Global backbone: the aggregate two-edge matrix obstruction remains active, while v14 identifies the all-cut first-jet one-rank transfer as the current primary proof route and leaves both all-rank saturation problems unproved.
Route status · Active routeAdditive combinatorics · finite fields · algebraic combinatorics
Graham’s Rearrangement Conjecture
Collaboration betaCan every finite set of nonzero residues modulo a prime be ordered so that all of its nonempty partial sums are different?

Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
Let be prime and let have elements. Then there is an ordering of such that, for ,
Equivalently, every consecutive block with is nonzero.
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on Graham’s Rearrangement Conjecture stands
This cumulative recorded snapshot retains the revised-v10 aggregate two-edge matrix as the global backbone and adds the v14 governing correction to the all-cut first-order formula, its factor-provenance convention, the provisional all-cut one-rank transfer program, source-reported finite-rank checks, and explicit reproducibility gaps. The all-rank transfer theorem and Graham’s rearrangement conjecture remain open. The direct Markdown receipt contains no companion scripts or matrices, so every v14 computation remains source-reported rather than independently reproduced by ProofAtlas.
Strongest fallback, narrowed to one S^(k−3,3) component; residual-branch separation remains unresolved.
Route status · Narrowed routeThe revised route replaces fixed deletion patterns with one aggregate cycle-chord class.
Evidence posture · Reported reductionThe current work gives the conditional all-rank implication and closes every rank through six by explicit certificates.
Evidence posture · Reported special caseProve Fₘ₋₁↓ ∈ Uₘ⊗Z[1/(m+1)!] for every m≥4 from quotient-compatible high-coefficient extraction, exact relation-error generation, and full-root cut covariance/two-component saturation.
Task status · Work already reported in progressWe corrected the cited passages. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchangedWork mapped so far
Graham’s Rearrangement Conjecture in numbers
- Argument development
- 6,121 · 86%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 279 · 4%
- Computational analysis
- 170 · 2%
- Open obligations
- 135 · 2%
- Definitions and setup
- 378 · 5%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Independently audit load-bearing derivations
Recheck the integral alternation normalization, exact parabolic presentation, exact annihilator pair, specialization ring, and conditional implication chain independently of the chat development.
Suggested move: Audit each load-bearing theorem against the retained exact source and record any corrected scope before formal certification.
What would count as progress
- Each load-bearing derivation has an independent, recorded check.
- Any correction is propagated through the dependency graph.
- No CHAT-PROVED label is treated as accepted evidence.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
Global backbone: the aggregate two-edge matrix obstruction remains active, while v14 identifies the all-cut first-jet one-rank transfer as the current primary proof route and leaves both all-rank saturation problems unproved.
Route status · Active routeSole primary all-rank target, with δₘ|2 preferred and the large-prime divisor bound sufficient.
Route status · Active routePrimary source-reported route: derive aggregate containment from the corrected all-cut value/normal packet using quotient-compatible extraction, exact relation errors, and full-root covariance. The load-bearing all-rank theorem remains open.
Route status · Active routeExplored alternatives
Other routes
recorded as historical infrastructure; revised v10 supersedes this as the primary route with the aggregate two-edge program.
Route status · Route held in reserverecorded as historical infrastructure; revised v10 supersedes this as the primary route with the aggregate two-edge program.
Route status · Route held in reserverecorded as historical infrastructure; revised v10 supersedes this as the primary route with the aggregate two-edge program.
Route status · Route held in reserveBrowse 9 more explored routes
Strongest fallback, narrowed to one S^(k−3,3) component; residual-branch separation remains unresolved.
Route status · Narrowed routeConcrete finite-matrix fallback with exact permanent formulas but no all-rank cancellation theorem.
Route status · Route held in reserveRetained strong fallback with finite contents supporting a factor-six pattern, but the all-rank saturation map is unproved.
Route status · Route held in reserveExplains cleaner arithmetic at deficiency one, but accumulated adjugate norms cannot yet be commuted through the Gysin tower.
Route status · Route held in reserveSuperseded because cyclicity of all four cubic summands is stronger than necessary and rank seven has an eigenvalue collision.
Route status · Not yet justifiedMathematically recorded as a historical fallback but superseded as the primary route by the exact direct kernel.
Route status · Route held in reserveArchived supporting certificates and checks; they are not current proof obligations.
Route status · Route held in reserveGeometric equivalent: use cyclic structure to prevent Qₘ from vanishing to second order on every coordinate boundary.
Route status · Narrowed routeIndependent secondary route retained through the source-reported m=5 to 3 identity; the all-rank two-rank transfer and its larger Smith tables remain unproved or artifact-incomplete.
Route status · Narrowed routeRoute statements and reductions
Statements the next route can inspect and build on
Summing every two-singleton-deleted interval kernel gives Sₖ⁽²⁾ = h eₘ₋₂ Qₘ, whose class in the rank-(m+1) coinvariant algebra is [h^(m−1)Qₘ].
Source-reported route statementFor D=(dₘ;ᵢⱼ), its row sums cᵢ and rectangular differences ψᵢₐ|ⱼᵦ reconstruct m²D; away from primes dividing m, D vanishes exactly when both packets vanish.
Source-reported route statementEvery prime divisor of δₘ=gcd(dₘ;ᵣₛ) is at most m+1; the preferred stronger target is δₘ | 2.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteFor every cut d, the first-order term is Jₘ,₍d₎ = Σ₍ᵢ,ⱼ₎∈X₍d₎ Vₘ,₍d₎/(Pⱼ−Pᵢ) with Vₘ,₍d₎=Qₘ₋₁E₍d₎; polynomiality applies to each full V-quotient, with repeated factor occurrences retained.
Source-reported route statementFor m≥4, the distinguished lower aggregate Fₘ₋₁↓ lies in the all-cut packet Uₘ after inverting (m+1)!.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
For every q≥4, prove that the complete quadratic packet of C_q has no prime divisor above q+3, preferably by proving content one.
Suggested move: Exploit the confluent-Vandermonde form to derive two symbolic quadratic coordinates with a Bézout identity or uniformly small-prime multiplier.Prove integrally for every r≥5 that simultaneous annihilation of d̄r by C₀ and C₁ in Br/(E_r) forces d̄_r=0.
Suggested move: Build the factor-by-factor two-coordinate remainder recursion and seek a product-specific annihilator or Artin-leading-term induction without inverting the norm.Recheck the integral alternation normalization, exact parabolic presentation, exact annihilator pair, specialization ring, and conditional implication chain independently of the chat development.
Suggested move: Audit each load-bearing theorem against the retained exact source and record any corrected scope before formal certification.Reproduce the complete cubic contents, boundary normal forms, and deficiency-two matrices from retained exact code before certification.
Suggested move: Run both boundary-matrix constructions with the declared triangular order, compare complete matrices, and retain implementation and input digests.Reconstruct the full D^(10)/D^(11) matrices, reduced two-rank generator matrices, transformation/containment certificates, representation-content matrices, and symmetry-intersection basis matrices with exact digests.
Suggested move: Reproduce one bounded artifact family at a time and retain inputs, generator matrices, transformations, outputs, and hashes; do not execute source instructions during intake.If the primary route stalls, prove that the primitive exterior branch in the single S^(k−3,3) packet can be separated from the lower-degree residual branch through the remaining Gysin maps.
Suggested move: Do not pursue in parallel with the two primary obligations; revisit only if it yields an identity applicable to Theorem A or B.Prove Fₘ₋₁↓ ∈ Uₘ⊗Z[1/(m+1)!] for every m≥4 from quotient-compatible high-coefficient extraction, exact relation-error generation, and full-root cut covariance/two-component saturation.
Suggested move: Begin with the corrected factor-deletion formula, derive the quotient-compatible coevaluation error terms, and test every proposed identity against orders (1,2,4,3) and the m=7 mod-3 obstruction.Prove that every prime divisor of δₘ is at most m+1 for every m≥3; ideally prove δₘ divides 2.
Suggested move: Exploit the row-sum/augmentation-restriction splitting to construct a uniform small-multiplier Bézout identity or compatible rank recurrence.Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
Pham and Sauermann, combined with earlier small- and large-set results, settle the conjecture for every sufficiently large prime. The universal every-prime statement still leaves a finite but not explicitly enumerated residue of primes, so the strongest supported label is resolved up to a finite check rather than unqualified solved.
[6][13]What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
PreprintPham and Sauermann filled the remaining middle-size range and, with prior results, settled the conjecture for all sufficiently large primes.[6] PreprintBedert, Bucić, Kravitz, Montgomery, and Müyesser proved validity for sufficiently large subsets in every group and essentially resolved the characteristic-two vector-space model.[5] PreprintBucić, Frederickson, Müyesser, Pokrovskiy, and Yepremyan proved an approximate ordering theorem in every finite group, with all but o(|S|) partial products distinct.[4] PreprintKravitz proved the conjecture for sets of size at most log(p)/log log(p), and Bedert-Kravitz improved this to exp((log p)^(1/4)).[3]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
When the total sum is nonzero, Alspach additionally requires the initial zero and every partial sum to be distinct; its hypothesis excludes zero-sum sets, so it is not a global strengthening without qualification.
[9]The unified formulation permits only the unavoidable equality between initial and final sums in the zero-total-sum case and extends the problem to general finite abelian groups.
[1]Every finite subset of nonzero integers has an ordering with distinct partial sums.
[11]Valid orderings correspond to rainbow paths in the associated edge-coloured Cayley graph, connecting the problem to sequenceability and Hall-Paige methods.
[4]Formal and computational footholds
Existing statements, libraries, computations, and datasets that can shorten the next serious attempt.
- certificate · source linked; not reproduced by ProofAtlasProof Candidate Certificates
A public repository contains Python certificate/checker experiments and small-prime backtests, but its maintainers describe it as a research draft rather than a peer-reviewed proof or proof-assistant formalization.
[10] - computation · source linked; not reproduced by ProofAtlasBounded Cardinality Computation And Polynomial Method
Published work verifies bounded-cardinality cases through theorem-specific constructions and polynomial methods; it is not a universal computational verification.
[7]
Later mathematical changes
What changed after the initial research map
Later recorded revisions that changed the mathematics, without inventing a date or an AI attribution.
Changed the research frontierLater mathematical revision
Changed the research frontierLater mathematical revision
The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.
Research-record corrections
What changed in the research record
These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.
How the route was assembled
Argument structure
These stages follow the mathematical order of the supplied argument.
Browse all 10 mapped stages
- stage 1Exact three-edge partial-sum kernel
- stage 2Complete cubic Poincaré detector
- stage 3Exact lower-rank factorization
- stage 4Exact-zero-divisor Euler descent
- stage 5Suffix-packet faithfulness isolated
- stage 6Deficiency-two boundary saturation isolated
- stage 7Low ranks closed inside the conditional program
- stage 8Current-route exact data
- stage 9Fallback route order fixed
- stage 10Invalid algebraic shortcuts retained
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.
- theorem candidate
3 of 28 3 - definition
1 of 28 1 - equivalence
5 of 28 5 - reduction
9 of 28 9 - lemma
5 of 28 5 - negative result
3 of 28 3 - computational claim
2 of 28 2
Exact direct certificateThe conjecture, exact three-edge kernel, exact nonvanishing equivalence, and complete cubic detector.8 displayed rows · 1 route included
- retained route statementGraham’s rearrangement conjecture
- retained route statementThree-edge-deleted partial-sum discriminantintermediate
- retained route statementExact discriminant detectionintermediate
- retained route statementOne nonzero cubic coefficient gives an orderingconditional
- retained route statementComplete cubic Poincaré detectionintermediate
- retained route statementCommuting divided-difference sourceintermediate
- DerivationThe deleted factors are nonzero on every permutation of A, so the kernel has exactly the desired zero set; a nonzero cubic alternation coefficient then selects a permutation with nonzero kernel.active reported
- Route held in reserveThree-edge partial-sum kernelrecorded as historical infrastructure; revised v10 supersedes this as the primary route with the aggregate two-edge program.
Rank recursion and exact-zero-divisor descentThe lower-rank factor, quadratic parabolic extension, exact annihilator pair, and two Euler-quotient equations.6 displayed rows · 1 route included
- retained route statementExact rank recursionintermediate
- retained route statementExact quadratic parabolic reductionintermediate
- retained route statementExact zero-divisor pairintermediate
- retained route statementVanishing descends to two Euler-quotient equationsintermediate
- DerivationExact rank factorization and the monic quadratic presentation reduce the class to −P d_r(C₀+C₁t); freeness and Ann(P)=(E_r) yield the two equations modulo E_r.active reported
- Route held in reserveThree-edge partial-sum kernelrecorded as historical infrastructure; revised v10 supersedes this as the primary route with the aggregate two-edge program.
Two-theorem frontierSuffix faithfulness, Euler-boundary contraction, complete quadratic detection, and boundary saturation form the precise unfinished chain.14 displayed rows · 2 routes included
- retained route statementSuffix-packet faithfulnessconditional
- retained route statementEuler-boundary contractionconditional
- retained route statementComplete deficiency-two packet detectionintermediate
- retained route statementIntegral Frobenius-dual quadratic basisintermediate
- retained route statementDeficiency-two boundary saturationconditional
- retained route statementTwo-lemma conditional completionconditional
- DerivationThe proposed faithfulness lemma makes the lower-rank class zero modulo E_r, so setting z₁=0 annihilates it and the exact interval factorization identifies the surviving boundary class C_q.proposed
- DerivationIf the contracted class vanished modulo p, every quadratic coordinate would vanish; the proposed packet-content bound forbids this when p>q+3=k.proposed
- DerivationFor k≥7, assume all cubic coefficients vanish, descend through the exact zero-divisor pair to the Euler quotient, apply suffix faithfulness, contract to C_{k−3}, and contradict boundary saturation; combine with the explicit ranks k≤6.challenged
- ChallengeThe conditional chain is not a complete proof because suffix-packet faithfulness and deficiency-two boundary saturation are explicitly unproved in all ranks.unsupported step · open
- Research targetProve suffix-packet faithfulnessopen
- Research targetProve deficiency-two boundary saturationopen
- Route held in reserveSuffix-packet faithfulnessrecorded as historical infrastructure; revised v10 supersedes this as the primary route with the aggregate two-edge program.
- Route held in reserveDeficiency-two boundary saturationrecorded as historical infrastructure; revised v10 supersedes this as the primary route with the aggregate two-edge program.
Low-rank closure and exact dataThe explicit ranks through six, cubic contents through nine, lower-rank boundary coordinates, and q=4,5 contracted matrices.5 displayed rows
- retained route statementExplicit closure through rank sixspecial case
- ComputationExact complete cubic Poincaré contents for the three-edge kernel in ranks 6 through 9.The current work reports contents (2,2,2,1) for k=6,7,8,9; the single S^(k−3,3) packet of the same kernel has matching contents in those ranks. · reported unreproduced
- ComputationExact Artin normal-form boundary coordinates for the lower-rank class d_r in r=5,6,7.The current work records primitive coordinates 1 at r=5, −1 at r=6, and a coprime pair 27 and 100 at r=7, hence observed normal-form contents (1,1,1). · reported unreproduced
- ComputationComplete quadratic Poincaré matrices of the contracted deficiency-two class for q=4 and q=5.Both matrices have entry gcd 1; explicit coprime Artin-coordinate pairs are (−3,4) and (−25,32), and the matrices were source-reported by direct top extraction and by the explicit dual basis. · reported unreproduced
- Research targetReproduce current-route exact computationsopen
Ranked fallback routesThe single Specht component, two permanents, weighted quadratic packet, adjugate route, confluent route, and historical programs.12 displayed rows · 7 routes included
- retained route statementSingle Specht-component fallbackconditional
- retained route statementWeighted quadratic six-saturation fallbackconditional
- DerivationA nonzero coordinate in the single S^(k−3,3) component of the older kernel would give an ordering, but all-rank separation of the primitive and residual branches is still missing.proposed
- ComputationConsolidated exact content sequences for the older weighted, degree-one, permanent, confluent, and Specht fallback packets.The source records finite-rank content tables for each fallback, including weighted quadratic contents (2,2,6,6), standard-row contents (2,6,6,1,1,2), and older-kernel Specht contents (2,6,6,1,1). · reported unreproduced
- Research targetSeparate the Specht fallback residual branchopen
- Narrowed routeSingle Specht-component saturationStrongest fallback, narrowed to one S^(k−3,3) component; residual-branch separation remains unresolved.
- Route held in reserveTwo-permanent noncancellationConcrete finite-matrix fallback with exact permanent formulas but no all-rank cancellation theorem.
- Route held in reserveWeighted quadratic six-saturationRetained strong fallback with finite contents supporting a factor-six pattern, but the all-rank saturation map is unproved.
- Route held in reserveDegree-one row and adjugate descentExplains cleaner arithmetic at deficiency one, but accumulated adjugate norms cannot yet be commuted through the Gysin tower.
- Not yet justifiedConfluent four-isotype cyclicitySuperseded because cyclicity of all four cubic summands is stronger than necessary and rank seven has an eigenvalue collision.
- Route held in reserveRevision-v6 common-ring local S₄ routeMathematically recorded as a historical fallback but superseded as the primary route by the exact direct kernel.
- Route held in reserveTerminal, all-cuts, and neighboring-cut programsArchived supporting certificates and checks; they are not current proof obligations.
Failed shortcuts and negative evidenceThe retained witnesses prevent repeated work on invalid cancellation, incomplete coordinate packets, norm inversion, and local-only reductions.13 displayed rows
- retained route statementSquarefree cubic data are incompleteintermediate
- retained route statementOne boundary coefficient cannot control packet contentcomputational
- retained route statementLocal divided differences miss one statecomputational
- Useful failureCancel the parabolic factor P=h₂ from P·u=0reported failure
- Useful failureUse one distinguished boundary coefficient as an all-rank certificatereported failure
- Useful failureDetect a cubic harmonic using only squarefree coefficientsreported failure
- Useful failureInvert the suffix norm or the factor norms q(−S_j) in adjugate descentreported failure
- Useful failureUse the raw fully terminalized quotient as the next monic statewitness reproduced
- Useful failurePromote a primitive leading exterior coefficient through all internal reductionswitness reproduced
- Useful failureGenerate the missing state using only local divided differences on {ρ,a,t,b}witness reproduced
- Useful failureProve cyclicity of all four cubic isotypes after confluent diagonal contractionreported failure
- Useful failureUse total unimodularity of the coefficient matrices to control their permanentsreported failure
- ComputationRank-six characteristic-seven dimension comparison for a broad local nilHecke module and the missing state.The local module has dimension 36; adding the missing state gives dimension 37, falsifying local divided-difference generation. · reported unreproduced
independent checking boundaryThe source’s CHAT-PROVED and VERIFIED COMPUTATION labels remain provisional until independently checked and digest-bound.3 displayed rows
- ChallengeThe current work labels its derivations CHAT-PROVED and requires independent checking before publication or formal certification.unsupported step · open
- Research targetIndependently audit load-bearing derivationsopen
- Research targetReproduce current-route exact computationsopen
Aggregate two-edge frontierThe current route links the aggregate kernel, quadratic matrix, row-difference splitting, one saturation obligation, and the conditional completion.10 displayed rows · 3 routes included
- retained route statementAggregate two-edge kernel collapseintermediate
- retained route statementQuadratic boundary matrix splits into two packetsintermediate
- retained route statementQuadratic two-edge saturation theorem
- retained route statementOne-theorem conditional completionconditional
- retained route statementCoordinate-square boundary formulationintermediate
- Research targetProve quadratic two-edge saturationin progress reported
- ComputationExact alternation computations for the quadratic boundary matrices through m=9.The reported contents δₘ for m=3,…,9 are 1,1,2,2,2,2,2; the row and rectangular-difference contents are complementary in the tested range. · reported unreproduced
- Active routeAggregate two-edge kernelGlobal backbone: the aggregate two-edge matrix obstruction remains active, while v14 identifies the all-cut first-jet one-rank transfer as the current primary proof route and leaves both all-rank saturation problems unproved.
- Active routeQuadratic two-edge saturationSole primary all-rank target, with δₘ|2 preferred and the large-prime divisor bound sufficient.
- Narrowed routeCoordinate-square boundary attackGeometric equivalent: use cyclic structure to prevent Qₘ from vanishing to second order on every coordinate boundary.
All-cut transfer frontierThe corrected all-cut contraction, provisional one-rank transfer, finite source-reported evidence, radius-two base identity, open all-rank obligation, and explicit artifact-reconstruction boundary.10 displayed rows · 2 routes included
- retained route statementCorrect all-cut first-order contractionintermediate
- retained route statementAll-cut first-jet one-rank transferconditional
- retained route statementSource-reported m=4 to 3 one-rank identityspecial case
- retained route statementSource-reported m=5 to 3 radius-two identityspecial case
- ComputationThe direct v14 Markdown reports exact Artin/Hermite computations for the one-rank all-cut packet through m=7.The source-reported aggregate orders are (1,2,4,3) for m=4,5,6,7, with a genuine rank jump modulo 3 at m=7. ProofAtlas did not run the declared companion script because it is absent from this direct-Markdown receipt. · reported unreproduced
- ComputationThe v14 status ledger separates claims it labels source-reported or arithmetic-checked from larger matrices and Smith/representation tables whose working artifacts were not retained.This intake records the source’s status distinctions only. No script, full D^(10)/D^(11) matrix, reduced two-rank generator matrix, Smith transformation, or representation-content matrix accompanied the received direct Markdown. · reported unreproduced
- Research targetProve the all-cut first-jet one-rank transferin progress reported
- Research targetReconstruct and retain the missing exact-computation artifactsopen
- Active routeAll-cut first-jet one-rank transferPrimary source-reported route: derive aggregate containment from the corrected all-cut value/normal packet using quotient-compatible extraction, exact relation errors, and full-root covariance. The load-bearing all-rank theorem remains open.
- Narrowed routeResidual-free radius-two two-rank transferIndependent secondary route retained through the source-reported m=5 to 3 identity; the all-rank two-rank transfer and its larger Smith tables remain unproved or artifact-incomplete.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
3 approaches have already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Every denominator has prime support at most m+1
- Full-root cut covariance is proved before representation splitting
- The standard and rectangular components are controlled separately
- The m=4 through m=7 exact tests are reproduced from retained artifacts
- Load-bearing mathematics receives independent review
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
Graham’s Rearrangement Conjecture · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
Can every finite set of nonzero residues modulo a prime be ordered so that all of its nonempty partial sums are different?
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references13 cited works · next context review by Nov 22, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Aug 22, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1On Sequences in Cyclic Groups with Distinct Partial Sumspreprint · Simone Costa, Stefano Della Fiore, M. A. Ollis, Sarah Z. Rovner-Frydman · arXiv · 2022-03-30 · ARXIV 2203.16658 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
- 2Rearranging small sets for distinct partial sumspreprint · Noah Kravitz · arXiv · 2024-07-01 · ARXIV 2407.01835 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
- 3Graham's rearrangement conjecture beyond the rectification barrierpreprint · Benjamin Bedert, Noah Kravitz · arXiv · 2024-09-11 · ARXIV 2409.07403 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
- 4Towards Graham's rearrangement conjecture via rainbow pathspreprint · Matija Bucić, Bryce Frederickson, Alp Müyesser, Alexey Pokrovskiy, Liana Yepremyan · arXiv · 2025-03-03 · ARXIV 2503.01825 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
- 5On Graham's rearrangement conjecture over F_2^npreprint · Benjamin Bedert, Matija Bucić, Noah Kravitz, Richard Montgomery, Alp Müyesser · arXiv · 2025-08-25 · ARXIV 2508.18254 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
- 6On Graham's rearrangement conjecturepreprint · Huy Tuan Pham, Lisa Sauermann · arXiv · 2026-02-17 · ARXIV 2602.15797 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
- 7Distinct partial sums in cyclic groups: polynomial method and constructive approachespeer reviewed result · Jacob Hicks, M. A. Ollis, John R. Schmitt · Journal of Combinatorial Designs · 2019-01-31 · DOI 10.1002/jcd.21652 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
- 8Some new results about a conjecture by Brian Alspachpeer reviewed result · Simone Costa, Marco A. Pellegrini · Archiv der Mathematik · 2020-08-29 · DOI 10.1007/s00013-020-01507-7 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
- 9Directed paths of diagonals within polygonspeer reviewed result · Jens-P. Bode, Heiko Harborth · Discrete Mathematics · 2005-08-28 · DOI 10.1016/j.disc.2005.05.006 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
- 10Graham rearrangement certificatessoftware or dataset · Atomicium · GitHub · 2026-05-04 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
- 11Ordering subsets of the cyclic group to give distinct partial sumsauthoritative webpage · Ian Wanless · MathOverflow · 2014-04-25 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
- 12On Sums of Integers Taken from a Fixed Sequenceoriginal source · Ronald L. Graham · Washington State University Conference on Number Theory · 1971 · accessed Aug 22, 2026
- 13Erdős Problem #475: Graham's rearrangement conjecturemaintained problem list · Thomas F. Bloom · Erdős Problems · accessed Aug 22, 2026
Important qualifications
- Use nonzero elements of F_p under addition. Writing F_p^times without explanation can misleadingly suggest the multiplicative group.
- Graham requires the listed nonempty partial sums to be pairwise distinct; unlike the Alspach variant, it does not include the initial sum zero and therefore does not require every partial sum to be nonzero.
- Empty formalization or computation lists mean that none was verified in this scoped search, not that none exists.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces