The source’s p=137 example has 47 composite candidates in the full linear window, including 42 that survive through 274 and are pairwise coprime. This is a counterexample to that inference, not to Fortune’s conjecture. A larger-window or original-minimality argument using additional arithmetic may still work; it must distinguish proper factors from prime values.
Route status · Narrowed routePrimorials and prime-producing offsets
Fortune’s conjecture
Collaboration betaAfter multiplying the first n ordinary primes, find the first offset greater than one that makes another prime. Must that offset always be prime? The packet develops arithmetic and sieve reductions but leaves the conjecture open.

Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
Let enumerate all ordinary primes. For each , put and
Fortune’s conjecture asserts
The offset is excluded even when is prime. The source reports no proof or counterexample to this full statement.
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on Fortune’s conjecture stands
Selected route highlights from the mathematical source. This is not yet a complete mathematical inventory.
For , next prime , , , , and , prime offsets give the exact screen . Positivity is sufficient for the target, with no converse established. Separately, the original conjecture is equivalent to every successful composite offset having an earlier successful prime offset.
Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteWork mapped so far
Fortune’s conjecture in numbers
- Argument development
- 784 · 72%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 82 · 7%
- Computational analysis
- 74 · 7%
- Open obligations
- 58 · 5%
- Definitions and setup
- 98 · 9%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Prove an actual prime-producing lower bound at every sufficiently large ordinary primorial, with an explicit account of any initial range left outside the asymptotic theorem.
Suggested move: Formulate a cofactor or prime-value estimate that excludes composite survivors, including candidates whose proper factors are unique to them. Show why it reaches the exact prime screen rather than merely another polynomial large-factor cutoff.
What would count as progress
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
Explored alternatives
Other routes
The source’s p=137 example has 47 composite candidates in the full linear window, including 42 that survive through 274 and are pairwise coprime. This is a counterexample to that inference, not to Fortune’s conjecture. A larger-window or original-minimality argument using additional arithmetic may still work; it must distinguish proper factors from prime values.
Route status · Narrowed routeAt , the available prime-base supply exceeds the candidate count and even is of order , outside the required height range. A new cofactor estimate or the exact minimality route could bypass this failure. Improving the early-sieve numerical constant alone does not supply that information.
Route status · Narrowed routeMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
For each primorial P, let m be the least integer greater than one for which P + m is prime. The assertion that every such m is prime remains open.
[1]What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
Computational resultAn OEIS comment by Brock Falfas reports that the first 4,600 Fortunate numbers are prime; this is a finite reported check.[2]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
The glossary also records the different conjecture formed from the gap to the greatest prime below P - 1. It does not replace the least positive offset target.
[1]Formal and computational footholds
Existing statements, libraries, computations, and datasets that can shorten the next serious attempt.
- formal statement · statement onlyFortuneConjecture in Fortune.Defs
The Lean file defines the least offset with m > 1 and states the prime-offset assertion for positive primorial indices. This inspection establishes a statement resource, not a proof or a checked build.
[3] - dataset · source linked; not reproduced by ProofAtlasOEIS Fortunate-number data
The sequence entry provides finite terms and a linked table; the linked data were not downloaded or independently recomputed.
[2]
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.
- theorem candidate
1 of 9 1 - reduction
3 of 9 3 - lemma
3 of 9 3 - equivalence
1 of 9 1 - computational claim
1 of 9 1
Current research mapThe conjecture, retained reductions, explored limitations, and open questions represented in this overview.25 displayed rows · 2 routes included
- retained route statementIs the first successful offset after a primorial always prime?
- retained route statementCurrent reductionintermediate
- retained route statementClosing targetintermediate
- retained route statementA strict quadratic window is sufficientintermediate
- retained route statementMinimality beyond the short windowintermediate
- retained route statementMany large factors, with primality still missingintermediate
- retained route statementA positive early-sieve fractionintermediate
- retained route statementA signed late-elimination condition remains openintermediate
- retained route statementThe p=137 linear window blocks a shortcutintermediate
- Recorded relationshipThe source reports this as a route toward the conjecture; missing or unaudited premises remain and the reduction does not itself prove the target.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- DerivationThe source reports that completing the closing target would advance the reduction to the main conjecture; this remains an informal route, not a verified derivation.proposed
- Useful failureRoughness and pairwise coprimality in a linear windowreported failure
- Useful failureReplacing a polynomial factor cutoff by the primality thresholdreported failure
- Research targetProve an actual prime-producing lower bound at every sufficiently large ordinary primorial, with an explicit account of any initial range left outside the asymptotic theorem.open
- Research targetProve that every successful composite offset has an earlier successful prime offset without assuming the stronger quadratic window.open
- Research targetEstablish the actual signed first-elimination estimate in the eventual regime , or supply another independently estimated margin implying .open
- ComputationThe source reports complete factorizations for 1,938 candidates in the ten rows p=13,17,19,23,29,31,37,41,43,47, with 5,657 recursive prime-certificate nodes. It separately reports exact compositeness witnesses for all 47 candidates in the p=137 linear window. These attachments were not rerun here.These finite records cover specified rows and examples only. At p=137, all 47 prime offsets in (137,411] give composite values; 42 survive the cutoff 274 and are pairwise coprime. This refutes a linear-window inference, while the relevant composite-offset threshold is 139²=19321. · reported unreproduced
- Narrowed routeRoughness and pairwise coprimality in a linear windowThe source’s p=137 example has 47 composite candidates in the full linear window, including 42 that survive through 274 and are pairwise coprime. This is a counterexample to that inference, not to Fortune’s conjecture. A larger-window or original-minimality argument using additional arithmetic may still work; it must distinguish proper factors from prime values.
- Narrowed routeReplacing a polynomial factor cutoff by the primality thresholdAt , the available prime-base supply exceeds the candidate count and even is of order , outside the required height range. A new cofactor estimate or the exact minimality route could bypass this failure. Improving the early-sieve numerical constant alone does not supply that information.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
2 approaches have already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
Fortune’s conjecture · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
After multiplying the first n ordinary primes, find the first offset greater than one that makes another prime. Must that offset always be prime? The current work develops arithmetic and sieve reductions but leaves the conjecture open.
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references3 cited works · next context review by Dec 7, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Sep 7, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1The Prime Glossary: Fortunate numberauthoritative webpage · Prime Pages · accessed Sep 7, 2026
- 2A005235 — Fortunate numberssoftware or dataset · The OEIS Foundation Inc. · OEIS A005235 · accessed Sep 7, 2026
- 3Fortune.Defs — least Fortunate offsets and conjecture statementformalization · accessed Sep 7, 2026
Important qualifications
- The original proposal date and original publication were not established in this bounded search.
- Finite computations and public Lean statements were inspected as external metadata; no program, theorem build, or proof audit was run.
- This private draft grants no mathematical acceptance, rights, authorship, contributor credit, or publication authority.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces