The source says rooted strip certificates rule out that stronger prescribed-edge assertion, while leaving the unrooted circuit formulation controlling. Keep the plane-graph dual Jordan circuit unanchored; the rooted strip certificates rule out only the stronger prescribed-edge assertion.
Route status · Narrowed routeTheoretical computer science · graph metrics · embeddings
GNRS Conjecture
Collaboration betaDo all proper minor-closed graph families have uniformly bounded L1 metric distortion?

Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
For every proper minor-closed family of finite graphs , does there exist a finite constant such that every nonnegatively weighted shortest-path metric of every embeds into with distortion at most ?
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on GNRS Conjecture stands
Selected route highlights from the mathematical source. This is not yet a complete mathematical inventory.
For a contraction-closed graph class and fixed A, uniform L1 distortion at most A is equivalent to the unrooted geodesic signed-cut property; for plane graphs the source reduces this to an unanchored simple dual Jordan circuit.
Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteWork mapped so far
GNRS Conjecture in numbers
- Argument development
- 979 · 84%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 61 · 5%
- Computational analysis
- 52 · 4%
- Open obligations
- 18 · 2%
- Definitions and setup
- 51 · 4%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Close two distinct separator gates: weighted bounded adhesion without depth accumulation, and quota-zonoid projection for weighted treewidth two along the whole SPQR/clique tree.
Suggested move: Generalize the unit triangle state to weighted separators with one-junction additive loss, then establish the separate whole-SPQR/clique-tree projection for the union of boundary-conditioned quota zonoids.
What would count as progress
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
Explored alternatives
Other routes
The source says rooted strip certificates rule out that stronger prescribed-edge assertion, while leaving the unrooted circuit formulation controlling. Keep the plane-graph dual Jordan circuit unanchored; the rooted strip certificates rule out only the stronger prescribed-edge assertion.
Route status · Narrowed routeThe current work lists that frozen-metric strategy among the routes ruled out and separately lists iteration of one-level interface costs through every decomposition depth as ruled out. Any replacement must avoid iterating one frozen metric or one-level exact-interface costs through every decomposition depth.
Route status · Narrowed routeMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
A genuine weighted 3-connected planar R-node theorem is still missing.
Suggested move: Resolve the exact source-reported obligation without treating it as an established negative result.The planar theorem must be lifted through bounded genus, apices, vortices, and clique sums.
Suggested move: Resolve the exact source-reported obligation without treating it as an established negative result.Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
Historical source posture only: the 2004 original paper proves bounded distortion for selected families and presents the broader minor-closed-family statement as conjectural. This field does not independently establish the problem's status after 2004.
[1]What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
Peer reviewedGupta, Newman, Rabinovich, and Sinclair developed constant-distortion L1 embeddings for selected minor-closed graph families and posed the broader characterization.[1]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
Formalization opportunities
Lean work can make these reusable foundations precise without being presented as a proof of the core problem.
- Formalization targetA formalization needs finite weighted graph shortest-path metrics, proper minor-closed families, L1 embeddings, and a family-uniform distortion bound.
- Formalization targetSpecial-family embeddings must not be promoted to the universal proper-minor-closed-family statement.
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.
- theorem candidate
1 of 7 1 - reduction
1 of 7 1 - lemma
1 of 7 1 - equivalence
1 of 7 1 - special case
3 of 7 3
Current research mapThe conjecture, retained reductions, explored limitations, and open questions represented in this overview.23 displayed rows · 2 routes included
- retained route statementExcluded-minor graph metrics should admit a family-dependent bounded-distortion embedding into L1.
- retained route statementCurrent reductionintermediate
- retained route statementClosing targetintermediate
- retained route statementGeodesic cut characterizationintermediate
- retained route statementPlanar boundary exactnessintermediate
- retained route statementTwo-separator controlintermediate
- retained route statementUnweighted 3-tree boundintermediate
- Recorded relationshipThe source reports this as a route toward the conjecture; missing or unaudited premises remain and the reduction does not itself prove the target.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- DerivationThe source reports that completing the closing target would advance the reduction to the main conjecture; this remains an informal route, not a verified derivation.proposed
- Useful failurePrescribed-edge planar peelingreported failure
- Useful failureFrozen edge-exact factor-two metricreported failure
- Research targetClose two distinct separator gates: weighted bounded adhesion without depth accumulation, and quota-zonoid projection for weighted treewidth two along the whole SPQR/clique tree.open
- Research targetClose the weighted 3-connected planar core.open
- Research targetLift the planar theorem to every proper minor-closed family.open
- Research targetWeighted planar coreopen
- Research targetFull minor-closed liftopen
- ComputationA deterministic verifier reportedly rebuilds the finite 3-tree automata and corrected tetrahedral deficit enumeration.The finite enumeration supports the current work's 3-tree theorem interface but is not a proof of GNRS for arbitrary minor-closed families. Intake did not execute it. · reported unreproduced
- Narrowed routePrescribed-edge planar peelingThe source says rooted strip certificates rule out that stronger prescribed-edge assertion, while leaving the unrooted circuit formulation controlling. Keep the plane-graph dual Jordan circuit unanchored; the rooted strip certificates rule out only the stronger prescribed-edge assertion.
- Narrowed routeFrozen edge-exact factor-two metricThe current work lists that frozen-metric strategy among the routes ruled out and separately lists iteration of one-level interface costs through every decomposition depth as ruled out. Any replacement must avoid iterating one frozen metric or one-level exact-interface costs through every decomposition depth.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
2 approaches have already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
GNRS Conjecture · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
Do all proper minor-closed graph families have uniformly bounded L1 metric distortion?
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references1 cited works · next context review by Nov 28, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Aug 28, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1Cuts, Trees and L1 Embeddings of Graphsoriginal source · Anupam Gupta, Ilan Newman, Yuri Rabinovich, Alistair Sinclair · Combinatorica · 2004 · DOI 10.1007/s00493-004-0015-x · accessed Aug 28, 2026
Important qualifications
- This was a bounded primary-source and publisher-record search, not an exhaustive literature, priority, citation, rights, or authorship review.
- Open status means that the cited source states or studies the problem as a conjecture or open problem and the bounded search found no statement-aligned primary resolution; it does not prove that no later claim exists.
- Recent preprints are recorded only with their stated preprint posture and are not treated as peer-reviewed or independently verified.
- No submitted attachment, submitted URL, packet-reported computation, or model output was treated as independent external authority.
- No statement-aligned formalization, certificate, or independently reproduced computation was established by this search.
- The status date 2004-12-31 is a conservative year-end normalization of the source's 2004 publication label, not a claim about an exact publication day or any later status.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces