Wrong threshold area and shape are recombined into one nonnegative divergence whose total mass is L²/2 and whose first 56.9% is paid levelwise.
Evidence posture · Reported resultConvex geometry · geometric probability · additive energy
Hall’s Random-Triangle Conjecture
Collaboration betaAmong planar convex regions of a fixed area, does the disk give the largest chance that three independent uniform points form an acute triangle?

Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
Let be the probability that three independent uniform points in a bounded planar convex region form an acute triangle, and let be a disk of the same area. Hall’s conjecture asks whether
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on Hall’s Random-Triangle Conjecture stands
The retained v8 source material gives exact probability, additive-energy, chord-deficit, affine-synchronization, threshold-Bregman, obstacle, Bellman, Stieltjes, and roof-rigidity reductions; records strict special-class results for ellipses, rectangles, triangles, and parallelograms; closes the smooth and centrally symmetric homothetic-level branches; and preserves exact witnesses eliminating several tempting proof routes. Its current frontier is the threshold–obstacle clipping comparison, whose load-bearing coefficient-four identity, moderate-band comparison, roof-to-triangle stability, high-core estimate, nonsmooth passage, and fragile certificates still require the stated independent audits. The conjecture remains open, and this state is a curated overview rather than a complete inventory of the 14,136-line source.
Rebuild the load-bearing coefficient-four decomposition before using the current frontier as a positive comparison.
Route status · Active routeThis branch is closed: the covered homothetic-level bodies are ellipses, so further reclassification is not a current proof task.
Route status · Eliminated routeThe smooth reserve is replaced by an all-convex Stieltjes action, and exact roof behavior at one level is reduced to the triangle class.
Evidence posture · Reported reductionThe current work records strict Hall comparisons for noncircular ellipses, rectangles, triangles, and parallelograms, with the triangle certificate still awaiting regeneration.
Evidence posture · Reported special caseCharge the exact moderate-level clipping source to the same-threshold Bregman/Jacobi resource while preserving synchronization, sign, homogeneity, Green, overlap, and saturation remainders.
Task status · Ready to work onWe corrected the cited passages. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchangedWork mapped so far
Hall’s Random-Triangle Conjecture in numbers
- Argument development
- 4,278 · 87%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 141 · 3%
- Computational analysis
- 76 · 2%
- Open obligations
- 183 · 4%
- Definitions and setup
- 257 · 5%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Prove the moderate-band Bellman comparison
Charge the exact moderate-level clipping source to the same-threshold Bregman/Jacobi resource while preserving synchronization, sign, homogeneity, Green, overlap, and saturation remainders.
Suggested move: Start from the exact levelwise clipping density and adjoint identity on 0≤τ≤τ*, then compare the equilibrium drift source directly with the threshold resource.
What would count as progress
- Prove an exact constant comparison on the moderate band.
- Leave all favorable Bellman, Green, overlap, and saturation terms explicitly subtracted.
- Use only the one global affine shear.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
Rebuild the load-bearing coefficient-four decomposition before using the current frontier as a positive comparison.
Route status · Active routeCombine the paid band with the exact Bellman source, Green interpolation, overlap, saturation, and secant cancellation under one global affine shear.
Route status · Active routeTurn small compact-band localized roof reserve into quantitative triangle proximity and then use the regenerated strict triangle margin.
Route status · Active routeUse secant localization, the polar invariant, top-core truncation, the disk Hessian, and 𝒪₄ to pay the residual high-core clipping term across levels.
Route status · Active routeExplored alternatives
Other routes
Retain the all-convex threshold, roof, and Stieltjes quantities while smoothing only the clipping/Bellman side with explicit endpoint and semicontinuity control.
Route status · Narrowed routeThis branch is closed: the covered homothetic-level bodies are ellipses, so further reclassification is not a current proof task.
Route status · Eliminated routeThe equilateral triangle defeats every universal attempt to pay Γ using only the threshold L² resource.
Route status · Refuted routeBrowse 7 more explored routes
The square witness refutes pointwise inclusion at the disk ratio; an integrated angular energy-body comparison remains possible.
Route status · Refuted routeThe triangle–body–disk orders are informative but too weak to supply the final disk-Jacobi sign without two-dimensional geometry.
Route status · Useful but insufficientSeparate positive-part bounds discard the exact secant cancellation and are structurally incompatible with disk-sharp scaling.
Route status · Eliminated routeIntegrated moments and finitely many affine constraints do not encode the spatial compatibility needed for Hall.
Route status · Useful but insufficientCap support, symmetry, concavity, and affine-isoperimetric reserves are too weak without quantitative use of the nonlinear cap equation.
Route status · Useful but insufficientThe equilateral triangle refutes the global ratio, although a central-slice version remains an open testbed.
Route status · Refuted routeEndpoint order mismatch rules out paying the high-core cubic pointwise with quartic inertia or roof reserve; cross-level obstacle compensation is required.
Route status · Eliminated routeRoute statements and reductions
Statements the next route can inspect and build on
The retained coefficient-four identity decomposes 4𝓔−δ_Q as 𝓛₂+2𝒞_D+𝒪₄ with 𝒪₄≥0, hence 𝒫_obs=𝒞_D+𝒪₄/2≥0.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteFor thresholds 0≤τ≤τ*=0.5693178886…, the disk Jacobi budget pays the combined wrong-area and wrong-shape threshold divergence levelwise; the defining root still needs interval certification.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteThe levelwise clipping Bellman identity exposes synchronization, sign, and homogeneity remainders, all nonnegative, and aligns its positive source with the exact drift measure.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteSigned value mismatch and threshold geometry combine into a quadratic spatial term plus an outside-disk-support obstacle; estimating their positive parts separately destroys the disk scaling.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteIf the localized roof reserve vanishes at any one nonzero covariogram height, then K is a triangle up to affine equivalence.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteThe current work reports Hall strictly for every triangle via an affine deficit ratio at least Λ△=1.8038103379…>9/5; its Bernstein tree, sector Jacobian, and interval certificate must be regenerated.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
Charge the exact moderate-level clipping source to the same-threshold Bregman/Jacobi resource while preserving synchronization, sign, homogeneity, Green, overlap, and saturation remainders.
Suggested move: Start from the exact levelwise clipping density and adjoint identity on 0≤τ≤τ*, then compare the equilibrium drift source directly with the threshold resource.Charge every residual high-core negative secant contribution to the coefficient-four core-obstacle resource using cross-level compensation rather than pointwise local inertia.
Suggested move: Combine secant localization, the polar invariant, top-core truncation, the disk Hessian, and 𝒪₄ with exact constants.Independently rederive the convolution expansion, affine-frame scaling, reflection orientation, and core-potential sign behind 4𝓔−δ_Q=𝓛₂+2𝒞_D+𝒪₄ and 𝒫_obs≥0.
Suggested move: Re-expand g_K−g_D from 1_K−1_D in the canonical covariance-isotropic frame and verify every coefficient and sign before estimating Γ.Quantify how small localized roof reserve on a compact level band forces sufficient triangle proximity to invoke the strict all-triangle clipping margin.
Suggested move: Combine one-level rigidity, affine compactness, an explicit symmetric-difference continuity modulus, and a regenerated triangle certificate.Independently regenerate the all-triangle Bernstein and sector certificate, the equilateral mixed integral and rational >1/4000 witness, and the τ* interval root before public reliance.
Suggested move: Reimplement each retained certificate independently and preserve code, inputs, exact intervals, and digests.Pass the regular-level clipping, Bellman, Gauss-angle, and obstacle formulas rigorously to nonsmooth convex bodies while retaining lower semicontinuity and endpoint control.
Suggested move: Recombine the smooth identities into all-convex Stieltjes and threshold quantities before taking polygonal or smoothing limits.Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
The conjecture that the Euclidean ball maximizes the probability that three independent uniform points in a bounded convex domain form an acute triangle remains open. The strongest located general progress is local extremality of the disk in dimension two, weak local extremality of the ball in dimension three, an explicit exclusion for planar domains of sufficiently large isoperimetric ratio, and a finite but presently infeasible reduction of the planar case.
[1]What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
PreprintKhan proved planar convex domains with isoperimetric ratio greater than 7688/15 have smaller acute-triangle probability than the disk and reduced the full planar conjecture to a finite, currently intractable…[1] Peer reviewedKhan proved the disk is a local maximum among bounded planar convex domains and the three-dimensional ball is a weak local maximum.[2] Historical sourceHall computed the acute-triangle probability for the n-ball and observed the ball's criticality, motivating the extremal conjecture.[3]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
The strong form asks that, for every angle threshold, the n-ball maximize the distribution function for the largest angle; Hall’s original acute-triangle claim is the threshold pi/2 case.
[1]Khan frames the conjecture as an isoprobabilistic extremal inequality for convex bodies.
[1]Formal and computational footholds
Existing statements, libraries, computations, and datasets that can shorten the next serious attempt.
- computation · source linked; not reproduced by ProofAtlasauthor-supplied Mathematica and GeoGebra materials
Gabriel Khan's project page links the Mathematica computation used for the three-dimensional Legendre-polynomial lemma and several GeoGebra constructions used in the published work.
[4]
Research-record corrections
What changed in the research record
These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.
How the route was assembled
Argument structure
These stages follow the mathematical order of the supplied argument.
Browse all 12 mapped stages
- stage 1Exact probability and Q–D frontier
- stage 2Sharp energy endpoints and affine minimization
- stage 3Positive disk-obstacle resource
- stage 4One globally synchronized clipping rebate
- stage 5Four global affine classes retained
- stage 6Exact route eliminations
- stage 7Homothetic-level branches classified
- stage 8Bellman, adjoint, and saturation structure
- stage 9All-convex action and one-level roof rigidity
- stage 10Threshold Bregman resource and paid band
- stage 11Equilateral obstruction makes the obstacle resource mandatory
- stage 12Threshold–obstacle frontier and first missing bridge
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.
- theorem candidate
1 of 24 1 - equivalence
5 of 24 5 - lemma
14 of 24 14 - counterexample
3 of 24 3 - reduction
1 of 24 1
Probability, energy, and affine frontierThe exact probability identity, sharp energy endpoints, affine minimization, and literature-level local disk result.6 displayed rows
- retained route statementHall’s random-triangle conjecture
- retained route statementExact probability and Q–D frontier
- retained route statementSharp additive-energy range
- retained route statementAffine-minimized Hall frontier
- retained route statementPublished local maximality of the diskspecial case
- DerivationSubstituting the exact chord decomposition into the acute-probability identity gives H0; rearranging H0 at the disk value gives the exact Q–D inequality.active reported
Synchronized clipping and positive resourcesOne global affine clipping rebate is compared with threshold-Bregman and coefficient-four obstacle resources.11 displayed rows · 3 routes included
- retained route statementGlobal affine synchronization identityintermediate
- retained route statementThreshold Bregman resourceintermediate
- retained route statementCoefficient-four obstacle decompositionintermediate
- retained route statementThreshold–obstacle normal form
- retained route statementUniversal paid threshold bandconditional
- retained route statementExact secant cancellationintermediate
- DerivationThe synchronization identity supplies 2𝓔−Γ/A³; the coefficient-four decomposition splits 2𝓔−δ_Q/2 into 𝓛₂/2+𝒫_obs; the threshold identity identifies 𝓛₂/2 with the integrated Bregman resource.active reported
- ChallengeThe coefficient-four obstacle identity is load-bearing, but the current work expressly requires independent regeneration of its convolution expansion, scaling, and core-potential sign before publication or use as audited evidence.unsupported step · open
- Active routeCoefficient-four obstacle regenerationRebuild the load-bearing coefficient-four decomposition before using the current frontier as a positive comparison.
- Active routeModerate-band Bellman-to-threshold comparisonCombine the paid band with the exact Bellman source, Green interpolation, overlap, saturation, and secant cancellation under one global affine shear.
- Active routeHigh-core obstacle–clipping estimateUse secant localization, the polar invariant, top-core truncation, the disk Hessian, and 𝒪₄ to pay the residual high-core clipping term across levels.
Bellman, Green, and level geometryExact activation propagation and the retained remainders that a disk-sharp clipping comparison must preserve.4 displayed rows · 1 route included
- retained route statementExact Bellman propagation with favorable remaindersintermediate
- DerivationThe paid-band inequality covers threshold geometry up to τ*, while the still-open step is to compare the clipping source to that same-threshold payment without dropping Bellman, Green, overlap, or saturation remainders.proposed
- Research targetProve the moderate-band Bellman comparisonopen
- Active routeModerate-band Bellman-to-threshold comparisonCombine the paid band with the exact Bellman source, Green interpolation, overlap, saturation, and secant cancellation under one global affine shear.
Homothetic and roof rigidityEllipse classification for synchronized level families and triangle classification for exact roof behavior.9 displayed rows · 3 routes included
- retained route statementCentrally symmetric homothetic-level rigidityspecial case
- retained route statementSmooth homothetic-level rigidityspecial case
- retained route statementAll-convex Stieltjes area actionintermediate
- retained route statementOne-level roof rigidityconditional
- DerivationThe two homothetic-level classifications force the covered bodies into the ellipse class, where the disk is the unique equality case and noncircular ellipses are strict.active reported
- DerivationSmall compact-band roof reserve should force triangle proximity by one-level rigidity and affine compactness, after which the retained strict triangle margin and an audited continuity passage would close that branch.proposed
- Eliminated routeClassify smooth or centrally symmetric homothetic coresThis branch is closed: the covered homothetic-level bodies are ellipses, so further reclassification is not a current proof task.
- Active routeRoof proximity to strict triangle marginTurn small compact-band localized roof reserve into quantitative triangle proximity and then use the regenerated strict triangle margin.
- Narrowed routeAll-convex nonsmooth passageRetain the all-convex threshold, roof, and Stieltjes quantities while smoothing only the clipping/Bellman side with explicit endpoint and semicontinuity control.
Retained special classes and calibrationsStrict results for ellipses, rectangles, triangles, and parallelograms, with exact equilateral and paid-band calibration work still unregenerated.8 displayed rows
- retained route statementEllipse classspecial case
- retained route statementRectangle classspecial case
- retained route statementStrict all-triangle Hall marginspecial case
- retained route statementParallelogram classspecial case
- ChallengeThe strict triangle margin remains in the current research map with an exact-certificate description, but the code and full coefficient arrays do not survive and must be independently regenerated.unsupported step · open
- ComputationReported exact tensor-Bernstein subdivision for the strengthened triangular-slice envelope, followed by a positive-definite corner estimate.The current work reports 81 certified boxes and one final dyadic corner, yielding Λ△=1.8038103379…>9/5 and a strict all-triangle Hall margin. · reported unreproduced
- ComputationRetained exact equilateral-triangle calculation comparing the optimized clipping rebate with the normalized covariogram L² resource.The reported rational interval certificate gives Γ/A³−𝓛₂/2>1/4000, eliminating the L²-only clipping theorem. · reported unreproduced
- ComputationNumerical solution of the exact defining equation for the endpoint τ* of the universal paid threshold band.The current work reports τ*=0.5693178886350659…, but treats the decimal as calibration until uniqueness and the root are interval-certified. · reported unreproduced
Exact and structural route failuresWitnesses and no-go results prevent reuse of proof architectures that lose obstacle, spatial, secant, saturation, or cross-level information.20 displayed rows · 8 routes included
- retained route statementEquilateral L²-only obstructionspecial case
- retained route statementSquare obstruction to pointwise energy-body inclusionspecial case
- retained route statementGlobal 15/8 ratio obstructionspecial case
- retained route statementTriangle–body–disk stochastic corridorintermediate
- Useful failurePay the globally optimized clipping rebate using threshold L² geometry alone.reported failure
- Useful failureProve Hall through the universal ratio d(K)≥15𝓔(K)/8.reported failure
- Useful failureProve a pointwise containment of the covariogram energy body at the disk ratio.reported failure
- Useful failureBound positive value mismatch and positive threshold geometry separately.reported failure
- Useful failureUse only integrated Fourier moments, Gram positivity, affine stationarity, and finitely many affine derivatives.reported failure
- Useful failureUse separate cap-wise affine-isoperimetric reserves without the nonlinear cap PDE.reported failure
- Useful failureClose Hall from the one-dimensional triangle–body–disk stochastic corridor alone.reported failure
- Useful failurePay the pointwise high-core clipping cubic with local inertia or the localized roof reserve.reported failure
- Refuted routeL²-only clipping paymentThe equilateral triangle defeats every universal attempt to pay Γ using only the threshold L² resource.
- Refuted routeGlobal 15/8 affine-deficit ratioThe equilateral triangle refutes the global ratio, although a central-slice version remains an open testbed.
- Refuted routePointwise energy-body inclusionThe square witness refutes pointwise inclusion at the disk ratio; an integrated angular energy-body comparison remains possible.
- Eliminated routeSeparate value and threshold estimatesSeparate positive-part bounds discard the exact secant cancellation and are structurally incompatible with disk-sharp scaling.
- Useful but insufficientAbstract Fourier and moment relaxationIntegrated moments and finitely many affine constraints do not encode the spatial compatibility needed for Hall.
- Useful but insufficientSeparate cap-wise reservesCap support, symmetry, concavity, and affine-isoperimetric reserves are too weak without quantitative use of the nonlinear cap equation.
- Useful but insufficientOne-dimensional stochastic corridor aloneThe triangle–body–disk orders are informative but too weak to supply the final disk-Jacobi sign without two-dimensional geometry.
- Eliminated routePointwise local payment of high-core clippingEndpoint order mismatch rules out paying the high-core cubic pointwise with quartic inertia or roof reserve; cross-level obstacle compensation is required.
Current analytic frontierThe source-prioritized obligations are obstacle regeneration, moderate-band comparison, roof stability, high-core compensation, nonsmooth passage, and exact-certificate regeneration.11 displayed rows · 5 routes included
- Research targetRegenerate the coefficient-four obstacle identityopen
- Research targetProve the moderate-band Bellman comparisonopen
- Research targetTransfer roof proximity to the triangle marginopen
- Research targetControl the residual high-core clipping termopen
- Research targetMake the clipping comparison all-convexopen
- Research targetRegenerate fragile exact certificatesopen
- Active routeCoefficient-four obstacle regenerationRebuild the load-bearing coefficient-four decomposition before using the current frontier as a positive comparison.
- Active routeModerate-band Bellman-to-threshold comparisonCombine the paid band with the exact Bellman source, Green interpolation, overlap, saturation, and secant cancellation under one global affine shear.
- Active routeRoof proximity to strict triangle marginTurn small compact-band localized roof reserve into quantitative triangle proximity and then use the regenerated strict triangle margin.
- Active routeHigh-core obstacle–clipping estimateUse secant localization, the polar invariant, top-core truncation, the disk Hessian, and 𝒪₄ to pay the residual high-core clipping term across levels.
- Narrowed routeAll-convex nonsmooth passageRetain the all-convex threshold, roof, and Stieltjes quantities while smoothing only the clipping/Bellman side with explicit endpoint and semicontinuity control.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
1 approach has already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Prove an exact constant comparison on the moderate band.
- Leave all favorable Bellman, Green, overlap, and saturation terms explicitly subtracted.
- Use only the one global affine shear.
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
Hall’s Random-Triangle Conjecture · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
Among planar convex regions of a fixed area, does the disk give the largest chance that three independent uniform points form an acute triangle?
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references4 cited works · next context review by Nov 22, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Aug 22, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1Hall's Conjecture on Extremal Sets for Random Trianglespreprint · Gabriel Khan · arXiv · 2017-04-19 · ARXIV 1704.05913 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
- 2Hall's Conjecture on Extremal Sets for Random Trianglespeer reviewed result · Gabriel Khan · Journal of Geometric Analysis · 2020 · DOI 10.1007/s12220-019-00202-6 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
- 3Acute triangles in the n-balloriginal source · Glen Richard Hall · Journal of Applied Probability · 1982 · DOI 10.1017/S0021900200037244 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
- 4Hall's Conjecture (Gabriel Khan project page)authoritative webpage · Gabriel Khan · Iowa State University · accessed Aug 22, 2026
Important qualifications
- The short name ‘Hall’s conjecture’ is ambiguous: it is also widely used for a distinct Diophantine conjecture. Public copy should retain the random-triangle qualifier.
- Empty formalization or computation lists mean that none was verified in this scoped search, not that none exists.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces