At (q,d,j)=(3,13,0), the history containing (3,13), (1,7), and (1,10), with other queried points unoccupied, is safe; adding (2,12) yields (3,13)→(4,10)→(3,6)→(2,3)→(1,1), whose next subtraction hits. These are consistent artificial histories, not asserted actual prefixes. The one-interval and two-level theorems rely on specified positive occupied sets and certify the same entrance. Their stated hypotheses remain available even though arbitrary-history monotonicity fails.
Route status · Narrowed routeInteger sequences and coverage
Recamán’s Sequence Coverage Conjecture
Collaboration betaDoes the standard Recamán sequence visit every nonnegative integer? Addition may repeat a value; the question concerns coverage. The source leaves both coverage and permanent omission unresolved.

Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
Full objective: prove that every nonnegative integer occurs in the standard Recamán sequence, or disprove this by certifying a permanently omitted integer. The present work has neither a coverage proof nor a permanent-omission proof. The source reports exact reductions and local avoidance theorems, and describes its finite certificates as reproducible. These results and computations have not been independently checked here and do not establish a completed resolution.
The target is the standard sequence
This is OEIS A005132; the definition and permission for repetitions on the addition branch are confirmed by the primary references [SRC-01] and [SRC-03]. The target is coverage, not injectivity. Repetition on addition is part of the problem and may not be removed by an optimization or comparison argument.
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on Recamán’s Sequence Coverage Conjecture stands
Selected route highlights from the mathematical source. This is not yet a complete mathematical inventory.
Starting from the stated untouched prefix at N0=30000000, a sufficient positive certificate of either kind at every future active entrance would permanently protect G=[27662800,27662934] and disprove coverage. The source reports the implication, while explicitly leaving its universal regeneration premise unproved.
Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteWork mapped so far
Recamán’s Sequence Coverage Conjecture in numbers
- Argument development
- 719 · 59%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 71 · 6%
- Computational analysis
- 159 · 13%
- Open obligations
- 206 · 17%
- Definitions and setup
- 74 · 6%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Establish perpetual regeneration of a one-interval or two-level positive certificate along the actual future Recamán history.
Suggested move: Suggested next step: identify how newly occupied intervals are born and transported to the next entrance scale, then state an inductive renewal invariant with explicit initialization and preservation clauses.
What would count as progress
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
Explored alternatives
Other routes
At (q,d,j)=(3,13,0), the history containing (3,13), (1,7), and (1,10), with other queried points unoccupied, is safe; adding (2,12) yields (3,13)→(4,10)→(3,6)→(2,3)→(1,1), whose next subtraction hits. These are consistent artificial histories, not asserted actual prefixes. The one-interval and two-level theorems rely on specified positive occupied sets and certify the same entrance. Their stated hypotheses remain available even though arbitrary-history monotonicity fails.
Route status · Narrowed routeThe source reports that H=[167526,167661] had a same-entrance certificate at N=471296, yet a later entrance at N′=65854466988 led to a hit at 167659 and then the gap bottom 167526. The old occupied interval remained at the wrong location for the later phase. A renewal theorem that produces the required occupied intervals at each new entrance remains a candidate route; the source explicitly leaves this regeneration step open.
Route status · Narrowed routeMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
Computational resultChaffin reports computing beyond 10^612 terms while 852655 remains the smallest unvisited nonnegative integer. This finite observation does not show that it is never visited.[2]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
Alekseyev and coauthors study distinct greedy constructions with different operation rules. Results for those sequences do not settle coverage for the original recurrence.
[3]Formal and computational footholds
Existing statements, libraries, computations, and datasets that can shorten the next serious attempt.
- dataset · source linked; not reproduced by ProofAtlasOEIS standard Recamán sequence data
The entry supplies the recurrence and finite terms, including repeated values. Its linked tables were not reproduced.
[1] - computation · not independently reproducedChaffin's 2026 Recamán computation
The author's page reports a finite computational horizon and missing-value information. The implementation and result files were not executed or checked.
[2]
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.
- theorem candidate
1 of 9 1 - reduction
3 of 9 3 - lemma
3 of 9 3 - equivalence
1 of 9 1 - computational claim
1 of 9 1
Current research mapThe conjecture, retained reductions, explored limitations, and open questions represented in this overview.25 displayed rows · 2 routes included
- retained route statementCoverage of every nonnegative integer, with repetitions permitted on addition
- retained route statementCurrent reductionintermediate
- retained route statementClosing targetintermediate
- retained route statementMarked-gap coupling and late clearingintermediate
- retained route statementExact wide-gap proposal criterionintermediate
- retained route statementBounded local decision, with history retainedintermediate
- retained route statementPositive certificates protect one entranceintermediate
- retained route statementA conditional route to permanent omissionintermediate
- retained route statementFinite certificates through index 10^13intermediate
- Recorded relationshipThe source reports this as a route toward the conjecture; missing or unaudited premises remain and the reduction does not itself prove the target.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- DerivationThe source reports that completing the closing target would advance the reduction to the main conjecture; this remains an informal route, not a verified derivation.proposed
- Useful failureAssume that adding occupied values can only improve local safetyreported failure
- Useful failureCarry a certificate unchanged to every later entrance merely because the visited set growsreported failure
- Research targetEstablish perpetual regeneration of a one-interval or two-level positive certificate along the actual future Recamán history.open
- Research targetConstruct a globally valid transition for incoming occupancy profiles, including consistency and generated history, instead of treating the finite local query mask as a closed state.open
- Research targetAn alternative coverage route must force a hitting profile from actual Recamán history; realizability of a safe or dangerous artificial local state alone is insufficient.open
- ComputationThe source reports two finite engines reaching index 10^13, with direct comparison through 10^6, checkpoint comparisons, and exact incoming profiles for 23 active entrance groups between indices 30000000 and 10^13.Among the 23 observed groups, 22 have a one-interval certificate and 10 have a two-level certificate; their union covers 23 groups. The candidate gap remains missing at the finite horizon, without a theorem about later entrances. · reported unreproduced
- Narrowed routeAssume that adding occupied values can only improve local safetyAt (q,d,j)=(3,13,0), the history containing (3,13), (1,7), and (1,10), with other queried points unoccupied, is safe; adding (2,12) yields (3,13)→(4,10)→(3,6)→(2,3)→(1,1), whose next subtraction hits. These are consistent artificial histories, not asserted actual prefixes. The one-interval and two-level theorems rely on specified positive occupied sets and certify the same entrance. Their stated hypotheses remain available even though arbitrary-history monotonicity fails.
- Narrowed routeCarry a certificate unchanged to every later entrance merely because the visited set growsThe source reports that H=[167526,167661] had a same-entrance certificate at N=471296, yet a later entrance at N′=65854466988 led to a hit at 167659 and then the gap bottom 167526. The old occupied interval remained at the wrong location for the later phase. A renewal theorem that produces the required occupied intervals at each new entrance remains a candidate route; the source explicitly leaves this regeneration step open.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
2 approaches have already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
Recamán’s Sequence Coverage Conjecture · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
Does the standard Recamán sequence visit every nonnegative integer? Addition may repeat a value; the question concerns coverage. The source leaves both coverage and permanent omission unresolved.
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references3 cited works · next context review by Dec 7, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Sep 7, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1A005132 — Recamán's sequencesoftware or dataset · The OEIS Foundation Inc. · OEIS A005132 · accessed Sep 7, 2026
- 2The Recamán Sequenceauthoritative webpage · Ben Chaffin · 2026-02-07 · accessed Sep 7, 2026
- 3Three Cousins of Recaman's Sequencepeer reviewed result · Max A. Alekseyev, Joseph Samuel Myers, Richard Schroeppel, S. R. Shannon, N. J. A. Sloane, Paul Zimmermann · The Fibonacci Quarterly · 2022 · ARXIV 2004.14000v2 · DOI 10.1080/00150517.2022.12427470 · accessed Sep 7, 2026
Important qualifications
- The workspace title is packet-defined. Proposer and year reflect Sloane's own retrospective OEIS statement about the coverage conjecture; the original 1991 correspondence was not inspected and no priority claim is made.
- The sequence's inventor is not inferred to be the coverage conjecture's proposer. The OEIS also records Sloane's later doubt about complete coverage.
- Chaffin's very large finite computation is an attributed author report; no code, linked result table, or computational certificate was downloaded or reproduced.
- No exact formalization was established by this bounded search. This private draft grants no mathematical acceptance, rights, authorship, contributor credit, or publication authority.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces