The current work identifies nonlinear dense holonomy as the surviving regular branch after the rigid model is excluded. A projective cocycle analysis directly in the nonlinear transverse coordinate remains viable.
Route status · Narrowed routeContact and symplectic topology
Higher-Dimensional Weinstein Conjecture
Collaboration betaMust every Reeb vector field on a closed contact manifold have a periodic orbit? Dimension three is known externally, but the unrestricted higher-dimensional problem remains open.

Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
Let be a closed contact manifold with , and let be its Reeb field. The conjecture is
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on Higher-Dimensional Weinstein Conjecture stands
Selected route highlights from the mathematical source. This is not yet a complete mathematical inventory.
Under hypothetical aperiodicity, pass from positive loop quantization to invariant measures with a symplectic zero center, then force a fixed point or globalize center flux.
Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteWe corrected the cited passages. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchangedWork mapped so far
Higher-Dimensional Weinstein Conjecture in numbers
- Argument development
- 1,929 · 85%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 75 · 3%
- Computational analysis
- 4 · 0%
- Open obligations
- 64 · 3%
- Definitions and setup
- 193 · 9%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Eliminate the nonlinear dense-holonomy T^3-bundle branch without assuming smooth affine linearization.
Suggested move: Construct its transverse suspension model and analyze the equivariant projective conormal cocycle under recurrence.
What would count as progress
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
Explored alternatives
Other routes
The current work identifies nonlinear dense holonomy as the surviving regular branch after the rigid model is excluded. A projective cocycle analysis directly in the nonlinear transverse coordinate remains viable.
Route status · Narrowed routeMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
Peer reviewedAlbers and Hofer proved the conjecture for higher-dimensional contact structures containing a Plastikstufe.[3] Peer reviewedTaubes proved the Weinstein conjecture for closed oriented three-manifolds using Seiberg–Witten theory.[2] Historical sourceWeinstein established periodic-orbit results for convex Hamiltonian systems and formulated the conjectural closed-characteristic framework.[1]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
Every Reeb vector field of a contact form on a closed oriented three-manifold has a closed orbit.
[2]The existence of a Plastikstufe implies the conjecture for all supporting contact forms.
[3]Formalization opportunities
Lean work can make these reusable foundations precise without being presented as a proof of the core problem.
- Formalization targetA formal statement needs closed contact manifolds, the Reeb vector field, and periodic integral curves in arbitrary odd dimension at least five.
- Formalization targetA checked proof would require substantial contact/symplectic topology infrastructure; no checked formal proof of the unrestricted higher-dimensional statement was located.
Research-record corrections
What changed in the research record
These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.
- theorem candidate
1 of 6 1 - reduction
1 of 6 1 - lemma
3 of 6 3 - negative result
1 of 6 1
Current research mapThe conjecture, retained reductions, explored limitations, and open questions represented in this overview.19 displayed rows · 1 route included
- retained route statementEvery closed contact manifold should carry a periodic Reeb orbit.
- retained route statementCurrent reductionintermediate
- retained route statementClosing targetintermediate
- retained route statementPeriodic Reeb orbitintermediate
- retained route statementCanonical current identityintermediate
- retained route statementRegularity firewallintermediate
- Recorded relationshipThe source reports this as a route toward the conjecture; missing or unaudited premises remain and the reduction does not itself prove the target.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- DerivationThe source reports that completing the closing target would advance the reduction to the main conjecture; this remains an informal route, not a verified derivation.proposed
- Useful failureRigid affine leaf-space reduction outside its hypothesesreported failure
- Research targetEliminate the nonlinear dense-holonomy T^3-bundle branch without assuming smooth affine linearization.open
- Research targetProve a flux-to-time globalization lemma producing a closed one-form with nonzero Reeb average.open
- Research targetDevelop a reduced center fixed-point index that survives measurable or non-Hausdorff center geometry.open
- Research targetNonlinear dense holonomysuperseded
- Research targetFlux globalizationsuperseded
- Research targetReduced center indexsuperseded
- Narrowed routeRigid affine leaf-space reduction outside its hypothesesThe current work identifies nonlinear dense holonomy as the surviving regular branch after the rigid model is excluded. A projective cocycle analysis directly in the nonlinear transverse coordinate remains viable.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
1 approach has already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
Higher-Dimensional Weinstein Conjecture · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
Must every Reeb vector field on a closed contact manifold have a periodic orbit? Dimension three is known externally, but the unrestricted higher-dimensional problem remains open.
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references3 cited works · next context review by Nov 14, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Aug 14, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1Periodic orbits for convex Hamiltonian systemsoriginal source · Alan Weinstein · Annals of Mathematics 108(3), 507–518 · 1978 · DOI 10.2307/1971185 · MR 0512430 · accessed Aug 14, 2026
- 2The Seiberg-Witten equations and the Weinstein conjecturepeer reviewed result · Clifford Henry Taubes · Geometry & Topology 11, 2117–2202 · 2007 · ARXIV math/0611007 · DOI 10.2140/gt.2007.11.2117 · accessed Aug 14, 2026
- 3On the Weinstein conjecture in higher dimensionspeer reviewed result · Peter Albers, Helmut W. Hofer · Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 84(2), 429–436 · 2009 · ARXIV 0705.3953 · DOI 10.4171/CMH/167 · accessed Aug 14, 2026
Important qualifications
- External metadata was collected independently of the unreviewed source material; packet claims are not external evidence.
- Scoped searches do not establish that no additional result, formalization, or dataset exists elsewhere.
- No external computation was rerun, and no source-submitted URL or packet attachment was fetched, executed, or rendered.
- This metadata grants no proof, acceptance, credit, publication, redistribution, deployment, or public-write authority.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces