{-T\cosh q}

is positive on its physical domain. J4 cancels the entire sin(gamma*r) difference-frequency channel at the two nulls. The remaining channels are 2r*sinh(ar)*sin(gamma*t) and -2t²*cosh(ar)*sin(gamma*t); estimating canceled pieces separately loses the useful identity. J5–J6 prove fixed-scale TP2 of the imbalance functions U_w,V_w. As the physical scale moves, raw ratios turn: no joint intertwining theorem follows. The Bessel completion contains divisor sum .5*k^-a*sigma_(2a)(k), but incomplete causal tails cannot be dropped after modular cancellation.

H1–H7 (coupled Gaussian/heat structure). Put b=k/t and theta_a=partial_a k/(a*t²*k). The exact actual-a Gaussian comparison gives 0<theta_a<1/3, theta_a'<0, and endpoint limits 1/3 and 0. This is not permission to replace a by zero. The induced heat identity is inhomogeneous, U_tau=U_omegaomega-G; physical positivity of the forcing profile does not sign its oscillatory transform. At a stationary contact NC asks for U_omegaomega*(U_omegaomega-G)>0. Homogeneous variation-diminishing intuition omits the forcing.

A1–A7 (autocorrelation and Stieltjes forms). The autocorrelation is G_ac=k+m, with transforms S_G,S_m; R_ac=S_m/S_G gives K=S_G(1-R_ac) and fold product S_G²*(R_ac)_a*(R_ac)_gammagamma at R_ac=1,(R_ac)_gamma=0. Physical monotonicity of m/k does not control those signed ratios. For beta=-d(k/t) and alpha=-d(theta_a*k/t), the kernels are J1(z)=sin z-z cos z, JR(z)=z sin z+cos z-1, and J3(z)=-z³cos z+3z²sin z+6z cos z-6sin z. There are two null constraints and a negative real contact moment. An exact positive three-atom model with decreasing tail ratios .3,.2,.1 satisfies them but has both relevant J3 moments negative, defeating the abstract orientation inference. It is not an actual-theta counterexample. A7's additional weighted prefix property remains unproved.

Phase, crossed-frequency, and critical fallbacks. The identity aϑ=-apa*γγϑ\partial_a\vartheta=-a\,p_a*\partial_{\gamma\gamma}\vartheta, pa(s)=(πa)-1logcoth(π|s|/(4a))p_a(s)=(\pi a)^{-1}\log\coth(\pi|s|/(4a)), is a positive average of curvature, not its local sign. The crossed-frequency integral is regular only after combining the singular pieces; complex tilted measures are not positive laws, so a mean/variance comparison is not legal. CR4 has the regular critical jet -(H(3)/(3(H'')2))-\Re(H^{(3)}/(3(H'')^2)) under its nonzero second-jet hypothesis; higher-order critical contacts need a separate argument. Local unused-left rays and favorable local jets do not establish a globally compatible graph splicing. NC does not automatically solve CR.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis. · After this update

J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis.

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption.

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption.. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

3.3 Barrier and slack reductions — A26-09–11

For constants a0,b0a_0,b_0 with a0+α>0a_0+\alpha>0, b00b_0\ge0, an eventual integer implication

Uar(N)>a0 Var(N)-b0/N(A26-BARRIER)U_{\rm ar}(N)>a_0\ \Longrightarrow\ V_{\rm ar}(N)\ge-b_0/\sqrt N \tag{A26-BARRIER}

forces Far(x)-a0-2(b0+1)/xF_{\rm ar}(x)\ge-a_0-2(b_0+1)/\sqrt x eventually, hence RH. In particular, boundedness of UarU_{\rm ar} along integers with Var<0V_{\rm ar}<0 is equivalent to RH. The special threshold a0=-5/2,b0=0a_0=-5/2,b_0=0 is the shifted joint-sign target, whether imposed for all N100N\ge100 or eventually. Under RH the converse follows from the preceding margins, not from a generic PNT estimate.

For fixed C0,C20C_0,C_2\ge0, the eventual implication

Uar(N)>0 AN312BN+C0N+C2NUar(N)2(A26-SLACK)U_{\rm ar}(N)>0\ \Longrightarrow\ A_N^3\le12B_N+C_0N+C_2\sqrt N\,U_{\rm ar}(N)^2 \tag{A26-SLACK}

is sufficient for RH. The proof at a negative excursion minimum uses Uar=o(x)U_{\rm ar}=o(\sqrt x) to absorb the quadratic slack. It does not bound that slack by a constant without the PNT input. The finite certificate below has Uar<0U_{\rm ar}<0, so it does not test this branch nonvacuously.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption. · After this update

A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption.

Included in this source revision.

After this update: A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption.

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship
R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes

Source-reported result

Source-reported subject: R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes. The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

2.6 General power bias and correlated block conditioning

For fixed 0<α<10<\alpha<1, let P(Ip=1)=1/(2pα)\mathbb P(I_p=1)=1/(2p^\alpha). Then

Eh(n)=rad(n)-α,rad(n)-αn-s=ζ(s+α)Kα(s),\mathbb Eh(n)=\operatorname{rad}(n)^{-\alpha},\quad \sum\operatorname{rad}(n)^{-\alpha}n^{-s}=\zeta(s+\alpha)K_\alpha(s),
Kα(s)=p(1+p-α(1-p-α)p-2s1-p-s),s>(1-α)/2.K_\alpha(s)=\prod_p\left(1+ \frac{p^{-\alpha}(1-p^{-\alpha})p^{-2s}}{1-p^{-s}}\right), \qquad\Re s>(1-\alpha)/2.

The factor is absolutely convergent and nonzero there. A centered Euler logarithm supplies H(s)=ζ(s+α)Gα(s)H(s)=\zeta(s+\alpha)G_\alpha(s) almost surely. The positive-coefficient Wiener–Ikehara theorem gives, with Zα=Gα(1-α)>0Z_\alpha=G_\alpha(1-\alpha)>0,

nXh(n)ZαX1-α/(1-α).(R32-01)\sum_{n\le X}h(n)\sim Z_\alpha X^{1-\alpha}/(1-\alpha). \tag{R32-01}

Thus the finite cost grows as ZαX1/2-α/(1/2-α)Z_\alpha X^{1/2-\alpha}/(1/2-\alpha) for α<1/2\alpha<1/2, as Z1/2logXZ_{1/2}\log X at equality, and converges for α>1/2\alpha>1/2, with tail ZαX1/2-α/(α-1/2)Z_\alpha X^{1/2-\alpha}/(\alpha-1/2). These are fixed-parameter almost-sure statements.

A separate finite inequality handles moving parameters. Set Jα(X)=nXn-α-1/2J_\alpha(X)=\sum_{n\le X}n^{-\alpha-1/2}, κα=Kα(1/2)\kappa_\alpha=K_\alpha(1/2). Both the convolution factor and its inverse have critical norm at most κα\kappa_\alpha; R30-01 gives a finite constant RαR_\alpha with

Eλ(X)κα2Jα(X)2EEgα(X)Rακα2Jα(X)2Eλ(X).(R32-02)\frac{\mathcal E_\lambda(X)}{\kappa_\alpha^2J_\alpha(X)^2} \le\mathbb E\mathcal E_{g_\alpha}(X) \le R_\alpha\kappa_\alpha^2J_\alpha(X)^2\mathcal E_\lambda(X). \tag{R32-02}

The constants are uniformly bounded for α[1/4,3/4]\alpha\in[1/4,3/4]. Hence any deterministic αX1/2\alpha_X\to1/2 gives EEgαX(X)=Eλ(X)Xo(1)\mathbb E\mathcal E_{g_{\alpha_X}}(X)=\mathcal E_\lambda(X)X^{o(1)} in the two-sided sense. No unproved uniform sample-path asymptotic is used. For fixed α<1/2\alpha<1/2, the positive mean source gives EEg(X)αX1-2α\mathbb E\mathcal E_g(X)\gg_\alpha X^{1-2\alpha} (R32-03); the audit supplies a direct kernel proof in place of the extra Hardy argument. R32-04 records the independent-bias obstruction, not a ban on every correlated construction.

Recorded statements, qualifications and references

R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes · After this update

R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes

Included in this source revision.

After this update: R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes

Record in this revision

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Private source preparation time; not mathematical priority or source authorship

The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.

Research-record corrections

What changed in the research record

These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Research-record correctionWe corrected supporting details in the research record. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Corrected the research recordCorrection note

Correction details
Research-record correctionWe corrected the cited passages. We clarified what the cited material supports. We removed a duplicate or outdated task or route step. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Corrected the research recordCorrection note

Correction details
Research-record correctionWe corrected the cited passages. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Corrected the research recordCorrection note

Correction details
Research-record correctionWe corrected the cited passages. We removed a duplicate or outdated task or route step. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Corrected the research recordCorrection note

Correction details
Research-record correctionWe corrected supporting details in the research record. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Corrected the research recordCorrection note

Correction details

The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.

How the route was assembled

Argument structure

These stages follow the mathematical order of the supplied argument.

Directed nodal graph research baselineRevision 6 retains a substantial analytic program and isolates global endpoint incidence, same-sign phase pairing, and zero-phase singular exclusion as the leading unresolved gate.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Analytic route assembled

Recorded statements and qualifications

History entries link to the full mathematics below. Open a statement to read its complete qualifications and reported status.

Current arithmetic route · After this update

Current arithmetic route

After this update

  • Route disposition: active
Route scope

An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Open arithmetic work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open arithmetic work with exact source conditions

After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

A28-TARGET all-scale exceptional-count endpoint; A28 sparse count and good-window endpoint; A28 decisive arithmetic work order

Required conclusion

Produce the specifically scoped missing theorem or estimate.

Retain exact analytic or combinatorial conditions and all source/destination dependencies.

A source-reported audit or a finite diagnostic does not complete this obligation.

Proposed next action

Follow the exact source work quoted in these anchors, preserving every stated hypothesis, quantifier, source measure and exclusion.

Current energy route · After this update

Current energy route

After this update

  • Route disposition: active
Route scope

An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Open energy work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open energy work with exact source conditions

After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

Q30-TARGET; Q30-06 same-cutoff reference target; Q30/Q32 decisive energy work order

Required conclusion

Produce the specifically scoped missing theorem or estimate.

Retain exact analytic or combinatorial conditions and all source/destination dependencies.

A source-reported audit or a finite diagnostic does not complete this obligation.

Proposed next action

Follow the exact source work quoted in these anchors, preserving every stated hypothesis, quantifier, source measure and exclusion.

Missing-reference and phase-gate status · After this update

Missing-reference and phase-gate status

After this update

  • Route disposition: narrowed
Route scope

The current source states that reference existence and upper bounds remain missing. T32-01 restricts PFX, while NC and CR remain separate. The seven topic files are cited for full proofs; those attachments have not been inspected here. This is a current route-status record, not a newly proposed existence theorem or attachment verification.

Current reference route · After this update

Current reference route

After this update

  • Route disposition: active
Route scope

An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Current theta route · After this update

Current theta route

After this update

  • Route disposition: active
Route scope

An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Open reference work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open reference work with exact source conditions

After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

Q32-07 residual-energy warning; R32 centered-energy missing estimate; R32 decisive centered-reference work order

Required conclusion

Produce the specifically scoped missing theorem or estimate.

Retain exact analytic or combinatorial conditions and all source/destination dependencies.

A source-reported audit or a finite diagnostic does not complete this obligation.

Proposed next action

Follow the exact source work quoted in these anchors, preserving every stated hypothesis, quantifier, source measure and exclusion.

Open theta work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open theta work with exact source conditions

After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

flat stationary-fold and critical alternatives; compatible higher-order local-ray selection gap; support-disc noniteration boundary; NC and CR closed-pencil targets; PFX and T32-01 high-contact stopping rule; COMPACT-PROFILE finite rectangle and full-theta closure; Theta decisive NC/CR work order

Required conclusion

Produce the specifically scoped missing theorem or estimate.

Retain exact analytic or combinatorial conditions and all source/destination dependencies.

A source-reported audit or a finite diagnostic does not complete this obligation.

Proposed next action

Follow the exact source work quoted in these anchors, preserving every stated hypothesis, quantifier, source measure and exclusion.

Noncritical stationary-fold exclusion · After this update

Noncritical stationary-fold exclusion

After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

13. Positive curvature pencil and the bad-fold interface

Detailed proofs: active_proof_curvature_profile.txt (R21-7 and inherited pencil IDs). For x+y=t, d=x-y, z=ad, define ηc(u)=q(u)-2cu20\eta_c(u)=\mathfrak q(u)-2cu^2\ge0 for 0<=c<=C_th, and

Fc,a(t)=0tΦ(x)Φ(y){cd2(coshz-sinhz/z)+(ηc(x)+ηc(y))coshz}dx.\mathcal F_{c,a}(t)=\int_0^t\Phi(x)\Phi(y) \{cd^2(\cosh z-\sinh z/z)+(\eta_c(x)+\eta_c(y))\cosh z\}\,dx.

It is strictly positive for t>0. Put Ga=t2ka+a-1aka\mathcal G_a=t^2k_a+a^{-1}\partial_a k_a, with continuous a=0 extension. Exact integration by parts gives

Fc,a=F0,a-cGa=ka-ttka-ct2ka+(a-c/a)aka,\mathcal F_{c,a}=\mathcal F_{0,a}-c\mathcal G_a =k_a-t\partial_tk_a-ct^2k_a+(a-c/a)\partial_ak_a,
Fˆc,a=2K+γKγ+cKγγ+(a-c/a)Ka.(PENCIL)\widehat{\mathcal F}_{c,a}=2K+\gamma K_\gamma+cK_{\gamma\gamma}+(a-c/a)K_a. \tag{PENCIL}

At a stationary negative-axis contact K=K_gamma=0, Fˆ0,a=aKa\widehat{\mathcal F}_{0,a}=aK_a, Fˆa2,a=a2Kγγ\widehat{\mathcal F}_{a^2,a}=a^2K_{\gamma\gamma}. For noncritical K_a!=0, favorable NC orientation is equivalent to nonvanishing of the affine transform for every c in the closed interval [0,a²]. A flat K_gammagamma=0 is a bad endpoint, not excluded by strict-minimum language. Critical K_a=0 is the separate CR gate.

Required conclusion

Give a source-auditable argument for the exact stated domain.

Do not substitute a pointwise/finite diagnostic, a nonuniform collar, an open-interval pencil, or a source-decay assertion.

Proposed next action

Establish this exact source interface with all of its displayed hypotheses. NC and CR remain separate; compact-profile alone closes neither.

Critical stationary-contact exclusion · After this update

Critical stationary-contact exclusion

After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

10.4 Critical contacts and the remaining assembly distinction

At a critical contact, Q(w)=r>0\mathcal Q(w)=r>0, H'(w)=0\mathcal H'(w)=0, and L(-z)+rL(z)L(-z)+rL(z) has a zero of multiplicity at least two at ww. Its associated normalized positive two-sided density has characteristic nulls

EeiγX=E[XeiγX]=0.(CR1)\mathbb E e^{i\gamma X}=\mathbb E[Xe^{i\gamma X}]=0. \tag{CR1}

The exact scalar inequality y2(π2/2)(1-cosy)-2ysinyy^2\ge(\pi^2/2)(1-\cos y)-2y\sin y gives VarXπ2/(2γ2)\operatorname{Var}X\ge\pi^2/(2\gamma^2), strictly for the continuous theta law. This bound decays with height and does not close CR. A separate positive-convolution moment obstruction is γ2EX2>12\gamma^2\mathbb E X^2>12; its exact three-point ceiling is below 12.04, so optimizing only that constant cannot solve the high-height problem. These are different probability laws and different moments.

The order-dd local normal form H-H(w0)=ζd\mathcal H-\mathcal H(w_0)=\zeta^d supplies 2d2d rays, including a smaller-aa ray. That does not force a selected source-to-sink path to use a compatible pair of rays. R21-11.2 is a finite resolved-graph dichotomy with explicit path-class and leaf hypotheses. The unresolved global replacement must prove compatibility under splicing, attainment or stable limiting selection, and every boundary/infinite-height continuation. The fixed-witness theorem above does not supply family-wise compactness. A direct proof of CR would bypass those additional obligations.

Required conclusion

Give a source-auditable argument for the exact stated domain.

Do not substitute a pointwise/finite diagnostic, a nonuniform collar, an open-interval pencil, or a source-decay assertion.

Proposed next action

Establish this exact source interface with all of its displayed hypotheses. NC and CR remain separate; compact-profile alone closes neither.

Uniform compact-profile rectangle · After this update

Uniform compact-profile rectangle

After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

15. Compact profile gate: exact target and stopping rule

The missing finite-domain inequality is

D(a,t)=tκa'(t)t2>0,0a1/2,0t8/5,(COMPACT-PROFILE)D(a,t)=\frac{t\kappa_a'(t)}{t^2}>0, \quad 0\le a\le1/2,\quad 0\le t\le8/5, \tag{COMPACT-PROFILE}

with removable values at t=0. The front expansion is

κa(t)=Cth+(q4+a2q2)t2/80+O(t4),D(a,0)=(q4+a2q2)/40>0.\kappa_a(t)=C_{\rm th}+(q_4+a^2q_2)t^2/80+O(t^4),\quad D(a,0)=(q_4+a^2q_2)/40>0.

A uniform finite-width remainder has not been certified. A pointwise Taylor expansion does not fill a rectangle.

The retained quadrature contract allows two overlapping boxes [0,1/2] and [9/20,8/5] in t, with the full a strip. It requires outward arithmetic, positive denominator enclosures, all theta-atom tails and derivative tails, removable singularities, and an explicit seam. The production/covariance formula is preferable to finite-differencing kappa. The analytic large-t theorem already handles t>=8/5; do not recertify the infinite tail merely to postpone the compact interior.

The observed minimum D≈4.78752 near (a,t)≈(1/2,.9059) and covariance diagnostic≈.07815 are not interval certificates. They motivate a finite target but do not satisfy it. data/V25_QUADRATURE_CONTRACT.json, the existing diagnostic scripts, and the complete topic proof specify the integrands and regularizations. A legitimate completion needs a new certificate plus a checker that fails when any domain, tail, seam or denominator bound is removed. No such certificate is present.

Completing this gate plus the inherited tail gives full-profile varrho'<0. The dependency is then full-profile + PFX -> NC, followed by NC + CR -> exclusion of the hypothetical witness. Compact profile alone is not a full RH route, and the dependency checker rejects that promotion.

T32-01 is an additional stopping rule: finishing this physical compact certificate does not cure the exponentially large prefix-to-terminal ratio at hypothetical high stationary contacts. An independent high-contact exclusion or signed transform argument is needed before PFX can be used there.

Required conclusion

Give a source-auditable argument for the exact stated domain.

Do not substitute a pointwise/finite diagnostic, a nonuniform collar, an open-interval pencil, or a source-decay assertion.

Proposed next action

Establish this exact source interface with all of its displayed hypotheses. NC and CR remain separate; compact-profile alone closes neither.

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing · Before this update

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing

Before this update

  • Route disposition: active
Route scope

Leading route: use the source-reported proper analytic nodal graph, strict phase flow, singular normal forms, and classified ends to determine global incidence and prove component-wise phase avoidance.

Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate · Before this update · After this update

Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate

Before this update · After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: proposed
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: missing premise
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: general
Statement kind

reduction

Statement

Every connected component of the target nodal set has phase image disjoint from zero.

Formula
0V(C)for every connected componentCM0\notin V(\mathcal C) \quad \text{for every connected component }\mathcal C\subset\mathcal M
Variables

connected component C of M={0<Re(w)<1/2, Im(w)>0, U(w)=0}

Build the global endpoint-incidence atlas · Before this update · After this update

Build the global endpoint-incidence atlas

Before this update · After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

Determine which portal, right-edge, singular-vertex, top-cut, and infinity ends belong to each global component of the proper directed nodal graph.

Required conclusion

Every permitted endpoint and infinity end has a multiplicity-safe component-incidence assignment.

Any infinite family of vertices or ends is controlled by a proved locally finite direct limit.

The first exact ambiguity is returned if a complete pairing cannot be proved.

Proposed next action

Use growing generic rectangles, label every truncated edge endpoint, pass through singular vertices with the alternating flow rule, and give a locally finite direct-limit argument.

Prove directed same-sign endpoint pairing · Before this update · After this update

Prove directed same-sign endpoint pairing

Before this update · After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

Prove that no connected component of the target nodal graph has a phase image containing zero.

Required conclusion

Every finite endpoint and singular vertex is assigned a compatible phase sign.

Opposite-sign endpoints are excluded from each component.

Infinity phase zero occurs only as a nonattained endpoint value.

Proposed next action

Record portal and right-edge phase signs and combine the directed graph with a planar-flow, argument-principle, or multiplicity-safe rectangle-winding identity.

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing · After this update

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing

After this update

  • Route disposition: paused
Route scope

Leading route: use the source-reported proper analytic nodal graph, strict phase flow, singular normal forms, and classified ends to determine global incidence and prove component-wise phase avoidance.

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing · After this update

Directed nodal graph and endpoint pairing

After this update

  • Route disposition: narrowed
Route scope

Retained Revision 6 modulus-one U=0 boundary-graph route with increasing phase V. Its source-scoped local results and open pairing obligations remain historical mathematics. The current packet instead uses phase-zero Theta=0 fixed witnesses with increasing U; neither chart is silently substituted for the other.

Fourier-decay and scalar-growth closures · After this update

Fourier-decay and scalar-growth closures

After this update

  • Route disposition: active
Route scope

Current actual Liouville sine, exponential and triangular-source lower-bound routes remain open. The sine condition is required for every sufficiently large k; positivity of selected characters or comparison models does not supply actual Liouville signs.

Riemann hypothesis · After this update

Riemann hypothesis

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: proposed
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: missing premise
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: general
Statement kind

theorem candidate

Statement

Every zero of the usual completed xi function has real part 1/2. Here X(w)=xi(1/2+w) is unnormalized; the older normalized function differs by the nonzero constant xi(1/2).

Formula
ξ(ρ)=0ρ=12\xi(\rho)=0\Longrightarrow\Re\rho=\tfrac12
Variables

zero rho of usual completed xi

w with X(w)=xi(1/2+w)

Hypotheses

usual zeta/xi normalization

Exceptions

No RH proof is reported.

Open signed-kernels work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open signed-kernels work with exact source conditions

After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

O28-10 triangular-source endpoint; L30 logarithmic and subexponential all-k endpoints; S30 actual exponential endpoint; L28 selected-character matching and sign bridge; L30/S30/O28 decisive signed-transform work order

Required conclusion

Produce the specifically scoped missing theorem or estimate.

Retain exact analytic or combinatorial conditions and all source/destination dependencies.

A source-reported audit or a finite diagnostic does not complete this obligation.

Proposed next action

Follow the exact source work quoted in these anchors, preserving every stated hypothesis, quantifier, source measure and exclusion.

Current fixed-function route · After this update

Current fixed-function route

After this update

  • Route disposition: active
Route scope

An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Open fixed-function work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open fixed-function work with exact source conditions

After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

B32-TARGET fixed-function construction; B32 decisive fixed-function work order

Required conclusion

Produce the specifically scoped missing theorem or estimate.

Retain exact analytic or combinatorial conditions and all source/destination dependencies.

A source-reported audit or a finite diagnostic does not complete this obligation.

Proposed next action

Follow the exact source work quoted in these anchors, preserving every stated hypothesis, quantifier, source measure and exclusion.

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance · Before this update

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

Before this update

  • Route disposition: active
Route scope

Active companion route: determine portal and right-edge phase signs and combine them with multiplicity-safe rectangle accounting to forbid opposite-sign pairing.

Determine portal and right-edge phase signs · Before this update · After this update

Determine portal and right-edge phase signs

Before this update · After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

Obtain theta-specific phase-sign and incidence information at imaginary-boundary portals and right-edge intersections.

Required conclusion

Portal phase signs and their ordering are rigorously bounded.

Right-edge intersection phase signs are rigorously bounded.

The resulting data constrain or determine component incidence.

Proposed next action

Retain the theta lattice before absolute values and focus signed Stokes analysis on incidence and finite endpoint signs rather than re-proving safety of an already identified escaping edge.

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance · After this update

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

After this update

  • Route disposition: paused
Route scope

Active companion route: determine portal and right-edge phase signs and combine them with multiplicity-safe rectangle accounting to forbid opposite-sign pairing.

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance · After this update

Endpoint phases and rectangle flow balance

After this update

  • Route disposition: narrowed
Route scope

Retained Revision 6 modulus-one U=0 boundary-graph route with increasing phase V. Its source-scoped local results and open pairing obligations remain historical mathematics. The current packet instead uses phase-zero Theta=0 fixed witnesses with increasing U; neither chart is silently substituted for the other.

Current signed-kernels route · After this update

Current signed-kernels route

After this update

  • Route disposition: active
Route scope

An exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.

Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure · Before this update · After this update

Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure

Before this update · After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

Either quantify a height-growing Pick/Padé hierarchy below the completed-xi scale or prove a theta-density inequality excluding the exact forced moments.

Required conclusion

The interpolation error is explicitly below the completed-xi scale with controlled conditioning, or

A source-specific theta-density theorem rigorously excludes the forced moments.

Proposed next action

For interpolation, quantify m(gamma), feasible-region diameter, and conditioning; for density, isolate a genuine property of the explicit theta density rather than generic positivity.

Fixed-distinct-node interpolation blindness · Before this update · After this update

Fixed-distinct-node interpolation blindness

Before this update · After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

negative result

Statement

The packet reports that the proved fixed finite distinct-node Pick tests eventually accept the exponentially close zero-forced data, while height-growing order and arbitrary moving or confluent schemes remain outside the proved elimination.

Variables

fixed finite set of distinct interpolation nodes independent of height

Hypotheses

polynomial lower margin established

Exceptions

arbitrary moving finite configurations

exponentially conditioned fixed-size schemes

height-growing order

blanket confluent-jet class

Riemann Hypothesis · Before this update

Riemann Hypothesis

Before this update

  • Source-reported logical status: proposed
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: missing premise
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: general
Statement kind

theorem candidate

Statement

Every zero rho of the completed zeta function xi has real part one half.

Formula
ξ(ρ)=0Reρ=12\xi(\rho)=0 \Longrightarrow \operatorname{Re}\rho=\frac12
Variables

rho in the complex plane

Hypotheses

xi(rho)=0

Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure · After this update · Historical record

Test an exponentially resolving or theta-density closure

After this update · Historical record

  • Reported status: open
  • Record status: superseded
Open task

Either quantify a height-growing Pick/Padé hierarchy below the completed-xi scale or prove a theta-density inequality excluding the exact forced moments.

Required conclusion

The interpolation error is explicitly below the completed-xi scale with controlled conditioning, or

A source-specific theta-density theorem rigorously excludes the forced moments.

Proposed next action

For interpolation, quantify m(gamma), feasible-region diameter, and conditioning; for density, isolate a genuine property of the explicit theta density rather than generic positivity.

Riemann Hypothesis · After this update · Historical record

Riemann Hypothesis

After this update · Historical record

  • Source-reported logical status: superseded
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: missing premise
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: general
Statement kind

theorem candidate

Statement

Every zero rho of the completed zeta function xi has real part one half.

Formula
ξ(ρ)=0Reρ=12\xi(\rho)=0 \Longrightarrow \operatorname{Re}\rho=\frac12
Variables

rho in the complex plane

Hypotheses

xi(rho)=0

Open overview work with exact source conditions · After this update

Open overview work with exact source conditions

After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

opening missing-reference and theta-gate status; alternative endpoint availability

Required conclusion

Produce the specifically scoped missing theorem or estimate.

Retain exact analytic or combinatorial conditions and all source/destination dependencies.

A source-reported audit or a finite diagnostic does not complete this obligation.

Proposed next action

Follow the exact source work quoted in these anchors, preserving every stated hypothesis, quantifier, source measure and exclusion.

S30 actual exponential lower bound · After this update

S30 actual exponential lower bound

After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

Prove, for the actual Liouville coefficients, the source-defined B_exp(x)=Σ λ(n)n^−2(1−e^(−nx)) lower bound B_exp(x)≥−C_η x^(3/2−η) eventually for every η>0. The source reports this family as equivalent to RH and does not obtain the signed-coefficient cancellation merely from a nonoscillatory kernel.

Required conclusion

Retain the actual λ(n) coefficients and the exact exponential kernel.

Prove the eventual family for every η>0, not a finite sample or a different sign sequence.

Keep the equivalence proof separate from achievement of its unproved lower-bound premise.

Proposed next action

Control the signed actual exponential sum with the stated η-dependent lower bound in the limiting regime of the source.

L28-01/02 and L30-01–03 actual Liouville sine series, k^3 truncation, x=k^-2 · After this update

L28-01/02 and L30-01–03 actual Liouville sine series, k^3 truncation, x=k^-2

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

6. Actual Liouville Fourier estimates, real smoothing, and characters

All controlling proofs are in active_proof_fourier_arithmetic.txt, especially SEG-v28-fourier, SEG-v30-fourier and SEG-v30-smoothing. Actual Liouville coefficients, an arbitrary sign model and a prime quadratic character are distinct inputs.

6.1 Sampling and the correct quantifier — L28-01–02; L30-01–03

Define

L(x)=n1λ(n)n-2sin(2πnx),Tk=nk3λ(n)n-2sin(2πn/k2).\mathscr L(x)=\sum_{n\ge1}\lambda(n)n^{-2}\sin(2\pi nx),\quad T_k=\sum_{n\le k^3}\lambda(n)n^{-2}\sin(2\pi n/k^2).

Davenport's uniform additive-twist estimate, with partial summation, gives uniform convergence of G=λ(n)n-1cos(2πnx)G=\sum\lambda(n)n^{-1}\cos(2\pi nx), L'=2πG\mathscr L'=2\pi G, G(0)=0G(0)=0, and

L(x)=Tk+OA(k-3(logk)-A),(k+1)-2xk-2.(L30-01)\mathscr L(x)=T_k+O_A(k^{-3}(\log k)^{-A}), \quad(k+1)^{-2}\le x\le k^{-2}. \tag{L30-01}

A fixed logarithmic loss transfers with the same exponent B, improving the older bounded-coefficient modulus. At B=0 the continuous lower constant may be C+eta. These unconditional logarithmic savings do not supply the missing power of k.

For 0<s<10<\Re s<1,

0L(x)xs-2dx=Asin(s)ζ(2s+2)ζ(s+1),Asin(s)=(2π)1-sΓ(s)cos(πs/2)1-s.(L28-01)\int_0^\infty\mathscr L(x)x^{s-2}dx= \mathcal A_{\sin}(s)\frac{\zeta(2s+2)}{\zeta(s+1)},\quad \mathcal A_{\sin}(s)=\frac{(2\pi)^{1-s}\Gamma(s)\cos(\pi s/2)}{1-s}. \tag{L28-01}

The real boundary pole at s=-1/2 has residue a0=-4π2/(3ζ(1/2))>0a_0=-4\pi^2/(3\zeta(1/2))>0. A fixed bound Tk-Ck-3(logk)BT_k\ge-Ck^{-3}(\log k)^B, B>=0, for every sufficiently large k gives RH and

mρB+1.(L30-02)m_\rho\le\lfloor B\rfloor+1. \tag{L30-02}

The nonreal boundary numerator does not cancel, and the added logarithmic Mellin term is locally holomorphic there, including nonintegral B. For B=0 this forces simplicity and |Asin(ρ-1)ζ(2ρ)/ζ'(ρ)|a0+C|\mathcal A_{\sin}(\rho-1)\zeta(2\rho)/\zeta'(\rho)|\le a_0+C. Do not call fixed-log estimates automatic consequences of RH.

The non-overshooting target is instead

RHTk-k-3exp((logk)2/3)for every sufficiently large integerk.(L30-03)\mathrm{RH}\iff T_k\ge-k^{-3}\exp((\log k)^{2/3}) \quad\text{for every sufficiently large integer }k. \tag{L30-03}

Sufficiency uses the subpower loss and nonnegative Mellin argument. Necessity uses R-MOBIUS-RH, not the unconditional source, followed by the square-divisor identity and subtraction of the zero linear sine term. The lower-bound quantifier remains all-k. The new Q32 sparse-energy theorem does not authorize sparse Fourier sampling.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

L28-01/02 and L30-01–03 actual Liouville sine series, k^3 truncation, x=k^-2; every large k required, fixed log loss implies extra multiplicity constraints.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

A28 all-scale exceptional-count bound · After this update

A28 all-scale exceptional-count bound

After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

Establish the all-scale bound E_h(X)=O_ε(X^(1/2+ε)) for every ε>0 in the source-defined actual exceptional-count problem. The source gives this as a sufficient RH interface and does not establish it. The stronger polylogarithmic count is a separate, unproved target.

Required conclusion

The count is the source-defined E_h rather than a model or replacement sequence.

The estimate holds at all sufficiently large scales for each ε>0; a sparse statement must be separately justified by the applicable endpoint.

Neither the conditional implication nor a finite count experiment is reported as the missing estimate.

Proposed next action

Prove a uniform eventual count estimate for the actual E_h and each positive ε, preserving the source definition and its all-scale quantifier.

A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension · After this update

A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

4. Theta annihilation, zero isolation and all-scale bad blocks

The A28 family is a separate arithmetic route. Full proofs and the v31 endpoint/filter audit are in active_proof_arithmetic.txt, notably SEG-v28-excursions and SEG-v31-perron-filter-audit. The implications below are inherited written analysis; the first v32 audit reran their finite checks but did not independently reprove this entire infinite spectral argument.

4.1 Exact annihilation and returns — A28-01–03

The whole-line spectral extension is

Gspec(t)=α+ρmρe(ρ-1/2)t(ρ-1/2)(ρ+1/2).G_{\rm spec}(t)=\alpha+\sum_\rho\frac{m_\rho e^{(\rho-1/2)t}}{(\rho-1/2)(\rho+1/2)}.

Its series is locally uniformly absolutely convergent, with growth at most |α|+Ce|t|/2|\alpha|+Ce^{|t|/2}. It is not the zero extension used in the divisor operator, and it does not extend the trivial-zero series to negative t. For the even probability density p=Φ/X(0)p=\Phi/X(0),

p(u)Gspec(t+u)du=α.(A28-01)\int_{\mathbb R}p(u)G_{\rm spec}(t+u)du=\alpha. \tag{A28-01}

Each shifted-zero exponential is annihilated by the exact theta transform; exponential moments justify interchange. The theta-tail estimate yields the constructive return

supxyY(x)Far(y)α-O((logx)-9/4),Y(x)=xπ(12logx+4loglogx).(A28-02)\sup_{x\le y\le Y(x)}F_{\rm ar}(y)\ge\alpha-O((\log x)^{-9/4}),\quad Y(x)=\frac{x}{\pi}(\tfrac12\log x+4\log\log x). \tag{A28-02}

The center factor eR/2e^{R/2} is retained in the tail calculation. A cell maximum is at an integer endpoint. Combining these returns with the clipped potential gives

(h-Far(x))+3NEhx/(3logx)N3xlogxN-1/2+O(logx/x).(A28-03)(h-F_{\rm ar}(x))_+\le 3\!\sum_{\substack{N\in\mathcal E_h\\x/(3\log x)\le N\le3x\log x}}N^{-1/2} +O(\sqrt{\log x/x}). \tag{A28-03}

Thus a proved all-scale bound Eh(X)=Oϵ(X1/2+ϵ)E_h(X)=O_\varepsilon(X^{1/2+\varepsilon}) for every positive epsilon would imply RH. The stronger polylogarithmic version gives a polylogarithmic lower bound for F. Neither count upper bound is established.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension; theta annihilation and constructive kernel do not supply exceptional-count upper bound.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Selected-character matching and sign together · After this update

Selected-character matching and sign together

After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

For every sufficiently large k, produce the selected prime character required by L28-05 with both its Liouville-prefix matching and its signed finite-sum lower bound at that same scale. The characters may change with k. The source does not provide one fixed character with arbitrarily long Liouville prefixes, and it excludes universal positivity.

Required conclusion

Use one admissible prime character for the two requirements at each sufficiently large k.

Preserve the source’s exact congruence, matching and lower-bound conditions, including the tail error.

Do not replace selected-character control by universal positivity or by a single fixed character.

Proposed next action

Prove the selected-family matching and sign estimates jointly with the precise modulus, parity, prefix and error conditions in L28-05.

Separate arithmetic, energy and theta endpoints remain open · After this update

Separate arithmetic, energy and theta endpoints remain open

After this update

  • Reported status: reported
Milestone kind

frontier refined

Milestone scope

The source adds sparse energy, same-function reference, arithmetic and signed-transform endpoints. The newer phase-zero fixed-witness route is distinct from the retained modulus-one boundary graph.

Boundary geometry and portal law · Before this update · After this update

Boundary geometry and portal law

Before this update · After this update

  • Reported status: reported
Milestone kind

result

Milestone scope

The packet reports the boundary circle, canonical phase, Wronskian formulas, boundary jets, portal law, regular-edge phase monotonicity, and multiplicity-safe rectangle accounting.

Strict phase flow on regular nodal edges · Before this update · After this update

Strict phase flow on regular nodal edges

Before this update · After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: intermediate
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The packet reports that every regular edge of U=0 can be oriented so V increases strictly with derivative |grad U|^2.

Formula
dVds=|U|2>0\frac{dV}{ds}=|\nabla U|^2>0
Variables

regular point of U=0

Hypotheses

the tangent is oriented by (-U_gamma,U_a)

Exceptions

singular points are treated as vertices

Boundary geometry and portal law · After this update · Historical record

Boundary geometry and portal law

After this update · Historical record

  • Reported status: superseded
Milestone kind

result

Milestone scope

The packet reports the boundary circle, canonical phase, Wronskian formulas, boundary jets, portal law, regular-edge phase monotonicity, and multiplicity-safe rectangle accounting.

Directed nodal graph frontier · Before this update · After this update

Directed nodal graph frontier

Before this update · After this update

  • Reported status: reported
Milestone kind

frontier refined

Milestone scope

Revision 6 adds singular geometry, endpoint exclusions, properness and end classification, compact-component exclusion, infinity/right-edge safety, and recasts the root gate as global directed endpoint pairing.

Exact local singular normal form · Before this update · After this update

Exact local singular normal form

Before this update · After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: intermediate
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The packet reports a local conformal coordinate in which an order-m singular point satisfies h-h(w0)=z^m and has exactly m incoming and m outgoing nodal half-branches.

Formula
h(w)-h(w0)=zmh(w)-h(w_0)=z^m
Variables

interior singular point w0

order m of the first nonzero derivative

Hypotheses

U(w0)=0

Proper components and classified ends · Before this update · After this update

Proper components and classified ends

Before this update · After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: intermediate
Statement kind

reduction

Statement

The packet reports that target nodal components are proper, have no bottom, origin, or compact-component endpoints, and can end only at imaginary-boundary portals, right-edge intersections, or infinity; regular infinity edges are phase-safe.

Variables

connected component of U=0 in 0<Re(w)<1/2, Im(w)>0

Hypotheses

component lies in the target half-strip

Exceptions

global incidence among the allowed ends is not determined

Zero-phase singular exclusion · Before this update · After this update

Zero-phase singular exclusion

Before this update · After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: proposed
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: missing premise
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: general
Statement kind

theorem candidate

Statement

There is no target-strip point with U=0, V=0, and h'=0; equivalently, the two displayed L-equations have no target-strip solution.

Formula
¬w: U(w)=V(w)=h'(w)=0\neg\exists w:\ U(w)=V(w)=h'(w)=0
Variables

w in the target half-strip

Hypotheses

0<Re(w)<1/2

Im(w)>0

Directed nodal graph frontier · After this update · Historical record

Directed nodal graph frontier

After this update · Historical record

  • Reported status: superseded
Milestone kind

frontier refined

Milestone scope

Revision 6 adds singular geometry, endpoint exclusions, properness and end classification, compact-component exclusion, infinity/right-edge safety, and recasts the root gate as global directed endpoint pairing.

NR-16 — Finite scopes. C103, C163, D26-BAND and profile diagnostics concern different domains; their finite coverage cannot be merged. · After this update

NR-16 — Finite scopes. C103, C163, D26-BAND and profile diagnostics concern different domains; their finite coverage cannot be merged.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-16 — Finite scopes. C103, C163, D26-BAND and profile diagnostics concern different domains; their finite coverage cannot be merged.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-14 — Local rays. An available left ray need not splice to the fixed witness. Admissibility, endpoints and attained extrema remain separate. · After this update

NR-14 — Local rays. An available left ray need not splice to the fixed witness. Admissibility, endpoints and attained extrema remain separate.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-14 — Local rays. An available left ray need not splice to the fixed witness. Admissibility, endpoints and attained extrema remain separate.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

K26 zero-replacement and prescribed-fold constructions have different retained hypotheses; E26 loses exact arithmetic/functional equation; no counterexample to actual zeta. · After this update

K26 zero-replacement and prescribed-fold constructions have different retained hypotheses; E26 loses exact arithmetic/functional equation; no counterexample to actual zeta.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

The shortcut, overstatement or model substitution identified in the exact governing quotation.

Failure scope

17. Same-kernel and Euler-data stress tests

Full constructions are in active_proof_contact_geometry.txt, with K26/E26 stable IDs. These are precise scope tests, not counterexamples to the actual zeta function.

K26-01–03: common-kernel zero replacement. Choose simple critical-line pairs at T±delta and write

P(w)=(w2+(T-δ)2)(w2+(T+δ)2),Q(w)=((w-δ)2+T2)((w+δ)2+T2).P(w)=(w^2+(T-\delta)^2)(w^2+(T+\delta)^2),\quad Q(w)=((w-\delta)^2+T^2)((w+\delta)^2+T^2).

Then Q-P=4delta²(T²-w²) and X˜=XQ/P\widetilde X=XQ/P replaces those pairs with an off-axis quartet while preserving the full prescribed zero strip. Resolvents realize this through a single common positive even analytic superexponentially decreasing kernel, preserving the listed finite open curvature/shape bounds for sufficiently late choices. The supply of suitable simple pairs uses the cited positive-proportion theorem; that external analytic premise was not independently reproved in the first audit.

K26-04–05: prescribed regular wrong fold. A separate six-jet common-kernel perturbation fixes a0=1/4, high w_tau and epsilon=e^-tau, prescribing the quotient perturbation T(w)=epsilon,T'=i*epsilon,T''=i*epsilon. The resulting actual contact for that perturbed kernel has K_a<0, K_gammagamma>0, radial second derivative 1, and pencil root c=1/20. This construction does not assert that every zero stays in the original strip. Never combine its fold conclusion with the strip-preservation claim from the other family without a new simultaneous construction.

K26-06: lost exact arithmetic. The first deformation gives ζ˜(σ)=1-4δ2/σ2+O(σ-3)\widetilde\zeta(\sigma)=1-4\delta^2/\sigma^2+O(\sigma^{-3}), inconsistent with the exponentially small right-half-plane tail of the exact ordinary Dirichlet series. Generic positive-kernel and finite-jet conditions thus do not replace exact zeta arithmetic.

E26-01: positive Euler data are also insufficient. The model Zmod(s)=ζ(s)/[ζ(s+1/4+i/4)ζ(s+1/4-i/4)]Z_{\rm mod}(s)=\zeta(s)/[\zeta(s+1/4+i/4)\zeta(s+1/4-i/4)] with the specified small-prime corrections through 13 has positive ordinary and logarithmic-derivative coefficients, the leading PNT scale, and zeros at 3/4±i/4. It loses the exact coefficients and completed functional equation. The O28 inverse perturbations in §5 preserve a different list (integer forcing, jumps, moments) but lose the exact between-jump ODE. These lists cannot be merged into a stronger countermodel than was actually built.

A reopened generic route must name an exact additional hypothesis excluding the relevant retained model. Replacing 'positive kernel' by 'very regular positive kernel' or positive coefficients by 'Euler-positive' does not do so.

Reported witness

Source-reported argument or finite witness only; source attachments were not inspected or executed.

What remains viable

Only the alternatives and stronger hypotheses explicitly preserved in this quotation.

S30-01–05 actual exponential endpoint remains open; positive squarefree average, squared inverse and smoothing obstructions do not refute the actual Liouville lower bound. · After this update

S30-01–05 actual exponential endpoint remains open; positive squarefree average, squared inverse and smoothing obstructions do not refute the actual Liouville lower bound.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

The shortcut, overstatement or model substitution identified in the exact governing quotation.

Failure scope

6.2 Exact real-kernel identities and sign obstructions — S30-01–05

Let Bexp(x)=λ(n)n-2(1-e-nx)B_{\exp}(x)=\sum\lambda(n)n^{-2}(1-e^{-nx}). Its Mellin factor is Γ(s)/(1-s)\Gamma(s)/(1-s) times the same zeta quotient. The family Bexp(x)-Cηx3/2-ηB_{\exp}(x)\ge-C_\eta x^{3/2-\eta} eventually for every eta>0 is equivalent to RH. A nonoscillatory kernel still requires signed-coefficient cancellation.

For bounded continuous phi and Hφ=λ(n)n-2φ(nx)H_\phi=\sum\lambda(n)n^{-2}\phi(nx), define Dwf=w(d)d-2f(dx)D_wf=\sum w(d)d^{-2}f(dx). Then

DwHφ=(w*λ)(n)n-2φ(nx),λ*μ2=δ1,Dμ2Hφ=φ.(S30-02)D_wH_\phi=\sum(w*\lambda)(n)n^{-2}\phi(nx),\quad \lambda*\mu^2=\delta_1,\quad D_{\mu^2}H_\phi=\phi. \tag{S30-02}

If w(1)=1 and w*lambda is coefficientwise nonnegative, then w=μ2*(w*λ)μ2w=\mu^2*(w*\lambda)\ge\mu^2, also on a finite positive prefix. The critical absolute norm is therefore at least 12M/π2-O(logM)12\sqrt M/\pi^2-O(\log M). The positive average cancels the detecting poles, not the inverse sign problem.

For the actual coefficients,

Vexp(x)=2Bexp(x)-Bexp(2x),Dμ2Vexp=(1-e-x)2>0,Vexp(log(4/3))<-1/50.(S30-03)V_{\exp}(x)=2B_{\exp}(x)-B_{\exp}(2x),\quad D_{\mu^2}V_{\exp}=(1-e^{-x})^2>0, \quad V_{\exp}(\log(4/3))<-1/50. \tag{S30-03}

A positive increasing source (1-e-x)+5(1-e-x)2(1-e^{-x})+5(1-e^{-x})^2 also has a negative inverse below -1/100 there; the same certificate has Bexp(log(4/3))<9/100B_{\exp}(\log(4/3))<9/100. CK056 stores the exact rational finite sums and tails once. These examples do not show that B_exp or the actual sine series is negative.

For bounded continuous nonzero phi>=0 satisfying φ(x)=O(xq)\phi(x)=O(x^q), q>3/2,

liminfx0Hφ(x)x3/2rφ:=12ζ(1/2)0φ(u)u-5/2du<0.(S30-04)\liminf_{x\downarrow0}\frac{H_\phi(x)}{x^{3/2}}\le r_\phi:=\frac1{2\zeta(1/2)}\int_0^\infty\phi(u)u^{-5/2}du<0. \tag{S30-04}

The negative real residue and Landau positivity prove the statement. More positive smoothing can create unavoidable negative values. Subtracting a zero linear term is not the same operation as replacing the original kernel by its square.

For a finite-support normalized filter, (w*λ)(p)=-1(w*\lambda)(p)=-1 beyond support. At x=1/X the absolute prime contribution in (X,2X] is of order 1/(XlogX)1/(X\log X), larger than X-3/2+o(1)X^{-3/2+o(1)}. An absolute far-tail estimate needs support at least X3/2-o(1)X^{3/2-o(1)}, hence positive-prefix critical norm at least X3/4-o(1)X^{3/4-o(1)}. This limits absolute estimation; it does not determine the complete signed sum.

Reported witness

Source-reported argument or finite witness only; source attachments were not inspected or executed.

What remains viable

Only the alternatives and stronger hypotheses explicitly preserved in this quotation.

NR-11 — Endpoint jets. All finite algebraic odd-sine endpoint jets vanish. More fixed-order integration by parts does not recover the sign. · After this update

NR-11 — Endpoint jets. All finite algebraic odd-sine endpoint jets vanish. More fixed-order integration by parts does not recover the sign.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-11 — Endpoint jets. All finite algebraic odd-sine endpoint jets vanish. More fixed-order integration by parts does not recover the sign.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-20 — Positive Euler data. E26 has positive ordinary/prime-power data and PNT leading behavior but off-line zeros; exact arithmetic is missing. · After this update

NR-20 — Positive Euler data. E26 has positive ordinary/prime-power data and PNT leading behavior but off-line zeros; exact arithmetic is missing.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-20 — Positive Euler data. E26 has positive ordinary/prime-power data and PNT leading behavior but off-line zeros; exact arithmetic is missing.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-36 — Two different costs. Critical finite W has coefficient Z; the coarse prime-local product has e^gamma_E Z. Keep finite cutoffs in asymptotics. · After this update

NR-36 — Two different costs. Critical finite W has coefficient Z; the coarse prime-local product has e^gamma_E Z. Keep finite cutoffs in asymptotics.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-36 — Two different costs. Critical finite W has coefficient Z; the coarse prime-local product has e^gamma_E Z. Keep finite cutoffs in asymptotics.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-42 — Threshold example. The ternary reference has nonnegative sums but cost~(2sqrt3/pi)sqrt X. Big-O cost does not imply the little-o terminal condition. · After this update

NR-42 — Threshold example. The ternary reference has nonnegative sums but cost~(2sqrt3/pi)sqrt X. Big-O cost does not imply the little-o terminal condition.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-42 — Threshold example. The ternary reference has nonnegative sums but cost~(2sqrt3/pi)sqrt X. Big-O cost does not imply the little-o terminal condition.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

B32-05 finite seven-frequency constant obstruction >1.0057; CK062/067 are source-reported and share interval backend. · After this update

B32-05 finite seven-frequency constant obstruction >1.0057; CK062/067 are source-reported and share interval backend.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

The shortcut, overstatement or model substitution identified in the exact governing quotation.

Failure scope

2.8 A finite spectral obstruction and the exact threshold example

Let ρ0=1/2+iγ0\rho_0=1/2+i\gamma_0 be the simple zero certified near γ0=14.13472514173469379046\gamma_0=14.13472514173469379046, and put

c0=-1/ζ(1/2),a0=ζ(2ρ0)/(ρ0ζ'(ρ0)),d0=2cos(π/8)|a0|.c_0=-1/\zeta(1/2),\quad a_0=\zeta(2\rho_0)/(\rho_0\zeta'(\rho_0)), \quad d_0=2\cos(\pi/8)|a_0|.

CK062 proves nonvanishing of ζ(1/2+ijγ0)\zeta(1/2+ij\gamma_0) for j=2,,6j=2,\ldots,6, and c0>d0c_0>d_0. Under an eventual lower barrier ug-Cu_g\ge-C and weak cost, a seven-frequency positivity matrix gives

Cc0Mg+2cos(π/8)|a0Hg(ρ0)|c0Mg+d0/Mgc0+d0>1.0057.(B32-05)C\ge c_0M_g+2\cos(\pi/8)|a_0H_g(\rho_0)| \ge c_0M_g+d_0/M_g\ge c_0+d_0>1.0057. \tag{B32-05}

Thus every such weak-cost reference has liminfSg(x)/x-(c0+d0)\liminf S_g(x)/\sqrt x\le-(c_0+d_0). The matrix is tridiagonal because the five harmonics are nonzeros. This does not assume rational independence of ordinates or an infinite residue expansion.

Independent finite recheck: CK067 uses a separate explicit-derivative Euler–Maclaurin implementation (192 terms, 18 Bernoulli corrections and a radius-10-1210^{-12} root disk). It certifies 1.0057490559<c0+d0<1.00574905691.0057490559<c_0+d_0<1.0057490569, inside the repaired CK062 enclosure. Both use the same directed-interval library, so this is implementation independence, not backend independence. Exact rational endpoints govern, and the stable conclusion remains >1.0057. Neither program is an all-height zero check.

Reported witness

Source-reported argument or finite witness only; source attachments were not inspected or executed.

What remains viable

Only the alternatives and stronger hypotheses explicitly preserved in this quotation.

NR-25 — Universal characters. Genuine characters violate universal positivity even with any fixed matching prefix. No negative actual Liouville value is inferred. · After this update

NR-25 — Universal characters. Genuine characters violate universal positivity even with any fixed matching prefix. No negative actual Liouville value is inferred.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-25 — Universal characters. Genuine characters violate universal positivity even with any fixed matching prefix. No negative actual Liouville value is inferred.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-37 — Moving alpha. Use the finite uniform energy sandwich, not fixed-alpha sample asymptotics with alpha_X substituted. · After this update

NR-37 — Moving alpha. Use the finite uniform energy sandwich, not fixed-alpha sample asymptotics with alpha_X substituted.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-37 — Moving alpha. Use the finite uniform energy sandwich, not fixed-alpha sample asymptotics with alpha_X substituted.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-35 — Sparse independence. Logarithmic cost does not bound the hard deterministic mean. Expected energy is comparable to it; exceptional correlations are not excluded. · After this update

NR-35 — Sparse independence. Logarithmic cost does not bound the hard deterministic mean. Expected energy is comparable to it; exceptional correlations are not excluded.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-35 — Sparse independence. Logarithmic cost does not bound the hard deterministic mean. Expected energy is comparable to it; exceptional correlations are not excluded.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-33 — Fair/block-first references. Low fair energy comes with high cost; fixing a late block forces many positive signs under the stated conditioning. · After this update

NR-33 — Fair/block-first references. Low fair energy comes with high cost; fixing a late block forces many positive signs under the stated conditioning.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-33 — Fair/block-first references. Low fair energy comes with high cost; fixing a late block forces many positive signs under the stated conditioning.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-26 — Finite square samples. T_100>0 does not prove eventual control. Matching characters supplies approximation, not a nonnegative sign. · After this update

NR-26 — Finite square samples. T_100>0 does not prove eventual control. Matching characters supplies approximation, not a nonnegative sign.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-26 — Finite square samples. T_100>0 does not prove eventual control. Matching characters supplies approximation, not a nonnegative sign.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-18 — Common-kernel stress. K26 full-strip replacement and prescribed wrong-fold constructions are different families, not one combined countermodel. · After this update

NR-18 — Common-kernel stress. K26 full-strip replacement and prescribed wrong-fold constructions are different families, not one combined countermodel.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-18 — Common-kernel stress. K26 full-strip replacement and prescribed wrong-fold constructions are different families, not one combined countermodel.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-02 — Stieltjes order. A5–A6 retains positive measures, decreasing tail ratios, both nulls and negative contact, but the wrong J3 sign. · After this update

NR-02 — Stieltjes order. A5–A6 retains positive measures, decreasing tail ratios, both nulls and negative contact, but the wrong J3 sign.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-02 — Stieltjes order. A5–A6 retains positive measures, decreasing tail ratios, both nulls and negative contact, but the wrong J3 sign.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-21 — Finite sampling. No exception through two million is not tail control. The summable half N^-3/2 sampling loss must be retained. · After this update

NR-21 — Finite sampling. No exception through two million is not tail control. The summable half N^-3/2 sampling loss must be retained.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-21 — Finite sampling. No exception through two million is not tail control. The summable half N^-3/2 sampling loss must be retained.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-28 — Fourier overreach. B=0 fixed-log Fourier bounds force simplicity and derivative-residue bounds. Use L30-03 for the RH-equivalent target. · After this update

NR-28 — Fourier overreach. B=0 fixed-log Fourier bounds force simplicity and derivative-residue bounds. Use L30-03 for the RH-equivalent target.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-28 — Fourier overreach. B=0 fixed-log Fourier bounds force simplicity and derivative-residue bounds. Use L30-03 for the RH-equivalent target.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

B32-06 ternary reference has bounded energy and big-O sqrt-cost; little-o cannot be replaced by big-O. Composite feedback and finite tests are limited. · After this update

B32-06 ternary reference has bounded energy and big-O sqrt-cost; little-o cannot be replaced by big-O. Composite feedback and finite tests are limited.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

The shortcut, overstatement or model substitution identified in the exact governing quotation.

Failure scope

For the threshold example, define g3(3am)=χ3(m)g_3(3^a m)=\chi_3(m) for 3m3\nmid m, where χ3\chi_3 is the nonprincipal real character modulo 3. Then

Sg3(N)=#{base-3 digits ofNequal to 1},Eg3()1+2/log3+2/(log3)2,S_{g_3}(N)=\#\{\text{base-3 digits of }N\text{ equal to 1}\},\quad \mathcal E_{g_3}(\infty)\le1+2/\log3+2/(\log3)^2,
Wg3(X)=23πX+O((logX)3).(B32-06)W_{g_3}(X)=\frac{2\sqrt3}{\pi}\sqrt X+O((\log X)^3). \tag{B32-06}

This disproves replacing little-o by big-O in the cost-improvement conclusion, not RH itself. A bounded-energy, one-sided reference is not enough without the specified cost.

CK064 independently replays exact energies at 10610^6, the feedback reference and its cost, the conditional mean at 10510^5, and the digit identity through 10510^5. The feedback rule changes a prime only if the previous sum is below -p-\sqrt p; it already fails the literal barrier at the composite integer 32. Its energy is about 5.85805 at 10610^6, but its cost is about 17.1570, giving a transferred upper bound over 1700 rather than the actual energy about 6.20034. These finite facts neither prove nor disprove all possible adaptive constructions.

Reported witness

Source-reported argument or finite witness only; source attachments were not inspected or executed.

What remains viable

Only the alternatives and stronger hypotheses explicitly preserved in this quotation.

Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height · Before this update · After this update

Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height

Before this update · After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

The positive-shift window can grow linearly with height without losing its global sign.

Failure scope

The source reports oscillation along every positive-slope ray.

Reported witness

Gamma-saddle asymptotics force the proportional shifted transforms to take both signs.

What remains viable

Keep shifts bounded and seek theta-specific localization.

Use height-growing interpolation order rather than an unbounded positive shift.

Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height · After this update · Historical record

Positive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with height

After this update · Historical record

  • Reported status: reported failure
  • Record status: superseded
Claimed shortcut

The positive-shift window can grow linearly with height without losing its global sign.

Failure scope

The source reports oscillation along every positive-slope ray.

Reported witness

Gamma-saddle asymptotics force the proportional shifted transforms to take both signs.

What remains viable

Keep shifts bounded and seek theta-specific localization.

Use height-growing interpolation order rather than an unbounded positive shift.

Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure · Before this update · After this update

Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure

Before this update · After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Generic positivity and the forced moment constraints alone rule out the zero-forced Stieltjes data.

Failure scope

The source reports a sharp positive two-atomic realization of the generic moment barrier.

Reported witness

A positive two-atomic construction realizes the forced moments whenever the sharp generic barrier holds.

What remains viable

Prove an actual theta-density property that excludes the two-atomic behavior.

Use a theta-specific higher determinant or density-ratio inequality.

Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure · After this update · Historical record

Abstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structure

After this update · Historical record

  • Reported status: reported failure
  • Record status: superseded
Claimed shortcut

Generic positivity and the forced moment constraints alone rule out the zero-forced Stieltjes data.

Failure scope

The source reports a sharp positive two-atomic realization of the generic moment barrier.

Reported witness

A positive two-atomic construction realizes the forced moments whenever the sharp generic barrier holds.

What remains viable

Prove an actual theta-density property that excludes the two-atomic behavior.

Use a theta-specific higher determinant or density-ratio inequality.

NR-43 — Prefix overshoot. T32-01 forces high-contact overshoot regardless of curvature orientation. PFX would already exclude those contacts; existence is not asserted. · After this update

NR-43 — Prefix overshoot. T32-01 forces high-contact overshoot regardless of curvature orientation. PFX would already exclude those contacts; existence is not asserted.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-43 — Prefix overshoot. T32-01 forces high-contact overshoot regardless of curvature orientation. PFX would already exclude those contacts; existence is not asserted.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-41 — Fixed barrier. The eventual -sqrt x barrier is impossible in B32 weak-cost references. Prime feedback alone does not control composite descendants. · After this update

NR-41 — Fixed barrier. The eventual -sqrt x barrier is impossible in B32 weak-cost references. Prime feedback alone does not control composite descendants.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-41 — Fixed barrier. The eventual -sqrt x barrier is impossible in B32 weak-cost references. Prime feedback alone does not control composite descendants.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-34 — Fixed bias limit. Fixed bias has a polynomial mean-energy term. Its nonuniform near-Liouville remainder cannot be discarded at the endpoint. · After this update

NR-34 — Fixed bias limit. Fixed bias has a polynomial mean-energy term. Its nonuniform near-Liouville remainder cannot be discarded at the endpoint.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-34 — Fixed bias limit. Fixed bias has a polynomial mean-energy term. Its nonuniform near-Liouville remainder cannot be discarded at the endpoint.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

O28-04–08 smooth/diagonal countermodels retain enumerated moments, jumps and decay but lose exact between-jump ODE; hypothetical off-line growth stays conditional. · After this update

O28-04–08 smooth/diagonal countermodels retain enumerated moments, jumps and decay but lose exact between-jump ODE; hypothetical off-line growth stays conditional.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

The shortcut, overstatement or model substitution identified in the exact governing quotation.

Failure scope

O28-04–05, resonance limitation. For a smooth cutoff chi=0 below1 and chi=1 above2,

Dar(χxλ)=ζ(λ+1/2)xλ+OK(x-K),λ<1/2,\mathcal D_{\rm ar}(\chi x^\lambda)=\zeta(\lambda+1/2)x^\lambda+O_K(x^{-K}), \quad\Re\lambda<1/2,

locally uniformly with parameter derivatives. A hypothetical off-line zero allows a power-growing oscillation whose image is smaller than every power; this is not an exhibited off-line zero or an exactly homogeneous solution. An actual critical-line zero also gives an unconditional loglog-growing oscillation with image tending to zero. A compact moment correction and the stated baseline retain negative forcing and its limit, defeating a bounded inverse rule. This alone does not defeat every subpower rule.

O28-06–08, arbitrary small negative sources. The exact inverse for h zero below1 is

(Rh)(x)=nμ(n)n-1/2h(x/n),TRh=h.(\mathcal Rh)(x)=\sum_n\mu(n)n^{-1/2}h(x/n),\qquad\mathcal T\mathcal Rh=h.

For smooth h supported in (Y,2Y), the unconditional Mertens estimate gives Rh(x)A,Yx(logx)-AVY(h)\mathcal Rh(x)\ll_{A,Y}\sqrt x(\log x)^{-A}\mathcal V_Y(h), where VY(h)=12|h|y-3/2+|h'|y-1/2\mathcal V_Y(h)=\frac12\int|h|y^{-3/2}+\int|h'|y^{-1/2}. The moment is absolutely convergent and zero, so DarRh=h\mathcal D_{\rm ar}\mathcal Rh=h.

Negative narrow bumps at P/n for μ(n)=1\mu(n)=1, avoiding integers and all other sample points, produce

Rh(P)-c+εP/Y,c+=6π2(1-1/2)>0.\mathcal Rh(P)\sim-c_+\epsilon\sqrt{P/Y},\quad c_+=\frac6{\pi^2}(1-1/\sqrt2)>0.

A locally finite diagonal choice makes the source h nonpositive, arbitrarily small in sup norm, zero near every integer, and OK(x-K)O_K(x^{-K}) for every fixed K. The perturbed solution g=F_0+u agrees initially, has the same derivative jumps and moment, and satisfies

g(Pj)-Pj1/2-1/j,g=o(x),Darg=Gar+h-κ0,|u|x-3/2<η.(O28-08)g(P_j)\le-P_j^{1/2-1/j},\quad g=o(\sqrt x),\quad \mathcal D_{\rm ar}g=\mathcal G_{\rm ar}+h\le-\kappa_0, \quad\int|u|x^{-3/2}<\eta. \tag{O28-08}

Thus exact forcing near integers, pointwise asymptotics to every order and a strict negative margin still do not give a generic subpower inverse theorem. Width choices are made after a variation-controlled tail cutoff; pointwise source decay is not derivative decay.

Reported witness

Source-reported argument or finite witness only; source attachments were not inspected or executed.

What remains viable

Only the alternatives and stronger hypotheses explicitly preserved in this quotation.

NR-01 — Generic positivity. Positive analytic/log-concave kernels admit off-axis zeros and wrong folds; an additional exact assumption is necessary. · After this update

NR-01 — Generic positivity. Positive analytic/log-concave kernels admit off-axis zeros and wrong folds; an additional exact assumption is necessary.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-01 — Generic positivity. Positive analytic/log-concave kernels admit off-axis zeros and wrong folds; an additional exact assumption is necessary.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-07 — Canceled channel. J4 already cancels the full sin(gamma r) channel. Bounding pieces first loses the relevant cancellation. · After this update

NR-07 — Canceled channel. J4 already cancels the full sin(gamma r) channel. Bounding pieces first loses the relevant cancellation.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-07 — Canceled channel. J4 already cancels the full sin(gamma r) channel. Bounding pieces first loses the relevant cancellation.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-30 — Extra smoothing. A nonnegative kernel vanishing faster than x^1.5 has negative real residue. Subtracting a zero linear term is not squaring the kernel. · After this update

NR-30 — Extra smoothing. A nonnegative kernel vanishing faster than x^1.5 has negative real residue. Subtracting a zero linear term is not squaring the kernel.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-30 — Extra smoothing. A nonnegative kernel vanishing faster than x^1.5 has negative real residue. Subtracting a zero linear term is not squaring the kernel.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-15 — Moment ceiling. The stationary-moment method has an exact constant ceiling near12; improving it cannot cover unbounded height. · After this update

NR-15 — Moment ceiling. The stationary-moment method has an exact constant ceiling near12; improving it cannot cover unbounded height.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-15 — Moment ceiling. The stationary-moment method has an exact constant ceiling near12; improving it cannot cover unbounded height.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

R30-01/02/03 independent prime signs; exact squarefree moment and fixed-bias/coherence failures only for the stated classes. · After this update

R30-01/02/03 independent prime signs; exact squarefree moment and fixed-bias/coherence failures only for the stated classes.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

The shortcut, overstatement or model substitution identified in the exact governing quotation.

Failure scope

For independent prime signs, write mp=Eg(p)m_p=\mathbb E g(p), vp=1-mp2v_p=1-m_p^2, and a(n)=Eg(n)a(n)=\mathbb E g(n). The mean is multiplicative but generally not completely multiplicative: its even prime-power values are 1, its odd values are mpm_p. If ada_d sets odd means to zero at primes dividing squarefree dd, then

EEg(X)=d squarefree,dXpdvpdEad(X/d).(R30-01)\mathbb E\mathcal E_g(X)=\sum_{d\ \mathrm{squarefree},d\le X} \frac{\prod_{p\mid d}v_p}{d}\,\mathcal E_{a_d}(X/d). \tag{R30-01}

It follows that EaEEgRm(X)Ea\mathcal E_a\le\mathbb E\mathcal E_g\le R_m(X)\mathcal E_a, where

Rm(X)=pX(1+1-mp2p(1-|mp|/p)2)pXpp-1=O(logX).(R30-02)R_m(X)=\prod_{p\le X}\left(1+\frac{1-m_p^2}{p(1-|m_p|/\sqrt p)^2}\right) \le\prod_{p\le X}\frac p{p-1}=O(\log X). \tag{R30-02}

The local inequality is the square (p|mp|-1)20(\sqrt p\,|m_p|-1)^2\ge0. Fair signs have square-indicator mean, EEg(X)=3(logX)2/π2+O(logX)\mathbb E\mathcal E_g(X)=3(\log X)^2/\pi^2+O(\log X), and almost surely a polylogarithmic prefix-maximum Qg*Q_g^* bound; their comparison cost is not subpower. The order-log mean-energy factor is genuine (R30-03).

Q30-07–09 record precise failed shortcuts: coherent high-prime translations have norm of order X/logX\sqrt X/\log X; a prime-13 change lowers Q(13)Q(13) by exactly 8/138/13; block-first fair conditioning forces about half the block positive to preserve low mean energy; and fixed negative bias has a polynomial-size Selberg–Delange mean. None proves a universal impossibility for carefully coordinated references. Each counterexample's retained and lost hypotheses are recorded in §18 and the proof topic.

Reported witness

Source-reported argument or finite witness only; source attachments were not inspected or executed.

What remains viable

Only the alternatives and stronger hypotheses explicitly preserved in this quotation.

NR-03 — Fixed ballot sign. Actual theta germs near heights 82.9 and 84.7 force both proposed J signs; the exact live-ballot check excludes the gate. · After this update

NR-03 — Fixed ballot sign. Actual theta germs near heights 82.9 and 84.7 force both proposed J signs; the exact live-ballot check excludes the gate.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-03 — Fixed ballot sign. Actual theta germs near heights 82.9 and 84.7 force both proposed J signs; the exact live-ballot check excludes the gate.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-39 — Auxiliary cancellation. Quarter-power control is for c, not lambda or g. Affine subtraction and decaying source retain hypothetical off-line poles. · After this update

NR-39 — Auxiliary cancellation. Quarter-power control is for c, not lambda or g. Affine subtraction and decaying source retain hypothetical off-line poles.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-39 — Auxiliary cancellation. Quarter-power control is for c, not lambda or g. Affine subtraction and decaying source retain hypothetical off-line poles.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

L28-03–06 finite altered g and CRT-selected characters only; reported external Conrey v1 counterexample needs separate review, no fixed-character or Liouville-sign inference. · After this update

L28-03–06 finite altered g and CRT-selected characters only; reported external Conrey v1 counterexample needs separate review, no fixed-character or Liouville-sign inference.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

The shortcut, overstatement or model substitution identified in the exact governing quotation.

Failure scope

6.3 Genuine-character obstruction and its precise scope — L28-03–06

Take g completely multiplicative, +1 on primes 5000<p<10000 and -1 otherwise. Independent fixed-point and Fraction engines certify at N=10^6, x=10^-4:

-4956/109<nNg(n)sin(2πnx)/n2<-4953/109,8755/109<T100<8757/109.(L28-CERT)-4956/10^9<\sum_{n\le N}g(n)\sin(2\pi nx)/n^2<-4953/10^9, \quad8755/10^9<T_{100}<8757/10^9. \tag{L28-CERT}

The absolute 1/N tails imply a negative infinite g series and a positive actual Liouville series. For each odd p<=N, prescribe (q/p)=g(p)(-1)(p-1)/2(q/p)=g(p)(-1)^{(p-1)/2} and q=3 mod8. Reciprocity, CRT and Dirichlet give infinitely many prime conductors q>N realizing the entire finite sign pattern; mod8 supplies the sign at2. Thus these are genuine prime quadratic characters, not relabelled arbitrary sequences. No explicit conductor was computed.

This contradicts the universal positivity statement of Conrey's arXiv:2404.19647v1, Conjecture1, as stated there, but not his conditional implication or the actual Liouville inequality. No novelty-priority assertion is made. Finite exact logs and the two engines are retained; optimized Python cannot silently skip assertions.

Arbitrary fixed-prefix agreement does not restore universality. The unconditional Mertens bound and the zero harmonic sum give L(x)Ax/(log(1/x))A\mathscr L(x)\ll_A x/(\log(1/x))^A. On [2/3,5/6], a first-term and tail estimate gives L(y)-c0\mathscr L(y)\le-c_0, c0=1+3/2-π2/6>0c_0=1+\sqrt3/2-\pi^2/6>0. For small x, flip only primes 2/(3x)<p<5/(6x)2/(3x)<p<5/(6x). Then g_x agrees with lambda through 2/(3x), but the positive convolution identity yields

Sgx(x)L(x)-2c0Sx+O(Sx2)-cx/log(1/x),Sx(3/10)x/log(1/x).(L28-04/06)\mathscr S_{g_x}(x)\le\mathscr L(x)-2c_0S_x+O(S_x^2) \le-cx/\log(1/x),\quad S_x\sim(3/10)x/\log(1/x). \tag{L28-04/06}

Longer finite CRT matching and an absolute tail transfer the negative value to genuine characters at each scale. Characters change with x; no one fixed character has arbitrarily long Liouville prefixes.

The remaining selected-family possibility L28-05 is: for every sufficiently large k find one prime character q_k=3 mod8 matching through k^3 and with Sχqk(k-2)0\mathscr S_{\chi_{q_k}}(k^{-2})\ge0. It would give T_k>=-k^-3, hence RH and simplicity. CRT supplies matching, not the required sign. This optional gate must control scale, match length and sign together and has not been proved.

Reported witness

Source-reported argument or finite witness only; source attachments were not inspected or executed.

What remains viable

Only the alternatives and stronger hypotheses explicitly preserved in this quotation.

NR-12 — Nearest-zero model. Support-pole models may violate stationarity or the sign. Actual nulls and background terms must be retained. · After this update

NR-12 — Nearest-zero model. Support-pole models may violate stationarity or the sign. Actual nulls and background terms must be retained.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-12 — Nearest-zero model. Support-pole models may violate stationarity or the sign. Actual nulls and background terms must be retained.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-22 — Count quantifiers. All-window blocks give exponent1 without attainment. Positive lower density requires attainment; o(X) is not enough generally. · After this update

NR-22 — Count quantifiers. All-window blocks give exponent1 without attainment. Positive lower density requires attainment; o(X) is not enough generally.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-22 — Count quantifiers. All-window blocks give exponent1 without attainment. Positive lower density requires attainment; o(X) is not enough generally.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-13 — Boundary collar. Multiplicity-safe local collars depend on height and do not provide a uniform all-height collar. · After this update

NR-13 — Boundary collar. Multiplicity-safe local collars depend on height and do not provide a uniform all-height collar.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-13 — Boundary collar. Multiplicity-safe local collars depend on height and do not provide a uniform all-height collar.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-31 — Energy minimizer. A single prime13 flip decreases Q(13) by8/13. Liouville is not the minimizer; this alone says nothing about every mean comparison. · After this update

NR-31 — Energy minimizer. A single prime13 flip decreases Q(13) by8/13. Liouville is not the minimizer; this alone says nothing about every mean comparison.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-31 — Energy minimizer. A single prime13 flip decreases Q(13) by8/13. Liouville is not the minimizer; this alone says nothing about every mean comparison.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-08 — Moving divisor scale. J6 fixed-scale TP2 does not persist under changing physical scale or removal of incomplete causal tails. · After this update

NR-08 — Moving divisor scale. J6 fixed-scale TP2 does not persist under changing physical scale or removal of incomplete causal tails.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-08 — Moving divisor scale. J6 fixed-scale TP2 does not persist under changing physical scale or removal of incomplete causal tails.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-19 — Cubic recursion. The cubic increment is not monotone; fixed ratio slack is already PNT-scale. Absolute inversion loses sqrt x. · After this update

NR-19 — Cubic recursion. The cubic increment is not monotone; fixed ratio slack is already PNT-scale. Absolute inversion loses sqrt x.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-19 — Cubic recursion. The cubic increment is not monotone; fixed ratio slack is already PNT-scale. Absolute inversion loses sqrt x.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-24 — Negative source. O28 defeats generic inverse bounds while losing exact between-jump evolution. Pointwise source decay is not derivative decay. · After this update

NR-24 — Negative source. O28 defeats generic inverse bounds while losing exact between-jump evolution. Pointwise source decay is not derivative decay.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-24 — Negative source. O28 defeats generic inverse bounds while losing exact between-jump evolution. Pointwise source decay is not derivative decay.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-29 — Positive averages. The squarefree average cancels zeta poles but has a negative actual squared-exponential inverse. Positive-source inversion is not sign-preserving. · After this update

NR-29 — Positive averages. The squarefree average cancels zeta poles but has a negative actual squared-exponential inverse. Positive-source inversion is not sign-preserving.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-29 — Positive averages. The squarefree average cancels zeta poles but has a negative actual squared-exponential inverse. Positive-source inversion is not sign-preserving.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-17 — Denominator sign. D26 locates supporting zeros, not new stationary contacts. D26-POLY defeats orientation from that sign alone. · After this update

NR-17 — Denominator sign. D26 locates supporting zeros, not new stationary contacts. D26-POLY defeats orientation from that sign alone.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-17 — Denominator sign. D26 locates supporting zeros, not new stationary contacts. D26-POLY defeats orientation from that sign alone.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-04 — Old envelope. At a=.01 the old ratio t²k/(k−tk′) turns near t=.5–.72. It is not the current varrho profile. · After this update

NR-04 — Old envelope. At a=.01 the old ratio t²k/(k−tk′) turns near t=.5–.72. It is not the current varrho profile.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-04 — Old envelope. At a=.01 the old ratio t²k/(k−tk′) turns near t=.5–.72. It is not the current varrho profile.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-40 — Covariance-only repair. R32-05 conditional means produce a same-sign x/log²x drift despite arbitrary large-prime correlations. Other means are outside scope. · After this update

NR-40 — Covariance-only repair. R32-05 conditional means produce a same-sign x/log²x drift despite arbitrary large-prime correlations. Other means are outside scope.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-40 — Covariance-only repair. R32-05 conditional means produce a same-sign x/log²x drift despite arbitrary large-prime correlations. Other means are outside scope.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-32 — Generic operator norm. Coherent large-prime translations have squared norm of order X/log²X. A smaller norm for actual inputs needs arithmetic proof. · After this update

NR-32 — Generic operator norm. Coherent large-prime translations have squared norm of order X/log²X. A smaller norm for actual inputs needs arithmetic proof.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-32 — Generic operator norm. Coherent large-prime translations have squared norm of order X/log²X. A smaller norm for actual inputs needs arithmetic proof.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-23 — Spectral filters. A zero-dependent filter proves oscillation, not an arithmetic count upper bound. Omitting its resonance repair kills selected modes. · After this update

NR-23 — Spectral filters. A zero-dependent filter proves oscillation, not an arithmetic count upper bound. Omitting its resonance repair kills selected modes.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-23 — Spectral filters. A zero-dependent filter proves oscillation, not an arithmetic count upper bound. Omitting its resonance repair kills selected modes.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-38 — Sparse multiplicity. Q32-06 now permits sparse logarithmic energy cutoffs. It does not permit sparse Fourier sampling. · After this update

NR-38 — Sparse multiplicity. Q32-06 now permits sparse logarithmic energy cutoffs. It does not permit sparse Fourier sampling.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-38 — Sparse multiplicity. Q32-06 now permits sparse logarithmic energy cutoffs. It does not permit sparse Fourier sampling.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-05 — Unweighted prefix. The z cot z=y prefix fails at y=4/5. Central-range estimates do not extend through y=1 or all y<1. · After this update

NR-05 — Unweighted prefix. The z cot z=y prefix fails at y=4/5. Central-range estimates do not extend through y=1 or all y<1.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-05 — Unweighted prefix. The z cot z=y prefix fails at y=4/5. Central-range estimates do not extend through y=1 or all y<1.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-06 — Positive polynomial. Positive physical amplitudes and pencils can have opposite leading sine signs. Positivity is not P6. · After this update

NR-06 — Positive polynomial. Positive physical amplitudes and pencils can have opposite leading sine signs. Positivity is not P6.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-06 — Positive polynomial. Positive physical amplitudes and pencils can have opposite leading sine signs. Positivity is not P6.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

R32-05 fixed theta in (1/2,1), exact small-prime sigma-field and conditional means; extra independence needed for asymptotic equality, no uniform q to -1. · After this update

R32-05 fixed theta in (1/2,1), exact small-prime sigma-field and conditional means; extra independence needed for asymptotic equality, no uniform q to -1.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

The shortcut, overstatement or model substitution identified in the exact governing quotation.

Failure scope

R32-05 addresses a correlated class. Fix 1/2<θ<11/2<\theta<1, y=Xθy=X^\theta, Y=(logX)2Y=(\log X)^2. Change an arbitrary random subset SS of primes at most YY, keep all other primes at most yy negative, and allow arbitrary dependence among primes above yy, subject to conditional mean zero given SS. With RS=pS(p+1)/(p-1)R_S=\prod_{p\in S}(p+1)/(p-1), the exact conditional mean satisfies uniformly for X/(logX)6xXX/(\log X)^6\le x\le X,

E[Sg(x)S]=MS,y(x)=-(ζ(2)RS+o(RS))x/(logx)2.\mathbb E[S_g(x)\mid S]=M_{S,y}(x) =-(\zeta(2)R_S+o(R_S))x/(\log x)^2.

Conditional Jensen gives

EEg(X)(1-o(1))ζ(2)2E[RS2]X(logX)4.(R32-05)\mathbb E\mathcal E_g(X)\ge(1-o(1))\zeta(2)^2\mathbb E[R_S^2] \frac X{(\log X)^4}. \tag{R32-05}

Conditional independence upgrades this to an asymptotic. A fixed common conditional mean q>-1q>-1 multiplies the lower coefficient by (1+q)2(1+q)^2. No uniform q-1q\to-1 assertion is made. Only the small-prime cost is automatically subpower; the full reference need not have low cost. The obstruction is to the exact stated marginals and range, not arbitrary prime-dependent means.

Reported witness

Source-reported argument or finite witness only; source attachments were not inspected or executed.

What remains viable

Only the alternatives and stronger hypotheses explicitly preserved in this quotation.

NR-44 — Outward intervals. Count16 decimal endpoints rounded inward. CK062 repairs them; independent CK067 encloses the same constant more tightly. Old residual tables remain diagnostic. · After this update

NR-44 — Outward intervals. Count16 decimal endpoints rounded inward. CK062 repairs them; independent CK067 encloses the same constant more tightly. Old residual tables remain diagnostic.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-44 — Outward intervals. Count16 decimal endpoints rounded inward. CK062 repairs them; independent CK067 encloses the same constant more tightly. Old residual tables remain diagnostic.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-09 — Componentwise completion. Low Jacobi products defeat completion positivity and constant repair; the wedge defect need not decrease. · After this update

NR-09 — Componentwise completion. Low Jacobi products defeat completion positivity and constant repair; the wedge defect need not decrease.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-09 — Componentwise completion. Low Jacobi products defeat completion positivity and constant repair; the wedge defect need not decrease.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-45 — Fixed-function gate. B32 requires one fixed g, all-scale lower bounds and a sparse weak-cost sequence. Different g at each cutoff needs the R30 same-pair route. · After this update

NR-45 — Fixed-function gate. B32 requires one fixed g, all-scale lower bounds and a sparse weak-cost sequence. Different g at each cutoff needs the R30 same-pair route.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-45 — Fixed-function gate. B32 requires one fixed g, all-scale lower bounds and a sparse weak-cost sequence. Different g at each cutoff needs the R30 same-pair route.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-27 — Audit scope. Both current audits have stated analytic and executable scopes, not formal verification. Hashes and finite checks do not prove infinite gates; optimized assertions are forbidden. · After this update

NR-27 — Audit scope. Both current audits have stated analytic and executable scopes, not formal verification. Hashes and finite checks do not prove infinite gates; optimized assertions are forbidden.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-27 — Audit scope. Both current audits have stated analytic and executable scopes, not formal verification. Hashes and finite checks do not prove infinite gates; optimized assertions are forbidden.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

NR-10 — Unmatched cones. Hyperbola-Abel and inner-score positivity need a proved intertwiner matching all normalizations and nulls. · After this update

NR-10 — Unmatched cones. Hyperbola-Abel and inner-score positivity need a proved intertwiner matching all normalizations and nulls.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

Only the exact tempting inference or unchanged route quoted from the source.

Failure scope

NR-10 — Unmatched cones. Hyperbola-Abel and inner-score positivity need a proved intertwiner matching all normalizations and nulls.

Reported witness

Source-reported obstruction, limitation, withdrawal or missing certificate, according to the exact quoted status.

What remains viable

A modified statement is open only to the extent expressly retained by the source; no global impossibility is inferred.

Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X → Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ · After this update

Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X → Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X · After this update

Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

10.3 Root-locus moment chart — R21-3

For real λ\lambda, let

Fλ(w)=e-λL(-w)+eλL(w)=20Φ(x)cosh(wx-λ)dx.F_\lambda(w)=e^{-\lambda}L(-w)+e^\lambda L(w) =2\int_0^\infty\Phi(x)\cosh(wx-\lambda)\,dx.

Every negative-axis contact has a unique λ\lambda for which Fλ(w)=0F_\lambda(w)=0. Define

Cj=0xjΦ(x)cosh(wx-λ)dx,Sj=0xjΦ(x)sinh(wx-λ)dx.\mathcal C_j=\int_0^\infty x^j\Phi(x)\cosh(wx-\lambda)\,dx, \quad \mathcal S_j=\int_0^\infty x^j\Phi(x)\sinh(wx-\lambda)\,dx.

At the contact,

C0=0,S00,P=-|S0|2.\mathcal C_0=0,\quad\mathcal S_0\ne0,\quad P=-|\mathcal S_0|^2.

The exact area formulas are

Ka=2(S0S1¯),Kγ=-2(S0S1¯),K_a=2\Im(\mathcal S_0\overline{\mathcal S_1}),\qquad K_\gamma=-2\Re(\mathcal S_0\overline{\mathcal S_1}),
Kγγ=2(C2S0¯+2C1S1¯).(G8)K_{\gamma\gamma}=2\Im\left(\mathcal C_2\overline{\mathcal S_0} +2\mathcal C_1\overline{\mathcal S_1}\right). \tag{G8}

Thus the old determinant D1D2>0D_1D_2>0 is exactly one quarter of the current fold-product inequality. At a stationary contact, Ka=0S1=0H'=0K_a=0\iff\mathcal S_1=0\iff\mathcal H'=0.

At a simple root,

wλ=S0/S1,wλλ=S0(2S1C1-S0C2)S13.w_\lambda=\mathcal S_0/\mathcal S_1,\qquad w_{\lambda\lambda}= \frac{\mathcal S_0(2\mathcal S_1\mathcal C_1-\mathcal S_0\mathcal C_2)}{\mathcal S_1^3}.

Stationarity is wλ=0\Re w_\lambda=0; the desired fold sign is equivalently wλλ<0\Re w_{\lambda\lambda}<0. This provides an independent sign/orientation cross-check without dividing by XX.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X; simple-root derivatives require nonzero S1, and stationary and critical cases remain distinct.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ · After this update

Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

10.4 Critical contacts and the remaining assembly distinction

At a critical contact, Q(w)=r>0\mathcal Q(w)=r>0, H'(w)=0\mathcal H'(w)=0, and L(-z)+rL(z)L(-z)+rL(z) has a zero of multiplicity at least two at ww. Its associated normalized positive two-sided density has characteristic nulls

EeiγX=E[XeiγX]=0.(CR1)\mathbb E e^{i\gamma X}=\mathbb E[Xe^{i\gamma X}]=0. \tag{CR1}

The exact scalar inequality y2(π2/2)(1-cosy)-2ysinyy^2\ge(\pi^2/2)(1-\cos y)-2y\sin y gives VarXπ2/(2γ2)\operatorname{Var}X\ge\pi^2/(2\gamma^2), strictly for the continuous theta law. This bound decays with height and does not close CR. A separate positive-convolution moment obstruction is γ2EX2>12\gamma^2\mathbb E X^2>12; its exact three-point ceiling is below 12.04, so optimizing only that constant cannot solve the high-height problem. These are different probability laws and different moments.

The order-dd local normal form H-H(w0)=ζd\mathcal H-\mathcal H(w_0)=\zeta^d supplies 2d2d rays, including a smaller-aa ray. That does not force a selected source-to-sink path to use a compatible pair of rays. R21-11.2 is a finite resolved-graph dichotomy with explicit path-class and leaf hypotheses. The unresolved global replacement must prove compatibility under splicing, attainment or stable limiting selection, and every boundary/infinite-height continuation. The fixed-witness theorem above does not supply family-wise compactness. A direct proof of CR would bypass those additional obligations.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

Exact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differ; moment >12 is not a uniform high-height Fourier sign or global ray-selection theorem.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Reflection-quotient phase gate · Before this update

Reflection-quotient phase gate

Before this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: general
Statement kind

equivalence

Statement

In the target half-strip, RH is equivalent to the implication U(w)=0 implies V(w) is nonzero for the principal logarithm h=U+iV of the reflection quotient.

Formula
U(w)=0V(w)0U(w)=0 \Longrightarrow V(w)\ne0
Variables

w in the complex plane

Hypotheses

0<Re(w)<1/2

Im(w)>0

h(w)=Log(-L(-w)/L(w))=U(w)+iV(w)

Reflection-quotient phase gate · After this update · Historical record

Reflection-quotient phase gate

After this update · Historical record

  • Source-reported logical status: superseded
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: general
Statement kind

equivalence

Statement

In the target half-strip, RH is equivalent to the implication U(w)=0 implies V(w) is nonzero for the principal logarithm h=U+iV of the reflection quotient.

Formula
U(w)=0V(w)0U(w)=0 \Longrightarrow V(w)\ne0
Variables

w in the complex plane

Hypotheses

0<Re(w)<1/2

Im(w)>0

h(w)=Log(-L(-w)/L(w))=U(w)+iV(w)

Riemann Hypothesis → Reflection-quotient phase gate · Before this update

Riemann Hypothesis → Reflection-quotient phase gate

Before this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

equivalent to

Connection

The source reports the completed-zeta zero condition and the reflection-quotient phase gate as exact reformulations of the same problem.

Riemann Hypothesis → Reflection-quotient phase gate · After this update · Historical record

Riemann Hypothesis → Reflection-quotient phase gate

After this update · Historical record

  • Reported status: reported by source
  • Record status: superseded
Connection kind

equivalent to

Connection

The source reports the completed-zeta zero condition and the reflection-quotient phase gate as exact reformulations of the same problem.

Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion → Reflection-quotient phase gate · Before this update

Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion → Reflection-quotient phase gate

Before this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

supports

Connection

A component-wise phase-avoidance theorem, including singular vertices, would establish the exact quotient gate.

Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion → Reflection-quotient phase gate · After this update · Historical record

Global endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate; Zero-phase singular exclusion → Reflection-quotient phase gate

After this update · Historical record

  • Reported status: reported by source
  • Record status: superseded
Connection kind

supports

Connection

A component-wise phase-avoidance theorem, including singular vertices, would establish the exact quotient gate.

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption. · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

3. Exact arithmetic foundation and inherited criteria

3.1 Dynamics, explicit formula and Mellin positivity — A26-01–05

At a prime power qq, both UarU_{\rm ar} and VarV_{\rm ar} jump upward by Λ(q)/q\Lambda(q)/\sqrt q. Their difference FarF_{\rm ar} is continuous. Between jumps,

U'ar=-x-1/2,V'ar=-Var/x-x-1/2,F'ar=-Var/x.(A26-DYN)U'_{\rm ar}=-x^{-1/2},\quad V'_{\rm ar}=-V_{\rm ar}/x-x^{-1/2},\quad F'_{\rm ar}=-V_{\rm ar}/x. \tag{A26-DYN}

Thus v=f'+v=f'_+ has only downward jumps, and increases smoothly between them. A minimum of ff cannot occur at a genuine downward derivative jump; at an interior minimum v=0v=0. A first upward crossing of a slope threshold is continuous. These facts are used instead of applying a differentiable theorem at a prime-power corner.

For s>1/2\Re s>1/2, direct integration gives

MF(s)=1Far(x)x-s-1dx=4/3s-1/2+(ζ'/ζ)(s+1/2)s(s+1).(A26-MELLIN)M_F(s)=\int_1^\infty F_{\rm ar}(x)x^{-s-1}\,dx =\frac{4/3}{s-1/2}+\frac{(\zeta'/\zeta)(s+1/2)}{s(s+1)}. \tag{A26-MELLIN}

The real pole at 1/21/2 cancels. The meromorphic expression is analytic on the positive real axis. A nontrivial zero ρ\rho of multiplicity mρm_\rho gives a simple pole at s=ρ-1/2s=\rho-1/2, with nonzero residue mρ/[(ρ-1/2)(ρ+1/2)]m_\rho/[(\rho-1/2)(\rho+1/2)]. Landau's theorem applied to a nonnegative tail of Far+CxrF_{\rm ar}+C x^r shows that an eventual lower bound Far-CxrF_{\rm ar}\ge-Cx^r, r0r\ge0, excludes ρ>1/2+r\Re\rho>1/2+r. In particular, an eventual constant lower bound, or a subpower lower bound for every positive exponent, suffices for RH. Analytic continuation alone is not substituted for integral convergence; positivity forces the real convergence boundary to the permitted location.

The absolutely convergent smoothed explicit formula is

Far(x)=α-bζ/x+ρmρxρ-1/2(ρ-1/2)(ρ+1/2)+Ttriv(x),x1,F_{\rm ar}(x)=\alpha-b_\zeta/x+ \sum_\rho\frac{m_\rho x^{\rho-1/2}}{(\rho-1/2)(\rho+1/2)} +T_{\rm triv}(x),\qquad x\ge1,
Ttriv(x)=j1x-2j-1/24j2-1/4>0.(A26-EXPLICIT)T_{\rm triv}(x)=\sum_{j\ge1}\frac{x^{-2j-1/2}}{4j^2-1/4}>0. \tag{A26-EXPLICIT}

The endpoint weights match the smoothed formula; its quadratic denominator is summable. PNT gives the required absolute moment at exponent1/2.

Under RH, the sum Sξ=ρmρ/[ρ(1-ρ)]=2+γE-log(4π)<1/20S_\xi=\sum_\rho m_\rho/[\rho(1-\rho)]=2+\gamma_E-\log(4\pi)<1/20 is positive termwise and bounds the absolute oscillatory sum above. Together with the recorded rational constants and the trivial-zero correction this gives the inherited margins Far>17/20F_{\rm ar}>17/20 on [1,)[1,\infty), Far>2.61F_{\rm ar}>2.61 on [100,)[100,\infty), and asymptotically Farα-Sξ-o(1)>2.6399-o(1)F_{\rm ar}\ge\alpha-S_\xi-o(1)>2.6399-o(1). These are conditional-on-RH margins. They make both exceptional sets eventually empty under RH; they are not unconditional bounds hidden in the argument.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds; displayed margins under RH stay conditional.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption. · After this update

A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption.

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

3.3 Barrier and slack reductions — A26-09–11

For constants a0,b0a_0,b_0 with a0+α>0a_0+\alpha>0, b00b_0\ge0, an eventual integer implication

Uar(N)>a0 Var(N)-b0/N(A26-BARRIER)U_{\rm ar}(N)>a_0\ \Longrightarrow\ V_{\rm ar}(N)\ge-b_0/\sqrt N \tag{A26-BARRIER}

forces Far(x)-a0-2(b0+1)/xF_{\rm ar}(x)\ge-a_0-2(b_0+1)/\sqrt x eventually, hence RH. In particular, boundedness of UarU_{\rm ar} along integers with Var<0V_{\rm ar}<0 is equivalent to RH. The special threshold a0=-5/2,b0=0a_0=-5/2,b_0=0 is the shifted joint-sign target, whether imposed for all N100N\ge100 or eventually. Under RH the converse follows from the preceding margins, not from a generic PNT estimate.

For fixed C0,C20C_0,C_2\ge0, the eventual implication

Uar(N)>0 AN312BN+C0N+C2NUar(N)2(A26-SLACK)U_{\rm ar}(N)>0\ \Longrightarrow\ A_N^3\le12B_N+C_0N+C_2\sqrt N\,U_{\rm ar}(N)^2 \tag{A26-SLACK}

is sufficient for RH. The proof at a negative excursion minimum uses Uar=o(x)U_{\rm ar}=o(\sqrt x) to absorb the quadratic slack. It does not bound that slack by a constant without the PNT input. The finite certificate below has Uar<0U_{\rm ar}<0, so it does not test this branch nonvacuously.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] → D_theta chart valid at X=0 · After this update

C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] → D_theta chart valid at X=0

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] · After this update

C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90]

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

8. Inherited finite theorems and their separate scopes

C163: no negative-axis contact for 0a1/2,0<γ25/40\le a\le1/2,0<\gamma\le25/4. C103: no off-axis zero of ξ for |γ|82.40=412/5|\gamma|\le82.40=412/5. R22.52: profile theorem for physical t8/5t\ge8/5, not a zero-height statement. D26-BAND separately excludes stationary contacts only on [64,81.90][64,81.90]. A witness through a higher zero may have a stationary contact below its zero's height; C103 does not replace C163 in the fold or critical-contact gate.

8.1 Shift-two and Stieltjes supplying theorems — F1–F2

The proved shifted sine positivity is

Sσ(γ)=0eσuΦ(u)sinγudu>0,0σ2, γ>0.(F1)S_\sigma(\gamma)=\int_0^\infty e^{\sigma u}\Phi(u)\sin\gamma u\,du>0, \quad0\le\sigma\le2,\ \gamma>0.\tag{F1}

For σ≤0 it follows from strict decrease by adjacent half-period pairing. Thus L has no zero for Re z≥−2 and maps the upper part of that half-plane into the lower half-plane. The low-frequency proof uses decrease beyond u=1/8 and explicit front/shift comparisons. For γ≥10, the bounds Φ(0)>7/8 and sup0σ2|(eσuΦ(u))''|1<8\sup_{0\le\sigma\le2}\|(e^{\sigma u}\Phi(u))''\|_1<8 give Sσ>(7γ-64)/(8γ2)>0S_\sigma>(7\gamma-64)/(8\gamma^2)>0. The derivative-minimum cubic, rational root brackets and tails are in active_proof_theta_foundation.txt; the regression checks their finite witnesses, not the full analytic proof formally.

For 0<A20<A\le2, the principal square root gives

GA(z)=L(z-A)=0dνA(t)z+t,dνAdt=π-1SA(t)>0.(F2)G_A(z)=L(\sqrt z-A)=\int_0^\infty\frac{d\nu_A(t)}{z+t},\quad \frac{d\nu_A}{dt}=\pi^{-1}S_A(\sqrt t)>0.\tag{F2}

Decay excludes an affine term and finiteness at zero excludes an atom there. For |Re w|<A, L(±w)=GA((A±w)2)L(\pm w)=G_A((A\pm w)^2). Branch choice is essential. This Pick-function input supports finite exclusion, not a generic fold theorem.

8.2 Julia contact certificate — C163

Take A=2, P(z)=-L(z-2)\mathcal P(z)=-L(\sqrt z-2), expand at z=4. The Taylor coefficients through degree five are determined by mj=ujΦ(u)dum_j=\int u^j\Phi(u)du; initially p0=−m0,p1=m1/4. Julia boundary disks and inverse reductions give interval-safe angular bounds. The analytic first stage covers through 233/50 using M/N>23/4; second Julia covers [233/50,297/50]; third covers [297/50,25/4]. At a contact the two half-angle tangents have product one, while the certificate makes them exceed r(a)=1+a/2+7a2/100r(a)=1+a/2+7a^2/100 and 1/r(a), a contradiction.

The third stage uses 2^220-scale integer intervals, first two atoms, 4,000-panel Simpson enclosures with fourth-derivative and omitted-tail remainders, and 2,326 accepted boxes after 326 splits (maximum depth 3). The shared exact engine and scripts/rh_second_julia_contact_exact_checker.py, scripts/rh_third_julia_contact_exact_checker.py are delivered. Full formulas and the first-stage proof are in active_proof_finite_certificates.txt. The older moment bound for Re X>0 only excludes X=0, not stationary nonzero-X contacts, and is not substituted for C163.

8.3 Off-axis zero certificate — C103

The analytic front plus successive finite bands through 10.04,15.53,50,59.13,82.40 exclude simultaneous vanishing of the two normalized off-axis zero equations. Parameter variation, quadrature remainders and tails are enclosed. All three stages of scripts/rh_height_82_40_exact_extension.py were rerun; the late extension covers 234 height boxes. Older high-precision exploratory programs remain diagnostics only.

The corrected canonical right-edge checker also proves

-(L'/L)(1/2+iγ)>12/(25γ2),γ82.40,-\Re(L'/L)(1/2+i\gamma)>12/(25\gamma^2),\quad\gamma\ge82.40,

with its associated phase comparison. The older byte version is superseded in the relocation record. Exact programs establish their own named finite assertions; none establishes an unlimited-height zero or fold statement.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90]; F1 and F2 retain exact domains.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

D_theta chart valid at X=0 · After this update

D_theta chart valid at X=0

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

11. Antisymmetric high-height normalization and support discs

Define

D(w)=L(-w)-L(w),T(w)=X(w)/D(w).D(w)=L(-w)-L(w),\qquad\mathcal T(w)=X(w)/D(w).

At every negative-axis contact D0D\ne0, since D=0D=0 would imply R=|L|20R=|L|^2\ge0. Direct algebra gives

R=14|D|2(|T|2-1),K=-12|D|2T,T=Q-1Q+1=tanh(H/2).(D26-CHART)R=\tfrac14|D|^2(|\mathcal T|^2-1),\quad K=-\tfrac12|D|^2\Im\mathcal T, \quad\mathcal T=\frac{\mathcal Q-1}{\mathcal Q+1}=\tanh(\mathcal H/2). \tag{D26-CHART}

Thus contact means T(-1,1)\mathcal T\in(-1,1), and stationarity means T'=0\Re\mathcal T'=0. At a stationary contact,

Ka=-12|D|2T',Kγγ=12|D|2T''.(D26-FOLD)K_a=-\tfrac12|D|^2\Im\mathcal T',\qquad K_{\gamma\gamma}=\tfrac12|D|^2\Im\mathcal T''. \tag{D26-FOLD}

These formulas remain valid at X=0X=0. If X0X\ne0, stationarity implies X'/X=D'/D\Re X'/X=\Re D'/D, including at critical stationary contacts. Do not divide by XX at its zero.

11.1 Uniform estimate, including arbitrarily small positive aa

The exact finite norm certificate supplies

Φ(0)>7/8,|Φ''(0)|<35/2,Mj=0ujcosh(u/2)|Φ(4)(u)|du,(M0,M1,M2)<(290,90,40).\Phi(0)>7/8,\quad|\Phi''(0)|<35/2,\quad M_j=\int_0^\infty u^j\cosh(u/2)|\Phi^{(4)}(u)|du, \quad(M_0,M_1,M_2)<(290,90,40).

It uses a closed 4096-cell cover, not sampled quadrature, and explicit spatial/omitted-atom tails. The complete contract is in active_proof_theta_foundation.txt; its script regenerates data/V26_ANTISYMMETRIC_CERTIFICATE.json.

With φ0=Φ(0)\phi_0=\Phi(0), four integrations by parts give

D=-2φ0/w-2Φ''(0)/w3+DΦ(4)/w4.D=-2\phi_0/w-2\Phi''(0)/w^3+D_{\Phi^{(4)}}/w^4.

For B=-wD/(2φ0)\mathcal B=-wD/(2\phi_0), the norm bounds imply, uniformly in |a|1/2|a|\le1/2,

|B-1|E0=20/γ2+(2320/7)/γ3,|\mathcal B-1|\le E_0=20/\gamma^2+(2320/7)/\gamma^3,
|B'|E1=(40+720/7)/γ3+(6960/7)/γ4,|\mathcal B'|\le E_1=(40+720/7)/\gamma^3+(6960/7)/\gamma^4,
|B''|E2=(320/7)/γ3+(120+4320/7)/γ4+(27840/7)/γ5.|\mathcal B''|\le E_2=(320/7)/\gamma^3+(120+4320/7)/\gamma^4+(27840/7)/\gamma^5.

For γ64\gamma\ge64, E0<1/100E_0<1/100, so D0D\ne0. Since

(D'/D)'=w-2+B''/B-(B'/B)2,(D'/D)'=w^{-2}+\mathcal B''/\mathcal B-(\mathcal B'/\mathcal B)^2,

the scaled negative leading term at 64 exceeds 999/1000999/1000 and the scaled error is below 917/1000917/1000, with the former increasing and latter decreasing in height. Hence

(D'/D)'<-1/(16γ2).\Re(D'/D)'<-1/(16\gamma^2).

Odd reflection gives exactly (D'/D)(iγ)=0\Re(D'/D)(i\gamma)=0. Integrating horizontally proves

(D'/D)(a+iγ)<-a/(16γ2),0<a1/2, γ64.(D26-SIGN)\boxed{\Re(D'/D)(a+i\gamma)<-a/(16\gamma^2),\quad0<a\le1/2,\ \gamma\ge64.} \tag{D26-SIGN}

There is no additive remainder independent of aa. At a=0a=0, the real part itself is zero, not strictly negative. The old Z6/Z7 small-aa exception for the LL chart is superseded for this localization question, not silently assumed away for every other argument.

11.2 Canonical zero grouping and the new implication

The paired Hadamard logarithmic derivative is

X'X(w)=ρ/±mρ(1w-ρ+1w+ρ).(Z1)\frac{X'}X(w)=\sum_{\rho/\pm}m_\rho\left(\frac1{w-\rho}+\frac1{w+\rho}\right). \tag{Z1}

An off-axis quartet ±b±iτ\pm b\pm i\tau contributes mρ[Fa,b(γ-τ)+Fa,b(γ+τ)]m_\rho[F_{a,b}(\gamma-\tau)+F_{a,b}(\gamma+\tau)], where

Fa,b(d)=2a(d2+a2-b2)(d2+(a-b)2)(d2+(a+b)2).(Z2)F_{a,b}(d)=\frac{2a(d^2+a^2-b^2)}{(d^2+(a-b)^2)(d^2+(a+b)^2)}. \tag{Z2}

A critical-line pair contributes

mρ(aa2+(γ-τ)2+aa2+(γ+τ)2)>0.(Z3)m_\rho\left(\frac a{a^2+(\gamma-\tau)^2}+\frac a{a^2+(\gamma+\tau)^2}\right)>0. \tag{Z3}

This is half the expression obtained by mechanically collapsing a quartet at b=0b=0. The paired sums converge locally normally away from zeros; do not unpair them arbitrarily.

For γ64\gamma\ge64, the reflected-height quartet term is positive. Therefore at any stationary contact with X0X\ne0, D26-SIGN forces an off-axis zero b+iτb+i\tau with

b>a,a2+(γ-τ)2<b2.(D26-CONE)\boxed{b>a,\qquad a^2+(\gamma-\tau)^2<b^2.} \tag{D26-CONE}

This includes critical stationary contacts with X0X\ne0. Outside the union of these open half-discs, and away from X=0X=0, X'/X0\Re X'/X\ge0, giving

(T'/T)>a/(16γ2),|Θγ|>a|T|8γ2(1-T2),sgnΘγ=sgnT\Re(\mathcal T'/\mathcal T)>a/(16\gamma^2),\qquad |\Theta_\gamma|>\frac{a|\mathcal T|}{8\gamma^2(1-\mathcal T^2)},\quad \operatorname{sgn}\Theta_\gamma=\operatorname{sgn}\mathcal T

at a negative-axis contact. This is a transverse margin outside support discs, not a fold-sign statement inside them.

A supporting zero is not known to be a stationary contact. There is no proved iteration producing an infinite strictly rightward chain, and a closest-pole slogan does not enforce the real stationary equation. A meromorphic polynomial countermodel has the favorable denominator sign and an exact wrong fold. The stronger same-kernel countermodels below preserve additional assumptions but still are not the exact theta function.

11.3 Finite certificate transfer: the thresholds stay distinct

If an off-axis-zero exclusion theorem holds through height H64.5H\ge64.5, there are no stationary negative-axis contacts at 64γH-1/264\le\gamma\le H-1/2. It excludes X=0X=0 directly and all other stationary contacts by D26-CONE. Using C103 gives

no stationary negative-axis contact for64γ81.90.(D26-BAND)\boxed{\text{no stationary negative-axis contact for }64\le\gamma\le81.90.} \tag{D26-BAND}

This does not assert there are no ordinary contacts in that band, and does not fill the interval from 25/425/4 to 64. The inherited contact-free theorem through 25/425/4, zero-exclusion theorem through 82.40, and this stationary-contact band are different mathematical statements.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

D_theta chart valid at X=0; Re Dprime/D<-a/(16 gamma^2), 0<a<=1/2,gamma>=64, exactly zero on axis. Stationary support discs contain off-axis zeros, not stationary contacts.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input. · After this update

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering · After this update

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

2.2 An elementary positive-kernel detector and the real-pole floor

Use the explicitly nonnegative Liouville kernel

kL(t)=e-3t/2et(1-{et}),0kL(t)e-t/2,KL(s)=(s-1)ζ(s)s(s+1).(Q32-01)k_L(t)=e^{-3t/2}\lfloor e^t\rfloor(1-\{e^t\}),\quad 0\le k_L(t)\le e^{-t/2}, \quad K_L(s)=\frac{(s-1)\zeta(s)}{s(s+1)}. \tag{Q32-01}

Here KLK_L is a shifted Laplace transform, not the theta contact function KK. Put vλ(t)=e-t/2et/2v_\lambda(t)=e^{-t/2}\lfloor e^{t/2}\rfloor, ψ(t)=-e-t/2+2e-3t/2\psi(t)=-e^{-t/2}+2e^{-3t/2}. Then

kL*uλ=aL:=ψ*vλ,aL(t)=-2/3+O((1+t)e-t/2),AL(s)=(s-1)ζ(2s)s2(s+1).k_L*u_\lambda=a_L:=\psi*v_\lambda,\quad a_L(t)=-2/3+O((1+t)e^{-t/2}),\quad A_L(s)=\frac{(s-1)\zeta(2s)}{s^2(s+1)}.

The identities are established in an absolutely convergent half-plane before transform uniqueness is used. The proof never assumes convergence of the transform of uλu_\lambda at a prospective zero.

For an off-line zero of multiplicity mm, convolving kLk_L with tm-1e(ρ-1/2)t/(m-1)!t^{m-1}e^{(\rho-1/2)t}/(m-1)! produces a decaying filter \ell: zero moments change the integral to a tail, so |(t)|β-me-t/2|\ell(t)|\le\beta^{-m}e^{-t/2} and ||12β-m\|\ell\|_1\le2\beta^{-m}. Its response to the source retains a nonzero growing coefficient. Young's inequality proves the independent bound

liminfXEλ(X)X2β-1(logX)2m-2β2m|AL(ρ)|24(2β-1)((m-1)!)2>0.(Q32-02)\liminf_{X\to\infty} \frac{\mathcal E_\lambda(X)}{X^{2\beta-1}(\log X)^{2m-2}} \ge\frac{\beta^{2m}|A_L(\rho)|^2}{4(2\beta-1)((m-1)!)^2}>0. \tag{Q32-02}

This constant differs from Q30-02 and is an asymptotic liminf constant. Neither is claimed uniform over unknown zeros. No rightmost-zero, simplicity, or separation assumption is used.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering; no rightmost/simplicity/separation assumption or uniform zero-independent constants.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input. · After this update

Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input.

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

Finite subtraction is exact: for PΓ=cλ+(aρeiγt+aρ¯e-iγt)P_\Gamma=c_\lambda+\sum(a_\rho e^{i\gamma t}+\overline{a_\rho}e^{-i\gamma t}), the residual uλ-PΓu_\lambda-P_\Gamma has an exponentially decaying convolution source whose transform vanishes at the selected simple zeros (Q32-07). No bound on the residual input follows merely from this source decay. The residue-energy table in count 14 remains a diagnostic, not an infinite explicit formula.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

Q32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing → O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source · After this update

O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing → O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing · After this update

O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

5. Exact divisor forcing and inverse obstructions

The full O28 proofs are in active_proof_arithmetic.txt, SEG-v28-divisor-forcing and SEG-v28-mobius-inverse. Their distinction between actual arithmetic evolution and general smooth perturbations remains controlling.

For g zero below 1, with absolutely convergent moment when used, define

(Tg)(x)=m1m-1/2g(x/m),Cg=0g(y)y-3/2dy,Darg=Tg-Cgx.(\mathcal Tg)(x)=\sum_{m\ge1}m^{-1/2}g(x/m),\quad C_g=\int_0^\infty g(y)y^{-3/2}dy,\quad \mathcal D_{\rm ar}g=\mathcal Tg-C_g\sqrt x.

The actual zero extension F_0 has moment Car=32/9+4γE/3C_{\rm ar}=32/9+4\gamma_E/3. Its exact forcing is

Gar(x)=43xHx-nxlognn(1-n/x)-Carx-κ0<-2(x1).(O28-01--02)\mathcal G_{\rm ar}(x)=\tfrac43\sqrt x H_{\lfloor x\rfloor} -\sum_{n\le x}\frac{\log n}{\sqrt n}(1-n/x)-C_{\rm ar}\sqrt x \le-\kappa_0< -2\quad(x\ge1). \tag{O28-01--02}

Below 1 it equals -Carx-C_{\rm ar}\sqrt x. The proof uses exact trapezoidal and between-integer covariance bounds. Uniformly at real x, Gar=ζ'(1/2)-ζ'(-1/2)/x+O(x-1/2)\mathcal G_{\rm ar}=\zeta'(1/2)-\zeta'(-1/2)/x+O(x^{-1/2}); finer integer expansions cannot be transferred without fractional-part terms.

For smooth compact g, on -1/2<s<1/2-1/2<\Re s<1/2,

M(Darg)(s)=ζ(s+1/2)Mg(s).(O28-03)\mathcal M(\mathcal D_{\rm ar}g)(s)=\zeta(s+1/2)\mathcal Mg(s). \tag{O28-03}

The subtraction is essential. The exact source transform on 0<s<1/20<\Re s<1/2 is

MGar(s)=4ζ(s+1/2)3(s-1/2)+ζ'(s+1/2)s(s+1).\mathcal M\mathcal G_{\rm ar}(s)= \frac{4\zeta(s+1/2)}{3(s-1/2)}+ \frac{\zeta'(s+1/2)}{s(s+1)}.

At a hypothetical zero of multiplicity m, the source vanishes to order m-1, not m. Negative forcing does not cancel the inverse pole.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing; retain fractional-part real endpoint and inverse-pole obstruction.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source · After this update

O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

O28-10, one fixed test source. Put

K(x)=logx&1x2,log(4/x)&2x4,0&otherwise,Qμ=-RK.K_\triangle(x)=\begin{cases}\log x&1\le x\le2,\\\log(4/x)&2\le x\le4,\\0&\text{otherwise},\end{cases} \qquad Q_\mu=-\mathcal R K_\triangle.

Then CQμ=0C_{Q_\mu}=0, DarQμ=-K0\mathcal D_{\rm ar}Q_\mu=-K_\triangle\le0, and

Qˆμ(s)=-(1-2-s)2s2ζ(s+1/2),RHQμ(x)-Cϵxϵeventually for everyϵ>0.\widehat Q_\mu(s)=-\frac{(1-2^{-s})^2}{s^2\zeta(s+1/2)},\qquad \mathrm{RH}\iff Q_\mu(x)\ge-C_\varepsilon x^\varepsilon \text{ eventually for every }\varepsilon>0.

The numerator has no right-half-plane zero. Landau positivity proves sufficiency; the RH-conditional Mertens bound proves necessity. The unconditional estimate remains only x/(logx)A\sqrt x/(\log x)^A for each fixed A. This exact fixed-source test exposes, but does not solve, the required Möbius cancellation.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

O28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius source; eventual lower bound for every epsilon iff RH, with conditional necessity and unconditional Landau sufficiency.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d → R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference · After this update

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d → R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d · After this update

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

2.4 Same-cutoff reference comparison and independent means

For Dirichlet convolution,

Ec*w(X)dX|w(d)|dEc(X/d).(Q30-CONV)\sqrt{\mathcal E_{c*w}(X)}\le \sum_{d\le X}\frac{|w(d)|}{\sqrt d}\sqrt{\mathcal E_c(X/d)}. \tag{Q30-CONV}

For completely multiplicative sign functions differing on primes in SS, let

WS(X)=nXpnpS2ω(n)n.W_S(X)=\sum_{\substack{n\le X\\p\mid n\Rightarrow p\in S}}\frac{2^{\omega(n)}}{\sqrt n}.

Then WS(X)-2Eg(X)Ef(X)WS(X)2Eg(X)W_S(X)^{-2}\mathcal E_g(X)\le\mathcal E_f(X)\le W_S(X)^2\mathcal E_g(X) (Q30-06). If every changed prime exceeds X\sqrt X, exactly WS(X)=1+2pS,pXp-1/2W_S(X)=1+2\sum_{p\in S,p\le X}p^{-1/2}. The product over all powers of primes through XX is a coarser bound and may be much larger. Universally WS(X)2X(1+logX)W_S(X)\le2\sqrt X(1+\log X).

The original construction gate R30-CONSTRUCTION asks for the same pair (gj,Nj)(g_j,N_j) with NjN_j\to\infty, Egj(Nj)=Njo(1)\mathcal E_{g_j}(N_j)=N_j^{o(1)} and W{p:gj(p)=+1}(Nj)=Njo(1)W_{\{p:g_j(p)=+1\}}(N_j)=N_j^{o(1)}. References are allowed to vary here, unlike B32-TARGET. Separate low-energy and low-cost examples do not suffice.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d; reference energy and comparison cost must be small for the same g and cutoff.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference · After this update

R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

2.5 Critical sparse references: the cost is solved, the centered input is not

Independently choose Ip=1I_p=1 with probability 1/(2p)1/(2\sqrt p), set g(p)=2Ip-1g(p)=2I_p-1, and let hh encode its positive primes. R30-04–07 give a logarithmic coarse comparison product, an exact mean-energy comparison with factor below 6, and equivalence up to squared harmonic factors with bmean=λ*(n-1/2)b_{\rm mean}=\lambda*(n^{-1/2}). The rational product certificate establishing the factor below 6 is CK059, with its explicit prime tail. The deterministic mean retains every hypothetical off-line pole.

The sharper sample-path factorization is

H(s)=h(n)n-s=ζ(s+1/2)C(s),C(s)=c(n)n-s.H(s)=\sum h(n)n^{-s}=\zeta(s+1/2)C(s),\qquad C(s)=\sum c(n)n^{-s}.

For r=p-1/2r=p^{-1/2}, c(p)=2Ip-rc(p)=2I_p-r and c(pk)=2Ip(1-r)c(p^k)=2I_p(1-r) for k2k\ge2. Prime coefficients are centered; higher powers are not. Nonnegative cross second moments and a dyadic maximal inequality give, almost surely,

nXc(n)=Oω,ϵ(X1/4+ϵ),nX|c(n)|=Oω,ϵ(X1/2+ϵ).(R32-06)\sum_{n\le X}c(n)=O_{\omega,\varepsilon}(X^{1/4+\varepsilon}),\qquad \sum_{n\le X}|c(n)|=O_{\omega,\varepsilon}(X^{1/2+\varepsilon}). \tag{R32-06}

These are auxiliary-coefficient estimates, not estimates for gg or λ\lambda.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference; true constant Z log X; auxiliary coefficient cancellation does not transfer to g or Liouville.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss → A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension · After this update

A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss → A28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extension

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss · After this update

A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

3.4 The clipped potential and sparse exceptions — A26-12–15

For η0\eta\ge0, define

Pη(x)=[(Uar(x)+h)+-(Var(x))+-η]+.P_\eta(x)=\big[(U_{\rm ar}(x)+h)_+-(V_{\rm ar}(x))_+-\eta\big]_+.

It has nonnegative arithmetic jumps. Where positive and Var>0V_{\rm ar}>0, its derivative is Var/x0V_{\rm ar}/x\ge0. Where positive and Var<0V_{\rm ar}<0, it is -x-1/2-x^{-1/2}. Let IN=1Eh(N)I_N=1_{\mathcal E_h}(N) and dN=2(N+1-N)d_N=2(\sqrt{N+1}-\sqrt N). For dNηd_N\le\eta, the exact sampling estimate is

Pη(N)-Pη(N+1)dN(IN+IN+1)+12N3/2.(A26-SAMPLING)P_\eta(N)-P_\eta(N+1) \le d_N(I_N+I_{N+1})+\frac1{2N^{3/2}}. \tag{A26-SAMPLING}

The last summable term is essential. On a cell whose endpoints are not exceptional, a negative dip of VarV_{\rm ar} is bounded using Var(x)-(x-N)/xV_{\rm ar}(x)\ge-(x-N)/\sqrt x; its contribution integrates to at most 1/(2N3/2)1/(2N^{3/2}). Charging O(N-1/2)O(N^{-1/2}) at every cell would destroy the claimed sparse theorem. Full endpoints and the final cell must be retained.

The old exact criterion is still valid:

RHNEhN-1/2<.(A26-TARGET)\mathrm{RH}\iff\sum_{N\in\mathcal E_h}N^{-1/2}<\infty. \tag{A26-TARGET}

A sufficient dyadic budget is jej2-j/2<\sum_j e_j2^{-j/2}<\infty, where eje_j counts shifted exceptions in the jth dyadic interval. For example ej2j/2/j1+ϵe_j\ll2^{j/2}/j^{1+\varepsilon} suffices. For consecutive prime powers with right-continuous A_j,B_j, the exact real bad-gap cost is

Cj=2[min(qj+1,(Aj+h)/2)-max(qj,(3Bj/2)1/3)]+.(A26-GAP-COST)C_j=2[\min(\sqrt{q_{j+1}},(A_j+h)/2)-\max(\sqrt{q_j},(3B_j/2)^{1/3})]_+. \tag{A26-GAP-COST}

Summability of these clipped costs also suffices; without clipping the interval may not belong to the actual gap. The newer local return argument and all-scale unshifted blocks weaken the needed count hypothesis. Do not keep treating summability or a square-root global count as the only sufficient arithmetic endpoint.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss; shifted weighted counts differ from unclipped costs.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption. → A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss · After this update

A26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption. → A26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling loss

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR → Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR · After this update

Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR → Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR · After this update

Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

13. Positive curvature pencil and the bad-fold interface

Detailed proofs: active_proof_curvature_profile.txt (R21-7 and inherited pencil IDs). For x+y=t, d=x-y, z=ad, define ηc(u)=q(u)-2cu20\eta_c(u)=\mathfrak q(u)-2cu^2\ge0 for 0<=c<=C_th, and

Fc,a(t)=0tΦ(x)Φ(y){cd2(coshz-sinhz/z)+(ηc(x)+ηc(y))coshz}dx.\mathcal F_{c,a}(t)=\int_0^t\Phi(x)\Phi(y) \{cd^2(\cosh z-\sinh z/z)+(\eta_c(x)+\eta_c(y))\cosh z\}\,dx.

It is strictly positive for t>0. Put Ga=t2ka+a-1aka\mathcal G_a=t^2k_a+a^{-1}\partial_a k_a, with continuous a=0 extension. Exact integration by parts gives

Fc,a=F0,a-cGa=ka-ttka-ct2ka+(a-c/a)aka,\mathcal F_{c,a}=\mathcal F_{0,a}-c\mathcal G_a =k_a-t\partial_tk_a-ct^2k_a+(a-c/a)\partial_ak_a,
Fˆc,a=2K+γKγ+cKγγ+(a-c/a)Ka.(PENCIL)\widehat{\mathcal F}_{c,a}=2K+\gamma K_\gamma+cK_{\gamma\gamma}+(a-c/a)K_a. \tag{PENCIL}

At a stationary negative-axis contact K=K_gamma=0, Fˆ0,a=aKa\widehat{\mathcal F}_{0,a}=aK_a, Fˆa2,a=a2Kγγ\widehat{\mathcal F}_{a^2,a}=a^2K_{\gamma\gamma}. For noncritical K_a!=0, favorable NC orientation is equivalent to nonvanishing of the affine transform for every c in the closed interval [0,a²]. A flat K_gammagamma=0 is a bad endpoint, not excluded by strict-minimum language. Critical K_a=0 is the separate CR gate.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR; flat endpoint included, small perturbation not Fourier stability.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR · After this update

Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

Set ϱa=Ga/F0,a\varrho_a=\mathcal G_a/\mathcal F_{0,a}, κa=1/ϱa\kappa_a=1/\varrho_a. Then 0<varrho<1/C_th; its front limit is 4/q2=1/C_th and tail limit is 0. The physical perturbation c*varrho is less than 1/36 for c<=a²<=1/4. Small positive physical perturbation does not imply stability of a canceled Fourier value.

The prefix interface is exact. Let Aγ(T)=0TF0,a(t)sin(γt)dtA_\gamma(T)=\int_0^T\mathcal F_{0,a}(t)\sin(\gamma t)dt. If full-profile varrho'<0 is proved, the positive measure nu=-dvarrho has mass 4/q2. A noncritical bad-fold pencil root c0 in (0,a²] would force

Aγ()=c0Aγ(T)dν(T),supT|Aγ(T)|q24c0|Aγ()|>q2|Aγ()|>36|Aγ()|.(PFX-NECESSARY)A_\gamma(\infty)=c_0\int A_\gamma(T)d\nu(T),\quad \sup_T|A_\gamma(T)|\ge\frac{q_2}{4c_0}|A_\gamma(\infty)| >q_2|A_\gamma(\infty)|>36|A_\gamma(\infty)|. \tag{PFX-NECESSARY}

The missing actual-theta gate PFX is a bound no larger than q2 times the terminal modulus at those noncritical stationary contacts. Full profile + PFX formally implies NC, still requiring CR. Its current status is substantially stronger than a routine weighted-prefix problem:

T32-01, high-contact obstruction. Put f_a=F_{0,a} and M_a=max f_a. Uniform theta decay and two integrations by parts give

supT|Aγ(T)|=Ma/γ+O(γ-2),inf0a1/2Ma>0.\sup_T|A_\gamma(T)|=M_a/\gamma+O(\gamma^{-2}),\qquad\inf_{0\le a\le1/2}M_a>0.

The complete transform is 2K+gamma K_gamma+aK_a. The completed-zeta gamma factor makes K and its first two a derivatives exponentially small; K is even in a. At a noncritical stationary contact,

|Aγ()|=|aKa|Cηa2e-ηγ,supT|Aγ(T)||Aγ()|cηeηγa2γ,0<η<π/4.(T32-01)|A_\gamma(\infty)|=|aK_a|\le C_\eta a^2e^{-\eta\gamma},\qquad \frac{\sup_T|A_\gamma(T)|}{|A_\gamma(\infty)|} \ge c_\eta\frac{e^{\eta\gamma}}{a^2\gamma},\quad0<\eta<\pi/4. \tag{T32-01}

Thus any sufficiently high noncritical stationary contact would violate PFX. This is not a proof such a contact exists, nor unconditional falsity of PFX. The large overshoot required by a bad-fold root is automatic at high stationary contacts and does not distinguish the bad sign. A replacement must retain the signed identity

Aγ(T)dν(T)=-Kγγ+Ka/a,\int A_\gamma(T)d\nu(T)=-K_{\gamma\gamma}+K_a/a,

rather than its bound by total mass times a prefix supremum. Complete proof: SEG-v32-prefix-obstruction.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

Full profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CR; T32-01 hypothetical high contacts force exponential prefix overshoot, not an exhibited contact or unconditional PFX refutation.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m · After this update

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m · After this update

Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

For a finite set Γm\Gamma_m of positive ordinates of zeros of the same exact multiplicity mm, the weighted version is

liminfXEλ(X)(logX)2m-122m-1γΓm|mζ(2ρ)ρζ(m)(ρ)|2.(Q32-05)\liminf_{X\to\infty}\frac{\mathcal E_\lambda(X)}{(\log X)^{2m-1}} \ge\frac2{2m-1}\sum_{\gamma\in\Gamma_m} \left|\frac{m\zeta(2\rho)}{\rho\zeta^{(m)}(\rho)}\right|^2. \tag{Q32-05}

The factor 2m-12m-1 comes from integrating t2m-2t^{2m-2}. The proof does not infer infinite-series orthogonality or uniformity for growing zero sets.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m; fixed finite set, not a growing zero family.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion. · After this update

Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion. · After this update

Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion.

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

The same kernel gives an unconditional baseline

Eλ(X)logX-C0ζ(1/2)2,C0=283+(82-4)(1-γE).(Q32-03)\mathcal E_\lambda(X)\ge\frac{\log X-C_0}{\zeta(1/2)^2},\qquad C_0=\frac{28}{3}+(8\sqrt2-4)(1-\gamma_E). \tag{Q32-03}

It follows from |kL|1=-(2/3)ζ(1/2)\|k_L\|_1=-(2/3)\zeta(1/2) and an explicit L1L^1 bound for aL+2/3a_L+2/3. This is not an energy asymptotic; other modes may contribute more.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

Q32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros → A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge · After this update

A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros → A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros · After this update

A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

4.3 Compact positive filters and fixed-window oscillation — A28-05–07

For a shifted zero dj+iγjd_j+i\gamma_j, a positive two-point measure at 0,π/γj0,\pi/\gamma_j, with weights proportional to edjπ/γje^{d_j\pi/\gamma_j} and 1, annihilates the pair. Summability of reciprocal heights makes the infinite convolution compactly supported. To retain a selected pair d0+iγ0d_0+i\gamma_0, omit its factor and repair every accidental resonance. An unmodified factor also kills the selected pair precisely when dj=d0d_j=d_0 and γ0/γj\gamma_0/\gamma_j is an odd integer at least 3. There are only finitely many such factors; replace them by normalized positive densities

e-d0u(1+12cosγ0u)1[0,2π/γj](u).e^{-d_0u}(1+\tfrac12\cos\gamma_0u)\,1_{[0,2\pi/\gamma_j]}(u).

The replacement cancels the unwanted frequency and retains the chosen one. The remaining nonzero factors have summable deviations from 1. Hence a fixed compactly supported probability measure satisfies

f(t+u)dμ(u)=2(C0e(d0+iγ0)t)+O(e(σ-1/2)t), C00.(A28-06)\int f(t+u)d\mu(u)=2\Re(C_0e^{(d_0+i\gamma_0)t})+O(e^{(\sigma-1/2)t}),\ C_0\ne0. \tag{A28-06}

Every sufficiently late interval of a fixed logarithmic length therefore contains both signs of f with magnitude comparable to ed0te^{d_0t}. Other zeros farther right have been canceled, not assumed absent. This hypothetical-spectrum-dependent measure supplies no arithmetic upper bound.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros; neither rightmost assumption nor count upper bound.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge · After this update

A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

4.4 Forced consecutive blocks and count gates — A28-08–13

Under failure of RH, fix epsilon>0, choose σ<Θζ\sigma<\Theta_\zeta, an admissible kappa, eta=epsilon/2, and an actual zero β>max(σ,Θζ-ηκ)\beta>\max(\sigma,\Theta_\zeta-\eta\kappa). Attainment of the supremum is not required. The oscillation traps a negative minimum. The first actual continuous crossing into large positive v, not a left-limit touch at a downward jump, is used. On a following logarithmic interval of length e-ηte^{-\eta t}, the Holder and Perron errors are smaller than the trapped depth. Both v>0 and f+v<0 persist, including prime-power endpoints.

Consequently every sufficiently large X has a consecutive block

[N,N+N1-ϵ][X,CϵX]entirely inE0.(A28-08)[N,N+\lfloor N^{1-\varepsilon}\rfloor]\subset[X,C_\varepsilon X] \quad\text{entirely in }\mathcal E_0. \tag{A28-08}

The margins in Uar>0U_{\rm ar}>0 and -Var>0-V_{\rm ar}>0 are positive powers of N. Constants depend on the selected zero and epsilon; no effective universal C is supplied. It follows at every sufficiently large cutoff that

E0(X)ϵX1-ϵ,limlog(1+E0(X))logX=1E_0(X)\gg_\varepsilon X^{1-\varepsilon},\qquad \lim\frac{\log(1+E_0(X))}{\log X}=1

under failure of RH, whereas E_0 is bounded under RH. Therefore any fixed power saving on an unbounded sequence suffices (A28-TARGET). So does one good point in every late interval of length MθM^\theta, fixed theta<1, or a good point at every sufficiently large dth power for fixed integer d>=1. A good point means Uar0U_{\rm ar}\le0 or Var0V_{\rm ar}\ge0.

If the rightmost real part Θζ>1/2\Theta_\zeta>1/2 is attained, normalized almost-periodic edge profiles additionally give liminfE0(X)/X>0\liminf E_0(X)/X>0 (A28-11). Without attainment the profiles can vanish and that stronger statement is not available: an o(X) count, even on a sequence, is not the general endpoint. A28-12 gives an unconditional existential fixed-C return Far>5/2F_{\rm ar}>5/2 in every late [x,Cx], by an RH/failure case split, not an effective value of C. Independently, each off-line zero gives

liminfFar(x)x1/2-β-|mρ(ρ-1/2)(ρ+1/2)|.(A28-13)\liminf F_{\rm ar}(x)x^{1/2-\beta}\le- \left|\frac{m_\rho}{(\rho-1/2)(\rho+1/2)}\right|. \tag{A28-13}

The weaker Mellin oscillation is not a replacement proof for the all-window block theorem.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

A28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edge; sparse fixed power saving suffices; positive density only under attainment, o(X) not enough in general.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d → R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes · After this update

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d → R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes · After this update

R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

2.6 General power bias and correlated block conditioning

For fixed 0<α<10<\alpha<1, let P(Ip=1)=1/(2pα)\mathbb P(I_p=1)=1/(2p^\alpha). Then

Eh(n)=rad(n)-α,rad(n)-αn-s=ζ(s+α)Kα(s),\mathbb Eh(n)=\operatorname{rad}(n)^{-\alpha},\quad \sum\operatorname{rad}(n)^{-\alpha}n^{-s}=\zeta(s+\alpha)K_\alpha(s),
Kα(s)=p(1+p-α(1-p-α)p-2s1-p-s),s>(1-α)/2.K_\alpha(s)=\prod_p\left(1+ \frac{p^{-\alpha}(1-p^{-\alpha})p^{-2s}}{1-p^{-s}}\right), \qquad\Re s>(1-\alpha)/2.

The factor is absolutely convergent and nonzero there. A centered Euler logarithm supplies H(s)=ζ(s+α)Gα(s)H(s)=\zeta(s+\alpha)G_\alpha(s) almost surely. The positive-coefficient Wiener–Ikehara theorem gives, with Zα=Gα(1-α)>0Z_\alpha=G_\alpha(1-\alpha)>0,

nXh(n)ZαX1-α/(1-α).(R32-01)\sum_{n\le X}h(n)\sim Z_\alpha X^{1-\alpha}/(1-\alpha). \tag{R32-01}

Thus the finite cost grows as ZαX1/2-α/(1/2-α)Z_\alpha X^{1/2-\alpha}/(1/2-\alpha) for α<1/2\alpha<1/2, as Z1/2logXZ_{1/2}\log X at equality, and converges for α>1/2\alpha>1/2, with tail ZαX1/2-α/(α-1/2)Z_\alpha X^{1/2-\alpha}/(\alpha-1/2). These are fixed-parameter almost-sure statements.

A separate finite inequality handles moving parameters. Set Jα(X)=nXn-α-1/2J_\alpha(X)=\sum_{n\le X}n^{-\alpha-1/2}, κα=Kα(1/2)\kappa_\alpha=K_\alpha(1/2). Both the convolution factor and its inverse have critical norm at most κα\kappa_\alpha; R30-01 gives a finite constant RαR_\alpha with

Eλ(X)κα2Jα(X)2EEgα(X)Rακα2Jα(X)2Eλ(X).(R32-02)\frac{\mathcal E_\lambda(X)}{\kappa_\alpha^2J_\alpha(X)^2} \le\mathbb E\mathcal E_{g_\alpha}(X) \le R_\alpha\kappa_\alpha^2J_\alpha(X)^2\mathcal E_\lambda(X). \tag{R32-02}

The constants are uniformly bounded for α[1/4,3/4]\alpha\in[1/4,3/4]. Hence any deterministic αX1/2\alpha_X\to1/2 gives EEgαX(X)=Eλ(X)Xo(1)\mathbb E\mathcal E_{g_{\alpha_X}}(X)=\mathcal E_\lambda(X)X^{o(1)} in the two-sided sense. No unproved uniform sample-path asymptotic is used. For fixed α<1/2\alpha<1/2, the positive mean source gives EEg(X)αX1-2α\mathbb E\mathcal E_g(X)\gg_\alpha X^{1-2\alpha} (R32-03); the audit supplies a direct kernel proof in place of the extra Hardy argument. R32-04 records the independent-bias obstruction, not a ban on every correlated construction.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

R32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimes; moving alpha_X only through the uniform finite-mean sandwich on [1/4,3/4].

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof · After this update

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term · After this update

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

2.1 Exact energies, cutoff conventions, and inherited detector

For real arithmetic coefficients cc, define Sc(x)=nxc(n)S_c(x)=\sum_{n\le x}c(n), uc(t)=e-t/2Sc(et)u_c(t)=e^{-t/2}S_c(e^t), and Ec(X)=1X|Sc(x)|2x-2dx\mathcal E_c(X)=\int_1^X|S_c(x)|^2x^{-2}dx. Set the energy to zero for X1X\le1 and extend ucu_c by zero for t<0t<0. All endpoints have full right-continuous weights. At X=N+θX=N+\theta, add Sc(N)2(1/N-1/X)S_c(N)^2(1/N-1/X) to the sum through N-1N-1; internal cutoffs such as X/dX/d must not be silently rounded down.

For Pc,N(s)=nNc(n)n-sP_{c,N}(s)=\sum_{n\le N}c(n)n^{-s},

Qc(N)=m,nNc(m)c(n)max(m,n)=Ec(N)+Sc(N)2N=12π|Pc,N(1/2+it)|21/4+t2dt.(Q30-01)Q_c(N)=\sum_{m,n\le N}\frac{c(m)c(n)}{\max(m,n)} =\mathcal E_c(N)+\frac{S_c(N)^2}{N} =\frac1{2\pi}\int_{\mathbb R}\frac{|P_{c,N}(1/2+it)|^2}{1/4+t^2}\,dt. \tag{Q30-01}

The energy is monotone, whereas the endpoint term in QQ must be handled separately. These Gram identities require no multiplicativity. Also |Pc,N(s)||s|Qc(N)/(2s-1)|P_{c,N}(s)|\le|s|\sqrt{Q_c(N)/(2\Re s-1)} for s>1/2\Re s>1/2.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term; Hardy/Gram identities do not require multiplicativity.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof · After this update

Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

Q30-02 remains the inherited all-cutoff Hardy detector. Set

IX(s)=1XSλ(x)x-s-1dx,RH(s)=(s-1)(2s-1)(s+1)4,FX(s)=Xs-1/2{RH(s)ζ(2s)-RH(s)sζ(s)IX(s)}.I_X(s)=\int_1^X S_\lambda(x)x^{-s-1}dx,\quad R_H(s)=\frac{(s-1)(2s-1)}{(s+1)^4},\quad F_X(s)=X^{s-1/2}\{R_H(s)\zeta(2s)-R_H(s)s\zeta(s)I_X(s)\}.

The written proof separately establishes FXH2(s>1/2)F_X\in H^2(\Re s>1/2) and |FX|H2<10Eλ(X)\|F_X\|_{H^2}<10\sqrt{\mathcal E_\lambda(X)}, using the 1/(2π)1/(2\pi) boundary norm. Membership is not inferred from boundary integrability: bounded vertical strips use the finite Laplace integral, and the far right uses the absolutely convergent Euler tail. At an off-line zero it gives, for all X2X\ge2,

Eλ(X)2β-1100|(ρ-1)(2ρ-1)ζ(2ρ)(ρ+1)4|2X2β-1.(Q30-02)\mathcal E_\lambda(X)\ge\frac{2\beta-1}{100} \left|\frac{(\rho-1)(2\rho-1)\zeta(2\rho)}{(\rho+1)^4}\right|^2X^{2\beta-1}. \tag{Q30-02}

Derivative evaluation gives the multiplicity factor at all sufficiently large cutoffs. Q30-03 is the equivalence in §0; Q30-05 retains the weaker three-lines bound Qλ(N)ρ,ϵN2β-1-ϵQ_\lambda(N)\gg_{\rho,\varepsilon}N^{2\beta-1-\varepsilon} as an independent checkpoint. No unconditional subpower upper bound has been supplied.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof; any off-line zero with multiplicity forces all-large-cutoff energy lower bound; not boundary integrability alone.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X → J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis. · After this update

Root-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by X → J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis. · After this update

J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis.

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

16. Other live theta interfaces and their exact scope

These interfaces remain active components in active_proof_contact_geometry.txt; none is an omitted finished closure.

J1–J7; R21-4 (Jacobi/divisor structure). Individual atoms satisfy Φn(u)=n-1/2φ(u+logn)\Phi_n(u)=n^{-1/2}\phi(u+\log n). Grouping pairs by k=nm and imbalance log(m/n) yields a common physical kernel, with half weight at square diagonals. For T=2*pi*exp(Sigma),

GΣ(q)=4π2e5Σ/2(T2-6Tcoshq+9)e-TcoshqG_\Sigma(q)=4\pi^2e^{5\Sigma/2}(T^2-6T\cosh q+9)e^{-T\cosh q}

is positive on its physical domain. J4 cancels the entire sin(gamma*r) difference-frequency channel at the two nulls. The remaining channels are 2r*sinh(ar)*sin(gamma*t) and -2t²*cosh(ar)*sin(gamma*t); estimating canceled pieces separately loses the useful identity. J5–J6 prove fixed-scale TP2 of the imbalance functions U_w,V_w. As the physical scale moves, raw ratios turn: no joint intertwining theorem follows. The Bessel completion contains divisor sum .5*k^-a*sigma_(2a)(k), but incomplete causal tails cannot be dropped after modular cancellation.

H1–H7 (coupled Gaussian/heat structure). Put b=k/t and theta_a=partial_a k/(a*t²*k). The exact actual-a Gaussian comparison gives 0<theta_a<1/3, theta_a'<0, and endpoint limits 1/3 and 0. This is not permission to replace a by zero. The induced heat identity is inhomogeneous, U_tau=U_omegaomega-G; physical positivity of the forcing profile does not sign its oscillatory transform. At a stationary contact NC asks for U_omegaomega*(U_omegaomega-G)>0. Homogeneous variation-diminishing intuition omits the forcing.

A1–A7 (autocorrelation and Stieltjes forms). The autocorrelation is G_ac=k+m, with transforms S_G,S_m; R_ac=S_m/S_G gives K=S_G(1-R_ac) and fold product S_G²*(R_ac)_a*(R_ac)_gammagamma at R_ac=1,(R_ac)_gamma=0. Physical monotonicity of m/k does not control those signed ratios. For beta=-d(k/t) and alpha=-d(theta_a*k/t), the kernels are J1(z)=sin z-z cos z, JR(z)=z sin z+cos z-1, and J3(z)=-z³cos z+3z²sin z+6z cos z-6sin z. There are two null constraints and a negative real contact moment. An exact positive three-atom model with decreasing tail ratios .3,.2,.1 satisfies them but has both relevant J3 moments negative, defeating the abstract orientation inference. It is not an actual-theta counterexample. A7's additional weighted prefix property remains unproved.

Phase, crossed-frequency, and critical fallbacks. The identity aϑ=-apa*γγϑ\partial_a\vartheta=-a\,p_a*\partial_{\gamma\gamma}\vartheta, pa(s)=(πa)-1logcoth(π|s|/(4a))p_a(s)=(\pi a)^{-1}\log\coth(\pi|s|/(4a)), is a positive average of curvature, not its local sign. The crossed-frequency integral is regular only after combining the singular pieces; complex tilted measures are not positive laws, so a mean/variance comparison is not legal. CR4 has the regular critical jet -(H(3)/(3(H'')2))-\Re(H^{(3)}/(3(H'')^2)) under its nonzero second-jet hypothesis; higher-order critical contacts need a separate argument. Local unused-left rays and favorable local jets do not establish a globally compatible graph splicing. NC does not automatically solve CR.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

J/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → O28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcing

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma → A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros · After this update

A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma → A28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zeros

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma · After this update

A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

4.2 The right-hand zero part — A28-04

For fixed 1/2<σ<11/2<\sigma<1, Ingham's estimate is

N(σ,T)σTqσ(logT)5,qσ=3(1-σ)/(2-σ)<1.N(\sigma,T)\ll_\sigma T^{q_\sigma}(\log T)^5, \qquad q_\sigma=3(1-\sigma)/(2-\sigma)<1.

It makes the sums over ρ>σ\Re\rho>\sigma with weights (1+|ρ|)-1(1+|\Im\rho|)^{-1} and (1+|ρ|)κ-1(1+|\Im\rho|)^{\kappa-1} summable for 0<κ<1-qσ0<\kappa<1-q_\sigma. Put

Jσ(t)=ρ>σmρe(ρ-1/2)t(ρ-1/2)(ρ+1/2),Hσ(t)=ρ>σmρe(ρ-1/2)tρ+1/2.J_\sigma(t)=\sum_{\Re\rho>\sigma}\frac{m_\rho e^{(\rho-1/2)t}}{(\rho-1/2)(\rho+1/2)},\quad H_\sigma(t)=\sum_{\Re\rho>\sigma}\frac{m_\rho e^{(\rho-1/2)t}}{\rho+1/2}.

The derivative relation and actual arithmetic approximations are

J'σ=Hσ,f=Jσ+O(e(σ-1/2)t),v=Hσ+O((1+t)2e(σ-1/2)t).(A28-04)J'_\sigma=H_\sigma,\quad f=J_\sigma+O(e^{(\sigma-1/2)t}),\quad v=H_\sigma+O((1+t)^2e^{(\sigma-1/2)t}). \tag{A28-04}

The second estimate uses safe-height truncated Perron for B/x, including the nearest-integer endpoint error. It is not obtained by differentiating a discontinuous all-zero remainder. For 0u10\le u\le1,

|Hσ(t+u)-Hσ(t)|e(Θζ-1/2)tuκ.|H_\sigma(t+u)-H_\sigma(t)|\ll e^{(\Theta_\zeta-1/2)t}u^\kappa.

The complete error partition is A29-AUDIT-01/A31-PERRON.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma; safe-height Perron endpoints, not differentiated jump remainders.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d · After this update

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] → Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0 · After this update

C163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90] → Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0 · After this update

Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

9. Global phase geometry and the witness reduction

9.1 Legal phase and directed graph — C121

For -1/2σ1/2-1/2\le\sigma\le1/2, put Fσ(γ)=0Φ(u)eσueiγudu=|Fσ|eiφσF_\sigma(\gamma)=\int_0^\infty\Phi(u)e^{\sigma u}e^{i\gamma u}du =|F_\sigma|e^{i\phi_\sigma}. Shifted sine positivity gives 0<φσ<π0<\phi_\sigma<\pi, not merely a numerical branch choice. Then

L(-w)=Fa(γ),L(w)=F-a(γ)¯,Θ=φa+φ-a-π.(G2)L(-w)=F_a(\gamma),\quad L(w)=\overline{F_{-a}(\gamma)},\quad \Theta=\phi_a+\phi_{-a}-\pi.\tag{G2}

The phase-zero set is exactly K=0,R<0K=0,R<0; X=0X=0 means H=0H=0. At a regular phase-zero point orient the tangent by U\nabla U. Cauchy–Riemann gives

UΘ=0,dU/ds=|H'|2>0.(G3)\nabla U\cdot\nabla\Theta=0,\qquad dU/ds=|H'|^2>0.\tag{G3}

At a critical point a conformal coordinate gives H-H(w0)=ζmH-H(w_0)=\zeta^m, with m incoming and m outgoing level rays. A genuine closed level curve would force the harmonic phase to vanish inside and H to be constant; hence no cycles. This alone is not global compactness.

9.2 Fixed-witness boundary exclusion — C122/C123

At an off-axis zero choose a local positive-U ray forward and a negative-U ray backward; continue through critical vertices in the corresponding orientation. After a ray reaches a fixed nonzero U value it stays bounded away from zero. It cannot approach a=0, where phase-zero points have U=0, or the real bottom, whose phase tends to −π. Nor can it escape to infinity: uniformly for 0a1/20\le a\le1/2,

Y=X/L0,H=Log(1-Y)0(γ).Y=X/L\longrightarrow0,\qquad H=\Log(1-Y)\longrightarrow0 \quad(\gamma\to\infty).

The estimate uses exponential gamma-factor decay, a polynomial zeta bound in the fixed strip and L(w)=Φ(0)/w+O(|w|-2)L(w)=\Phi(0)/w+O(|w|^{-2}). This controls a fixed nonzero-U witness, not every changing family of near-zero components.

After these exclusions the ray lies in a compact region with finitely many critical points. Local analytic continuation rules out a finite interior endpoint; strict U orientation and absence of cycles rule out indefinite recurrence. The ray reaches a=1/2. The two rays give a compact source-to-sink witness through the zero with an interior leftmost coordinate. Multiplicity gives at least m incoming/outgoing endpoint germs; existence of one witness suffices.

At a right endpoint Y is real and less than 1: sources have U<0 and 0<Y<1; sinks have U>0 and Y<0. These labels apply at all heights. The high-boundary atlas, with Y=ρeiϑY=\rho e^{i\vartheta}, 0<ρ<10<\rho<1, ϑ'>0\vartheta'>0, provides alternating labels on complete turns but does not automatically specify a global pairing.

9.3 Weak stationary obstruction — C126/C127

At a regular leftmost point, K_a is nonzero and the curve is a=a(γ)a=a(\gamma). Thus

K=Kγ=0,a''=-Kγγ/Ka0,KaKγγ0.(G4)K=K_\gamma=0,\qquad a''=-K_{\gamma\gamma}/K_a\ge0, \qquad\boxed{K_aK_{\gamma\gamma}\le0.}\tag{G4}

Strict negativity requires a nondegenerate minimum. Flat folds are included in the obstruction and force the closed pencil endpoint c=a² to be tested. At a critical minimum K_a=K_γ=0, this regular formula is unavailable and CR is a separate obligation. The older C127 nondegenerate statement remains valid; its extension to every regular witness with a strict negative sign is not used.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0; U increases by gradient squared. Fix one nonzero-U witness; no family-wise compactness; flat Ka*Kgg<=0 and critical case separate.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering · After this update

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term → Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → B32-01–04 same fixed sign function · After this update

Q30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/d; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → B32-01–04 same fixed sign function

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

B32-01–04 same fixed sign function · After this update

B32-01–04 same fixed sign function

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

2.7 One-sided references: a positive primitive gives a genuine cost upper bound

For any fixed reference gg, define b+=(e-t/2-e-3t/2)*vλb_+=(e^{-t/2}-e^{-3t/2})*v_\lambda, the nonnegative measure dμg=hg(n)n-1/2δlognd\mu_g=\sum h_g(n)n^{-1/2}\delta_{\log n}, and Yg=b+*μgY_g=b_+*\mu_g. Then

0b+(t)4/3,b+(t)4/3,b+(t)4/3-(t+1)e-t/2-e-3t/2/3,0\le b_+(t)\le4/3,\quad b_+(t)\to4/3,\quad b_+(t)\ge4/3-(t+1)e^{-t/2}-e^{-3t/2}/3,
0Yg(t)43Wg(et),Yg'(t)-12Yg(t)=(kL*ug)(t).(B32-01)0\le Y_g(t)\le\tfrac43 W_g(e^t),\qquad Y_g'(t)-\tfrac12Y_g(t)=(k_L*u_g)(t). \tag{B32-01}

There is an exact finite arithmetic form:

Yg(t)=e-t/2net(g*1)(n)[t-logn-1+ne-t],Y_g(t)=e^{-t/2}\sum_{n\le e^t}(g*\mathbf1)(n) [t-\log n-1+ne^{-t}],

whose coefficients and brackets are nonnegative. This positivity is not an assumed property of a zeta inverse.

Let B=(ug)-B=(u_g)_-, F=kL*BF=k_L*B. The differential inequality gives, for TtT\ge t,

Yg(t)e-(T-t)/2Yg(T)+tTe-(v-t)/2F(v)dv.(B32-02)Y_g(t)\le e^{-(T-t)/2}Y_g(T) +\int_t^T e^{-(v-t)/2}F(v)dv. \tag{B32-02}

If the same fixed gg has B(t)=Oϵ(eϵt)B(t)=O_\varepsilon(e^{\varepsilon t}) for every ϵ>0\varepsilon>0 and liminfWg(X)/X=0\liminf W_g(X)/\sqrt X=0, the terminal term vanishes on a sequence. Therefore

Yg(t)ZB(t):=0e-w/2(kL*B)(t+w)dw=Oϵ(eϵt).Y_g(t)\le Z_B(t):=\int_0^\infty e^{-w/2}(k_L*B)(t+w)dw =O_\varepsilon(e^{\varepsilon t}).

For a fixed large LL, mL=infvLb+(v)>0m_L=\inf_{v\ge L}b_+(v)>0 and mLWg(et)Yg(t+L)m_LW_g(e^t)\le Y_g(t+L). This proves global Wg(X)=Xo(1)W_g(X)=X^{o(1)}. Conversely, any one-time strict deficit Yg(t)>ZB(t)Y_g(t)>Z_B(t) forces

Wg(eT)34e(T-t)/2(Yg(t)-ZB(t))(Tt).W_g(e^T)\ge\tfrac34 e^{(T-t)/2}(Y_g(t)-Z_B(t))\quad(T\ge t).

It is a square-root-cost barrier, not a numerical finite-cutoff heuristic.

B32-03 then proves RH under B32-TARGET. Subpower cost makes HgH_g absolutely convergent and nonzero for s>1/2\Re s>1/2. Apply Landau's nonnegative-Laplace theorem to (ug)+(u_g)_+, adding back the holomorphic transform of (ug)-(u_g)_-. The continued transform has no positive-real singularity, so its integral converges for every positive real Laplace parameter. An off-line zeta zero would then give a noncanceling pole in ζ(2s)Hg(s)/(sζ(s))\zeta(2s)H_g(s)/(s\zeta(s)), a contradiction. No upper bound on positive summatory excursions is presumed. The existence of the reference is still missing.

If instead ug(t)-(C+o(1))tru_g(t)\ge-(C+o(1))t^r, r0r\ge0, and the weak cost condition holds, the sharp leading budget is

limsupXWg(X)(logX)rC|ζ(1/2)|.(B32-04)\limsup_{X\to\infty}\frac{W_g(X)}{(\log X)^r}\le C|\zeta(1/2)|. \tag{B32-04}

For a constant barrier this implies Mg=Wg()C|ζ(1/2)|M_g=W_g(\infty)\le C|\zeta(1/2)| and g(p)=+1p-1/2<\sum_{g(p)=+1}p^{-1/2}<\infty. If the total comparison mass is infinite but the weak cost condition holds, liminfSg(x)/x=-\liminf S_g(x)/\sqrt x=-\infty. The statement is deterministic and includes dependent prime choices.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

B32-01–04 same fixed sign function; all-scale subpower negative excursions plus sparse little-o sqrt-cost, with positive primitive and Landau boundary argument.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution. · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution.

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution. · After this update

A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution.

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

3.2 Cubic, additive gap, jump and divisor interfaces — A26-06–08

The full cubic criterion is

RHAN312BNfor every integerN2.(A26-CUBIC)\mathrm{RH}\iff A_N^3\le12B_N\quad\text{for every integer }N\ge2. \tag{A26-CUBIC}

The equivalent root-gap condition is eventual lower boundedness of GN=(12BN)1/3-ANG_N=(12B_N)^{1/3}-A_N. The exact decomposition

12B-A3=12xFar-Uar2(6x+Uar)(A26-DECOMP)12B-A^3=12xF_{\rm ar}-U_{\rm ar}^2(6\sqrt x+U_{\rm ar}) \tag{A26-DECOMP}

and the prime-power increment, with aq=Λ(q)/qa_q=\Lambda(q)/\sqrt q and AA the pre-jump value,

Δ(12B-A3)=aq(12q-3A2-3Aaq-aq2),(A26-JUMP)\Delta(12B-A^3)=a_q(12q-3A^2-3Aa_q-a_q^2), \tag{A26-JUMP}

remain exact. Do not confuse a formal prefix minimizer with a minimum in its actual gap. The inherited proof uses the gap membership test and finite initial range where required.

For Rsm=A-B/xR_{\rm sm}=A-B/x, divisor convolution gives

mm-1/2Rsm(x/m)=nxlognn(1-n/x).(A26-DIVISOR)\sum_m m^{-1/2}R_{\rm sm}(x/m) =\sum_{n\le x}\frac{\log n}{\sqrt n}(1-n/x). \tag{A26-DIVISOR}

The shifted zeta quotient has coefficients dω(n)=nω-1/2pn(1-p-2ω)d_\omega(n)=n^{\omega-1/2}\prod_{p\mid n}(1-p^{-2\omega}), with derivative at zero d'0(n)=2Λ(n)/nd'_0(n)=2\Lambda(n)/\sqrt n. These exact coefficients are more restrictive than an arbitrary positive Euler product. Section 5 makes the operator inversion issue explicit rather than presuming that restriction already controls the needed sign.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

A26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → A28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigma

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall · After this update

A26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower bounds → O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall · After this update

O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

O28-09, arithmetic firewall. The actual logarithmic function obeys

f''+f'=et/2-n2Λ(n)nδlogn.f''+f'=e^{t/2}-\sum_{n\ge2}\frac{\Lambda(n)}{\sqrt n}\delta_{\log n}.

The diagonal perturbation loses this exact between-jump equation. Preserving it and initial data would force the smooth perturbation to vanish. These constructions are not counterexamples for the actual coefficients.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

O28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewall; perturbation examples do not change actual arithmetic coefficients.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Actual theta curvature facts → A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term · After this update

Actual theta curvature facts → A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Actual theta curvature facts · After this update

Actual theta curvature facts

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

12. Theta curvature theorem and supplying bounds

The inherited exact theorem C1 and its variants are in active_proof_curvature_profile.txt. With V=-log(Phi)'', for u>=0,

V''-4V>32/(π2e4u)>0,2V-V'>11/(πe2u)>0,V(0)>18,V'(0)=0.V''-4V>32/(\pi^2e^{4u})>0,\quad 2V-V'>11/(\pi e^{2u})>0, \quad V(0)>18,\quad V'(0)=0.

Consequently V'>0 for u>0 and 2tanh(2u)<V'/V<22\tanh(2u)<V'/V<2. For q(u)=-u(logΦ)'(u)\mathfrak q(u)=-u(\log\Phi)'(u),

q''>36,q2=2V(0)>36,Cth=q2/4>9,q4=4V''(0)>8q2.(C1)\mathfrak q''>36,\quad q_2=2V(0)>36,\quad C_{\rm th}=q_2/4>9,\quad q_4=4V''(0)>8q_2. \tag{C1}

These are actual-theta results, not general consequences of positive kernels.

The proof isolates two Jacobi atoms and bounds the rest on a complex disc of radius 1/50 before logarithmic differentiation. The controlling repaired tail is H<=T/(1-r2-T), not T/(1-r2). The stored rational enclosures r2<1/220, T<6.2e-9 yield H<6.3e-9. The one-atom tail comparison uses monotonicity of lambda*T_n; the abandoned inequality 6/lambda>0.7 was not uniform. The independent live-strip proof splits a first sine half-period and an integration-by-parts tail. These repairs remain in the proof topic and finite regressions. Regressions were rerun; analysis is not formally verified.

These curvature bounds do not sign oscillatory transforms.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

Actual theta curvature facts; repaired tail H<=T/(1-r2-T), not T/(1-r2); physical curvature does not imply oscillatory sign.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term · After this update

A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

14. Exact profile decomposition and completed tail

Complete formulas, covariance proof and interval constants: active_proof_curvature_profile.txt. Write C=C_th, eta=eta_C, and integrate in x+y=t with the common positive theta weight. Let

Aa=(x2+y2)Φ(x)Φ(y)cosh(ad)dx, Eaprof=(η(x)+η(y))Φ(x)Φ(y)cosh(ad)dx,A_a=\int(x^2+y^2)\Phi(x)\Phi(y)\cosh(ad)dx, \ E_a^{\rm prof}=\int(\eta(x)+\eta(y))\Phi(x)\Phi(y)\cosh(ad)dx,
Baprof=d2(cosh(ad)-sinh(ad)/(ad))Φ(x)Φ(y)dx.B_a^{\rm prof}=\int d^2(\cosh(ad)-\sinh(ad)/(ad))\Phi(x)\Phi(y)dx.

Then F0=2CAa+Eaprof\mathcal F_0=2CA_a+E_a^{\rm prof}, G=2Aa-Baprof\mathcal G=2A_a-B_a^{\rm prof}, and FC=Eaprof+CBaprof>0\mathcal F_C=E_a^{\rm prof}+CB_a^{\rm prof}>0. Put R_prof=E_prof/(2A), epsilon=B_prof/(2A). The exact ratio is

ϱ=(1-ε)/(C+Rprof).\varrho=(1-\epsilon)/(C+R_{\rm prof}).

R_prof'>0 is proved by differentiating its normalized expectation: a strictly positive covariance plus a nonnegative moving-endpoint term. Strict stochastic ordering alone would not establish a strictly positive derivative at every t; A33-PROFILE supplies the missing argument. Epsilon=0 at a=0, so varrho_0'<0 follows. For the full strip, 0εa2/[3(C-a2)]<1/1050\le\epsilon\le a^2/[3(C-a^2)]<1/105 and E_prof>16C B_prof. Neither value inequality proves derivative domination. The old decimal .00915 is not an extra certified bound.

For the covariance representation use r in [0,1], x_±=t(1±r)/2, z=atr, W=Phi(x_-)Phi(x_+)cosh z, Q=mathfrakq(x_-)+mathfrakq(x_+), and Pw=1+r2thc(z)P_w=1+r^2\operatorname{thc}(z), thc(z)=tanh(z)/z with its removable value at zero. Under density mu proportional to W P_w,

Λ=Q/(t2Pw),κ=EμΛ,T=-r2zthc'(z)/Pw0,\Lambda=Q/(t^2P_w),\quad\kappa=\mathbb E_\mu\Lambda, \quad T=-r^2z\operatorname{thc}'(z)/P_w\ge0,
Λ˙=p(x-)+p(x+)t2Pw+ΛT>0,p(u)=uq'(u)-2q(u),\dot\Lambda=\frac{\mathfrak p(x_-)+\mathfrak p(x_+)}{t^2P_w}+\Lambda T>0, \quad \mathfrak p(u)=u\mathfrak q'(u)-2\mathfrak q(u),
S=-Q+ztanhz+r2zthc'(z)/Pw,tκ'=EΛ˙+Cov(Λ,S).(PROFILE-SCORE)S=-Q+z\tanh z+r^2z\operatorname{thc}'(z)/P_w, \qquad t\kappa'=\mathbb E\dot\Lambda+\operatorname{Cov}(\Lambda,S). \tag{PROFILE-SCORE}

Here dot means t*d/dt at fixed r. Lambda_r>0 and S_r<0 for r>0, so the covariance is unfavorable. Positive pointwise production alone is not enough.

The resolvent covariance bound uses the even sector with its correct endpoint conditions; it is not a full-space spectral claim. With Vc=V(t/2)V_c=V(t/2), on t>=8/5 and 0<=a<=1/2,

Vc>4πet,m=t2(Vc/2-a2)-2>0,V_c>4\pi e^t,\qquad m=t^2(V_c/2-a^2)-2>0,
EΛ˙>Vc4t(t-tanht),-Srctt2Nr,ct=1+1/(8t2),\mathbb E\dot\Lambda>\frac{V_c}{4t}(t-\tanh t), \quad -S_r\le c_t t^2N_r,\quad c_t=1+1/(8t^2),

where Nr=Qr/t2r(1+t/2)VceαttrN_r=Q_r/t^2\le r(1+t/2)V_ce^{\alpha_ttr}, αt=1+1/(t+2)\alpha_t=1+1/(t+2). The absolute unfavorable covariance is bounded above by

2.32ctt2(1+t/2)2Vc2m2.\frac{2.3}{2}\,c_t t^2(1+t/2)^2\frac{V_c^2}{m^2}.

At the endpoint production exceeds 6.57588 and the covariance bound is below 6.53237; the certified margin exceeds .0435. The stored monotonic envelopes extend the comparison to infinity. Therefore kappa_a'(t)>0 on t>=8/5, uniformly on the closed a strip, is an inherited proved theorem. The second audit rederives the even-sector boundary conditions, hyperbolic derivative bounds and monotone tail envelopes; CK066 independently checks the endpoint margin with rational arithmetic. The older C1 curvature theorem remains an explicitly named supplying result, not a newly formalized theorem.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

A33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary term; strict stochastic order alone insufficient. Unfavorable covariance and even-sector boundary conditions retained.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error · After this update

Q30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary term; Q32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filtering → Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error · After this update

Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

2.3 Critical-line modes add, and sparse logarithmic cutoffs constrain multiplicity

For a simple critical-line zero ρ=1/2+iγ\rho=1/2+i\gamma, define

aρ=ζ(2ρ)ρζ'(ρ),cλ=1/ζ(1/2).a_\rho=\frac{\zeta(2\rho)}{\rho\zeta'(\rho)},\qquad c_\lambda=1/\zeta(1/2).

For any finite set Γ\Gamma of positive ordinates of simple zeros,

Eλ(eT)(cλ2+2γΓ|aρ|2)T-OΓ(T+1).(Q32-04)\mathcal E_\lambda(e^T)\ge \left(c_\lambda^2+2\sum_{\gamma\in\Gamma}|a_\rho|^2\right)T -O_\Gamma(\sqrt T+1). \tag{Q32-04}

The proof subtracts the constant baseline, uses the decaying filter at each selected zero to extract a finite-cutoff Fourier coefficient, then applies the Gram inequality to finitely many distinct frequencies. The Fourier-coefficient error contains Eλ(eT)\sqrt{\mathcal E_\lambda(e^T)}; it is absorbed algebraically, not assumed bounded in advance. Other zeros need not be excluded. No linear-independence conjecture on ordinates is used.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

Q32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic error; no all-zero simplicity or independence premise.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference → R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay · After this update

R30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) reference → R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay · After this update

R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

Define the almost-sure constants

Z=C(1/2)=p(1-p-1)(p+1p-1)Ip>0,D=C'(1/2)Z=plogpp-1(1-2Ipp).Z=C(1/2)=\prod_p(1-p^{-1}) \left(\frac{\sqrt p+1}{\sqrt p-1}\right)^{I_p}>0, \quad D=\frac{C'(1/2)}Z=\sum_p\frac{\log p}{p-1}(1-2I_p\sqrt p).

Their logarithmic/centered series have summable variances. Two exact hyperbola decompositions give

nXh(n)=2ZX+Oω,ϵ(X3/10+ϵ),Wg(X)=Z(logX+γE+D)+Oω,ϵ(X-1/5+ϵ),(R32-07)\sum_{n\le X}h(n)=2Z\sqrt X+O_{\omega,\varepsilon}(X^{3/10+\varepsilon}), \quad W_g(X)=Z(\log X+\gamma_E+D)+O_{\omega,\varepsilon}(X^{-1/5+\varepsilon}), \tag{R32-07}
nX(g*1)(n)=ZX(logX+D+3γE-2)+Oω,ϵ(X5/14+ϵ).(R32-08)\sum_{n\le X}(g*\mathbf1)(n) =Z\sqrt X(\log X+D+3\gamma_E-2) +O_{\omega,\varepsilon}(X^{5/14+\varepsilon}). \tag{R32-08}

The positive source is g*1=h*1squaresg*\mathbf1=h*\mathbf1_{\rm squares}. These rates are proved, not asserted optimal. The coarse prime product has leading coefficient eγEZe^{\gamma_E}Z, while the finite cost has leading coefficient ZZ; they are not interchangeable.

Convolution with ψ\psi supplies an affine source and the unconditional lower bound

Eg(X)Z23ζ(1/2)2(logX)3-Oω((logX)2+1).(R32-09)\mathcal E_g(X)\ge\frac{Z^2}{3\zeta(1/2)^2}(\log X)^3-O_\omega((\log X)^2+1). \tag{R32-09}

Moreover EZ=ζ(3/2)/ζ(3)\mathbb EZ=\zeta(3/2)/\zeta(3), EZ2=p(1+4p-3/2+3p-2)\mathbb EZ^2=\prod_p(1+4p^{-3/2}+3p^{-2}), and Fatou gives the corresponding expected-energy lower coefficient EZ2/[3ζ(1/2)2]\mathbb EZ^2/[3\zeta(1/2)^2]. Cubic logarithmic energy is still compatible with the desired subpower bound.

Remove the real pole explicitly by

wω(t)=ug(t)-Zζ(1/2)t-Zζ(1/2)(D+3γE-2-ζ'ζ(1/2)).w_\omega(t)=u_g(t)-\frac Z{\zeta(1/2)}t -\frac Z{\zeta(1/2)}\left(D+3\gamma_E-2-\frac{\zeta'}\zeta(1/2)\right).

Then kL*wω=Oω,ϵ(e-(1/7-ϵ)t)k_L*w_\omega=O_{\omega,\varepsilon}(e^{-(1/7-\varepsilon)t}), and

Eλ(eT)Cω[(1+T2)0T|wω(t)|2dt+1+T5].(R32-10)\mathcal E_\lambda(e^T)\le C_\omega\left[ (1+T^2)\int_0^T|w_\omega(t)|^2dt+1+T^5\right]. \tag{R32-10}

The missing statement is subexponential residual energy along a sequence for one fixed realization. Exponential source decay does not establish it; at any hypothetical off-line zero, the residual source transform is nonzero and the detector still forces growth.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

R32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decay; one fixed realization with sparse subexponential residual energy remains missing.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0; Actual theta curvature facts → Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR · After this update

Incoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0; Actual theta curvature facts → Closed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CR

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof; Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m → Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity · After this update

Q30-02 separate Hardy membership proof; Q32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity m → Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity

After this update

  • Reported status: reported by source
Connection kind

depends on

Connection

Prerequisites reported for the scoped interface; all additional analytic/combinatorial hypotheses remain explicit in the target quotation.

Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity · After this update

Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

Consequently, even on an arbitrarily sparse unbounded sequence,

Eλ(Xj)C(logXj)B RHandmρB+12.(Q32-06)\mathcal E_\lambda(X_j)\le C(\log X_j)^B \ \Longrightarrow\ \mathrm{RH}\text{ and } m_\rho\le\left\lfloor\frac{B+1}{2}\right\rfloor. \tag{Q32-06}

This supersedes the scope restriction attached to Q30-04, whose old proof used all cutoffs. It does not change that older proof retroactively. A sparse O(logX)O(\log X) bound additionally supplies simplicity and the global nonnegative residue budget cλ2+2γ>0|aρ|2Cc_\lambda^2+2\sum_{\gamma>0}|a_\rho|^2\le C. Such logarithmic objectives are stronger than the subpower RH endpoint; do not impose them without need. The all-k Fourier requirement in L30-03 is unaffected.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

Q32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicity; does not transfer sparse quantifiers to L30 sine samples.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

A26 exact finite N<=2e6 diagnostics, extrema and counts; U<0 makes the tested implication branch vacuous. No payload replay. · After this update

A26 exact finite N<=2e6 diagnostics, extrema and counts; U<0 makes the tested implication branch vacuous. No payload replay.

After this update

  • Computation evidence: reported unreproduced
Computation

A26 exact finite N<=2e6 diagnostics, extrema and counts; U<0 makes the tested implication branch vacuous. No payload replay.

Reported result

7. Exact finite arithmetic and Fourier state

A26-COMP certifies for every integer 2<=N<=2,000,000:

12BN-(AN+7/4)3>1/2.12B_N-(A_N+7/4)^3>1/2.

On the full real interval [1,2,000,000], Uar<-49/25U_{\rm ar}<-49/25 and 11/4-Far>1/2511/4-F_{\rm ar}>1/25. The unique extremizers are 24,137 and 319,391, respectively. Exactly 362,547 integers N>=100 have U>-5/2 and each has V>1/6; the shifted exceptional set is empty. The unshifted U>0 branch is only vacuously tested. All 5,161 actual interior gap minima have F>7/3, with explicit gap-membership and truncated-last-gap checks.

The scale-10^36 outward logarithm/square-root engine, event counts and bounds are in data/V26_ARITHMETIC_CERTIFICATE.json. Its registered checks were rerun; diagnostic decimals are not substitutes. L28-CERT separately covers k=100 and one altered prime-sign pattern, not all k or an explicit conductor. CK064 adds exact finite energy/cost and digit tests. Full commands, scope and fresh logs are in CHECK_REGISTRY.json and data/V33_RUN_SUMMARY.json. None is an infinite count or energy upper bound.

Scope of the report

Only the finite ranges and audit scope stated in the governing quotation; not a claim of reproduction or proof of the conjecture.

Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50. · Before this update · After this update

Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50.

Before this update · After this update

  • Computation evidence: reported unreproduced
Computation

Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50.

Reported result

The packet reports finite-height exclusion candidates, but directed-rounding and implementation seams remain unresolved and no candidate is promoted to theorem status.

Analytic off-line zero-free band · Before this update · After this update

Analytic off-line zero-free band

Before this update · After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: special case
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The packet reports that xi(1/2+a+i gamma) is nonzero for 0<a<1/2 and 0<|gamma|<=39/10, without relying on a finite-height numerical zero certificate.

Formula
ξ(1/2+a+iγ)0(0<a<1/2, 0<|γ|39/10)\xi(1/2+a+i\gamma)\ne0 \quad (0<a<1/2,\ 0<|\gamma|\le39/10)
Variables

a

gamma

Hypotheses

0<a<1/2

0<|gamma|<=39/10

Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50. · After this update · Historical record

Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50.

After this update · Historical record

  • Record status: superseded
  • Computation evidence: reported unreproduced
Computation

Inherited finite-height exclusion programs at heights 10, 15.53, and 50.

Reported result

The packet reports finite-height exclusion candidates, but directed-rounding and implementation seams remain unresolved and no candidate is promoted to theorem status.

Narrowed alternative closures · Before this update

Narrowed alternative closures

Before this update

Mathematical context

Height-growing interpolation, theta-density localization, and retained Fourier/scalar backups after scoped route eliminations.

Fixed finite distinct-node Pick interpolation with polynomial margin · Before this update · After this update

Fixed finite distinct-node Pick interpolation with polynomial margin

Before this update · After this update

  • Reported status: reported failure
Claimed shortcut

A fixed height-independent node set can resolve the zero-forced xi perturbation at arbitrarily high height.

Failure scope

Only fixed distinct nodes and families with an independently established polynomial positivity margin are eliminated; arbitrary moving, exponential-conditioning, height-growing, and blanket confluent cases remain open.

Reported witness

The source reports polynomial determinant margin but exponentially smaller zero-forced data perturbation.

What remains viable

Let interpolation order grow with height and prove an exponentially small complex error.

Analyze an exponentially conditioned fixed-size scheme only with an explicit margin theorem.

Height-growing Pick/Padé hierarchy · Before this update · After this update

Height-growing Pick/Padé hierarchy

Before this update · After this update

  • Route disposition: narrowed
Route scope

Narrowed backup: interpolation order must grow with height and provide explicit complex-domain error below the completed-xi scale together with exact conditioning control.

Theta-density localization · Before this update · After this update

Theta-density localization

Before this update · After this update

  • Route disposition: narrowed
Route scope

Narrowed backup: generic moment positivity is sharp, so a closure must use a quantitative property of the actual theta density that excludes the forced zero data.

Fourier-decay and scalar-growth closures · Before this update · After this update

Fourier-decay and scalar-growth closures

Before this update · After this update

  • Route disposition: paused
Route scope

Retained but not prioritized over the directed reflection graph: almost-pi/2 reflection-profile decay or the scalar subexponential bound would provide equivalent closure routes.

Narrowed alternative closures · After this update · Historical record

Narrowed alternative closures

After this update · Historical record

  • Record status: superseded
Mathematical context

Height-growing interpolation, theta-density localization, and retained Fourier/scalar backups after scoped route eliminations.

Retained obstacles and current Fourier/scalar endpoints · After this update

Retained obstacles and current Fourier/scalar endpoints

After this update

  • Record status: active
Mathematical context

Retained fixed-order obstacles and the open alternative-closure task, alongside current actual-arithmetic Fourier/scalar endpoints. The historical Pick/Padé and theta-density route records remain separately source-scoped.

Directed nodal graph frontier · Before this update

Directed nodal graph frontier

Before this update

Mathematical context

Local phase geometry and classified ends reduce the leading program to global incidence, same-sign pairing, and singular exclusion.

Exclude zero-phase singular vertices · Before this update · After this update

Exclude zero-phase singular vertices

Before this update · After this update

  • Reported status: open
Open task

Eliminate the simultaneous target-strip system U=0, V=0, and h'=0, or produce an exact solution.

Required conclusion

The simultaneous system is eliminated throughout the target strip, or an exact solution is produced.

The first unverified sign or localization step is explicitly identified.

Proposed next action

Test whether the two exact L-equations force an impossible positive-measure covariance identity, while keeping every Stieltjes/Pick input within its stated scope.

Directed nodal graph frontier · After this update · Historical record

Directed nodal graph frontier

After this update · Historical record

  • Record status: superseded
Mathematical context

Local phase geometry and classified ends reduce the leading program to global incidence, same-sign pairing, and singular exclusion.

Retained modulus-one boundary geometry · After this update

Retained modulus-one boundary geometry

After this update

  • Record status: active
Mathematical context

Revision 6 U=0 geometry and its still-open pairing/singularity obligations remain separately scoped historical mathematics; current Theta=0 fixed-witness arguments do not replace these hypotheses.

Exact zero-location formulations · Before this update

Exact zero-location formulations

Before this update

Mathematical context

The completed-zeta statement, centered entire function, and reflection-quotient phase gate.

Exact zero-location formulations · After this update · Historical record

Exact zero-location formulations

After this update · Historical record

  • Record status: superseded
Mathematical context

The completed-zeta statement, centered entire function, and reflection-quotient phase gate.

Completed-zeta target and current phase-zero chart · After this update

Completed-zeta target and current phase-zero chart

After this update

  • Record status: active
Mathematical context

The completed-zeta target and the prescribed upper-strip phase-zero chart K=0, R<0. The current fixed-witness record keeps its regular, flat and critical cases separate; the older U=0/V presentation remains source-local history.

Current source frontier · After this update

Current source frontier

After this update

  • Record status: active
Mathematical context

Separate energy, arithmetic, signed-transform and theta interfaces; no endpoint or NC/CR closure is proved here.

Arbitrary finite multiplicity yields local critical-line collar with zero- and height-dependent radius · After this update

Arbitrary finite multiplicity yields local critical-line collar with zero- and height-dependent radius

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

10. Boundary collars, critical contacts, and root charts

10.1 Arbitrary-multiplicity critical-line collar — R23-3

Let X(iγ0)=0X(i\gamma_0)=0 have finite multiplicity mm. Using the even/reality symmetries, the nonvanishing of LL, and a local coordinate with radial displacement aa and height displacement δ=γ-γ0\delta=\gamma-\gamma_0, the common-contact equations have leading forms

K=c(δ+ia)m+O((a2+δ2)(m+1)/2),K=c\Re(\delta+ia)^m+O((a^2+\delta^2)^{(m+1)/2}),
Kγ=cm(δ+ia)m-1+O((a2+δ2)m/2),c0.(G5)K_\gamma=cm\Re(\delta+ia)^{m-1}+O((a^2+\delta^2)^{m/2}), \qquad c\ne0. \tag{G5}

The two leading homogeneous terms cannot vanish simultaneously on the relevant unit semicircle: cos(mθ)\cos(m\theta) and cos((m-1)θ)\cos((m-1)\theta) have no common zero there. Compactness of that semicircle yields a punctured neighborhood, on the live side, free of simultaneous K=Kγ=0K=K_\gamma=0. The argument handles all finite multiplicities at once and does not assume simplicity of critical-line zeros.

The collar radius depends on the zero and its local coefficients. It is not a uniform collar in γ\gamma, and it does not exclude contacts approaching a=0a=0 while γ\gamma\to\infty. It also does not justify extending the interior fold sign to the boundary: the boundary determinant can have the opposite sign.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

Arbitrary finite multiplicity yields local critical-line collar with zero- and height-dependent radius; no uniform high-height collar.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Y/G6 includes X=0; g/G7 requires its nonzero, noncritical domain · After this update

Y/G6 includes X=0; g/G7 requires its nonzero, noncritical domain

After this update

  • Source-reported logical status: standing
  • Evidence: narrative only
  • Trust posture: provisional
  • Dependencies: clean
  • Statement scope: exact
  • Mathematical scope: conditional
Statement kind

lemma

Statement

The governing source reports the following scoped result or conditional interface. Its full hypotheses and exclusions remain part of this report.

10.2 Nonzero quotient chart and its restrictions

At a stationary contact, the identity

P=|L|2(Y-1)P=|L|^2(Y-1)

gives YY\in\mathbb R, Y<1Y<1, and Y'=0\Re Y'=0. Direct differentiation, with the first contact equations imposed before simplification, yields

KaKγγ>0Y'Y''<0.(G6)K_aK_{\gamma\gamma}>0 \iff \Im Y'\,\Im Y''<0. \tag{G6}

This formulation is valid even at Y=0Y=0, but still requires the stated stationary-contact equations. For Y0Y\ne0, define

g=Y'Y=X'X-L'L.g=\frac{Y'}Y=\frac{X'}X-\frac{L'}L.

At a noncritical stationary contact g=iβg=i\beta, β{0}\beta\in\mathbb R\setminus\{0\}, and

KaKγγ>0βg'<0.(G7)\boxed{K_aK_{\gamma\gamma}>0\iff \beta\,\Im g'<0.} \tag{G7}

The precise domain of the old R23.36 target is therefore

0<a<1/2, γ>25/4,Y{0},Y<1,g=0,g0.0<a<1/2,\ \gamma>25/4,\quad Y\in\mathbb R\setminus\{0\},\quad Y<1,\quad\Re g=0,\quad\Im g\ne0.

At X=0X=0, gg is undefined; use G6 or the root-locus moment chart below. At a critical stationary contact, g=0g=0 when Y0Y\ne0, and G7 is not the noncritical sign theorem. These are separate cases, not removable notational inconveniences.

Variables

Exactly the variables and domains in the quoted governing source.

Hypotheses

At stationary negative-axis contacts, Y=X/L is real, Y<1 and Re Y'=0. Since L is nonzero, Y and G6 remain valid at X=0. The logarithmic quotient g=Y'/Y requires Y!=0; G7 further requires g=i beta with beta!=0. The old R23.36 domain also retains 0<a<1/2 and gamma>25/4. Neither equivalence supplies the separate critical-contact (CR) exclusion.

Exceptions

Narrative source report only; omitted proof attachments and computation payloads have not been replayed.

Detailed research inventory

Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map

This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.

45 standing statements3 proposed statements6 mathematical milestones18 open questions5 narrowed routes38 conditional results1 completed special cases
Statements by mathematical role48 selected mapped statements
  • lemma43 of 4843
  • reduction2 of 482
  • theorem candidate2 of 482
  • negative result1 of 481
Selected mathematical clusters6 mathematical clusters
One-sided transform and logarithmic stripSource-reported shifted sine positivity, zero-free transform, and global logarithm.4 displayed rows
  • retained route statementShifted sine positivity through shift twointermediate
  • retained route statementOne-sided transform zero-free half-planeintermediate
  • retained route statementGlobal principal logarithmintermediate
  • retained route statementAnalytic off-line zero-free bandspecial case
Evidence and trust boundaryRecorded packet audit transcripts and finite-height candidates remain distinct from mathematical acceptance.1 displayed row
  • ComputationBundled Revision 5 exact symbolic/rational audit, Revision 6 structural audit, Python compilation transcript, and theta-kernel monotonicity checker transcript.The retained transcript reports that all listed checks passed. ProofAtlas did not execute the bundled scripts, so the result remains source-reported rather than independently reproduced here. · reported unreproduced
Current source frontierSeparate energy, arithmetic, signed-transform and theta interfaces; no endpoint or NC/CR closure is proved here.55 displayed rows · 6 routes included
  • retained route statementRiemann hypothesis
  • retained route statementQ30-01 real endpoint energy and boundary termconditional
  • retained route statementQ30-02 separate Hardy membership proofconditional
  • retained route statementQ32-01/02 positive convolution detector and multiplicity filteringconditional
  • retained route statementQ32-03 logarithmic lower baseline, not an asymptotic expansion.conditional
  • retained route statementQ32-04 finite chosen positive ordinates of simple critical zeros, with square-root logarithmic errorconditional
  • retained route statementQ32-05 finite critical ordinates all of exact multiplicity mconditional
  • retained route statementQ32-06 sparse unbounded logarithmic energy controls RH and multiplicityconditional
  • retained route statementQ32-07 finite-mode subtraction gives decaying source, not bounded residual input.conditional
  • retained route statementQ30-CONV/06 exact real cutoffs X/dconditional
  • retained route statementR30-04–07 critical 1/(2 sqrt p) referenceconditional
  • retained route statementR32-07–10 affine real-pole subtraction, exact asymptotics and source decayconditional
  • retained route statementR32-01–04 fixed-alpha almost-sure regimesconditional
  • retained route statementB32-01–04 same fixed sign functionconditional
  • retained route statementA26-01–05 exact prime-power jumps, continuous F, downward slope jumps, Mellin/Landau lower boundsconditional
  • retained route statementA26-CUBIC equivalence at every N>=2 with exact endpoint gap, cubic slack, and divisor convolution.conditional
  • retained route statementA26-BARRIER/SLACK requires stated a0+alpha>0, b0>=0 and eventual branch condition or fixed quadratic slack/PNT absorption.conditional
  • retained route statementA26-12–15 clipped slope, nonnegative jumps and essential half N^-3/2 sampling lossconditional
  • retained route statementA28-01–03 whole spectral extension differs from zero extensionconditional
  • retained route statementA28-04 fixed sigma in (1/2,1), Ingham q_sigma<1 and kappa<1-q_sigmaconditional
  • retained route statementA28-05–07 positive compact filters and finite odd-harmonic resonance repair for selected zerosconditional
  • retained route statementA28-08–13 every-late-window exceptional blocks without attained edgeconditional
  • retained route statementO28-01–03 exact F0 extension, moment and strict negative forcingconditional
  • retained route statementO28-09 actual between-jump differential equation is the firewallconditional
  • retained route statementO28-10 one fixed triangular Mobius sourceconditional
  • retained route statementL28-01/02 and L30-01–03 actual Liouville sine series, k^3 truncation, x=k^-2conditional
  • ComputationA26 exact finite N<=2e6 diagnostics, extrema and counts; U<0 makes the tested implication branch vacuous. Payload not independently reproduced.7. Exact finite arithmetic and Fourier state A26-COMP certifies for every integer 2<=N<=2,000,000: 12BN-(AN+7/4)3>1/2.12B_N-(A_N+7/4)^3>1/2. On the full real interval [1,2,000,000], Uar<-49/25U_{\rm ar}<-49/25 and 11/4-Far>1/2511/4-F_{\rm ar}>1/25. The unique extremizers are 24,137 and 319,391, respectively. Exactly 362,547 integers N>=100 have U>-5/2 and each has V>1/6; the shifted exceptional set is empty. The unshifted U>0 branch is only vacuously tested. All 5,161 actual interior gap minima have F>7/3, with explicit gap-membership and truncated-last-gap checks. The scale-10^36 outward logarithm/square-root engine, event counts and bounds are in data/V26_ARITHMETIC_CERTIFICATE.json. Its registered checks were rerun; diagnostic decimals are not substitutes. L28-CERT separately covers k=100 and one altered prime-sign pattern, not all k or an explicit conductor. CK064 adds exact finite energy/cost and digit tests. Full commands, scope and fresh logs are in CHECK_REGISTRY.json and data/V33_RUN_SUMMARY.json. None is an infinite count or energy upper bound. · reported unreproduced
  • retained route statementC163 phase-contact band 0<gamma<=25/4 differs from C103 off-axis-zero band |gamma|<=82.40 and stationary band [64,81.90]conditional
  • retained route statementIncoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0conditional
  • retained route statementArbitrary finite multiplicity yields local critical-line collar with zero- and height-dependent radiusconditional
  • retained route statementY/G6 includes X=0; g/G7 requires its nonzero, noncritical domainconditional
  • retained route statementRoot-locus moment chart handles X=0 without dividing by Xconditional
  • retained route statementExact CR variance and convolution curvature quantities differconditional
  • retained route statementD_theta chart valid at X=0conditional
  • retained route statementActual theta curvature factsconditional
  • retained route statementClosed pencil c in [0,a^2], NC for noncritical Ka!=0 and independent CRconditional
  • retained route statementFull profile plus PFX only implies NC, still requiring CRconditional
  • retained route statementA33-PROFILE strict derivative includes covariance plus moving-boundary termconditional
  • retained route statementJ/divisor/heat/autocorrelation tools keep common kernels, canceled differences, actual positive a, inhomogeneous forcing, moment scope and separate higher-order critical analysis.conditional
  • Research targetOpen energy work with exact source conditionsopen
  • Research targetOpen overview work with exact source conditionsopen
  • Research targetOpen reference work with exact source conditionsopen
  • Research targetOpen fixed-function work with exact source conditionsopen
  • Research targetOpen arithmetic work with exact source conditionsopen
  • Research targetOpen signed-kernels work with exact source conditionsopen
  • Research targetOpen theta work with exact source conditionsopen
  • Research targetNoncritical stationary-fold exclusionopen
  • Research targetCritical stationary-contact exclusionopen
  • Research targetUniform compact-profile rectangleopen
  • Active routeCurrent energy routeAn exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.
  • Active routeCurrent fixed-function routeAn exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.
  • Active routeCurrent reference routeAn exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.
  • Active routeCurrent arithmetic routeAn exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.
  • Active routeCurrent signed-kernels routeAn exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.
  • Active routeCurrent theta routeAn exact endpoint or theta subproblem remains open; retain the stated sparse/all-scale, same-function and same-cutoff quantifiers.
Retained modulus-one boundary geometryRevision 6 U=0 geometry and its still-open pairing/singularity obligations remain separately scoped historical mathematics; current Theta=0 fixed-witness arguments do not replace these hypotheses.11 displayed rows · 2 routes included
  • retained route statementStrict phase flow on regular nodal edgesintermediate
  • retained route statementExact local singular normal formintermediate
  • retained route statementProper components and classified endsintermediate
  • retained route statementGlobal endpoint-incidence and same-sign pairing gate
  • retained route statementZero-phase singular exclusion
  • Research targetBuild the global endpoint-incidence atlasopen
  • Research targetProve directed same-sign endpoint pairingopen
  • Research targetExclude zero-phase singular verticesopen
  • Research targetDetermine portal and right-edge phase signsopen
  • Narrowed routeDirected nodal graph and endpoint pairingRetained Revision 6 modulus-one U=0 boundary-graph route with increasing phase V. Its source-scoped local results and open pairing obligations remain historical mathematics. The current packet instead uses phase-zero Theta=0 fixed witnesses with increasing U; neither chart is silently substituted for the other.
  • Narrowed routeEndpoint phases and rectangle flow balanceRetained Revision 6 modulus-one U=0 boundary-graph route with increasing phase V. Its source-scoped local results and open pairing obligations remain historical mathematics. The current packet instead uses phase-zero Theta=0 fixed witnesses with increasing U; neither chart is silently substituted for the other.
Completed-zeta target and current phase-zero chartThe completed-zeta target and the prescribed upper-strip phase-zero chart K=0, R<0. The current fixed-witness record keeps its regular, flat and critical cases separate; the older U=0/V presentation remains source-local history.2 displayed rows
  • retained route statementRiemann hypothesis
  • retained route statementIncoming phase-zero component Theta=0, K=0,R<0conditional
Retained obstacles and current Fourier/scalar endpointsRetained fixed-order obstacles and the open alternative-closure task, alongside current actual-arithmetic Fourier/scalar endpoints. The historical Pick/Padé and theta-density route records remain separately source-scoped.6 displayed rows · 1 route included
  • retained route statementFixed-distinct-node interpolation blindnessconditional
  • Useful failureAbstract Stieltjes positivity without theta-density structurereported failure
  • Useful failureFixed finite distinct-node Pick interpolation with polynomial marginreported failure
  • Useful failurePositive Stieltjes shifts growing proportionally with heightreported failure
  • Research targetTest an exponentially resolving or theta-density closureopen
  • Active routeActual Liouville sine, exponential and triangular-source boundsCurrent actual Liouville sine, exponential and triangular-source lower-bound routes remain open. The sine condition is required for every sufficiently large k; positivity of selected characters or comparison models does not supply actual Liouville signs.
How to interpret these counts

A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.

Research outlook

Conditions that would advance the current route

Priority open bridge10.4 Critical contacts and the remaining assembly distinction At a critical contact, Q(w)=r>0\mathcal Q(w)=r>0, H'(w)=0\mathcal H'(w)=0, and L(-z)+rL(z)L(-z)+rL(z) has a zero of multiplicity at least two at ww. Its associated normalized positive two-sided density has characteristic nulls EeiγX=E[XeiγX]=0.(CR1)\mathbb E e^{i\gamma X}=\mathbb E[Xe^{i\gamma X}]=0. \tag{CR1} The exact scalar inequality y2(π2/2)(1-cosy)-2ysinyy^2\ge(\pi^2/2)(1-\cos y)-2y\sin y gives VarXπ2/(2γ2)\operatorname{Var}X\ge\pi^2/(2\gamma^2), strictly for the continuous theta law. This bound decays with height and does not close CR. A separate positive-convolution moment obstruction is γ2EX2>12\gamma^2\mathbb E X^2>12; its exact three-point ceiling is below 12.04, so optimizing only that constant cannot solve the high-height problem. These are different probability laws and different moments. The order-dd local normal form H-H(w0)=ζd\mathcal H-\mathcal H(w_0)=\zeta^d supplies 2d2d rays, including a smaller-aa ray. That does not force a selected source-to-sink path to use a compatible pair of rays. R21-11.2 is a finite resolved-graph dichotomy with explicit path-class and leaf hypotheses. The unresolved global replacement must prove compatibility under splicing, attainment or stable limiting selection, and every boundary/infinite-height continuation. The fixed-witness theorem above does not supply family-wise compactness. A direct proof of CR would bypass those additional obligations.

No completion estimate is inferred from the number of recorded checks, routes, or source statements.

Evidence needed nextConcrete conditions for progress

A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.

  • Give a source-auditable argument for the exact stated domain.
  • Do not substitute a pointwise/finite diagnostic, a nonuniform collar, an open-interval pencil, or a source-decay assertion.

Continue the mathematics

Contribute

ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.

Read-only beta · actions unavailable
Prepared starting pointCritical stationary-contact exclusion

Riemann Hypothesis · ready to start

Mathematical updatesFollow this problem

Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.

Research contextPrepared context for any AI agent

Does every zero of the completed zeta function lie on the critical line with real part one half?

  • Exact question and boundaries
  • Current routes and known obstacles
  • What a useful result should report
Return mathematical workReturn what you or your agent found

A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.

Proof attempt or partial resultSupporting notes or data
Hosted agentRun this task with a hosted agent

A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.

Your own AI agentConnect an outside research agent

Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.

Sources and references15 cited works · next context review by Nov 4, 2026

The mathematical context was checked on Aug 4, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.

  1. 1
    Ueber die Anzahl der Primzahlen unter einer gegebenen Grösseoriginal source · Bernhard Riemann · Monatsberichte der Berliner Akademie · 1859 · accessed Aug 4, 2026
  2. 2
    Riemann's 1859 Manuscriptauthoritative webpage · Clay Mathematics Institute · accessed Aug 4, 2026
  3. 3
    Riemann Hypothesis — Millennium Prize Problemmaintained problem list · Clay Mathematics Institute · accessed Aug 4, 2026
  4. 4
    Problems of the Millennium: The Riemann Hypothesissurvey or monograph · Enrico Bombieri · Clay Mathematics Institute · 2000 · accessed Aug 4, 2026
  5. 5
    DLMF §25.10: Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Functionencyclopedia · National Institute of Standards and Technology · accessed Aug 4, 2026
  6. 6
    More than five-twelfths of the zeros of ζ are on the critical linepeer reviewed result · Kyle Pratt, Nicolas Robles, Alexandru Zaharescu, Dirk Zeindler · Research in the Mathematical Sciences · 2019-12-06 · ARXIV 1802.10521 · DOI 10.1007/s40687-019-0199-8 · accessed Aug 4, 2026
  7. 7
    The de Bruijn–Newman constant is non-negativepeer reviewed result · Brad Rodgers, Terence Tao · Forum of Mathematics, Pi · 2020 · DOI 10.1017/fmp.2020.6 · accessed Aug 4, 2026
  8. 8
    The Riemann hypothesis is true up to 3×10^12peer reviewed result · Dave Platt, Tim Trudgian · Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society · 2021 · ARXIV 2004.09765 · DOI 10.1112/blms.12460 · accessed Aug 4, 2026
  9. 9
    An Elementary Problem Equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesispeer reviewed result · Jeffrey C. Lagarias · The American Mathematical Monthly · 2002 · ARXIV math/0008177 · DOI 10.1080/00029890.2002.11919883 · accessed Aug 4, 2026
  10. 10
    The Positivity of a Sequence of Numbers and the Riemann Hypothesispeer reviewed result · Xian-Jin Li · Journal of Number Theory · 1997 · DOI 10.1006/jnth.1997.2137 · accessed Aug 4, 2026
  11. 11
    Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.RiemannZetaformalization · Mathlib · accessed Aug 4, 2026
  12. 12
    Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.ZetaZerosformalization · Mathlib · accessed Aug 4, 2026
  13. 13
    LMFDB Auxiliary Datasets — Zeros of ζ(s)software or dataset · LMFDB Collaboration · accessed Aug 4, 2026
  14. 14
    Hilbert problems — Hilbert's eighth problemencyclopedia · Encyclopedia of Mathematics · accessed Aug 4, 2026
  15. 15
    Riemann hypothesisencyclopedia · Wikimedia Foundation · accessed Aug 4, 2026

Important qualifications

  • This record describes the classical Riemann Hypothesis for the Riemann zeta function, not the generalized Riemann hypothesis for Dirichlet, Dedekind, automorphic, or other L-functions.
  • No exact problem-level Riemann Hypothesis entry was verified in the current Epoch FrontierMath Open Problems collection; related problems or problems conditional on a generalized Riemann hypothesis do not establish membership.
  • The scoped formalization review verified a canonical Lean statement and substantial zeta-function support in Mathlib, but no checked proof of the Riemann Hypothesis.
  • Mathlib is a moving library. Any formal-library declaration shown publicly should be pinned to an exact source revision.
  • The LMFDB auxiliary dataset page advertises the first 10^11 zeta zeros, while its associated explanatory knowledge page is marked awaiting review; the data are useful computational material, not a proof of the infinite statement.
  • The Platt–Trudgian finite-height verification was not independently rerun by ProofAtlas during this administrative collection.
  • Recent manuscripts and purported proofs do not change the problem's open status without authoritative mathematical acceptance.

Continue exploring

Compare another research frontier

See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.

Explore all research workspaces

Expanded visual

Open original image