Projective algebraic geometry · smooth subvarieties · complete intersections · Chern classes and Schubert geometry

Hartshorne Complete-Intersection Conjecture

Collaboration beta

Must every smooth projective variety whose dimension is more than twice its codimension be cut out by exactly as many hypersurfaces as its codimension?

XmPn, c=n-m, m>2c?Xis a complete intersection
Known results and sources
Landscape illustration of a smooth connected nondegenerate projective variety over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, suspended in projective n-space with c hypersurface sheets and the exact intersection unresolved.
Over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, Hartshorne's conjecture asks whether a smooth connected nondegenerate projective subvariety of sufficiently small codimension is a complete intersection.

Research problem

Exact mathematical statement

Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero and let

XmPkn,c=n-m,m>2c,X^m \subset \mathbf P^n_k, \qquad c=n-m, \qquad m>2c,

be smooth, connected, and nondegenerate. Hartshorne's complete-intersection conjecture asks whether X must be a complete intersection in projective space.

The full conjecture remains open. The source reports an internally dependency-checked excess-three theorem for c at least 5 and generator count mu(I_X)=c+3, modulo named standard inputs and still requiring independent expert review. Its next source-reported frontier is mu(I_X)=c+4, with the singular or nonclean codimension-three root-column defect unresolved.

Problem infographic

Problem at a glance

Wide projective-geometry explainer for a smooth connected nondegenerate subvariety X of projective n-space over an algebraically closed characteristic-zero field, with m greater than 2c and an open question asking whether c hypersurfaces cut it out.
For smooth connected nondegenerate X in projective n-space over an algebraically closed characteristic-zero field, the conjecture asks whether sufficiently small codimension forces a complete intersection; the route frontier remains subordinate and open.

Current mathematical picture

Where work on Hartshorne Complete-Intersection Conjecture stands

Open conjecture

Selected route highlights from the mathematical source. This is not yet a complete mathematical inventory.

Useful failureRaw replication of the rank-three root-column argument in rank four

The source's raw rank-four replication yields m at most 4c - 4s - 1 after s root quadruples and expressly says the ratio is too weak to exhaust the source near m = 2c. Chern-root columns, Schubert penalties, and incidence estimates remain viable at excess four if the singular/nonclean codimension-three defect can be controlled at generic local points.

Route status · Narrowed route
Main reductionCurrent reduction

The source's weighted conormal bound forces every counterexample in Hartshorne's range to have at least c+3 generators, and its source-reported excess-three theorem raises that to c+4 when c is at least 5.

Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Priority open bridgeShow that a singular or non-lci codimension-three defect either carries a usable rank-one excess quotient, forces a smaller-codimension zero locus, or yields a nonzero weight-zero four-minor.Task status · Ready to work on
Research-record correctionResearch-record correction

We corrected the cited passages. We removed a duplicate or outdated task or route step. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchanged

Work mapped so far

Hartshorne Complete-Intersection Conjecture in numbers

2.3kretained lines of mathematical investigation2,307 in the current working snapshot
Argument development
1,877 · 81%
Explored or eliminated routes
83 · 4%
Computational analysis
34 · 1%
Open obligations
134 · 6%
Definitions and setup
179 · 8%
8selected mapped statements2routes investigated3open questions3contribution-ready tasks
How this is measured

This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.

Argument map and routes

How the current approaches connect

Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.

Visible working map

Research route map

13 selected steps

Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.

13 selected steps

Scroll horizontally to explore the route

Working route overview for Hartshorne Complete-Intersection ConjectureA selected map of recorded claims, active routes, useful failures, open questions, and their explicit relationships. Search, filter, zoom, or pan within this page.Does sufficiently small codimension force a complete intersection? — Depends on missing premiseDoes sufficiently smallcodimension force a completeintersection?Current reduction — Depends on missing premiseCurrent reductionGlobal complete-intersection detector — Depends on missing premiseGlobal complete-intersectiondetectorSource-reported excess-three closure — Depends on missing premiseSource-reported excess-threeclosureWeighted conormal bound — Depends on missing premiseWeighted conormal boundClean root-defect exclusion — Depends on missing premiseClean root-defect exclusionClosing target — Depends on missing premiseClosing targetSmall-codimension complete-intersection question — Depends on missing premiseSmall-codimensioncomplete-intersectionquestionRaw replication of the rank-three root-column argument in rank four — stoppedRaw replication of therank-three root-columnargument…Treating low height of a rank-jump locus as an immediate contradiction — stoppedTreating low height of arank-jump locus as animmediate…Show that a singular or non-lci codimension-three defect either carries a usable rank-one excess quotient, forces a smaller-codimension zero locus, or yields a nonzero weight-zero four-minor. — OpenShow that a singular ornon-lci codimension-threedefect…Use Rado/matroid alternatives and exact Schubert penalties to determine whether they close the finite clean-regime strips in the rank-four frontier. — OpenUse Rado/matroidalternatives and exactSchubert…Connect any finite presentation-frontier advance to the unrestricted complete-intersection conjecture before making a global claim. — OpenConnect any finitepresentation-frontieradvance…
Working claimActive routeOpen, active, or blocked questionUseful failure

Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.

Explored alternatives

Other routes

2 recorded
Narrowed routeRaw replication of the rank-three root-column argument in rank four

The source's raw rank-four replication yields m at most 4c - 4s - 1 after s root quadruples and expressly says the ratio is too weak to exhaust the source near m = 2c. Chern-root columns, Schubert penalties, and incidence estimates remain viable at excess four if the singular/nonclean codimension-three defect can be controlled at generic local points.

Route status · Narrowed route
Narrowed routeTreating low height of a rank-jump locus as an immediate contradiction

The do-not-revisit list expressly closes the route that treats low height of a rank-jump locus as a contradiction. Use exact weighted minors, Chern factors, local zero ideals, and incidence bounds rather than rank-jump height alone.

Route status · Narrowed route

More ways to contribute

Open questions

Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.

3 featured tasks
01
Show that a singular or non-lci codimension-three defect either carries a usable rank-one excess quotient, forces a smaller-codimension zero locus, or yields a nonzero weight-zero four-minor.Suggested move: Analyze the generic local algebra of a codimension-three root-column zero ideal generated by four elements in a regular local ring.
Ready to work on
02
Use Rado/matroid alternatives and exact Schubert penalties to determine whether they close the finite clean-regime strips in the rank-four frontier.Suggested move: Combine local defect control with rank-four Schubert penalties and codimension-cost reduction across labeled root quadruples.
Ready to work on
03
Connect any finite presentation-frontier advance to the unrestricted complete-intersection conjecture before making a global claim.Suggested move: After excess four, reassess whether a general excess-rho induction is viable or whether the detector D_X provides the scalable route.
Ready to work on

Sourced mathematical context

The known mathematical landscape

Context collected Aug 14, 2026
Current statusOpen conjecture

The general small-codimension complete-intersection statement remains open. Erman, Sam, and Snowden prove a field-independent special case when ambient dimension is sufficiently large relative to codimension and degree, while current primary literature continues to use the general Hartshorne statement as a conjectural hypothesis. No reviewed source located here supplies a complete proof for every smooth X with dimension greater than twice codimension.

[1][2][3]
External progress

What the literature has established

Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.

  1. Peer reviewedBenoist and Voisin used the validity of Hartshorne's complete-intersection conjecture as a conjectural hypothesis in a neighboring obstruction to smoothing algebraic cycles, confirming that the general statement remains part of the current conjectural landscape.[3]
  2. Peer reviewedErman, Sam, and Snowden proved a field-independent theorem: for fixed codimension and degree, sufficiently high ambient dimension forces a projective scheme that is sufficiently nonsingular to be a complete intersection.[2]
  3. Historical sourceHartshorne formulated the small-codimension program for smooth projective subvarieties and established degree-dependent results that motivate the complete-intersection conjecture.[1]
3 cited sources3 related results or reductionsReferences

Mathematical neighborhood

Related results and reusable starting points

Current focusHartshorne complete-intersection conjecture
Solved special caseHigh ambient dimension relative to fixed codimension and degree

For fixed codimension c and degree e, there is a bound N(c,e) such that an equidimensional projective subscheme whose singular locus has sufficiently large codimension is a complete intersection. This does not give the conjecture's degree-free m > 2c conclusion.

[2]
Equivalent formulationAmbient-dimension formulation c < n/3

For X of dimension m and codimension c in projective n-space, c < n/3 is algebraically equivalent to m > 2c because n = m + c.

[1][2]
Related problemSmoothability of algebraic cycles with rational coefficients

The validity of Hartshorne's conjecture would conflict with a proposed universal smoothability statement for rational algebraic-cycle classes, revealing a current topological and vector-bundle consequence without resolving the conjecture.

[3]

Formalization opportunities

Lean work can make these reusable foundations precise without being presented as a proof of the core problem.

  • Formalization targetA proof-assistant development of projective schemes and varieties, smoothness, connectedness, nondegeneracy, codimension, homogeneous ideals, and complete intersections at the needed generality.
  • Formalization targetFormal conormal bundles, Chern classes, Chow or cohomology rings, Grassmannians, Schubert varieties, and Lefschetz/Barth–Larsen restriction theorems with exact endpoint hypotheses.
  • Formalization targetFormal projective dimension, unmixedness, generic reducedness, and descent of complete-intersection status under characteristic-zero spreading out and faithfully flat base change.
  • Formalization targetA formal statement separating the degree-free full conjecture from high-degree, bounded-degree, fixed-codimension, and positive-characteristic neighboring results.

Research-record corrections

What changed in the research record

These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Research-record correctionWe corrected the cited passages. We removed a duplicate or outdated task or route step. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Corrected the research recordCorrection note

Correction details

The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.

Detailed research inventory

Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map

This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.

4 standing statements4 proposed statements3 open questions2 narrowed routes
Statements by mathematical role8 selected mapped statements
  • theorem candidate1 of 81
  • reduction3 of 83
  • lemma2 of 82
  • equivalence1 of 81
  • negative result1 of 81
Selected mathematical clusters1 mathematical clusters
Current research mapThe conjecture, retained reductions, explored limitations, and open questions represented in this overview.23 displayed rows · 2 routes included
  • retained route statementDoes sufficiently small codimension force a complete intersection?
  • retained route statementCurrent reductionintermediate
  • retained route statementClosing targetintermediate
  • retained route statementSmall-codimension complete-intersection questionintermediate
  • retained route statementGlobal complete-intersection detectorintermediate
  • retained route statementWeighted conormal boundintermediate
  • retained route statementSource-reported excess-three closureintermediate
  • retained route statementClean root-defect exclusionintermediate
  • Recorded relationshipThe source reports this as a route toward the conjecture; missing or unaudited premises remain and the reduction does not itself prove the target.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • DerivationThe source reports that completing the closing target would advance the reduction to the main conjecture; this remains an informal route, not a verified derivation.proposed
  • Useful failureRaw replication of the rank-three root-column argument in rank fourreported failure
  • Useful failureTreating low height of a rank-jump locus as an immediate contradictionreported failure
  • Research targetShow that a singular or non-lci codimension-three defect either carries a usable rank-one excess quotient, forces a smaller-codimension zero locus, or yields a nonzero weight-zero four-minor.open
  • Research targetUse Rado/matroid alternatives and exact Schubert penalties to determine whether they close the finite clean-regime strips in the rank-four frontier.open
  • Research targetConnect any finite presentation-frontier advance to the unrestricted complete-intersection conjecture before making a global claim.open
  • Research targetSingular root-defect local algebrasuperseded
  • Narrowed routeRaw replication of the rank-three root-column argument in rank fourThe source's raw rank-four replication yields m at most 4c - 4s - 1 after s root quadruples and expressly says the ratio is too weak to exhaust the source near m = 2c. Chern-root columns, Schubert penalties, and incidence estimates remain viable at excess four if the singular/nonclean codimension-three defect can be controlled at generic local points.
  • Narrowed routeTreating low height of a rank-jump locus as an immediate contradictionThe do-not-revisit list expressly closes the route that treats low height of a rank-jump locus as a contradiction. Use exact weighted minors, Chern factors, local zero ideals, and incidence bounds rather than rank-jump height alone.
How to interpret these counts

A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.

Research outlook

Conditions that would advance the current route

Priority open bridgeShow that a singular or non-lci codimension-three defect either carries a usable rank-one excess quotient, forces a smaller-codimension zero locus, or yields a nonzero weight-zero four-minor.

2 approaches have already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.

Evidence needed nextConcrete conditions for progress

A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.

  • Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
  • Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.

Continue the mathematics

Contribute

ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.

Read-only beta · actions unavailable
Prepared starting pointShow that a singular or non-lci codimension-three defect either carries a usable rank-one excess quotient, forces a smaller-codimension zero locus, or yields a nonzero weight-zero four-minor.

Hartshorne Complete-Intersection Conjecture · ready to start

Mathematical updatesFollow this problem

Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.

Research contextPrepared context for any AI agent

Must every smooth projective variety whose dimension is more than twice its codimension be cut out by exactly as many hypersurfaces as its codimension?

  • Exact question and boundaries
  • Current routes and known obstacles
  • What a useful result should report
Return mathematical workReturn what you or your agent found

A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.

Proof attempt or partial resultSupporting notes or data
Hosted agentRun this task with a hosted agent

A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.

Your own AI agentConnect an outside research agent

Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.

Sources and references3 cited works · next context review by Nov 14, 2026

The mathematical context was checked on Aug 14, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.

  1. 1
    Varieties of small codimension in projective spaceoriginal source · Robin Hartshorne · Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society · 1974 · DOI 10.1090/S0002-9904-1974-13612-8 · accessed Aug 14, 2026
  2. 2
    Strength and Hartshorne's Conjecture in high degreepeer reviewed result · Daniel Erman, Steven V. Sam, Andrew Snowden · Mathematische Zeitschrift / Springer · 2021 · ARXIV 1804.09730 · DOI 10.1007/s00209-020-02564-y · accessed Aug 14, 2026
  3. 3
    On the smoothability problem with rational coefficientspeer reviewed result · Olivier Benoist, Claire Voisin · Rendiconti Lincei. Matematica e Applicazioni / EMS Press · 2026 · DOI 10.4171/RLM/1076 · accessed Aug 14, 2026

Important qualifications

  • The review is scoped to the smooth projective small-codimension complete-intersection statement and representative degree-bounded progress; it is not an exhaustive bibliography of Babylonian tower theorems, vector-bundle splitting, or complete intersections.
  • The characteristic-zero formulation used by the intake candidate is narrower than some field-independent special-case results and must remain explicitly distinguished.
  • No intake-packet theorem, packet status label, source-reported computation, embedded bibliography, or submitted URL was used as external-status authority.
  • The 2026 Benoist–Voisin paper is neighboring evidence that the statement remains conjectural; it is not itself a status registry or a proof of the conjecture.
  • No exact problem-level formalization was identified in the scoped review, but this does not establish nonexistence in every proof assistant or private project.
  • This metadata has no proof, novelty, review, acceptance, credit, visibility, publication, or deployment authority.

Continue exploring

Compare another research frontier

See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.

Explore all research workspaces

Expanded visual

Open original image