The route ledger labels that system unstructured and wasteful and directs work to symmetry-reduced exact modules first. Use multiplicity partitions, harmonic resonance, trace matrices, saturation, and real-singularity tests before coupling.
Route status · Narrowed routeMinimal surfaces · nonlinear elliptic PDE · real algebraic geometry · exact computation
Polynomial Entire Minimal Graphs
Collaboration betaNonlinear smooth entire minimal graphs exist in high dimensions, but can one be the graph of a polynomial? The source has no example and narrows only conditional leading-term branches.
Known results and sources
Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
Find an integer and a non-affine real polynomial satisfying the exact polynomial identity
Approximate residuals and approximate positivity tests are not certificates. The retained source reports no surviving exact non-affine polynomial example.
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on Polynomial Entire Minimal Graphs stands
Selected route highlights from the mathematical source. This is not yet a complete mathematical inventory.
Conditional on imported dimension-eight geometry, the first arithmetic branch is P19=p^5Q with cubic p and quartic Q.
Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteWe corrected the cited passages. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchangedWork mapped so far
Polynomial Entire Minimal Graphs in numbers
- Argument development
- 1,970 · 88%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 56 · 2%
- Computational analysis
- 65 · 3%
- Open obligations
- 41 · 2%
- Definitions and setup
- 110 · 5%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Independently audit the load-bearing local product lemmas, block-radial formula, and two-eigenvalue CAS tables.
Suggested move: Reproduce each displayed matrix, Gröbner basis, and exceptional-line rejection with exact fixtures and document any mismatch.
What would count as progress
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
Explored alternatives
Other routes
The route ledger labels that system unstructured and wasteful and directs work to symmetry-reduced exact modules first. Use multiplicity partitions, harmonic resonance, trace matrices, saturation, and real-singularity tests before coupling.
Route status · Narrowed routeRevision 4 corrects this: any positive-definite quadratic square occurs in the reducible class, including a displayed nonradial fixture. Use the stronger positive-quadratic-cofactor obstruction, which excludes every such square from a leading pair.
Route status · Narrowed routeMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
Every admissible cubic in the conditional branch must have at least three tangential Hessian eigenvalues at each normalized spherical critical point.
Suggested move: Resolve the exact source-reported obligation without treating it as an established negative result.Later dimension-eight branches and all higher dimensions remain live alongside the conditional mainline.
Suggested move: Resolve the exact source-reported obligation without treating it as an established negative result.Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
Guo’s March 2026 revision says no explicit nonlinear polynomial solution is found. It proves strong restrictions, including nonhomogeneity and degree at least four, but does not construct a solution or prove global nonexistence.
[2]What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
PreprintGuo derived a leading-factor structure theorem, ruled out homogeneous solutions and degrees two and three, constrained dimension-eight tangent cones, and still found no explicit polynomial solution.[2] Peer reviewedBombieri, De Giorgi, and Giusti established the high-dimensional failure of the classical Bernstein conclusion by producing non-affine smooth entire minimal graphs; these are not polynomial examples.[1]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
Smooth non-affine entire graphs exist in dimensions at least eight, but polynomiality is an additional unresolved algebraic constraint.
[1][2]The current preprint rules out non-affine polynomial solutions of degrees two and three.
[2]A nonlinear polynomial solution on R^8 would force a cubic area-minimizing but not strictly minimizing tangent cone.
[2]Formalization opportunities
Lean work can make these reusable foundations precise without being presented as a proof of the core problem.
- Formalization targetFormalize the minimal-surface operator on multivariate real polynomials and equivalence with the graph equation as an exact polynomial identity.
- Formalization targetFormalize Guo’s leading-factor, tangent-cone, nonhomogeneity, and low-degree exclusion theorems with their analytic and geometric-measure-theory dependencies.
- Formalization targetDefine a certificate format for algebraic coefficients, exact positivity, and polynomial identity checking before a candidate computation can count as checked evidence.
Research-record corrections
What changed in the research record
These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.
- theorem candidate
1 of 7 1 - reduction
2 of 7 2 - lemma
2 of 7 2 - negative result
2 of 7 2
Current research mapThe conjecture, retained reductions, explored limitations, and open questions represented in this overview.23 displayed rows · 2 routes included
- retained route statementCan a nonlinear polynomial define an entire minimal graph?
- retained route statementCurrent reductionintermediate
- retained route statementClosing targetintermediate
- retained route statementExact polynomial targetintermediate
- retained route statementNo surviving certificateintermediate
- retained route statementConditional degree-19 branchintermediate
- retained route statementUnstructured expansion rejectedintermediate
- Recorded relationshipThe source reports this as a route toward the conjecture; missing or unaudited premises remain and the reduction does not itself prove the target.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- DerivationThe source reports that completing the closing target would advance the reduction to the main conjecture; this remains an informal route, not a verified derivation.proposed
- Useful failureRaw full coefficient expansionreported failure
- Useful failureRadial-square-only reducible quartic classificationreported failure
- Research targetIndependently audit the load-bearing local product lemmas, block-radial formula, and two-eigenvalue CAS tables.open
- Research targetClassify three-or-more-eigenvalue cubic branches for the smallest multiplicity partitions.open
- Research targetClassify genuinely angular positive quartics through their complex singular schemes.open
- Research targetFirst open cubic frontieropen
- Research targetHigher branches remain openopen
- ComputationThe source specifies exact CAS tasks for harmonic modules, resonance matrices, saturation, factorization, and real singularity, but supplies no surviving certificate.Scalar and two-eigenvalue cubic branches are source-reported closed after targeted audits; the first open cubic frontier has at least three eigenvalues. · reported unreproduced
- Narrowed routeRaw full coefficient expansionThe route ledger labels that system unstructured and wasteful and directs work to symmetry-reduced exact modules first. Use multiplicity partitions, harmonic resonance, trace matrices, saturation, and real-singularity tests before coupling.
- Narrowed routeRadial-square-only reducible quartic classificationRevision 4 corrects this: any positive-definite quadratic square occurs in the reducible class, including a displayed nonradial fixture. Use the stronger positive-quadratic-cofactor obstruction, which excludes every such square from a leading pair.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
2 approaches have already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
Polynomial Entire Minimal Graphs · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
Nonlinear smooth entire minimal graphs exist in high dimensions, but can one be the graph of a polynomial? The source has no example and narrows only conditional leading-term branches.
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references2 cited works · next context review by Nov 14, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Aug 14, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1Minimal cones and the Bernstein problempeer reviewed result · Enrico Bombieri, Ennio De Giorgi, Enrico Giusti · Inventiones mathematicae 7, 243-268 · 1969 · accessed Aug 14, 2026
- 2On polynomial solutions to the minimal surface equationpreprint · Yifan Guo · arXiv; to appear in Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations · 2024; revised 2026-03-16 · ARXIV 2404.00115 · accessed Aug 14, 2026
Important qualifications
- The modern construction problem is sourced to Guo’s 2024 preprint, revised in 2026 and listed as forthcoming; this record does not infer a longer historical named-conjecture lineage.
- The classical Bombieri–De Giorgi–Giusti result supplies non-affine smooth entire minimal graphs in high dimension, not polynomial examples.
- No external computation or packet attachment was run, and no exact formalization of the construction problem was located in bounded official-repository searches.
- External metadata is independent of the private packet and grants no proof, review, credit, publication, or rights authority.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces