Ergodic theory and arithmetic dynamics

Furstenberg’s ×2, ×3 Conjecture

Collaboration beta

Can a genuinely diffuse ergodic measure be invariant under both doubling and tripling without being uniform Lebesgue measure?

μjointly ergodic andT2,T3-invariantμ=mTor a finite rational-orbit law
Known results and sources
The circle with doubling and tripling orbits, contrasting an even diffuse distribution with a finite rational orbit.
Furstenberg’s conjecture says an ergodic measure invariant under ×2 and ×3 is either uniform or finite and rational.

Research problem

Exact mathematical statement

On T=/\mathbb T=\mathbb R/\mathbb Z, let

T2x=2x(mod1),T3x=3x(mod1).T_2x=2x\pmod1,\qquad T_3x=3x\pmod1.

Every jointly ergodic Borel probability measure invariant under both T2T_2 and T3T_3 is either Lebesgue measure or the invariant probability on a finite rational joint orbit.

Problem infographic

Problem at a glance

A problem-first explainer of doubling and tripling on the circle, invariant ergodic measures, the known positive-entropy case, and the open atomless zero-entropy case.
The remaining difficulty is the hypothetical atomless, jointly ergodic, zero-entropy invariant measure.

Current mathematical picture

Where work on Furstenberg’s ×2, ×3 Conjecture stands

Open conjecture

Selected route highlights from the mathematical source. This is not yet a complete mathematical inventory.

Useful failureSource-reported limitation

The following claim is rejected or insufficient in the recorded route: Separate marginal invariance at block scale automatically yields invariance of the full joint block law under the carry map. Turn rational Følner-box or finite-orbit approximations into either fixed-frequency Fourier cancellation and Lebesgue measure or stabilized rational support and a finite orbit.

Route status · Narrowed route
Main reductionZero-entropy residual case

Known positive-entropy rigidity and the atomic reduction leave only jointly ergodic atomless zero-entropy invariant measures.

Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Priority open bridgeClose the large-conductor remainder of the anisotropic HNF Fourier analysis.Task status · Ready to work on
Research-record correctionResearch-record correction

We corrected the cited passages. We removed a duplicate or outdated task or route step. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchanged

Work mapped so far

Furstenberg’s ×2, ×3 Conjecture in numbers

1.8kretained lines of mathematical investigation1,766 in the current working snapshot
Argument development
1,582 · 90%
Explored or eliminated routes
28 · 2%
Computational analysis
4 · 0%
Open obligations
49 · 3%
Definitions and setup
103 · 6%
7selected mapped statements1routes investigated3open questions3contribution-ready tasks
How this is measured

This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.

Argument map and routes

How the current approaches connect

Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.

Visible working map

Research route map

11 selected steps

Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.

11 selected steps

Scroll horizontally to explore the route

Working route overview for Furstenberg’s ×2, ×3 ConjectureA selected map of recorded claims, active routes, useful failures, open questions, and their explicit relationships. Search, filter, zoom, or pan within this page.Are Lebesgue measure and finite rational orbits the only ergodic ×2, ×3 measures? — Depends on missing premiseAre Lebesgue measure andfinite rational orbits theonly…Current reduction — Depends on missing premiseCurrent reductionSubcritical collision reduction — Depends on missing premiseSubcritical collisionreductionZero-entropy residual case — Depends on missing premiseZero-entropy residual caseClosing target — Depends on missing premiseClosing targetExact measure dichotomy — Depends on missing premiseExact measure dichotomyThin HNF model — Depends on missing premiseThin HNF modelSource-reported limitation — stoppedSource-reported limitationClose the large-conductor remainder of the anisotropic HNF Fourier analysis. — OpenClose the large-conductorremainder of the anisotropicHNF…Classify weak limits of complete finite rational joint-orbit measures under the source’s exponential shadowing assumptions. — OpenClassify weak limits ofcomplete finite rationaljoint-orbit…Prove a transverse-return or positive-entropy alternative in the logarithmically thick zero-entropy regime. — OpenProve a transverse-return orpositive-entropy alternativein…
Working claimActive routeOpen, active, or blocked questionUseful failure

Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.

Explored alternatives

Other routes

1 recorded
Narrowed routeSource-reported limitation

The following claim is rejected or insufficient in the recorded route: Separate marginal invariance at block scale automatically yields invariance of the full joint block law under the carry map. Turn rational Følner-box or finite-orbit approximations into either fixed-frequency Fourier cancellation and Lebesgue measure or stabilized rational support and a finite orbit.

Route status · Narrowed route

More ways to contribute

Open questions

Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.

3 featured tasks
01
Close the large-conductor remainder of the anisotropic HNF Fourier analysis.Suggested move: Estimate the exact weighted additive-character sum in the long transverse cyclic coordinate and force cancellation, a second relation, or a bounded rational kernel.
Ready to work on
02
Classify weak limits of complete finite rational joint-orbit measures under the source’s exponential shadowing assumptions.Suggested move: Prove fixed-frequency equidistribution or stabilization of a rational kernel while keeping empirical boxes, complete orbits, and graph joinings distinct.
Ready to work on
03
Prove a transverse-return or positive-entropy alternative in the logarithmically thick zero-entropy regime.Suggested move: Count deterministic modal carry fields on selected patches and show that avoiding transverse returns is incompatible with the observed entropy profile.
Ready to work on

Sourced mathematical context

The known mathematical landscape

Context collected Aug 14, 2026
Current statusOpen conjecture

A current peer-reviewed source continues to describe the measure-classification conjecture as a central open problem and supplies equivalent formulations rather than a proof.

[2]
External progress

What the literature has established

Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.

  1. Peer reviewedA current article gives equivalent complex-analytic and operator-algebraic formulations while continuing to identify the original conjecture as open.[2]
  2. Historical sourceFurstenberg introduced the disjointness framework and the ×2, ×3 problem.[1]
2 cited sources2 related results or reductionsReferences

Mathematical neighborhood

Related results and reusable starting points

Current focusFurstenberg’s ×2, ×3 Conjecture
Equivalent formulationCarathéodory-function and tracial-state formulations

The measure conjecture is equivalent to selected complex-analytic and operator-algebraic formulations developed in the paper.

[2]
Related problemPeriodic approximation and equidistribution variants

Periodic approximation and periodic equidistribution conjectures form two related triples of formulations.

[2]

Formalization opportunities

Lean work can make these reusable foundations precise without being presented as a proof of the core problem.

  • Formalization targetNo statement-aligned formalization of the full invariant-measure dichotomy was located.
  • Formalization targetA formal development would need entropy, ergodicity, invariant measures on the circle, and the positive-entropy rigidity input.

Research-record corrections

What changed in the research record

These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Research-record correctionWe corrected the cited passages. We removed a duplicate or outdated task or route step. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Corrected the research recordCorrection note

Correction details
Research-record correctionWe corrected the cited passages. We removed a duplicate or outdated task or route step. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.

Corrected the research recordCorrection note

Correction details

The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.

Detailed research inventory

Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map

This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.

5 standing statements2 proposed statements3 open questions1 narrowed routes
Statements by mathematical role7 selected mapped statements
  • theorem candidate1 of 71
  • reduction3 of 73
  • lemma3 of 73
Selected mathematical clusters1 mathematical clusters
Current research mapThe conjecture, retained reductions, explored limitations, and open questions represented in this overview.20 displayed rows · 1 route included
  • retained route statementAre Lebesgue measure and finite rational orbits the only ergodic ×2, ×3 measures?
  • retained route statementCurrent reductionintermediate
  • retained route statementClosing targetintermediate
  • retained route statementExact measure dichotomyintermediate
  • retained route statementZero-entropy residual caseintermediate
  • retained route statementSubcritical collision reductionintermediate
  • retained route statementThin HNF modelintermediate
  • Recorded relationshipThe source reports this as a route toward the conjecture; missing or unaudited premises remain and the reduction does not itself prove the target.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • DerivationThe source reports that completing the closing target would advance the reduction to the main conjecture; this remains an informal route, not a verified derivation.proposed
  • Useful failureSource-reported limitationreported failure
  • Research targetClose the large-conductor remainder of the anisotropic HNF Fourier analysis.open
  • Research targetClassify weak limits of complete finite rational joint-orbit measures under the source’s exponential shadowing assumptions.open
  • Research targetProve a transverse-return or positive-entropy alternative in the logarithmically thick zero-entropy regime.open
  • Research targetLarge-conductor Fourier zonesuperseded
  • Research targetGlobal approximation and thick-regime closuresuperseded
  • Narrowed routeSource-reported limitationThe following claim is rejected or insufficient in the recorded route: Separate marginal invariance at block scale automatically yields invariance of the full joint block law under the carry map. Turn rational Følner-box or finite-orbit approximations into either fixed-frequency Fourier cancellation and Lebesgue measure or stabilized rational support and a finite orbit.
How to interpret these counts

A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.

Research outlook

Conditions that would advance the current route

Priority open bridgeClose the large-conductor remainder of the anisotropic HNF Fourier analysis.

1 approach has already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.

Evidence needed nextConcrete conditions for progress

A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.

  • Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
  • Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.

Continue the mathematics

Contribute

ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.

Read-only beta · actions unavailable
Prepared starting pointClose the large-conductor remainder of the anisotropic HNF Fourier analysis.

Furstenberg’s ×2, ×3 Conjecture · ready to start

Mathematical updatesFollow this problem

Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.

Research contextPrepared context for any AI agent

Can a genuinely diffuse ergodic measure be invariant under both doubling and tripling without being uniform Lebesgue measure?

  • Exact question and boundaries
  • Current routes and known obstacles
  • What a useful result should report
Return mathematical workReturn what you or your agent found

A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.

Proof attempt or partial resultSupporting notes or data
Hosted agentRun this task with a hosted agent

A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.

Your own AI agentConnect an outside research agent

Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.

Sources and references2 cited works · next context review by Nov 14, 2026

The mathematical context was checked on Aug 14, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.

  1. 1
    Disjointness in ergodic theory, minimal sets, and a problem in Diophantine approximationoriginal source · Hillel Furstenberg · Mathematische Systeme Theorie · 1967 · DOI 10.1007/BF02392240 · accessed Aug 14, 2026
  2. 2
    Formulations of Furstenberg’s ×2 ×3 conjecture in complex analysis and operator algebraspeer reviewed result · Peter Burton, Jane Panangaden · Annals of Functional Analysis / Springer · 2026 · ARXIV 2410.22701 · DOI 10.1007/s43034-026-00512-1 · accessed Aug 14, 2026

Important qualifications

  • Selective primary-source status pass; not an exhaustive survey of entropy-rigidity and approximation results.
  • An unreviewed proof claim was not treated as status-changing evidence because a current peer-reviewed source still identifies the conjecture as open.

Continue exploring

Compare another research frontier

See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.

Explore all research workspaces

Expanded visual

Open original image