Convex geometry · geometric probability · additive energy

Hall’s Random-Triangle Conjecture

Collaboration beta

Among planar convex regions of a fixed area, does the disk give the largest chance that three independent uniform points form an acute triangle?

K2bounded and convex,p(K)p(D)=4π2-18
Known results and sources
An acute gold triangle joins three emerald sample points inside an ivory disk, while several quieter convex outlines recede behind it as comparison regions.
Three random points in a convex region form the triangle whose chance of being acute is compared with the disk.

Research problem

Exact mathematical statement

Let p(K)p(K) be the probability that three independent uniform points in a bounded planar convex region KK form an acute triangle, and let DD be a disk of the same area. Hall’s conjecture asks whether

K2bounded and convex,p(K)p(D)=4π2-18.\forall K\subset\mathbb R^2\text{ bounded and convex},\qquad p(K)\le p(D)=\frac{4}{\pi^2}-\frac18.

Problem infographic

Problem at a glance

Problem-centered plate for Hall's random-triangle conjecture. A same-area convex region K and disk D each contain three independently sampled points joined into a triangle; an acute example marks all three acute angles, while a small obtuse example marks one angle greater than 90 degrees. The plate asks whether p(K) is at most p(D), gives p(D) = 4/π² − 1/8 ≈ 0.280285, lists retained special classes, and marks the general case open.
Choose three independent uniform points in a bounded planar convex region K, and let p(K) be the probability that they form an acute triangle. Hall's conjecture asks whether, among regions of the same area, the disk D always maximizes this probability: p(K) ≤ p(D), where p(D) = 4/π² − 1/8. The recorded route treats ellipses, rectangles, triangles, and parallelograms as special classes; the general convex-region case remains open.

Current mathematical picture

Where work on Hall’s Random-Triangle Conjecture stands

Open conjecture

The retained v8 source material gives exact probability, additive-energy, chord-deficit, affine-synchronization, threshold-Bregman, obstacle, Bellman, Stieltjes, and roof-rigidity reductions; records strict special-class results for ellipses, rectangles, triangles, and parallelograms; closes the smooth and centrally symmetric homothetic-level branches; and preserves exact witnesses eliminating several tempting proof routes. Its current frontier is the threshold–obstacle clipping comparison, whose load-bearing coefficient-four identity, moderate-band comparison, roof-to-triangle stability, high-core estimate, nonsmooth passage, and fragile certificates still require the stated independent audits. The conjecture remains open, and this state is a curated overview rather than a complete inventory of the 14,136-line source.

Strongest supported footholdThreshold Bregman resource and paid band

Wrong threshold area and shape are recombined into one nonnegative divergence whose total mass is L²/2 and whose first 56.9% is paid levelwise.

Evidence posture · Reported result
Leading routeCoefficient-four obstacle regeneration

Rebuild the load-bearing coefficient-four decomposition before using the current frontier as a positive comparison.

Route status · Active route
Useful failureClassify smooth or centrally symmetric homothetic cores

This branch is closed: the covered homothetic-level bodies are ellipses, so further reclassification is not a current proof task.

Route status · Eliminated route
Main reductionAll-convex action and one-level roof rigidity

The smooth reserve is replaced by an all-convex Stieltjes action, and exact roof behavior at one level is reduced to the triangle class.

Evidence posture · Reported reduction
Completed special caseFour global affine classes retained

The current work records strict Hall comparisons for noncircular ellipses, rectangles, triangles, and parallelograms, with the triangle certificate still awaiting regeneration.

Evidence posture · Reported special case
Priority open bridgeProve the moderate-band Bellman comparison

Charge the exact moderate-level clipping source to the same-threshold Bregman/Jacobi resource while preserving synchronization, sign, homogeneity, Green, overlap, and saturation remainders.

Task status · Ready to work on
Research-record correctionResearch-record correction

We corrected the cited passages. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchanged

Work mapped so far

Hall’s Random-Triangle Conjecture in numbers

4.9kretained lines of mathematical investigation4,935 in the current working snapshot
Argument development
4,278 · 87%
Explored or eliminated routes
141 · 3%
Computational analysis
76 · 2%
Open obligations
183 · 4%
Definitions and setup
257 · 5%
24selected mapped statements14routes investigated12reported milestones6open questions6contribution-ready tasks
How this is measured

This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.

Argument map and routes

How the current approaches connect

Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.

Visible working map

Research route map

26 selected steps

Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.

26 selected steps

Scroll horizontally to explore the route

Working route overview for Hall’s Random-Triangle ConjectureA selected map of recorded claims, active routes, useful failures, open questions, and their explicit relationships. Search, filter, zoom, or pan within this page.Hall’s random-triangle conjecture — Depends on missing premiseHall’s random-triangleconjectureAffine-minimized Hall frontier — Depends on missing premiseAffine-minimized HallfrontierAll-convex Stieltjes area action — Depends on missing premiseAll-convex Stieltjes areaactionExact probability and Q–D frontier — Depends on missing premiseExact probability and Q–DfrontierGlobal affine synchronization identity — Depends on missing premiseGlobal affinesynchronization identityThreshold–obstacle normal form — Depends on missing premiseThreshold–obstacle normalformTriangle–body–disk stochastic corridor — Depends on missing premiseTriangle–body–diskstochastic corridorCentrally symmetric homothetic-level rigidity — Depends on missing premiseCentrally symmetrichomothetic-level rigidityCoefficient-four obstacle decomposition — ChallengedCoefficient-four obstacledecompositionEllipse class — Depends on missing premiseEllipse classEquilateral L²-only obstruction — Depends on missing premiseEquilateral L²-onlyobstructionExact Bellman propagation with favorable remainders — Depends on missing premiseExact Bellman propagationwith favorable remaindersCoefficient-four obstacle regeneration — activeCoefficient-four obstacleregenerationModerate-band Bellman-to-threshold comparison — activeModerate-bandBellman-to-thresholdcomparisonRoof proximity to strict triangle margin — activeRoof proximity to stricttriangle marginHigh-core obstacle–clipping estimate — activeHigh-core obstacle–clippingestimatePay the globally optimized clipping rebate using threshold L² geometry alone. — stoppedPay the globally optimizedclipping rebate usingthreshold…Prove Hall through the universal ratio d(K)≥15𝓔(K)/8. — stoppedProve Hall through theuniversal ratiod(K)≥15𝓔(K)/8.Prove a pointwise containment of the covariogram energy body at the disk ratio. — stoppedProve a pointwisecontainment of thecovariogram…Bound positive value mismatch and positive threshold geometry separately. — stoppedBound positive valuemismatch and positivethreshold…Regenerate the coefficient-four obstacle identity — OpenRegenerate thecoefficient-four obstacleidentityProve the moderate-band Bellman comparison — OpenProve the moderate-bandBellman comparisonTransfer roof proximity to the triangle margin — OpenTransfer roof proximity tothe triangle marginControl the residual high-core clipping term — OpenControl the residualhigh-core clipping termMake the clipping comparison all-convex — OpenMake the clipping comparisonall-convexRegenerate fragile exact certificates — OpenRegenerate fragile exactcertificates
Working claimActive routeOpen, active, or blocked questionUseful failure

Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.

Active routeCoefficient-four obstacle regeneration

Rebuild the load-bearing coefficient-four decomposition before using the current frontier as a positive comparison.

Route status · Active route
Active routeModerate-band Bellman-to-threshold comparison

Combine the paid band with the exact Bellman source, Green interpolation, overlap, saturation, and secant cancellation under one global affine shear.

Route status · Active route
Active routeRoof proximity to strict triangle margin

Turn small compact-band localized roof reserve into quantitative triangle proximity and then use the regenerated strict triangle margin.

Route status · Active route
Active routeHigh-core obstacle–clipping estimate

Use secant localization, the polar invariant, top-core truncation, the disk Hessian, and 𝒪₄ to pay the residual high-core clipping term across levels.

Route status · Active route

Explored alternatives

Other routes

10 recorded
Narrowed routeAll-convex nonsmooth passage

Retain the all-convex threshold, roof, and Stieltjes quantities while smoothing only the clipping/Bellman side with explicit endpoint and semicontinuity control.

Route status · Narrowed route
Eliminated routeClassify smooth or centrally symmetric homothetic cores

This branch is closed: the covered homothetic-level bodies are ellipses, so further reclassification is not a current proof task.

Route status · Eliminated route
Refuted routeL²-only clipping payment

The equilateral triangle defeats every universal attempt to pay Γ using only the threshold L² resource.

Route status · Refuted route
Browse 7 more explored routes
Refuted routePointwise energy-body inclusion

The square witness refutes pointwise inclusion at the disk ratio; an integrated angular energy-body comparison remains possible.

Route status · Refuted route
Useful but insufficientOne-dimensional stochastic corridor alone

The triangle–body–disk orders are informative but too weak to supply the final disk-Jacobi sign without two-dimensional geometry.

Route status · Useful but insufficient
Eliminated routeSeparate value and threshold estimates

Separate positive-part bounds discard the exact secant cancellation and are structurally incompatible with disk-sharp scaling.

Route status · Eliminated route
Useful but insufficientAbstract Fourier and moment relaxation

Integrated moments and finitely many affine constraints do not encode the spatial compatibility needed for Hall.

Route status · Useful but insufficient
Useful but insufficientSeparate cap-wise reserves

Cap support, symmetry, concavity, and affine-isoperimetric reserves are too weak without quantitative use of the nonlinear cap equation.

Route status · Useful but insufficient
Refuted routeGlobal 15/8 affine-deficit ratio

The equilateral triangle refutes the global ratio, although a central-slice version remains an open testbed.

Route status · Refuted route
Eliminated routePointwise local payment of high-core clipping

Endpoint order mismatch rules out paying the high-core cubic pointwise with quartic inertia or roof reserve; cross-level obstacle compensation is required.

Route status · Eliminated route

Route statements and reductions

Statements the next route can inspect and build on

Route statementCoefficient-four obstacle decomposition

The retained coefficient-four identity decomposes 4𝓔−δ_Q as 𝓛₂+2𝒞_D+𝒪₄ with 𝒪₄≥0, hence 𝒫_obs=𝒞_D+𝒪₄/2≥0.

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Route statementUniversal paid threshold band

For thresholds 0≤τ≤τ*=0.5693178886…, the disk Jacobi budget pays the combined wrong-area and wrong-shape threshold divergence levelwise; the defining root still needs interval certification.

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Route statementExact Bellman propagation with favorable remainders

The levelwise clipping Bellman identity exposes synchronization, sign, and homogeneity remainders, all nonnegative, and aligns its positive source with the exact drift measure.

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Route statementExact secant cancellation

Signed value mismatch and threshold geometry combine into a quadratic spatial term plus an outside-disk-support obstacle; estimating their positive parts separately destroys the disk scaling.

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Route statementOne-level roof rigidity

If the localized roof reserve vanishes at any one nonzero covariogram height, then K is a triangle up to affine equivalence.

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Route statementStrict all-triangle Hall margin

The current work reports Hall strictly for every triangle via an affine deficit ratio at least Λ△=1.8038103379…>9/5; its Bernstein tree, sector Jacobian, and interval certificate must be regenerated.

Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete

More ways to contribute

Open questions

Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.

6 featured tasks
01
Prove the moderate-band Bellman comparison

Charge the exact moderate-level clipping source to the same-threshold Bregman/Jacobi resource while preserving synchronization, sign, homogeneity, Green, overlap, and saturation remainders.

Suggested move: Start from the exact levelwise clipping density and adjoint identity on 0≤τ≤τ*, then compare the equilibrium drift source directly with the threshold resource.
Ready to work on
02
Control the residual high-core clipping term

Charge every residual high-core negative secant contribution to the coefficient-four core-obstacle resource using cross-level compensation rather than pointwise local inertia.

Suggested move: Combine secant localization, the polar invariant, top-core truncation, the disk Hessian, and 𝒪₄ with exact constants.
Ready to work on
03
Regenerate the coefficient-four obstacle identity

Independently rederive the convolution expansion, affine-frame scaling, reflection orientation, and core-potential sign behind 4𝓔−δ_Q=𝓛₂+2𝒞_D+𝒪₄ and 𝒫_obs≥0.

Suggested move: Re-expand g_K−g_D from 1_K−1_D in the canonical covariance-isotropic frame and verify every coefficient and sign before estimating Γ.
Ready to work on
04
Transfer roof proximity to the triangle margin

Quantify how small localized roof reserve on a compact level band forces sufficient triangle proximity to invoke the strict all-triangle clipping margin.

Suggested move: Combine one-level rigidity, affine compactness, an explicit symmetric-difference continuity modulus, and a regenerated triangle certificate.
Ready to work on
05
Regenerate fragile exact certificates

Independently regenerate the all-triangle Bernstein and sector certificate, the equilateral mixed integral and rational >1/4000 witness, and the τ* interval root before public reliance.

Suggested move: Reimplement each retained certificate independently and preserve code, inputs, exact intervals, and digests.
Ready to work on
06
Make the clipping comparison all-convex

Pass the regular-level clipping, Bellman, Gauss-angle, and obstacle formulas rigorously to nonsmooth convex bodies while retaining lower semicontinuity and endpoint control.

Suggested move: Recombine the smooth identities into all-convex Stieltjes and threshold quantities before taking polygonal or smoothing limits.
Ready to work on

Sourced mathematical context

The known mathematical landscape

Context collected Aug 22, 2026
Current statusOpen conjecture

The conjecture that the Euclidean ball maximizes the probability that three independent uniform points in a bounded convex domain form an acute triangle remains open. The strongest located general progress is local extremality of the disk in dimension two, weak local extremality of the ball in dimension three, an explicit exclusion for planar domains of sufficiently large isoperimetric ratio, and a finite but presently infeasible reduction of the planar case.

[1]
External progress

What the literature has established

Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.

  1. PreprintKhan proved planar convex domains with isoperimetric ratio greater than 7688/15 have smaller acute-triangle probability than the disk and reduced the full planar conjecture to a finite, currently intractable…[1]
  2. Peer reviewedKhan proved the disk is a local maximum among bounded planar convex domains and the three-dimensional ball is a weak local maximum.[2]
  3. Historical sourceHall computed the acute-triangle probability for the n-ball and observed the ball's criticality, motivating the extremal conjecture.[3]
4 cited sources2 related results or reductionsReferences

Mathematical neighborhood

Related results and reusable starting points

Current focusHall’s conjecture on extremal sets for random triangles
Stronger or generalized formStrong Hall’s conjecture

The strong form asks that, for every angle threshold, the n-ball maximize the distribution function for the largest angle; Hall’s original acute-triangle claim is the threshold pi/2 case.

[1]
Related problemisoperimetric and isoprobabilistic inequalities

Khan frames the conjecture as an isoprobabilistic extremal inequality for convex bodies.

[1]

Formal and computational footholds

Existing statements, libraries, computations, and datasets that can shorten the next serious attempt.

  • computation · source linked; not reproduced by ProofAtlasauthor-supplied Mathematica and GeoGebra materials

    Gabriel Khan's project page links the Mathematica computation used for the three-dimensional Legendre-polynomial lemma and several GeoGebra constructions used in the published work.

    [4]

Research-record corrections

What changed in the research record

These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Research-record correctionWe corrected the cited passages. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Corrected the research recordCorrection note

Correction details
Research-record correctionWe corrected the cited passages. We removed a duplicate or outdated task or route step. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Corrected the research recordCorrection note

Correction details

The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.

How the route was assembled

Argument structure

These stages follow the mathematical order of the supplied argument.

12 mapped milestonesretained argument map

Browse all 12 mapped stages

  1. stage 1Exact probability and Q–D frontier
  2. stage 2Sharp energy endpoints and affine minimization
  3. stage 3Positive disk-obstacle resource
  4. stage 4One globally synchronized clipping rebate
  5. stage 5Four global affine classes retained
  6. stage 6Exact route eliminations
  7. stage 7Homothetic-level branches classified
  8. stage 8Bellman, adjoint, and saturation structure
  9. stage 9All-convex action and one-level roof rigidity
  10. stage 10Threshold Bregman resource and paid band
  11. stage 11Equilateral obstruction makes the obstacle resource mandatory
  12. stage 12Threshold–obstacle frontier and first missing bridge
Exact probability and Q–D frontierThe retained source first converts acute-triangle probability into an exact additive-energy and chord-deficit inequality.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Research stage 1
Sharp energy endpoints and affine minimizationThe current work identifies triangle and ellipse energy endpoints and an attained affine-minimized equivalent frontier.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Research stage 2
Positive disk-obstacle resourceThe source isolates a non-L² positive obstacle surplus through the coefficient-four decomposition.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Research stage 3
One globally synchronized clipping rebateAffine synchronization reduces the negative side of the frontier to one exact optimized clipping rebate Γ.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Research stage 4
Four global affine classes retainedThe current work retains strict Hall results for noncircular ellipses, rectangles, triangles, and parallelograms.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Research stage 5
Exact route eliminationsThe source records witnesses against several attractive global, pointwise, Fourier, cap, and calibration-losing proof architectures.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Research stage 6
Homothetic-level branches classifiedThe retained source closes both the centrally symmetric nonsmooth and general smooth positively curved homothetic-level branches by ellipse rigidity.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Research stage 7
Bellman, adjoint, and saturation structureThe current work exactly integrates the scalar activation trajectory and exposes favorable remainders needed by the clipping comparison.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Research stage 8
All-convex action and one-level roof rigidityAn all-convex Stieltjes action and one-level rigidity isolate triangle-like roof degeneration as a controlled branch.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Research stage 9
Threshold Bregman resource and paid bandThe current work recombines threshold area and shape into one Bregman divergence with total L²/2 mass and a universal paid moderate band.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Research stage 10
Equilateral obstruction makes the obstacle resource mandatoryThe retained equilateral calculation eliminates L²-only clipping payment by a definite rational margin.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Research stage 11
Threshold–obstacle frontier and first missing bridgeThe v8 audit sharpens the remaining work into one Bellman-to-threshold-and-obstacle bridge with five named analytic branches and explicit certificate debt.

Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence

Research stage 12

Detailed research inventory

Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map

This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.

22 standing statements2 proposed statements12 mathematical milestones6 open questions1 narrowed routes2 conditional results10 completed special cases
Statements by mathematical role24 selected mapped statements
  • theorem candidate1 of 241
  • equivalence5 of 245
  • lemma14 of 2414
  • counterexample3 of 243
  • reduction1 of 241
Selected mathematical clusters7 mathematical clusters
Probability, energy, and affine frontierThe exact probability identity, sharp energy endpoints, affine minimization, and literature-level local disk result.6 displayed rows
  • retained route statementHall’s random-triangle conjecture
  • retained route statementExact probability and Q–D frontier
  • retained route statementSharp additive-energy range
  • retained route statementAffine-minimized Hall frontier
  • retained route statementPublished local maximality of the diskspecial case
  • DerivationSubstituting the exact chord decomposition into the acute-probability identity gives H0; rearranging H0 at the disk value gives the exact Q–D inequality.active reported
Synchronized clipping and positive resourcesOne global affine clipping rebate is compared with threshold-Bregman and coefficient-four obstacle resources.11 displayed rows · 3 routes included
  • retained route statementGlobal affine synchronization identityintermediate
  • retained route statementThreshold Bregman resourceintermediate
  • retained route statementCoefficient-four obstacle decompositionintermediate
  • retained route statementThreshold–obstacle normal form
  • retained route statementUniversal paid threshold bandconditional
  • retained route statementExact secant cancellationintermediate
  • DerivationThe synchronization identity supplies 2𝓔−Γ/A³; the coefficient-four decomposition splits 2𝓔−δ_Q/2 into 𝓛₂/2+𝒫_obs; the threshold identity identifies 𝓛₂/2 with the integrated Bregman resource.active reported
  • ChallengeThe coefficient-four obstacle identity is load-bearing, but the current work expressly requires independent regeneration of its convolution expansion, scaling, and core-potential sign before publication or use as audited evidence.unsupported step · open
  • Active routeCoefficient-four obstacle regenerationRebuild the load-bearing coefficient-four decomposition before using the current frontier as a positive comparison.
  • Active routeModerate-band Bellman-to-threshold comparisonCombine the paid band with the exact Bellman source, Green interpolation, overlap, saturation, and secant cancellation under one global affine shear.
  • Active routeHigh-core obstacle–clipping estimateUse secant localization, the polar invariant, top-core truncation, the disk Hessian, and 𝒪₄ to pay the residual high-core clipping term across levels.
Bellman, Green, and level geometryExact activation propagation and the retained remainders that a disk-sharp clipping comparison must preserve.4 displayed rows · 1 route included
  • retained route statementExact Bellman propagation with favorable remaindersintermediate
  • DerivationThe paid-band inequality covers threshold geometry up to τ*, while the still-open step is to compare the clipping source to that same-threshold payment without dropping Bellman, Green, overlap, or saturation remainders.proposed
  • Research targetProve the moderate-band Bellman comparisonopen
  • Active routeModerate-band Bellman-to-threshold comparisonCombine the paid band with the exact Bellman source, Green interpolation, overlap, saturation, and secant cancellation under one global affine shear.
Homothetic and roof rigidityEllipse classification for synchronized level families and triangle classification for exact roof behavior.9 displayed rows · 3 routes included
  • retained route statementCentrally symmetric homothetic-level rigidityspecial case
  • retained route statementSmooth homothetic-level rigidityspecial case
  • retained route statementAll-convex Stieltjes area actionintermediate
  • retained route statementOne-level roof rigidityconditional
  • DerivationThe two homothetic-level classifications force the covered bodies into the ellipse class, where the disk is the unique equality case and noncircular ellipses are strict.active reported
  • DerivationSmall compact-band roof reserve should force triangle proximity by one-level rigidity and affine compactness, after which the retained strict triangle margin and an audited continuity passage would close that branch.proposed
  • Eliminated routeClassify smooth or centrally symmetric homothetic coresThis branch is closed: the covered homothetic-level bodies are ellipses, so further reclassification is not a current proof task.
  • Active routeRoof proximity to strict triangle marginTurn small compact-band localized roof reserve into quantitative triangle proximity and then use the regenerated strict triangle margin.
  • Narrowed routeAll-convex nonsmooth passageRetain the all-convex threshold, roof, and Stieltjes quantities while smoothing only the clipping/Bellman side with explicit endpoint and semicontinuity control.
Retained special classes and calibrationsStrict results for ellipses, rectangles, triangles, and parallelograms, with exact equilateral and paid-band calibration work still unregenerated.8 displayed rows
  • retained route statementEllipse classspecial case
  • retained route statementRectangle classspecial case
  • retained route statementStrict all-triangle Hall marginspecial case
  • retained route statementParallelogram classspecial case
  • ChallengeThe strict triangle margin remains in the current research map with an exact-certificate description, but the code and full coefficient arrays do not survive and must be independently regenerated.unsupported step · open
  • ComputationReported exact tensor-Bernstein subdivision for the strengthened triangular-slice envelope, followed by a positive-definite corner estimate.The current work reports 81 certified boxes and one final dyadic corner, yielding Λ△=1.8038103379…>9/5 and a strict all-triangle Hall margin. · reported unreproduced
  • ComputationRetained exact equilateral-triangle calculation comparing the optimized clipping rebate with the normalized covariogram L² resource.The reported rational interval certificate gives Γ/A³−𝓛₂/2>1/4000, eliminating the L²-only clipping theorem. · reported unreproduced
  • ComputationNumerical solution of the exact defining equation for the endpoint τ* of the universal paid threshold band.The current work reports τ*=0.5693178886350659…, but treats the decimal as calibration until uniqueness and the root are interval-certified. · reported unreproduced
Exact and structural route failuresWitnesses and no-go results prevent reuse of proof architectures that lose obstacle, spatial, secant, saturation, or cross-level information.20 displayed rows · 8 routes included
  • retained route statementEquilateral L²-only obstructionspecial case
  • retained route statementSquare obstruction to pointwise energy-body inclusionspecial case
  • retained route statementGlobal 15/8 ratio obstructionspecial case
  • retained route statementTriangle–body–disk stochastic corridorintermediate
  • Useful failurePay the globally optimized clipping rebate using threshold L² geometry alone.reported failure
  • Useful failureProve Hall through the universal ratio d(K)≥15𝓔(K)/8.reported failure
  • Useful failureProve a pointwise containment of the covariogram energy body at the disk ratio.reported failure
  • Useful failureBound positive value mismatch and positive threshold geometry separately.reported failure
  • Useful failureUse only integrated Fourier moments, Gram positivity, affine stationarity, and finitely many affine derivatives.reported failure
  • Useful failureUse separate cap-wise affine-isoperimetric reserves without the nonlinear cap PDE.reported failure
  • Useful failureClose Hall from the one-dimensional triangle–body–disk stochastic corridor alone.reported failure
  • Useful failurePay the pointwise high-core clipping cubic with local inertia or the localized roof reserve.reported failure
  • Refuted routeL²-only clipping paymentThe equilateral triangle defeats every universal attempt to pay Γ using only the threshold L² resource.
  • Refuted routeGlobal 15/8 affine-deficit ratioThe equilateral triangle refutes the global ratio, although a central-slice version remains an open testbed.
  • Refuted routePointwise energy-body inclusionThe square witness refutes pointwise inclusion at the disk ratio; an integrated angular energy-body comparison remains possible.
  • Eliminated routeSeparate value and threshold estimatesSeparate positive-part bounds discard the exact secant cancellation and are structurally incompatible with disk-sharp scaling.
  • Useful but insufficientAbstract Fourier and moment relaxationIntegrated moments and finitely many affine constraints do not encode the spatial compatibility needed for Hall.
  • Useful but insufficientSeparate cap-wise reservesCap support, symmetry, concavity, and affine-isoperimetric reserves are too weak without quantitative use of the nonlinear cap equation.
  • Useful but insufficientOne-dimensional stochastic corridor aloneThe triangle–body–disk orders are informative but too weak to supply the final disk-Jacobi sign without two-dimensional geometry.
  • Eliminated routePointwise local payment of high-core clippingEndpoint order mismatch rules out paying the high-core cubic pointwise with quartic inertia or roof reserve; cross-level obstacle compensation is required.
Current analytic frontierThe source-prioritized obligations are obstacle regeneration, moderate-band comparison, roof stability, high-core compensation, nonsmooth passage, and exact-certificate regeneration.11 displayed rows · 5 routes included
  • Research targetRegenerate the coefficient-four obstacle identityopen
  • Research targetProve the moderate-band Bellman comparisonopen
  • Research targetTransfer roof proximity to the triangle marginopen
  • Research targetControl the residual high-core clipping termopen
  • Research targetMake the clipping comparison all-convexopen
  • Research targetRegenerate fragile exact certificatesopen
  • Active routeCoefficient-four obstacle regenerationRebuild the load-bearing coefficient-four decomposition before using the current frontier as a positive comparison.
  • Active routeModerate-band Bellman-to-threshold comparisonCombine the paid band with the exact Bellman source, Green interpolation, overlap, saturation, and secant cancellation under one global affine shear.
  • Active routeRoof proximity to strict triangle marginTurn small compact-band localized roof reserve into quantitative triangle proximity and then use the regenerated strict triangle margin.
  • Active routeHigh-core obstacle–clipping estimateUse secant localization, the polar invariant, top-core truncation, the disk Hessian, and 𝒪₄ to pay the residual high-core clipping term across levels.
  • Narrowed routeAll-convex nonsmooth passageRetain the all-convex threshold, roof, and Stieltjes quantities while smoothing only the clipping/Bellman side with explicit endpoint and semicontinuity control.
How to interpret these counts

A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.

Research outlook

Conditions that would advance the current route

Priority open bridgeCharge the exact moderate-level clipping source to the same-threshold Bregman/Jacobi resource while preserving synchronization, sign, homogeneity, Green, overlap, and saturation remainders.

1 approach has already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.

Evidence needed nextConcrete conditions for progress

A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.

  • Prove an exact constant comparison on the moderate band.
  • Leave all favorable Bellman, Green, overlap, and saturation terms explicitly subtracted.
  • Use only the one global affine shear.

Continue the mathematics

Contribute

ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.

Read-only beta · actions unavailable
Prepared starting pointProve the moderate-band Bellman comparison

Hall’s Random-Triangle Conjecture · ready to start

Mathematical updatesFollow this problem

Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.

Research contextPrepared context for any AI agent

Among planar convex regions of a fixed area, does the disk give the largest chance that three independent uniform points form an acute triangle?

  • Exact question and boundaries
  • Current routes and known obstacles
  • What a useful result should report
Return mathematical workReturn what you or your agent found

A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.

Proof attempt or partial resultSupporting notes or data
Hosted agentRun this task with a hosted agent

A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.

Your own AI agentConnect an outside research agent

Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.

Sources and references4 cited works · next context review by Nov 22, 2026

The mathematical context was checked on Aug 22, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.

  1. 1
    Hall's Conjecture on Extremal Sets for Random Trianglespreprint · Gabriel Khan · arXiv · 2017-04-19 · ARXIV 1704.05913 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
  2. 2
    Hall's Conjecture on Extremal Sets for Random Trianglespeer reviewed result · Gabriel Khan · Journal of Geometric Analysis · 2020 · DOI 10.1007/s12220-019-00202-6 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
  3. 3
    Acute triangles in the n-balloriginal source · Glen Richard Hall · Journal of Applied Probability · 1982 · DOI 10.1017/S0021900200037244 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
  4. 4
    Hall's Conjecture (Gabriel Khan project page)authoritative webpage · Gabriel Khan · Iowa State University · accessed Aug 22, 2026

Important qualifications

  • The short name ‘Hall’s conjecture’ is ambiguous: it is also widely used for a distinct Diophantine conjecture. Public copy should retain the random-triangle qualifier.
  • Empty formalization or computation lists mean that none was verified in this scoped search, not that none exists.

Continue exploring

Compare another research frontier

See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.

Explore all research workspaces

Expanded visual

Open original image