The following claim is rejected or insufficient in the recorded route: Anti-invariant chains or a complementary sign symmetry should kill the assembly identity carried by the fixed transfer. The source reaches finite algebraic generation and a global ordered coset-family model, but it has only finite support, not the continuous control and Or-spectrum factorization needed to annihilate the assembly obstruction. The arbitrary-coefficient generator theorem and exact Mackey…
Route status · Narrowed routeGeometric topology · algebraic K-theory · L-theory · assembly maps
Farrell–Jones Conjecture
Collaboration betaDo virtually cyclic subgroups contain enough information to reconstruct the algebraic K- and L-theory of every group through the Farrell–Jones assembly map?

Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
Let be any group and let be a small additive -category. The coefficient algebraic -theoretic Farrell–Jones conjecture asserts that, for every , the assembly map
is an isomorphism. If also carries an involution, the -theoretic Farrell–Jones conjecture asserts the analogous isomorphism for ultimate lower quadratic or symmetric -theory. The target here is the full coefficient statement for arbitrary groups; restrictions to regular rings, torsion-free groups, one orbit, or inverted primes are not the full conjecture. The full conjecture is not proved in this source.
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on Farrell–Jones Conjecture stands
Selected route highlights from the current work. This is not yet a complete mathematical inventory.
Conditional on metric Kan–Thurston and inheritance, a fixed finite acyclic CAT(0) seed U mapping onto A5 yields a fivefold amplified cover whose acyclic kernel is normally generated by U.
Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteWe corrected the cited passages. We clarified how the claims are connected. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchangedWork mapped so far
Farrell–Jones Conjecture in numbers
- Argument development
- 1,161 · 84%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 74 · 5%
- Computational analysis
- 1 · 0%
- Open obligations
- 37 · 3%
- Definitions and setup
- 107 · 8%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Write the global conjugacy-stable Mackey dg category with exact differential, intersection-sector, convolution-composition, coefficient, conjugation, and finite-support formulas.
Suggested move: Start from the finite complex P_U, calculate morphisms over U^lambda backslash Lambda_H slash U^mu, check triple-coset composition, and compare the resulting category with finite-propagation objects over the global ordered coset simplex.
What would count as progress
- Retain an exact proof or counterexample for the stated subproblem.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
Explored alternatives
Other routes
The following claim is rejected or insufficient in the recorded route: Anti-invariant chains or a complementary sign symmetry should kill the assembly identity carried by the fixed transfer. The source reaches finite algebraic generation and a global ordered coset-family model, but it has only finite support, not the continuous control and Or-spectrum factorization needed to annihilate the assembly obstruction. The arbitrary-coefficient generator theorem and exact Mackey…
Route status · Narrowed routeMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
The Full Farrell–Jones Conjecture is not known for all groups, and Lück's 2025 survey reports no known counterexample. It is proved for broad classes including hyperbolic groups, finite-dimensional CAT(0) groups, virtually solvable groups, the stated lattices, 3-manifold groups, S-arithmetic groups, mapping class groups, braid groups, and Coxeter groups. It remains open in general for classes including amenable groups, Out(F_n) for n ≥ 3, general Artin groups, Thompson groups, torsion-free one-relator groups, linear groups, residually finite groups, and automatic groups.
[2][3]What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
Authoritative summaryLück's survey and monograph consolidated the Full formulation, proved classes, inheritance properties, applications, and significant classes that remain open.[2][3] Peer reviewedBartels and Bestvina proved the Farrell–Jones conjecture for mapping class groups.[8] Peer reviewedWegner proved the K- and L-theoretic Farrell–Jones conjecture with coefficients in additive categories for virtually solvable groups.[7] Peer reviewedThe hyperbolic and finite-dimensional CAT(0) programs yielded topological rigidity via the K- and L-theoretic conjectures; Lück's current status theorem lists both as Full Farrell–Jones classes.[6][2]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
The coefficient formulation is stronger than the original ring-coefficient statement. Lück's Full formulation adds K-, L-, higher-categorical, and finite-wreath-product stability and implies the recorded literature variants.
[4][2]The conjecture asserts bijectivity of assembly maps from equivariant homology over the family of virtually cyclic subgroups to algebraic K- or L-theory of the group ring or coefficient category.
[2]Using subgroup and directed-colimit inheritance, the Full conjecture holds for all groups if and only if it holds for one universal finitely presented group. This is a one-group reduction, not a finite computation.
[2]Representative verified classes include hyperbolic groups, finite-dimensional CAT(0) groups, virtually solvable groups, and mapping class groups; the current survey lists further substantial classes.
[5][6]The Full conjecture implies major consequences involving the Borel and Novikov conjectures, Whitehead-group vanishing for torsion-free groups, and conjectures of Bass, Kaplansky, and Serre.
[2][3]Baum–Connes is a neighboring assembly conjecture in topological K-theory of reduced group C*-algebras; it is not the Farrell–Jones statement.
[3]Formalization opportunities
Lean work can make these reusable foundations precise without being presented as a proof of the core problem.
- Formalization targetFormal nonconnective algebraic K-theory and algebraic L-theory at the spectrum and coefficient-category level.
- Formalization targetFormal equivariant homology theories and classifying spaces for families of subgroups.
- Formalization targetFormal construction and functoriality of the Farrell–Jones assembly maps.
- Formalization targetFormal controlled algebra and topology, flow spaces, transfers, and the geometric group-theory inputs for the known classes.
Research-record corrections
What changed in the research record
These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.
- theorem candidate
1 of 9 1 - reduction
5 of 9 5 - lemma
3 of 9 3
Statements and reductionsClaims, implications, and derivations in the current map.17 displayed rows
- retained route statementVirtually cyclic subgroup data should recover all algebraic K- and L-theory of the group through assembly.
- retained route statementCurrent reductionintermediate
- retained route statementClosing targetintermediate
- retained route statementConditional acyclic coverintermediate
- retained route statementFivefold normal-seed coverintermediate
- retained route statementNonuniform seed-width boundintermediate
- retained route statementRing-level relative generatorintermediate
- retained route statementGlobal ordered coset modelintermediate
- retained route statementNSCM-Or factorization gateintermediate
- Recorded relationshipThe source material reports this as a route toward the conjecture; missing or unaudited premises remain and the reduction does not itself prove the target.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipthis work-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipthis work-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipthis work-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipthis work-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipthis work-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipthis work-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- DerivationThe current work reports that completing the closing target would advance the reduction to the main conjecture; this remains an informal route, not a verified derivation.proposed
Open questionsSpecific obligations that remain open in the current routes.3 displayed rows
- Research targetVerify the external metric Kan–Thurston, Farrell–Jones inheritance, Tor-unital localization, and finite-superperfect-seed inputs, and complete the arbitrary-coefficient/ringoid version of the normal-seed generator theorem.in progress reported
- Research targetWrite the global conjugacy-stable Mackey dg category with exact differential, intersection-sector, convolution-composition, coefficient, conjugation, and finite-support formulas.open
- Research targetProve NSCM-Or as a continuous family-controlled factorization of the full relative Or-spectrum endomorphism, then construct the duality-preserving NSCM-L refinement.open
Explored routes and evidenceChallenges, computations, and approaches that have already narrowed the search.3 displayed rows · 1 route included
- Useful failureSource-reported limitationreported failure
- ComputationThe source proposes exact finite matrices for the seed contraction and small Mackey sectors as future test evidence, but contains no executed computational result needed for the current status.No code or attachment was executed during intake. Conditional and internal labels are preserved as source-reported research standing and do not constitute independent theorem verification. · reported unreproduced
- Narrowed routeSource-reported limitationThe following claim is rejected or insufficient in the recorded route: Anti-invariant chains or a complementary sign symmetry should kill the assembly identity carried by the fixed transfer. The source reaches finite algebraic generation and a global ordered coset-family model, but it has only finite support, not the continuous control and Or-spectrum factorization needed to annihilate the assembly obstruction. The arbitrary-coefficient generator theorem and exact Mackey composition are also unfinished, and L-theory needs a duality-preserving controlled null-cobordism.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
1 approach has already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
Farrell–Jones Conjecture · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
Do virtually cyclic subgroups contain enough information to reconstruct the algebraic K- and L-theory of every group through the Farrell–Jones assembly map?
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references8 cited works · next context review by Nov 7, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Aug 7, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1Isomorphism conjectures in algebraic K-theoryoriginal source · F. Thomas Farrell, Lowell E. Jones · Journal of the American Mathematical Society · 1993 · DOI 10.1090/S0894-0347-1993-1179537-0 · MR 1179537 · accessed Aug 7, 2026
- 2Survey on the Farrell-Jones Conjecturesurvey or monograph · Wolfgang Lück · arXiv · 2025 preprint · ARXIV 2507.11337 · accessed Aug 7, 2026
- 3Isomorphism Conjectures in K- and L-Theorysurvey or monograph · Wolfgang Lück · Springer Cham · 2025 · DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-98976-6 · accessed Aug 7, 2026
- 4Coefficients for the Farrell–Jones Conjecturepeer reviewed result · Arthur Bartels, Holger Reich · Advances in Mathematics · 2007 · ARXIV math/0510602 · DOI 10.1016/j.aim.2006.05.005 · accessed Aug 7, 2026
- 5The K-theoretic Farrell–Jones conjecture for hyperbolic groupspeer reviewed result · Arthur Bartels, Wolfgang Lück, Holger Reich · Inventiones Mathematicae · 2008 · ARXIV math/0701434 · DOI 10.1007/s00222-007-0093-7 · accessed Aug 7, 2026
- 6The Borel Conjecture for hyperbolic and CAT(0)-groupspeer reviewed result · Arthur Bartels, Wolfgang Lück · Annals of Mathematics · 2012 · DOI 10.4007/annals.2012.175.2.5 · MR 2993750 · accessed Aug 7, 2026
- 7The Farrell–Jones conjecture for virtually solvable groupspeer reviewed result · Christian Wegner · Journal of Topology · 2015 · DOI 10.1112/jtopol/jtv026 · accessed Aug 7, 2026
- 8The Farrell–Jones Conjecture for mapping class groupspeer reviewed result · Arthur Bartels, Mladen Bestvina · Inventiones Mathematicae · 2019 · ARXIV 1606.02844 · DOI 10.1007/s00222-018-0834-9 · accessed Aug 7, 2026
Important qualifications
- Farrell–Jones has original, fibered, coefficient, K-theoretic, L-theoretic, higher-categorical, wreath-product-stable, and Full formulations; the record preserves these scopes rather than treating them as one unchanged sentence.
- The known-class and open-class audit is based chiefly on Wolfgang Lück's July 2025 survey, checked on 2026-08-07; later class results would require an event-driven refresh.
- No dedicated proof-assistant formalization, solver certificate, dataset, or independently reproduced computation for the conjecture was verified in the scoped search. Empty lists do not establish nonexistence.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces