The source explicitly says none of its coefficient statements is a short-interval asymptotic and lists hidden prime terms, generic negative rough terms, and an all-moduli parity tail. The canonical graph, matching, triangle, and older 8/7 routes remain possible only if an exact block inventory supports a provable endpoint theorem.
Route status · Narrowed routeAnalytic number theory · primes in short intervals · sieve methods · prime gaps
Legendre Conjecture
Collaboration betaIs there always a prime strictly between two consecutive positive squares?
Known results and sources
Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
For every integer , there exists a prime satisfying
Both inequalities are strict: in particular, the upper square is excluded. Equivalently, if is the prime-counting function, then for every . The source reports no proof; its bounded computational audit is an implementation guard, not evidence for all integers.
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on Legendre Conjecture stands
Selected route highlights from the mathematical source. This is not yet a complete mathematical inventory.
The current work constructs exact pointwise prime minorants from rough factor counts and organizes their coefficients through a five-factor pair budget; positivity of the resulting interval sums would imply the target.
Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteWe corrected the cited passages. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchangedWork mapped so far
Legendre Conjecture in numbers
- Argument development
- 2,233 · 89%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 46 · 2%
- Computational analysis
- 38 · 2%
- Open obligations
- 59 · 2%
- Definitions and setup
- 129 · 5%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Derive one common exact decomposition for the pair-budget detector family with every coefficient class and modulus range inventoried.
Suggested move: Compare the canonical graph and hybrid detector block by block, retain floors and endpoint differences, and identify the weakest genuinely sufficient estimate.
What would count as progress
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
Explored alternatives
Other routes
The source explicitly says none of its coefficient statements is a short-interval asymptotic and lists hidden prime terms, generic negative rough terms, and an all-moduli parity tail. The canonical graph, matching, triangle, and older 8/7 routes remain possible only if an exact block inventory supports a provable endpoint theorem.
Route status · Narrowed routeMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
Legendre's exact conjecture remains open. Current 2026 results prove a universal three-almost-prime analogue and conditional statements for intervals between consecutive larger powers, while the cited unconditional prime-gap theorem does not reach every interval between consecutive squares.
[2][3][1]What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
PreprintCampbell proves that every consecutive-square interval contains an integer with at most three prime factors, an explicit almost-prime analogue that does not require the integer to be prime.[3] PreprintChamberland and Straub review the open consecutive-square problem and derive conditional results for primes between consecutive powers with exponent strictly larger than two.[2] Peer reviewedBaker, Harman, and Pintz prove a major unconditional bound on gaps between consecutive primes. The exponent remains too large to force a prime in every interval between consecutive squares.[1]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
Replacing a prime by an integer with at most three prime factors yields a theorem for every interval, but permits composite witnesses.
[3]Intervals between consecutive powers with exponent larger than two are wider than consecutive-square intervals; the reviewed all-x results also assume the Riemann hypothesis.
[2]A sufficiently strong uniform bound on maximal prime gaps near x would imply the conjecture, but the cited unconditional exponent does not reach square-root-length intervals.
[1]Formal and computational footholds
Existing statements, libraries, computations, and datasets that can shorten the next serious attempt.
- computation · not independently reproducedFinite verification used in the three-almost-prime theorem
The preprint reports finite verification through a large explicit range as one component of its almost-prime theorem; this staging lane did not run or audit that computation.
[3]
Formalization opportunities
Lean work can make these reusable foundations precise without being presented as a proof of the core problem.
- Formalization targetA problem-level statement requires exact open endpoints and primality, not an almost-prime predicate.
- Formalization targetA universal proof needs both an effective large-n theorem at consecutive-square scale and reproducible closure of the remaining finite range.
Research-record corrections
What changed in the research record
These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.
- theorem candidate
1 of 8 1 - reduction
1 of 8 1 - lemma
4 of 8 4 - negative result
1 of 8 1 - computational claim
1 of 8 1
Current research mapThe conjecture, retained reductions, explored limitations, and open questions represented in this overview.22 displayed rows · 1 route included
- retained route statementEvery open interval between consecutive positive squares should contain a prime.
- retained route statementCurrent reductionintermediate
- retained route statementClosing targetintermediate
- retained route statementStrict consecutive-square intervalintermediate
- retained route statementFive-factor occurrence budgetintermediate
- retained route statementCanonical graph prime minorantintermediate
- retained route statementModel coefficient is not an asymptoticintermediate
- retained route statementBounded source-reported auditintermediate
- Recorded relationshipThe source reports this as a route toward the conjecture; missing or unaudited premises remain and the reduction does not itself prove the target.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- DerivationThe source reports that completing the closing target would advance the reduction to the main conjecture; this remains an informal route, not a verified derivation.proposed
- Useful failureTreating floor-free coefficient models as usable short-interval asymptoticsreported failure
- Research targetDerive one common exact decomposition for the pair-budget detector family with every coefficient class and modulus range inventoried.open
- Research targetProve an effective joint estimate for the prime and Buchstab coefficient classes before expansion reaches the nonoscillatory all-moduli parity tail.open
- Research targetClose the remaining finite range only after a valid effective large-n theorem supplies an explicit cutoff.open
- Research targetJoint coefficient-class estimatesuperseded
- ComputationThe source says a sieve script checked the stated identities for every 2≤n≤2000; this staging lane did not execute it.Source-reported only: 4,001,998 interval integers were examined; the current work explicitly says the counts are a guard against mistakes, not a proof. · reported unreproduced
- Narrowed routeTreating floor-free coefficient models as usable short-interval asymptoticsThe source explicitly says none of its coefficient statements is a short-interval asymptotic and lists hidden prime terms, generic negative rough terms, and an all-moduli parity tail. The canonical graph, matching, triangle, and older 8/7 routes remain possible only if an exact block inventory supports a provable endpoint theorem.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
1 approach has already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
Legendre Conjecture · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
Is there always a prime strictly between two consecutive positive squares?
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references3 cited works · next context review by Nov 14, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Aug 14, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1On the difference between consecutive primes, IIpeer reviewed result · Roger C. Baker, Glyn Harman, János Pintz · Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society · 2001 · DOI 10.1112/plms/83.3.532 · accessed Aug 14, 2026
- 2Weakening the Legendre Conjecturepreprint · Marc Chamberland, Armin Straub · arXiv · 2026-02-26 · ARXIV 2602.22502 · accessed Aug 14, 2026
- 3On the Existence of Integers with at Most 3 Prime Factors Between Every Pair of Consecutive Squarespreprint · Peter Campbell · arXiv · 2026-03-11 · ARXIV 2603.10356 · accessed Aug 14, 2026
Important qualifications
- The exact target requires a prime strictly between every pair of consecutive positive squares; almost-primes, conditional results, and intervals between larger powers are weaker statements.
- The current almost-prime preprint and its cited computation were not independently reproduced in this lane.
- No packet computation or submitted URL was used as external status authority.
- The source list is representative rather than an exhaustive history of prime-gap results.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces