Extremal graph theory · longest cycles · degree-sum conditions

Ore-Type Bondy Longest-Cycle Conjecture

Collaboration beta

In a k-connected graph with the required degree-sum bound, must every component outside a longest cycle avoid paths on k vertices?

σk+1(G)n+k(k-1)p(G-V(C))k-1
Known results and sources
A luminous longest cycle surrounds most of a graph while one exterior component contains an unresolved short path, giving the Ore-type Bondy question a distinct visual identity without presenting a certificate.
The conjecture asks whether a strong Ore-type degree-sum condition forces every component outside every longest cycle to contain no path on k vertices.

Research problem

Exact mathematical statement

σk+1(G)n+k(k-1)p(G-V(C))k-1\sigma_{k+1}(G)\ge n+k(k-1)\quad\Longrightarrow\quad p\bigl(G-V(C)\bigr)\le k-1

for every longest cycle CC in every kk-connected graph GG of order nn, where σk+1(G)\sigma_{k+1}(G) is the minimum degree sum of an independent set of k+1k+1 vertices, with value ++\infty when no such independent set exists. Equivalently, no component of G-CG-C contains a path on kk vertices.

Problem infographic

Problem at a glance

A dark graph-theory plate centers a large graph G with a gold cycle C and an exterior component H. A green path inside H is marked k vertices with a question mark, while a small cobalt inset highlights k+1 pairwise nonadjacent vertices for the degree-sum quantity σₖ₊₁. The conjectural degree-sum implication is shown as an open question, with the Ore-type k=3 case marked known and the general case marked open.
The Ore-type Bondy longest-cycle conjecture asks whether σₖ₊₁(G) ≥ n+k(k−1) forces every component outside every longest cycle C to avoid a path on k vertices. The highlighted exterior path is the forbidden configuration being asked about, not a counterexample. The Ore-type case k=3 is known; the statement for all k remains open.

Current mathematical picture

Where work on Ore-Type Bondy Longest-Cycle Conjecture stands

Open conjecture

This curated overview retains the open Ore-type longest-cycle conjecture, its conditional active chamber, exact degree-pressure tools, the current work-reported two-chain and protected-edge results, a boundary-safe fixed-endpoint argument, fragile separator and tripod candidates, two Revision-10 corrections, and the current rooted and switch-certificate obligations. Every project-derived [P] item remains provisional narrative evidence here rather than independently reviewed or kernel-checked proof. The 2026 sufficiently-large minimum-degree result is recorded only as a preprint-reported specialization, not as a checked proof of either the specialization or the full Ore-type conjecture. Revision 10 supersedes Revision 9's general multi-chain closure claim and refutes its overbroad rooted connected-deletion implication with rooted K_{2,3}. The conjecture remains open.

Strongest supported footholdBoundary-safe fixed-endpoint proof added

Revision 10 gives a complete project-derived argument that bad pairs in alpha<=3 graphs are supported by minimum 3-cuts.

Evidence posture · Reported result
Leading routeConditional active-chamber route

Develop exact degree pressure and attachment structure inside alpha(G)=k+3, |A|=k, alpha(H)<=3, n<=k^2+3k while preserving all upstream source gates.

Route status · Active route
Useful failureRevision-9 common rooted-gateway route

The route is eliminated in its Revision-9 form because its connected-deletion premise is refuted by rooted K_{2,3}.

Route status · Refuted route
Main reductionProtected-edge conservation retained

The corrected q_edge invariant closes low edge excess and isolates exact q_edge=1 and q_edge=2 frontiers.

Evidence posture · Reported reduction
Completed special caseOrdinary alpha<=2 rooted case retained

The Revision-8 endpoint theorem remains available when alpha(B)<=2, but cannot be extended merely from alpha(B-c)<=2.

Evidence posture · Reported special case
Priority open bridgeComplete literal p>=3 switch certificates

Define every live p>=3 saturated six/seven-edge state and supply a literal cyclic traversal or reproducible exact certificate preserving all rigid blocks.

Task status · Ready to work on
Earlier research stageRooted K_{2,3} refutes the connected-deletion extension

A five-vertex rooted K_{2,3} witness invalidates Revision 9's endpoint extension and its downstream gateway deductions.

Revision-history stage 12

Work mapped so far

Ore-Type Bondy Longest-Cycle Conjecture in numbers

6.6kretained lines of mathematical investigation6,594 in the current working snapshot
Argument development
5,538 · 84%
Explored or eliminated routes
271 · 4%
Computational analysis
86 · 1%
Open obligations
260 · 4%
Definitions and setup
439 · 7%
28selected mapped statements12routes investigated9reported milestones10open questions6contribution-ready tasks
How this is measured

This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.

Argument map and routes

How the current approaches connect

Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.

Visible working map

Research route map

28 selected steps

Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.

28 selected steps

Scroll horizontally to explore the route

Working route overview for Ore-Type Bondy Longest-Cycle ConjectureA selected map of recorded claims, active routes, useful failures, open questions, and their explicit relationships. Search, filter, zoom, or pan within this page.Ore-Type Bondy Longest-Cycle Conjecture — Depends on missing premiseOre-Type Bondy Longest-CycleConjectureRooted independence-three endblock target — Depends on challenged claimRooted independence-threeendblock targetThree-branch 3-cut endpoint classification candidate — ChallengedThree-branch 3-cut endpointclassification candidateTripod endpoint-support candidate — ChallengedTripod endpoint-supportcandidateActive conditional chamber — Depends on missing premiseActive conditional chamberBad endpoint pairs lie in 3-cuts — ActiveBad endpoint pairs lie in3-cutsConditional residual linear block chain — Depends on challenged claimConditional residual linearblock chainCorrected p>=3 switch frontier — Depends on missing premiseCorrected p>=3 switchfrontierExact q_edge=1 stall normal form — Depends on missing premiseExact q_edge=1 stall normalformFour q_edge=2 defect types — Depends on missing premiseFour q_edge=2 defect typesOre-to-minimum-degree implication — ActiveOre-to-minimum-degreeimplicationBoundary-safe fixed-endpoint theorem — ActiveBoundary-safe fixed-endpointtheoremConditional active-chamber route — activeConditional active-chamberrouteExact pair/triple pressure — activeExact pair/triple pressureLiteral p>=3 switch certificates — activeLiteral p>=3 switchcertificatesProtected-edge excess hierarchy — activeProtected-edge excesshierarchyTreat the R/L/B/O multi-chain switch table as a complete finite proof certificate. — stoppedTreat the R/L/B/Omulti-chain switch table asa…Extend the ordinary rooted alpha<=2 endpoint theorem using connected deletion under only alpha(B-c)<=2. — stoppedExtend the ordinary rootedalpha<=2 endpoint theoremusing…Proceed directly to common rooted-gateway uncrossing. — stoppedProceed directly to commonrooted-gateway uncrossing.Use WLO/ALO/PWLO/WIG, universal canonical-overlap bounds, or a universal strong-successor degree-sum lemma. — stoppedUse WLO/ALO/PWLO/WIG,universal canonical-overlapbounds,…Prove the rooted independence-three endblock theorem — OpenProve the rootedindependence-three endblocktheoremComplete literal p>=3 switch certificates — OpenComplete literal p>=3 switchcertificatesClose generalized q_edge=1 — OpenClose generalized q_edge=1Close all four q_edge=2 defects — OpenClose all four q_edge=2defectsAudit every three-branch endpoint orbit — OpenAudit every three-branchendpoint orbitAudit clique-tripod endpoint support — OpenAudit clique-tripod endpointsupportAudit source-normalized imports and lifting interfaces — BlockedAudit source-normalizedimports and liftinginterfacesComplete residual two-branch routing — OpenComplete residual two-branchrouting
Working claimActive routeOpen, active, or blocked questionUseful failure

Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.

Active routeConditional active-chamber route

Develop exact degree pressure and attachment structure inside alpha(G)=k+3, |A|=k, alpha(H)<=3, n<=k^2+3k while preserving all upstream source gates.

Route status · Active route
Active routeExact pair/triple pressure

Use ceiling-sensitive lifting and the canonical deficit to constrain independent pairs, triples, and separator patterns.

Route status · Active route
Active routeLiteral p>=3 switch certificates

Complete the live multi-chain rows with exact state definitions, tested edges, literal cycles, orientations, and restoration checks.

Route status · Active route
Active routeProtected-edge excess hierarchy

Organize closure by q_edge, using conservation to close q_edge<=0 and isolate q_edge=1 and q_edge=2 frontier states.

Route status · Active route
Active routeExceptional rooted independence-three route

Use block embedding, two external endpoint neighborhoods, 3-connectivity, and exact pressure to classify or penalize rooted K_{2,3}-type obstructions.

Route status · Active route

Explored alternatives

Other routes

7 recorded
Narrowed routeSaturated two-chain packet

Retain only the literal p=2 low/high-slack rows as a localized project proof certificate pending independent line audit.

Route status · Narrowed route
Narrowed routeFixed endpoints to minimum 3-cuts

Use the boundary-safe fixed-endpoint theorem to place every bad endpoint pair in a 3-cut.

Route status · Narrowed route
Not yet justifiedThree-branch separator classification

Retain the candidate classification and numerical elimination only conditionally until every endpoint orbit receives a literal route or obstruction.

Route status · Not yet justified
Browse 4 more explored routes
Route held in reserveThree-endblock tripod exclusion

Keep the exact tripod structure, but pause its exclusion until endpoint-support routing and integer-pressure applications are audited.

Route status · Route held in reserve
Refuted routeRevision-9 common rooted-gateway route

The route is eliminated in its Revision-9 form because its connected-deletion premise is refuted by rooted K_{2,3}.

Route status · Refuted route
Route held in reserveIndependent global gates

Residual two-branch routing, high-connectivity weaving, mixed cuts, multi-hard allocation, deep-cut capacity, and source/lifting audits remain separate open workstreams.

Route status · Route held in reserve
Narrowed routeSeparate minimum-degree specialization

Retain the 2026 preprint only as external context for a weaker sufficiently-large-order minimum-degree theorem, not as closure of the Ore route.

Route status · Narrowed route

Route statements and reductions

Statements the next route can inspect and build on

Route statementActive conditional chamber

The retained route works conditionally in the chamber alpha(G)=k+3, |N_C(H)|=k, alpha(H)<=3, and n<=k^2+3k, with an attachment matching saturating all k attachments.

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Route statementCanonical degree bound

In the active chamber, the canonical first-noninsertible independent set X satisfies S_X <= Theta-(h-k+4).

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Route statementRelative integer lifting

For an independent set Z of order k+l and a subset J of order j<=k+1, the current work derives the displayed ceiling-sensitive lower bound for the total degree of Z.

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Route statementExact independent-pair pressure

For a nonedge uv in H, D_2=d_G(u)+d_G(v) satisfies ceil((Theta-D_2)/(k-1)) <= D_2-h+k-4.

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Route statementExact independent-triple pressure

For an independent triple u,v,w in H, D_3=d_G(u)+d_G(v)+d_G(w) satisfies 2 ceil((Theta-D_3)/(k-2)) <= D_3-h+k-4.

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Route statementTwo- and three-component separator caps

The current work derives c<=2k^2+ks-6k+4 when an s-vertex separator leaves at least two components and 2c<=2k^2+2ks-7k+8 when it leaves at least three.

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Route statementCorrected p>=3 switch frontier

For p>=3, interval-flank nonedges, monotone connector words, edge-count identities, and candidate normalizations remain useful reductions, but the live rows remain unproved until literal state-by-state certificates or a reproducible exact certificate are supplied.

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Route statementProtected-edge conservation law

After greedily repairing every common unused port, a terminal protected-lifting stall satisfies a_pr+a_0+z_U+e_deg=q_edge-1.

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Route statementLow edge-excess stalls excluded

If q_edge<=0, a terminal stall is impossible and protected closure succeeds after finitely many common-port repairs.

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Route statementExact q_edge=1 stall normal form

At q_edge=1, all four conservation defects vanish; the exact switch word holds, every unused port is one-sided, no other artificial edge meets the endpoints, and the endpoint degree sum is exact.

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Route statementFour q_edge=2 defect types

At q_edge=2, exactly one defect occurs: a nonswitch protected edge, an uncovered path position, a port seeing neither endpoint, or one unit of degree/artificial-edge slack.

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Route statementRooted independence-three endblock target

For a rooted endblock embedded in the active 3-connected component with alpha(B-c)=2 and alpha(B)=3, use external endpoint incidences, 3-connectivity, and exact degree pressure to prove spanning root-to-entry paths, a bounded classified obstruction, or a degree-deficit contradiction.

Source-reported route statement
Route statementRooted K_{2,3} counterexample

Let B=K_{2,3}, root c in the part of order three, and target z in the part of order two. Then alpha(B-c)=2 and B-{c,z} is connected, but no Hamilton c-z path exists by bipartite parity.

Source-reported route statement

More ways to contribute

Open questions

Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.

10 featured tasks
01
Complete literal p>=3 switch certificates

Define every live p>=3 saturated six/seven-edge state and supply a literal cyclic traversal or reproducible exact certificate preserving all rigid blocks.

Suggested move: Begin with k=9 low slack and k=10 high slack; expand every table symbol to its tested edge and complete cycle.
Ready to work on
02
Close generalized q_edge=1

Handle every one-sided unused port and isolated protected port, then rotate or absorb to a certified spanning state.

Suggested move: Mark every unused port x-only or y-only and isolate repaired ports before seeking a rotation or absorption.
Ready to work on
03
Close mixed-cut, multi-hard, and deep-cut gates

Control mixed-cut lifting, allocate multi-hard loss, and prove deep-cut capacity without exceeding the retained surplus.

Suggested move: Write a single exact loss ledger separating mixed-cut, multi-hard, and deep-cut contributions.
Ready to work on
04
Develop 4-connected independence-three cyclic weaving

Supply the full ported path decomposition needed for the high-connectivity branch.

Suggested move: Specify the port constraints and spanning path decomposition before invoking cyclic weaving.
Ready to work on
05
Close all four q_edge=2 defects

Prove an exact-word or repair theorem for each of the four one-defect terminal states.

Suggested move: Treat separately the nonswitch edge, uncovered position, doubly-missed port, and degree-slack cases.
Ready to work on
06
Audit every three-branch endpoint orbit

List every valid endpoint orbit, give generic spanning paths, prove the K_{3,3} and J_8 obstructions, and retain exact integer pressure in the application.

Suggested move: Build the endpoint-orbit table and write one literal route for each generic orbit.
Ready to work on
07
Prove the rooted independence-three endblock theorem

Classify or eliminate bad root-to-entry pairs in the exceptional class alpha(B-c)=2, alpha(B)=3 using the block's embedding, external endpoint incidences, 3-connectivity, and exact degree pressure.

Suggested move: Start with rooted K_{2,3} and K_2 join 3K_1, record both external endpoint neighborhoods, and quantify their exact missing-incidence penalties.
Prerequisites still open
08
Audit clique-tripod endpoint support

List every tripod endpoint orbit, verify simultaneous splitting of nonsingleton petals, and only then apply sector and triple-pressure contradictions.

Suggested move: Enumerate endpoint placements relative to the three petal interiors and triangle cutvertices.
Prerequisites still open
09
Complete residual two-branch routing

Close the residual two-branch separator configurations that remain outside the three-branch and tripod analyses.

Suggested move: State the remaining two-branch endpoint patterns and exact attachment/loss budget.
Prerequisites still open
10
Audit source-normalized imports and lifting interfaces

Retrieve and check the exact imported theorem forms, first-noninsertible orientation, completed auxiliary cycle, protected reverse-closure indexing, and local-loss-to-longer-cycle comparison.

Suggested move: Start with Ota's exact hierarchy and the first-noninsertible package, binding each imported statement to original-source bytes.
Blocked by the current route

Sourced mathematical context

The known mathematical landscape

Context collected Aug 2, 2026
Current statusOpen conjecture

The all-order conjecture remains open for connectivity k at least 4. Its minimum-degree specialization is known for k at most 3 and, by Ma-Ning-Zhao, for every n at least 5k^2+7k. Their paper notes that Bondy's original 1980 formulation was the more general Ore-type form.

[2]
External progress

What the literature has established

Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.

  1. PreprintMa, Ning, and Zhao prove the minimum-degree specialization for all n at least 5k^2+7k.[2]
  2. Peer reviewedOzeki, Tsugaki, and Yamashita prove that sigma_4(G) at least n+6 implies p(G)-c(G) at most 2 for a 3-connected graph and formulate a generalization of Bondy's conjecture.[3]
  3. PreprintBondy posed the higher-connectivity longest-cycle conjecture in a general Ore-type form and proved a weaker result under stronger assumptions on the off-cycle graph.[2]
4 cited sources3 related results or reductionsReferences

Mathematical neighborhood

Related results and reusable starting points

Current focusBondy's Ore-Type Longest-Cycle Conjecture
Related problemBondy's minimum-degree longest-cycle conjecture

The Ore-type degree-sum hypothesis implies the corresponding minimum-degree hypothesis; the recent sufficiently-large theorem addresses only the minimum-degree specialization.

[2]
Solved special caseNash-Williams dominating-cycle theorem

The k=2 minimum-degree case is Nash-Williams' theorem that every longest cycle is dominating under delta(G) at least (n+2)/3.

[2]
Related problemOzeki-Tsugaki-Yamashita relative-length theorem

Their sigma_4 degree-sum result establishes the relevant relative-length bound in the 3-connected setting.

[3]

How the route was assembled

Argument structure

These stages follow the mathematical order of the supplied argument.

10 mapped milestonesretained argument map

Browse all 10 mapped stages

  1. Revision-history stage 1Open target and exact scope retained
  2. Revision-history stage 2Separate minimum-degree preprint context
  3. Revision-history stage 3Conditional chamber and exact pressure
  4. Revision-history stage 4Ordinary rooted case retained
  5. Revision-history stage 5Literal saturated two-chain rows
  6. Revision-history stage 6Protected-edge conservation
  7. Revision-history stage 8Separator and tripod candidate frontier
  8. Revision-history stage 10Boundary-safe fixed-endpoint theorem
  9. Revision-history stage 11General multi-chain closure demoted
  10. Revision-history stage 12Rooted K_{2,3} refutes the connected-deletion extension
Open target and exact scope retainedThe current work states the all-k Ore-type conjecture and distinguishes it from known or reported specializations.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Revision-history stage 1
Separate minimum-degree preprint contextA 2026 preprint-reported sufficiently-large minimum-degree specialization remains in the current research map without treating it as the full Ore theorem.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Revision-history stage 2
Conditional chamber and exact pressureThe current work retains a sharply defined chamber with exact canonical, lifting, pair/triple, and separator inequalities.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Revision-history stage 3
Ordinary rooted case retainedThe alpha(B)<=2 rooted endpoint case remains available, while the broader alpha(B-c)<=2 extension does not.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Revision-history stage 4
Literal saturated two-chain rowsThe listed p=2 saturated switch rows survive the audit as localized project certificates.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Revision-history stage 5
Protected-edge conservationThe q_edge conservation law closes q_edge<=0 and isolates exact q_edge=1 and q_edge=2 terminal forms.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Revision-history stage 6
Separator and tripod candidate frontierThree-branch and tripod structures narrow the low-connectivity branch but retain explicit routing audits.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Revision-history stage 8
Boundary-safe fixed-endpoint theoremRevision 10 supplies a packet-complete fixed-endpoint argument and places bad endpoint pairs in minimum 3-cuts.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Revision-history stage 10
General multi-chain closure demotedRevision 10 retains the p=2 rows but restores every p>=3 row to an explicit certificate obligation.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Revision-history stage 11
Rooted K_{2,3} refutes the connected-deletion extensionA five-vertex rooted K_{2,3} witness invalidates Revision 9's endpoint extension and its downstream gateway deductions.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Revision-history stage 12

Detailed research inventory

Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map

This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.

23 standing statements3 proposed statements2 challenged statements9 mathematical milestones10 open questions3 narrowed routes20 conditional results4 completed special cases
Statements by mathematical role28 selected mapped statements
  • theorem candidate4 of 284
  • reduction7 of 287
  • lemma14 of 2814
  • negative result2 of 282
  • counterexample1 of 281
Selected mathematical clusters8 mathematical clusters
Problem statement and literature boundaryThe all-k Ore-type conjecture, its minimum-degree implication, the reported k=3 case, and the separate sufficiently-large minimum-degree preprint.6 displayed rows · 1 route included
  • retained route statementOre-Type Bondy Longest-Cycle Conjecture
  • retained route statementOre-to-minimum-degree implication
  • retained route statementOre-type k=3 case reported knownspecial case
  • retained route statementPreprint-reported sufficiently-large minimum-degree specializationspecial case
  • ChallengeA sufficiently-large minimum-degree theorem must not be represented as an all-order proof or as proof of the stronger Ore-type conjecture.overclaimed scope · open
  • Narrowed routeSeparate minimum-degree specializationRetain the 2026 preprint only as external context for a weaker sufficiently-large-order minimum-degree theorem, not as closure of the Ore route.
Active chamber and degree pressureConditional normalization, canonical deficit, integer lifting, exact pair/triple pressure, and separator caps.10 displayed rows · 2 routes included
  • retained route statementActive conditional chamberconditional
  • retained route statementCanonical degree boundconditional
  • retained route statementRelative integer liftingconditional
  • retained route statementExact independent-pair pressureconditional
  • retained route statementExact independent-triple pressureconditional
  • retained route statementTwo- and three-component separator capsconditional
  • DerivationApply relative integer lifting to the canonical independent set augmented by a nonedge in H and compare with the canonical degree deficit, retaining the integer ceiling.active reported
  • DerivationApply the same lifting mechanism to an independent triple and preserve the doubled ceiling inequality for equality cases.active reported
  • Active routeConditional active-chamber routeDevelop exact degree pressure and attachment structure inside alpha(G)=k+3, |A|=k, alpha(H)<=3, n<=k^2+3k while preserving all upstream source gates.
  • Active routeExact pair/triple pressureUse ceiling-sensitive lifting and the canonical deficit to constrain independent pairs, triples, and separator patterns.
Protected switching and finite certificatesStable local switch tools, retained two-chain rows, the superseded general closure, and the corrected p>=3 certificate frontier.10 displayed rows · 2 routes included
  • retained route statementInterval-flank nonedge lemmaconditional
  • retained route statementEndpoint coverage and missing-incidence budgetconditional
  • retained route statementSaturated two-chain closurespecial case
  • retained route statementRevision-9 general multi-chain closure claimconditional
  • retained route statementCorrected p>=3 switch frontierconditional
  • Useful failureTreat the R/L/B/O multi-chain switch table as a complete finite proof certificate.reported failure
  • Research targetComplete literal p>=3 switch certificatesopen
  • ComputationLiteral cycle certificates reported in Revision 9 for the six listed saturated two-chain composition rows.The current work reports closure for k=8 low slack compositions (1,5),(2,4),(3,3) and k=9 high slack compositions (1,6),(2,5),(3,4). · reported unreproduced
  • Narrowed routeSaturated two-chain packetRetain only the literal p=2 low/high-slack rows as a localized project proof certificate pending independent line audit.
  • Active routeLiteral p>=3 switch certificatesComplete the live multi-chain rows with exact state definitions, tested edges, literal cycles, orientations, and restoration checks.
Protected-edge excess hierarchyTerminal conservation, closed low excess, and exact q_edge=1 and q_edge=2 open normal forms.8 displayed rows · 1 route included
  • retained route statementProtected-edge conservation lawconditional
  • retained route statementLow edge-excess stalls excludedconditional
  • retained route statementExact q_edge=1 stall normal formconditional
  • retained route statementFour q_edge=2 defect typesconditional
  • Research targetClose generalized q_edge=1open
  • Research targetClose all four q_edge=2 defectsopen
  • Useful failureUse raw difficult-block count as the protected-lifting invariant.reported failure
  • Active routeProtected-edge excess hierarchyOrganize closure by q_edge, using conservation to close q_edge<=0 and isolate q_edge=1 and q_edge=2 frontier states.
Fixed endpoints and separator candidatesThe fixed-endpoint theorem, 3-cut support, fragile three-branch classification, and tripod structure/support split.12 displayed rows · 3 routes included
  • retained route statementBoundary-safe fixed-endpoint theoremintermediate
  • retained route statementBad endpoint pairs lie in 3-cutsintermediate
  • retained route statementThree-branch 3-cut endpoint classification candidateconditional
  • retained route statementExact three-endblock tripod structureconditional
  • retained route statementTripod endpoint-support candidateconditional
  • ChallengeThe proposed classification omits a literal spanning path for every endpoint orbit and a proof that no orbit is omitted.unsupported step · open
  • ChallengeThe endpoint-support claim still lacks every endpoint placement and simultaneous petal-partition certificate.unsupported step · open
  • Research targetAudit every three-branch endpoint orbitopen
  • Research targetAudit clique-tripod endpoint supportopen
  • Narrowed routeFixed endpoints to minimum 3-cutsUse the boundary-safe fixed-endpoint theorem to place every bad endpoint pair in a 3-cut.
  • Not yet justifiedThree-branch separator classificationRetain the candidate classification and numerical elimination only conditionally until every endpoint orbit receives a literal route or obstruction.
  • Route held in reserveThree-endblock tripod exclusionKeep the exact tripod structure, but pause its exclusion until endpoint-support routing and integer-pressure applications are audited.
Residual block chain and rooted correctionConditional linear block chains, the rooted K_{2,3} refutation, retained ordinary/disconnected cases, and the exceptional rooted target.13 displayed rows · 2 routes included
  • retained route statementConditional residual linear block chainconditional
  • retained route statementRevision-9 rooted connected-deletion implicationconditional
  • retained route statementRooted independence-three endblock targetconditional
  • retained route statementRooted K_{2,3} counterexamplespecial case
  • retained route statementRooted disconnected-deletion formulaconditional
  • retained route statementOrdinary rooted alpha<=2 caseconditional
  • retained route statementRevision-9 common rooted-gateway deductionconditional
  • Useful failureExtend the ordinary rooted alpha<=2 endpoint theorem using connected deletion under only alpha(B-c)<=2.reported failure
  • Useful failureProceed directly to common rooted-gateway uncrossing.reported failure
  • Research targetProve the rooted independence-three endblock theoremopen
  • ComputationDirect five-vertex rooted K_{2,3} certificate for the failure of the connected-deletion endpoint implication.Deleting the root c and target a leaves connected K_{1,2}, while every Hamilton path in K_{2,3} has both endpoints in the three-vertex part. · reported unreproduced
  • Refuted routeRevision-9 common rooted-gateway routeThe route is eliminated in its Revision-9 form because its connected-deletion premise is refuted by rooted K_{2,3}.
  • Active routeExceptional rooted independence-three routeUse block embedding, two external endpoint neighborhoods, 3-connectivity, and exact pressure to classify or penalize rooted K_{2,3}-type obstructions.
No-revisit methodsHistorical overlap, successor, residue, port-lifting, sector, mu_2, and raw-block-count shortcuts excluded by the controlling ledger.6 displayed rows
  • Useful failureUse WLO/ALO/PWLO/WIG, universal canonical-overlap bounds, or a universal strong-successor degree-sum lemma.reported failure
  • Useful failureAfter two paths, assert an absolute O(k) residue theorem or traceability of the unique difficult component.reported failure
  • Useful failureUse simple port-edge closure without the exact protected forest and endpoint-incidence accounting.reported failure
  • Useful failureLocalize to a short sector using the wrong forward arc.reported failure
  • Useful failureImpose the universal mu_2>=b-3 inequality in the conditional k=7 kernel.reported failure
  • Useful failureUse raw difficult-block count as the protected-lifting invariant.reported failure
Independent global and audit gatesSource verification, residual two-branch routing, high-connectivity weaving, and global loss/capacity work remain independent of the localized rooted and switch packets.6 displayed rows · 1 route included
  • Research targetAudit source-normalized imports and lifting interfacesblocked
  • Research targetComplete residual two-branch routingopen
  • Research targetDevelop 4-connected independence-three cyclic weavingopen
  • Research targetClose mixed-cut, multi-hard, and deep-cut gatesopen
  • ComputationHistorical packet computations whose code, inputs, hashes, or certificates are not retained in Revision 10.Revision 10 claims no post-Revision-9 verified computation and keeps older computational reports as nonreproducible evidence only. · reported unreproduced
  • Route held in reserveIndependent global gatesResidual two-branch routing, high-connectivity weaving, mixed cuts, multi-hard allocation, deep-cut capacity, and source/lifting audits remain separate open workstreams.
How to interpret these counts

A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.

Research outlook

Conditions that would advance the current route

Priority open bridgeDefine every live p>=3 saturated six/seven-edge state and supply a literal cyclic traversal or reproducible exact certificate preserving all rigid blocks.

3 approaches have already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.

Evidence needed nextConcrete conditions for progress

A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.

  • Enumerate the full state including orientations and connector orders.
  • Give one literal cycle or retained machine certificate per state.
  • Check artificial-edge removal, rigid-block restoration, and strict length comparison.

Continue the mathematics

Contribute

ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.

Read-only beta · actions unavailable
Prepared starting pointComplete literal p>=3 switch certificates

Ore-Type Bondy Longest-Cycle Conjecture · ready to start

Mathematical updatesFollow this problem

Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.

Research contextPrepared context for any AI agent

In a k-connected graph with the required degree-sum bound, must every component outside a longest cycle avoid paths on k vertices?

  • Exact question and boundaries
  • Current routes and known obstacles
  • What a useful result should report
Return mathematical workReturn what you or your agent found

A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.

Proof attempt or partial resultSupporting notes or data
Hosted agentRun this task with a hosted agent

A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.

Your own AI agentConnect an outside research agent

Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.

Sources and references4 cited works · next context review by Nov 2, 2026

The mathematical context was checked on Aug 2, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
    On relative length of longest paths and cyclespeer reviewed result · accessed Aug 2, 2026
  4. 4
    Longest paths and cycles in graphs of high degreeoriginal source · accessed Aug 2, 2026

Important qualifications

  • The 2026 sufficiently-large result must not be presented as a proof of the full Ore-type conjecture; it proves the minimum-degree specialization under the explicit lower bound n >= 5k^2+7k.
  • Empty formalization or computation lists mean that none was verified in this scoped search, not that none exists.

Continue exploring

Compare another research frontier

See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.

Explore all research workspaces

Expanded visual

Open original image