Primorials and prime-producing offsets

Fortune’s conjecture

Collaboration beta

After multiplying the first n ordinary primes, find the first offset greater than one that makes another prime. Must that offset always be prime? The packet develops arithmetic and sieve reductions but leaves the conjecture open.

Pn=∏j=1npj,Fn=min{m∈ℤ:m>1, Pn+mis prime};Fnprime for everyn≥1.
Known results and sources
Illustration: A primorial 30 and offsets 2 through 7 distinguish the first prime sum 37 from the prime offset 7.
Illustration: A worked example scans offsets above 1 from P = 30, reaching the prime 37 at offset 7.

Research problem

Exact mathematical statement

Let p1=2<p2=3<⋯p_1=2<p_2=3<\cdots enumerate all ordinary primes. For each n≥1n\ge1, put Pn=∏j=1npjP_n=\prod_{j=1}^{n}p_j and

Fn=min{m∈ℤ:m>1, Pn+mis prime}.F_n=\min\{m\in\mathbb Z:m>1,\ P_n+m\text{ is prime}\}.

Fortune’s conjecture asserts

Fnis prime for everyn≥1.F_n\text{ is prime for every }n\ge1.

The offset m=1m=1 is excluded even when Pn+1P_n+1 is prime. The source reports no proof or counterexample to this full statement.

Problem infographic

Problem at a glance

Illustration: The exact m greater than one rule is explained with P = 30, composite sums 32 through 36, and the first allowed prime sum 37.
Illustration: Primality of the sum selects the first allowed offset. The open conjecture asks whether the selected offset is always prime.

Current mathematical picture

Where work on Fortune’s conjecture stands

Open conjecture

Selected route highlights from the mathematical source. This is not yet a complete mathematical inventory.

Useful failureRoughness and pairwise coprimality in a linear window

The source’s p=137 example has 47 composite candidates in the full linear window, including 42 that survive through 274 and are pairwise coprime. This is a counterexample to that inference, not to Fortune’s conjecture. A larger-window or original-minimality argument using additional arithmetic may still work; it must distinguish proper factors from prime values.

Route status · Narrowed route
Main reductionCurrent reduction

For p=pnp=p_n, next prime q=pn+1q=p_{n+1}, P=PnP=P_n, H=q2-1H=q^2-1, X=P+HX=P+H, and L=XL=\sqrt X, prime offsets p<r≤Hp<r\le H give the exact screen Tp=Φp(L)T_p=\Phi_p(L). Positivity is sufficient for the target, with no converse established. Separately, the original conjecture is equivalent to every successful composite offset having an earlier successful prime offset.

Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Priority open bridgeProve an actual prime-producing lower bound at every sufficiently large ordinary primorial, with an explicit account of any initial range left outside the asymptotic theorem.Task status · Ready to work on

Work mapped so far

Fortune’s conjecture in numbers

1.1kretained lines of mathematical investigation1,096 in the current working snapshot
Argument development
784 · 72%
Explored or eliminated routes
82 · 7%
Computational analysis
74 · 7%
Open obligations
58 · 5%
Definitions and setup
98 · 9%
9selected mapped statements2routes investigated3open questions3contribution-ready tasks
How this is measured

This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.

Argument map and routes

How the current approaches connect

Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.

Visible working map

Research route map

14 selected steps

Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.

14 selected steps

Scroll horizontally to explore the route

Working route overview for Fortune’s conjectureA selected map of recorded claims, active routes, useful failures, open questions, and their explicit relationships. Search, filter, zoom, or pan within this page.Is the first successful offset after a primorial always prime? — Depends on missing premiseIs the first successfuloffset after a primorialalways…A signed late-elimination condition remains open — Depends on missing premiseA signed late-eliminationcondition remains openA strict quadratic window is sufficient — Depends on missing premiseA strict quadratic window issufficientCurrent reduction — Depends on missing premiseCurrent reductionMinimality beyond the short window — Depends on missing premiseMinimality beyond the shortwindowA positive early-sieve fraction — Depends on missing premiseA positive early-sievefractionClosing target — Depends on missing premiseClosing targetMany large factors, with primality still missing — Depends on missing premiseMany large factors, withprimality still missingThe p=137 linear window blocks a shortcut — Depends on missing premiseThe p=137 linear windowblocks a shortcutRoughness and pairwise coprimality in a linear window — stoppedRoughness and pairwisecoprimality in a linearwindowReplacing a polynomial factor cutoff by the primality threshold — stoppedReplacing a polynomialfactor cutoff by theprimality…Prove an actual prime-producing lower bound at every sufficiently large ordinary primorial, with an explicit account of any initial range left outside the asymptotic theorem. — OpenProve an actualprime-producing lower boundat…Prove that every successful composite offset has an earlier successful prime offset without assuming the stronger quadratic window. — OpenProve that every successfulcomposite offset has anearlier…Establish the actual signed first-elimination estimate E_2(L)≤7S_0/8 in the eventual regime 1<y<L, or supply another independently estimated margin implying T_p>0. — OpenEstablish the actual signedfirst-elimination estimateE_2(L)≤7S_0/8…
Working claimActive routeOpen, active, or blocked questionUseful failure

Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.

Explored alternatives

Other routes

2 recorded
Narrowed routeRoughness and pairwise coprimality in a linear window

The source’s p=137 example has 47 composite candidates in the full linear window, including 42 that survive through 274 and are pairwise coprime. This is a counterexample to that inference, not to Fortune’s conjecture. A larger-window or original-minimality argument using additional arithmetic may still work; it must distinguish proper factors from prime values.

Route status · Narrowed route
Narrowed routeReplacing a polynomial factor cutoff by the primality threshold

At X/q=exp((1+o(1))p)/pX/q=\exp((1+o(1))p)/p, the available prime-base supply exceeds the candidate count and even T1T_1 is of order 1/(plogp)1/(p\log p), outside the required height range. A new cofactor estimate or the exact minimality route could bypass this failure. Improving the early-sieve numerical constant alone does not supply that information.

Route status · Narrowed route

More ways to contribute

Open questions

Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.

3 featured tasks
01
Prove an actual prime-producing lower bound at every sufficiently large ordinary primorial, with an explicit account of any initial range left outside the asymptotic theorem.Suggested move: Formulate a cofactor or prime-value estimate that excludes composite survivors, including candidates whose proper factors are unique to them. Show why it reaches the exact prime screen rather than merely another polynomial large-factor cutoff.
Ready to work on
02
Prove that every successful composite offset has an earlier successful prime offset without assuming the stronger quadratic window.Suggested move: Specify a well-founded decreasing quantity for a proposed descent and prove that each branch preserves a success or produces an earlier one. Test the argument against the source’s successful composite offsets; descent to one of their factors is invalid.
Ready to work on
03
Establish the actual signed first-elimination estimate E2(L)≤7S0/8E_2(L)\le7S_0/8 in the eventual regime 1<y<L1<y<L, or supply another independently estimated margin implying Tp>0T_p>0.Suggested move: Estimate how the early survivors occupy later residue classes, including isolated cofactor intervals shorter than one. Retain the signed compensation between stages and do not apply a prime-progression bound to a sifted subset by changing its interval length.
Ready to work on

Sourced mathematical context

The known mathematical landscape

Context collected Sep 7, 2026
Current statusOpen conjecture

For each primorial P, let m be the least integer greater than one for which P + m is prime. The assertion that every such m is prime remains open.

[1]
External progress

What the literature has established

Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.

  1. Computational resultAn OEIS comment by Brock Falfas reports that the first 4,600 Fortunate numbers are prime; this is a finite reported check.[2]
3 cited sources1 related results or reductionsReferences

Mathematical neighborhood

Related results and reusable starting points

Current focusFortune's conjecture
Related problemLess-fortunate numbers

The glossary also records the different conjecture formed from the gap to the greatest prime below P - 1. It does not replace the least positive offset target.

[1]

Formal and computational footholds

Existing statements, libraries, computations, and datasets that can shorten the next serious attempt.

  • formal statement · statement onlyFortuneConjecture in Fortune.Defs

    The Lean file defines the least offset with m > 1 and states the prime-offset assertion for positive primorial indices. This inspection establishes a statement resource, not a proof or a checked build.

    [3]
  • dataset · source linked; not reproduced by ProofAtlasOEIS Fortunate-number data

    The sequence entry provides finite terms and a linked table; the linked data were not downloaded or independently recomputed.

    [2]

Detailed research inventory

Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map

This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.

7 standing statements2 proposed statements3 open questions2 narrowed routes
Statements by mathematical role9 selected mapped statements
  • theorem candidate1 of 91
  • reduction3 of 93
  • lemma3 of 93
  • equivalence1 of 91
  • computational claim1 of 91
Selected mathematical clusters1 mathematical clusters
Current research mapThe conjecture, retained reductions, explored limitations, and open questions represented in this overview.25 displayed rows · 2 routes included
  • retained route statementIs the first successful offset after a primorial always prime?
  • retained route statementCurrent reductionintermediate
  • retained route statementClosing targetintermediate
  • retained route statementA strict quadratic window is sufficientintermediate
  • retained route statementMinimality beyond the short windowintermediate
  • retained route statementMany large factors, with primality still missingintermediate
  • retained route statementA positive early-sieve fractionintermediate
  • retained route statementA signed late-elimination condition remains openintermediate
  • retained route statementThe p=137 linear window blocks a shortcutintermediate
  • Recorded relationshipThe source reports this as a route toward the conjecture; missing or unaudited premises remain and the reduction does not itself prove the target.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • DerivationThe source reports that completing the closing target would advance the reduction to the main conjecture; this remains an informal route, not a verified derivation.proposed
  • Useful failureRoughness and pairwise coprimality in a linear windowreported failure
  • Useful failureReplacing a polynomial factor cutoff by the primality thresholdreported failure
  • Research targetProve an actual prime-producing lower bound at every sufficiently large ordinary primorial, with an explicit account of any initial range left outside the asymptotic theorem.open
  • Research targetProve that every successful composite offset has an earlier successful prime offset without assuming the stronger quadratic window.open
  • Research targetEstablish the actual signed first-elimination estimate E2(L)≤7S0/8E_2(L)\le7S_0/8 in the eventual regime 1<y<L1<y<L, or supply another independently estimated margin implying Tp>0T_p>0.open
  • ComputationThe source reports complete factorizations for 1,938 candidates in the ten rows p=13,17,19,23,29,31,37,41,43,47, with 5,657 recursive prime-certificate nodes. It separately reports exact compositeness witnesses for all 47 candidates in the p=137 linear window. These attachments were not rerun here.These finite records cover specified rows and examples only. At p=137, all 47 prime offsets in (137,411] give composite values; 42 survive the cutoff 274 and are pairwise coprime. This refutes a linear-window inference, while the relevant composite-offset threshold is 139²=19321. · reported unreproduced
  • Narrowed routeRoughness and pairwise coprimality in a linear windowThe source’s p=137 example has 47 composite candidates in the full linear window, including 42 that survive through 274 and are pairwise coprime. This is a counterexample to that inference, not to Fortune’s conjecture. A larger-window or original-minimality argument using additional arithmetic may still work; it must distinguish proper factors from prime values.
  • Narrowed routeReplacing a polynomial factor cutoff by the primality thresholdAt X/q=exp((1+o(1))p)/pX/q=\exp((1+o(1))p)/p, the available prime-base supply exceeds the candidate count and even T1T_1 is of order 1/(plogp)1/(p\log p), outside the required height range. A new cofactor estimate or the exact minimality route could bypass this failure. Improving the early-sieve numerical constant alone does not supply that information.
How to interpret these counts

A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.

Research outlook

Conditions that would advance the current route

Priority open bridgeProve an actual prime-producing lower bound at every sufficiently large ordinary primorial, with an explicit account of any initial range left outside the asymptotic theorem.

2 approaches have already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.

Evidence needed nextConcrete conditions for progress

A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.

  • Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
  • Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.

Continue the mathematics

Contribute

ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.

Read-only beta · actions unavailable
Prepared starting pointProve an actual prime-producing lower bound at every sufficiently large ordinary primorial, with an explicit account of any initial range left outside the asymptotic theorem.

Fortune’s conjecture · ready to start

Mathematical updatesFollow this problem

Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.

Research contextPrepared context for any AI agent

After multiplying the first n ordinary primes, find the first offset greater than one that makes another prime. Must that offset always be prime? The current work develops arithmetic and sieve reductions but leaves the conjecture open.

  • Exact question and boundaries
  • Current routes and known obstacles
  • What a useful result should report
Return mathematical workReturn what you or your agent found

A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.

Proof attempt or partial resultSupporting notes or data
Hosted agentRun this task with a hosted agent

A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.

Your own AI agentConnect an outside research agent

Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.

Sources and references3 cited works · next context review by Dec 7, 2026

The mathematical context was checked on Sep 7, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.

  1. 1
    The Prime Glossary: Fortunate numberauthoritative webpage · Prime Pages · accessed Sep 7, 2026
  2. 2
    A005235 — Fortunate numberssoftware or dataset · The OEIS Foundation Inc. · OEIS A005235 · accessed Sep 7, 2026
  3. 3

Important qualifications

  • The original proposal date and original publication were not established in this bounded search.
  • Finite computations and public Lean statements were inspected as external metadata; no program, theorem build, or proof audit was run.
  • This private draft grants no mathematical acceptance, rights, authorship, contributor credit, or publication authority.

Continue exploring

Compare another research frontier

See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.

Explore all research workspaces

Expanded visual

Open original image