The edge-normal 13-vertex quotient retains six pinched vertex links, and the current work states the rigidity theorem prevents removing all six without collapse or duplication. Normalization-cost optimization, deeper radius-four or contract-then-recover searches on the 16-vertex seed, and different cavity or completion routes remain open.
Route status · Narrowed routeSimplicial manifolds · normalization · polytope diameter
Dimension-Four Hirsch: Normalization-Fiber Audit
Collaboration betaNormalization can split singular local sheets and turn a labeled pseudomanifold into a genuine sphere with more vertices. The source reports reversing two such fibers to diagnose the original singular objects, but neither object is a dimension-four Hirsch counterexample.
Known results and sources
Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
Reverse the retained consecutive normalization fibers of the two source-reported diameter-11 simplicial 3-spheres on 19 and 21 vertices, reconstruct the corresponding 13-label source complexes, and audit their exact face vectors, dual diameters, edge links, vertex links, and normalization collision behavior.
Revision 10 reports source complexes with
each of dual diameter 11, but with disconnected edge links and nonspherical vertex links. These reconstructed degree-two pseudomanifolds are not combinatorial 3-manifolds, not polytopal counterexamples, and not a proof or disproof of the dimension-four conjecture.
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on Dimension-Four Hirsch: Normalization-Fiber Audit stands
Selected route highlights from the mathematical source. This is not yet a complete mathematical inventory.
The route treats normalization fibers as a reversible combinatorial map: split local sheets to genuine larger spheres, retain the consecutive fibers, then reverse them to recover and diagnose the smaller labeled singular sources.
Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteWe corrected the cited passages. We removed a duplicate or outdated task or route step. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchangedWork mapped so far
Dimension-Four Hirsch: Normalization-Fiber Audit in numbers
- Argument development
- 525 · 86%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 18 · 3%
- Computational analysis
- 52 · 8%
- Open obligations
- 12 · 2%
- Definitions and setup
- 6 · 1%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Independently replay the reconstruction audit
Suggested move: Reverse each retained normalization fiber in an independent implementation and verify exact tetrahedra, face vectors, dual diameter, edge links, vertex links, and collision behavior.
What would count as progress
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
Explored alternatives
Other routes
The edge-normal 13-vertex quotient retains six pinched vertex links, and the current work states the rigidity theorem prevents removing all six without collapse or duplication. Normalization-cost optimization, deeper radius-four or contract-then-recover searches on the 16-vertex seed, and different cavity or completion routes remain open.
Route status · Narrowed routeMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
The source reports neither a 13-vertex polytopal counterexample nor a proof of the full dimension-four conjecture.
Suggested move: Resolve the exact source-reported obligation without treating it as an established negative result.For the current 16-vertex seed, the source reports exhaustive radius-three failure and identifies radius four as the first unexplored direct layer.
Suggested move: Resolve the exact source-reported obligation without treating it as an established negative result.Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
The classical bounded Hirsch conjecture is false in general, but the bounded dimension-four case remains open. The current work's reconstructed singular sources and normalized spheres are not external counterexamples, are not independently reproduced here, and do not change open status.
[2][3]What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
Authoritative summaryEdward Kim's author-maintained page continues to list the bounded question as open in dimensions 4 through 19.[3] Peer reviewedSantos published a bounded counterexample, disproving the classical Hirsch conjecture in general but not resolving bounded dimension four.[2] Authoritative summaryThe survey attributes the diameter bound to a 1957 question of Warren Hirsch.[1]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
The classical all-dimensions bounded Hirsch conjecture is false; its bounded dimension-four restriction remains a separate open special case.
[2]The cited Coq project formalizes a known higher-dimensional counterexample and does not settle bounded dimension four or validate a normalization-fiber reconstruction.
[4]Formal and computational footholds
Existing statements, libraries, computations, and datasets that can shorten the next serious attempt.
- formal proof · source linked; not reproduced by ProofAtlasA Formal Disproof of the Hirsch Conjecture
A Coq formalization checks a higher-dimensional known counterexample to the general conjecture; it is not statement-aligned to bounded dimension four or this normalization-fiber audit.
[4]
Formalization opportunities
Lean work can make these reusable foundations precise without being presented as a proof of the core problem.
- Formalization targetFormalize the dimension-four boundary-sphere statement and separate pseudomanifold, combinatorial-sphere, and polytopal-realization gates.
- Formalization targetIndependently replay each retained normalization fiber and verify the reconstructed singular complexes, link defects, and sphere certificates.
- Formalization targetAny counterexample claim needs a 13-vertex diameter-at-least-10 combinatorial 3-sphere plus a separate exact polytopality certificate.
Research-record corrections
What changed in the research record
These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.
- theorem candidate
1 of 7 1 - reduction
1 of 7 1 - lemma
1 of 7 1 - computational claim
3 of 7 3 - negative result
1 of 7 1
Current research mapThe conjecture, retained reductions, explored limitations, and open questions represented in this overview.21 displayed rows · 1 route included
- retained route statementWhat singular local sheets were split when the two diameter-11 spheres were normalized?
- retained route statementCurrent reductionintermediate
- retained route statementClosing targetintermediate
- retained route statementReversed normalization fibersintermediate
- retained route statementFirst singular sourceintermediate
- retained route statementSecond singular sourceintermediate
- retained route statementEdge-normal quotient remains nonmanifoldintermediate
- Recorded relationshipThe source reports this as a route toward the conjecture; missing or unaudited premises remain and the reduction does not itself prove the target.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- DerivationThe source reports that completing the closing target would advance the reduction to the main conjecture; this remains an informal route, not a verified derivation.proposed
- Useful failureFacet-injective quotienting and local Pachner repairreported failure
- Research targetIndependently replay the reconstruction auditopen
- Research targetMinimize normalization cost at construction timeopen
- Research targetReach and realize a valid 13-vertex candidateopen
- Research targetNo dimension-four resolutionopen
- Research targetFirst unexplored local layeropen
- ComputationThe source reports reconstructing the two 13-label source complexes and independently checking their closed degree-two structure, face vectors, dual diameters, local links, and collision-free normalization.The recovered objects are reported as singular pseudomanifolds, not manifolds: one has six disconnected two-cycle edge links and the other eight, with six and five nonspherical vertex links respectively. · reported unreproduced
- Narrowed routeFacet-injective quotienting and local Pachner repairThe edge-normal 13-vertex quotient retains six pinched vertex links, and the current work states the rigidity theorem prevents removing all six without collapse or duplication. Normalization-cost optimization, deeper radius-four or contract-then-recover searches on the 16-vertex seed, and different cavity or completion routes remain open.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
1 approach has already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
Dimension-Four Hirsch: Normalization-Fiber Audit · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
Normalization can split singular local sheets and turn a labeled pseudomanifold into a genuine sphere with more vertices. The source reports reversing two such fibers to diagnose the original singular objects, but neither object is a dimension-four Hirsch counterexample.
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references4 cited works · next context review by Nov 15, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Aug 15, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1An Update on the Hirsch Conjecturesurvey or monograph · Edward D. Kim, Francisco Santos · Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung; University of California repository · 2010 · DOI 10.1365/s13291-010-0001-8 · accessed Aug 14, 2026
- 2A counterexample to the Hirsch conjecturepeer reviewed result · Francisco Santos · Annals of Mathematics 176(1), 383–412 · 2012 · DOI 10.4007/annals.2012.176.1.7 · accessed Aug 14, 2026
- 3Undergraduate Research — Hirsch conjectureauthoritative webpage · Edward D. Kim · Edward D. Kim · maintained · accessed Aug 14, 2026
- 4A Formal Disproof of the Hirsch Conjectureformalization · Xavier Allamigeon, Quentin Canu, Pierre-Yves Strub · arXiv · 2023 · ARXIV 2301.04060 · accessed Aug 14, 2026
Important qualifications
- This bounded primary-source pass is not an exhaustive literature, priority, or mathematical review.
- The classical bounded Hirsch conjecture is false in general; this workspace concerns only its still-open bounded dimension-four restriction and a narrower source-reported reconstruction audit.
- No submitted packet URL was fetched and no packet attachment was executed, compiled, or rendered.
- The reconstructed singular sources, normalization fibers, sphere certificates, and local searches remain source-reported and were not independently reproduced in this metadata pass.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces