Current primary route: promote the packet-split chain to moving tails, then compare lifetime-disjoint scales for recurrent kappa, a common descendant, an independent cube direction, or typed first-use excess.
Route status · Active routeNumber theory · additive bases · representation functions
Erdős–Turán Additive-Basis Conjecture
Collaboration betaIf a set of nonnegative integers represents every sufficiently large integer as a sum of two of its elements, must some integers have arbitrarily many ordered representations?

Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
For a set , let the ordered representation function be
The conjecture says that
In words, an asymptotic basis of order two cannot have a uniformly bounded ordered representation function. The current source reports a strong one-scale packet-split reduction, but it has not promoted that chain uniformly to moving tails or converted its typed correlation into a contradiction. The conjecture remains open, and ProofAtlas has not reproduced the submitted computations or upgraded the source's workstream labels to independently checked evidence.
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on Erdős–Turán Additive-Basis Conjecture stands
The cumulative v12 source keeps the Erdős–Turán conjecture open. Its current primary route is ET-R12 packet-split renewal; ET-R7 remains an active inherited interface within the retained ET-C0 content split, not the primary route.
The source retains the route from translated-prefix recurrence through coherent cap-five near-bases to the Abel hole contradiction, while preferring the stronger finite cap-three cube endpoint whenever separated low-loss switches can be extracted.
Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompletePromote ET-AFF7--ET-PKT7 uniformly from the normalized exact basis to moving tails, preserving ordinary-hole deletion, positivity, output ranges, typed thresholds, and exact lifetimes.
Task status · Ready to work onWe updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchangedWork mapped so far
Erdős–Turán Additive-Basis Conjecture in numbers
- Argument development
- 3,447 · 83%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 82 · 2%
- Computational analysis
- 96 · 2%
- Open obligations
- 303 · 7%
- Definitions and setup
- 206 · 5%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Moving-tail promotion of the v12 packet-split chain
Promote ET-AFF7--ET-PKT7 uniformly from the normalized exact basis to moving tails, preserving ordinary-hole deletion, positivity, output ranges, typed thresholds, and exact lifetimes.
Suggested move: Prove the moving-tail analogue of ET-AFF7 and audit forward and backward packet holes through complete ET-MT2 lifetime intervals.
What would count as progress
- Uniform constants for all M<=theta X and explicit deletion of ordinary tail holes before coverage.
- Every packet, rank, color, diagonal deletion, output range, and lifetime remains in the typed signature.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
Current primary route: promote the packet-split chain to moving tails, then compare lifetime-disjoint scales for recurrent kappa, a common descendant, an independent cube direction, or typed first-use excess.
Route status · Active routeRetained active inherited interface: renew outermost-star and product-core structure across separated scales. In v12 this remains supporting work within the inherited ET-C0 content split; it is not the current primary route.
Route status · Active route15.2 Route ET-R8-MODULAR-SYNC — prime descendants meet stars and transports Use ET-A9 in the same moving tails as ET-MT3 and ET-GRID1. Prime separation prevents one localized gap from serving too many large moduli. Seek a double-counting theorem over (modulus, star edge, shift, grid cell, transport) that forces a recurrent gap or many independent increments. This route may eliminate the pinned matching by imposing arithmetic structure on its gap set.
15.3 Route ET-R9-FIRSTUSE — exact typed-witness first use Define first use only after quotienting the exact ET-MT2 lifetime interval of a fully typed physical witness. ET-CAN3 gives the exact excess term for repeated witnesses. Prove bounded separated-scale reuse unless a recurrent lower-cap object appears, or attach every new use to a new independent increment. Shared prefixes and arbitrary fragment restrictions require no additional theorem.
15.4 Route ET-R4-NEARBASIS — lower-cap finite recurrence Use the cap-halving core to produce a finite lower-cap near-basis and then a coherent Abel limit. ET-T18C and ET-TERM1 are the endpoints. The missing quantitative requirement is a hole error small enough relative to sqrt W and a diameter-matched target interval.
15.5 Route ET-R3-CAPTURE — terminal interval compression Develop a density increment or interval-selection theorem for C+C, informed by the pinned-star exclusion sets. Repeatedly restrict to a subinterval where represented-target density increases while preserving coordinate mass and cap. Terminate at ET-TERM1 or pay ET-T25’s H,O,C,T,E currency.
15.6 Route ET-R1-SCI / ET-R6-SPECTRAL-CAPTURE — quantitative diagonal route Retain ET-T29 to relate a bad short-difference window to a mesoscopic packet. ET-S2 closes interior certification. The remaining analytic inverse theorem should correlate one common shift or modular descendant with the packet, or directly yield ET-T4D. This is the strongest planned route change if structural renewal stalls.
15.7 Route ET-R2-IDEM — direct zero-one square deficit Exploit simultaneously that F has zero-one coefficients, F^2 has bounded nonnegative coefficients, support is one-sided, and the Fejér functional is large. Generic norm and sign arguments are exhausted; a successful proof needs a new idempotent or uncertainty principle adapted to bounded convolution coefficients. ---
Explored alternatives
Other routes
The exact mixed-radix model permits floor(log2 K) independent additive switches while keeping cap 2^h, so repeated views of the same product structure are not renewed mass. Define an annular charged-mass functional that counts only new points, differences, or residual-capacity slots and survives the mixed-radix stress test.
Route status · Useful but insufficientThe source states that separate averaged inequalities add no new charge because the relevant mass must be placed on common outputs. Couple scales or moduli on one nested output family, or pursue the independent idempotent Fejér deficit route at the generic Cauchy scale.
Route status · Useful but insufficientUse globally synchronized cap descent and exact histories to obtain a low-loss cube, a terminal-family obstruction, exhausted canonical signatures, or enough lost mass for ET-T4D; common-output and no-duplicate capture remain missing.
Route status · Useful but insufficientBrowse 4 more explored routes
First remove the zero-extension boundary contribution, then localize genuine interior variation into bounded-multiplicity terminal history or obtain the ET-T29D gap; no current theorem performs that passage.
Route status · Useful but insufficientUse the exact Fejér functional and ET-T29 profile together with the 0–1, bounded-coefficient, eventual-coverage, one-sided, positive-definite, and density constraints to force the ET-T29D mesoscopic energy gap without asserting full Fourier-tail compactness.
Route status · Useful but insufficientExtract separated low-loss shifts for the ET-T23 finite cube endpoint, or coherently convergent cap-five near-bases for ET-T18C, from repeated near-direct residual-state reuse; actual-shift extraction and cumulative coordinate-loss control remain missing.
Route status · Useful but insufficientCombine near-minimal ET-T20C high-level mass with several growing moduli and ET-T8/T9 predictor exclusions to seek incompatible local integrality constraints; no cross-modulus coupling theorem is currently known.
Route status · Useful but insufficientRoute statements and reductions
Statements the next route can inspect and build on
The v8 source reduces completion to a separated-scale theorem that turns ET-MT3 pinned stars, ET-TR1 cap-halving cores, ET-A9 modular descendants, and ET-CAN3/ET-MT2 first-use accounting into near coverage, a fixed descendant, a forbidden cube, a superlinear charge, or ET-T4D.
Source-reported route statementProve a finite-depth separated-scale alternative from recurrent outermost stars and occasional product cores that forces a lower-cap near-cover, a recurrent gap, independent cube increments, excessive holes or density migration, or excessive first-use currency after exact lifetime reuse is quotiented.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteThe source-reported v12 chain reduces the normalized exact-basis complete-packet branch at one scale to a growing cap-halved descendant or genuinely typed two-coordinate transport, while leaving moving-tail promotion, recurrence, inherited coverage, and terminal conversion open.
Source-reported route statementCompletion still requires a lifetime-correct moving-tail promotion, cross-scale control of scale-local packets and shifts, correlation rigidity, descendant coverage, independent-switch composition, exact first-use excess, terminal coverage, or ET-T4D.
Source-reported route statementFor the normalized exact basis A, the source reports linearly many missing centers with square-root matched punctured additive rectangles and rare-smooth overlapping affine sheets, subject to the installed weighted-loss and regularization corrections.
Source-reported route statementIn the complete-packet branch at one fixed scale, the source reports factor-lambda tensorized cap compression, bilateral packet holes, universal anti-lifts, and elimination of the exact-level-four identity escape.
Source-reported route statementAt one fixed scale, the source reduces the complete-packet branch to a growing cap-halved descendant or genuinely nonidentity two-coordinate transports with natural-scale off-axis autocorrelation; this is not a contradiction.
Source-reported route statementMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
Promote ET-AFF7--ET-PKT7 uniformly from the normalized exact basis to moving tails, preserving ordinary-hole deletion, positivity, output ranges, typed thresholds, and exact lifetimes.
Suggested move: Prove the moving-tail analogue of ET-AFF7 and audit forward and backward packet holes through complete ET-MT2 lifetime intervals.Work Order 1 — outermost-star separated-scale renewal Fix geometrically separated scales and choose the unconditional ET-MT3 star in each fresh tail. Record for every star: • physical anchor and partner set; • individual gaps and target level; • anti-translate exclusion set Y+D_a; • first and last admissible thresholds from ET-MT2; • canonical depth-one typed witness; • prime divisors in the ET-A9 range, when present. Prove a trichotomy: popular fixed gap, two independent recurrent gaps, or an exclusion/first-use charge that is superlinear after lifetime quotienting. The first concrete subproblem is to bound how heavily the sets Y+D_a from separated stars can overlap under the global representation cap.
Y+D_a; • first and last admissible thresholds from ET-MT2; • canonical depth-one typed witness; • prime divisors in the ET-A9 range, when present. Prove a trichotomy: popular fixed gap, two independent recurrent gaps, or an exclusion/first-use charge that is superlinear after lifetime quotienting. The first concrete subproblem is to bound how heavily the sets Y+D_a from separated stars can overlap under the global representation cap.Work Order 2 — product-core density increment Given direct C+P subset A with r_C<=floor(K/2) and |C+C|>=delta_KW, analyze the distribution of C+C across its convex hull. Required outputs: • a subinterval with represented density increased by a fixed amount and coordinate diameter comparable to interval length; • or large outside/collision mass chargeable to ET-T25; • or a lower-cap moving-tail ambiguity estimate for a translate of C. Iterate only if the cap and direct decomposition are preserved quantitatively.
C+P subset A with r_C<=floor(K/2) and |C+C|>=delta_KW, analyze the distribution of C+C across its convex hull. Required outputs: • a subinterval with represented density increased by a fixed amount and coordinate diameter comparable to interval length; • or large outside/collision mass chargeable to ET-T25; • or a lower-cap moving-tail ambiguity estimate for a translate of C. Iterate only if the cap and direct decomposition are preserved quantitatively.Work Order 4 — exact typed-witness lifetime theorem For one fully typed witness tau, determine its exact admissible threshold interval and possible reappearance after a separated scale jump. Prove that appearances outside the lifetime interval are bounded, create a new independent increment, or imply a recurrent lower-cap state. Insert the resulting reuse bound into ET-CAN3’s exact excess term.
tau, determine its exact admissible threshold interval and possible reappearance after a separated scale jump. Prove that appearances outside the lifetime interval are bounded, create a new independent increment, or imply a recurrent lower-cap state. Insert the resulting reuse bound into ET-CAN3’s exact excess term.Work Order 3 — modular/star/transport incidence theorem On one fresh scale, combine: • >>sqrt N/log^2N prime-separated three-point descendants; • the unconditional ET-MT3 star; • >>W common shifts for a fixed grid; • the transport decomposition sigma=tau+(sigma-tau). Test whether a diffuse pinned matching can avoid all moderate modular descendants. Seek an inequality involving divisor weights of star gaps, tau, and sigma-tau that is bounded above by additive energy but forced below by ET-A8.
>>sqrt N/log^2N prime-separated three-point descendants; • the unconditional ET-MT3 star; • >>W common shifts for a fixed grid; • the transport decomposition sigma=tau+(sigma-tau). Test whether a diffuse pinned matching can avoid all moderate modular descendants. Seek an inequality involving divisor weights of star gaps, tau, and sigma-tau that is bounded above by additive energy but forced below by ET-A8.Work Order 6 — terminal compression stability Strengthen ET-TERM1 quantitatively. Determine an explicit defect threshold in terms of mixed cap L and diameter constant C. Develop a stable version allowing a bounded number of adjacent intervals or a controlled fragmented family, so a density increment need not achieve exact single-interval capture immediately.
L and diameter constant C. Develop a stable version allowing a bounded number of adjacent intervals or a controlled fragmented family, so a density increment need not achieve exact single-interval capture immediately.Work Order 7 — finite atlas of outermost stars and product cores Search bounded-cap finite sets for extremizers of the revised structural inputs. Record: • star size, rank profiles, exclusion overlap, and number of distinct gaps; • reuse across shifted tails after lifetime quotienting; • direct product cores and their sumset hull density; • modular divisors of star and transport gaps; • earliest proper cubes. The goal is a scale-independent conjectural lemma, not record prefix depths.
Suggested move: Work Order 7 — finite atlas of outermost stars and product cores Search bounded-cap finite sets for extremizers of the revised structural inputs. Record: • star size, rank profiles, exclusion overlap, and number of distinct gaps; • reuse across shifted tails after lifetime quotienting; • direct product cores and their sumset hull density; • modular divisors of star and transport gaps; • earliest proper cubes. The goal is a scale-independent conjectural lemma, not record prefix depths.Work Order 5 — star-rank and exclusion-overlap theorem Use the ordered list of alternate representations at the fixed star level lambda rather than only the first alternate. Canonize ranks across the partner set and ask whether repeated rank gaps create: • a common descendant of size Omega_K(sqrt W); • two compatible increments forming many proper cubes; • or many disjoint forbidden translates from the outermost exclusion (14.3). This is now a higher-value target than reauditing GRID1/TR1, whose quantifiers were checked in the second audit.
lambda rather than only the first alternate. Canonize ranks across the partner set and ask whether repeated rank gaps create: • a common descendant of size Omega_K(sqrt W); • two compatible increments forming many proper cubes; • or many disjoint forbidden translates from the outermost exclusion (14.3). This is now a higher-value target than reauditing GRID1/TR1, whose quantifiers were checked in the second audit.Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
The exact order-two Erdős–Turán additive-basis conjecture remains open. Nathanson supplies a peer-reviewed exact formulation and finite equivalence, the maintained Erdős Problem #28 entry currently marks the same problem open, and Pliego's recent bounded-representation construction concerns order three rather than a resolution of the order-two target.
[2][3][4]What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
PreprintPliego constructs related bounded-representation bases of order three with controlled growth; this marks progress around the broader representation problem but does not settle the order-two conjecture.[3] Peer reviewedNathanson states the exact order-two asymptotic-basis conjecture and proves an equivalent finite formulation, giving a precise reformulation rather than a resolution.[2] Historical sourceErdős and Turán posed the bounded-representation problem for additive bases in their original paper on Sidon-type questions.[1]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
Nathanson gives a finite-set formulation equivalent to the exact unbounded-representation conjecture for order-two asymptotic bases.
[2]Bounded-representation bases of order three show that phenomena for higher-order sums do not automatically resolve the order-two target.
[3]Formalization opportunities
Lean work can make these reusable foundations precise without being presented as a proof of the core problem.
- Formalization targetA statement-aligned formalization would need the ordered representation function on subsets of nonnegative integers, eventual order-two coverage, and the conclusion that the representation counts are unbounded.
- Formalization targetThe finite equivalence must remain distinct from a proof of either equivalent formulation.
- Formalization targetThe current work's multiscale renewal interface and source-reported computations are not independently reviewed external evidence.
Later mathematical changes
What changed after the initial research map
Later recorded revisions that changed the mathematics, without inventing a date or an AI attribution.
Changed the research frontierLater mathematical revision
Changed the research frontierLater mathematical revision
Changed the research frontierLater mathematical revision
The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.
Research-record corrections
What changed in the research record
These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This inventory covers all currently cataloged mathematical statements in the research notes.
- lemma
2 of 17 2 - reduction
1 of 17 1 - theorem candidate
14 of 17 14
Cumulative v12 recorded packet-split frontierThe v12 source retains the open exact target, installs eight audit bookkeeping corrections, adds one-scale many-center, packet-tensor, and typed-split interfaces, and keeps moving-tail promotion, cross-scale control, correlation rigidity, descendant coverage, and terminal conversion explicit as open.61 displayed rows · 8 routes included
- retained route statementInherited ET-R7 renewal interface remains open
- retained route statementCoherent finite-to-Abel bridge remains a valid fallbackintermediate
- retained route statementComplete packet tensorization and anti-lift
- retained route statementv12 Erdős–Turán order-two additive-basis target
- retained route statementET-MT2 exact moving-tail evolution and lifetime identities
- retained route statementGlobal coloring and lossless mixed cap descentintermediate
- retained route statementMany-center affine saturation
- retained route statementExact digital sharpness models constrain renewal
- retained route statementET-MT3 unconditional outermost pinned-star interface
- retained route statementMoving-tail packet renewal or correlation rigidity remains open
- retained route statementv12 exact-basis packet-split reduction
- retained route statementHigh representation levels have positive lower natural densityintermediate
- retained route statementET-A9 finite localization and prime-separated modular descendants
- retained route statementv8 renewal/compression reduction
- retained route statementET-TR1 transport-created cap-halving product core
- retained route statementTyped split correlation endpoint
- retained route statementET-CAN3 exact typed-witness multiplicity budget
- ComputationThe v8 package reports retained and new finite audits, exact certificates, and archive verification; all attachments were recorded as inert source bytes and were not executed, rendered, or fetched by this authoring lane.The source reports 503,030 v8 finite observations/checks and retains the 1,915,609-instance v6 core enumeration and 988,209 v7 algebraic checks without rerunning them; ProofAtlas has not reproduced or independently verified any of these suites. · reported unreproduced
- Recorded relationshipThe exact v8 quote names the source and destination interfaces in this direction; the destination remains missing and the edge does not establish the target.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThe exact v8 quote names the source and destination interfaces in this direction; the destination remains missing and the edge does not establish the target.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThe exact v8 quote names the source and destination interfaces in this direction; the destination remains missing and the edge does not establish the target.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThe exact v8 quote names the source and destination interfaces in this direction; the destination remains missing and the edge does not establish the target.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThe exact v8 quote names the source and destination interfaces in this direction; the destination remains missing and the edge does not establish the target.supports · reported by source
- Useful failureConjecture-status lookupreported failure
- Useful failureIndependent colorings for each gapreported failure
- Useful failureRaw additive energyreported failure
- Useful failureOne finite quotient or residue modulusreported failure
- Useful failureReversal-only modular collisionsreported failure
- Useful failureEffective cardinality implies coveragereported failure
- Useful failureSix-distinct-point grid languagereported failure
- Useful failureET-T30 boundary repairreported failure
- Useful failureMaximal-state requirement for arbitrary-fragment support packingreported failure
- Useful failureCounting every tail threshold as newreported failure
- Useful failurePositive-density lower-cap sumset as terminal near-coverreported failure
- Useful failureConstant transport alone finishesreported failure
- Useful failureMany transport values alone finishreported failure
- Useful failureRaw depth beyond log₂Kreported failure
- Useful failureArbitrary state summariesreported failure
- Useful failureTwelve-output endpoint as interior stabilityreported failure
- Useful failureThreshold-pigeonhole popular gap without energy couplingreported failure
- Useful failurePrime separation alone selects one gapreported failure
- Useful failureBrute-force prefix depth as proof strategyreported failure
- Useful failurePinned-star existence requires transportreported failure
- Useful failureShared history prefixes as unpriced overlapreported failure
- Useful failureOne-scale Cauchy-scale packet autocorrelation contradictionreported failure
- Research targetFinite atlas of outermost stars and product coresopen
- Research targetTerminal compression stabilityopen
- Research targetMoving-tail promotion of the v12 packet-split chainopen
- Research targetOutermost-star separated-scale renewalopen
- Research targetProduct-core density incrementopen
- Research targetExact typed-witness lifetime theoremopen
- Research targetStar-rank and exclusion-overlap theoremopen
- Research targetModular/star/transport incidence theoremopen
- Active routeET-R3-CAPTURE terminal interval compression15.5 Route
ET-R3-CAPTURE— terminal interval compression Develop a density increment or interval-selection theorem forC+C, informed by the pinned-star exclusion sets. Repeatedly restrict to a subinterval where represented-target density increases while preserving coordinate mass and cap. Terminate at ET-TERM1 or pay ET-T25’sH,O,C,T,Ecurrency. - Active routeET-R9-FIRSTUSE exact typed-witness first use15.3 Route
ET-R9-FIRSTUSE— exact typed-witness first use Define first use only after quotienting the exact ET-MT2 lifetime interval of a fully typed physical witness. ET-CAN3 gives the exact excess term for repeated witnesses. Prove bounded separated-scale reuse unless a recurrent lower-cap object appears, or attach every new use to a new independent increment. Shared prefixes and arbitrary fragment restrictions require no additional theorem. - Active routeET-R2-IDEM direct zero-one square deficit15.7 Route
ET-R2-IDEM— direct zero-one square deficit Exploit simultaneously thatFhas zero-one coefficients,F^2has bounded nonnegative coefficients, support is one-sided, and the Fejér functional is large. Generic norm and sign arguments are exhausted; a successful proof needs a new idempotent or uncertainty principle adapted to bounded convolution coefficients. --- - Active routeET-R8-MODULAR-SYNC prime descendants meet stars and transports15.2 Route
ET-R8-MODULAR-SYNC— prime descendants meet stars and transports Use ET-A9 in the same moving tails as ET-MT3 and ET-GRID1. Prime separation prevents one localized gap from serving too many large moduli. Seek a double-counting theorem over(modulus, star edge, shift, grid cell, transport)that forces a recurrent gap or many independent increments. This route may eliminate the pinned matching by imposing arithmetic structure on its gap set. - Active routeET-R4-NEARBASIS lower-cap finite recurrence15.4 Route
ET-R4-NEARBASIS— lower-cap finite recurrence Use the cap-halving core to produce a finite lower-cap near-basis and then a coherent Abel limit. ET-T18C and ET-TERM1 are the endpoints. The missing quantitative requirement is a hole error small enough relative tosqrt Wand a diameter-matched target interval. - Active routeET-R12 packet-split renewal through moving tails — current primary routeCurrent primary route: promote the packet-split chain to moving tails, then compare lifetime-disjoint scales for recurrent kappa, a common descendant, an independent cube direction, or typed first-use excess.
- Active routeET-R7 inherited outermost-star/product-core renewalRetained active inherited interface: renew outermost-star and product-core structure across separated scales. In v12 this remains supporting work within the inherited ET-C0 content split; it is not the current primary route.
- Active routeET-R1-SCI / ET-R6-SPECTRAL-CAPTURE quantitative diagonal route15.6 Route
ET-R1-SCI/ET-R6-SPECTRAL-CAPTURE— quantitative diagonal route Retain ET-T29 to relate a bad short-difference window to a mesoscopic packet. ET-S2 closes interior certification. The remaining analytic inverse theorem should correlate one common shift or modular descendant with the packet, or directly yield ET-T4D. This is the strongest planned route change if structural renewal stalls.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
The current research map records this as an open mathematical step.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Uniform constants for all M<=theta X and explicit deletion of ordinary tail holes before coverage.
- Every packet, rank, color, diagonal deletion, output range, and lifetime remains in the typed signature.
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
Erdős–Turán Additive-Basis Conjecture · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
If a set of nonnegative integers represents every sufficiently large integer as a sum of two of its elements, must some integers have arbitrarily many ordered representations?
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references4 cited works · next context review by Nov 26, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Aug 26, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1On a Problem of Sidon in Additive Number Theory, and on some Related Problemsoriginal source · P. Erdős, P. Turán · Journal of the London Mathematical Society · 1941-10 · DOI 10.1112/jlms/s1-16.4.212 · accessed Aug 26, 2026
- 2The Erdős–Turán Conjecture for Additive Basespeer reviewed result · Melvyn B. Nathanson · Journal of Number Theory · 2004 · ARXIV math/0302155 · DOI 10.1016/j.jnt.2003.12.012 · accessed Aug 26, 2026
- 3On the Erdős-Turán Conjecture and the growth of B_2[g] sequencespreprint · Javier Pliego · arXiv · 2024-05-07 · ARXIV 2405.04154 · accessed Aug 26, 2026
- 4Erdős Problem #28maintained problem list · Thomas F. Bloom · Erdős Problems · last edited 2026-04-06 · accessed Aug 26, 2026
Important qualifications
- The bounded primary/direct-source review establishes the exact conjecture's current open posture and representative milestones, not an exhaustive bibliographic history.
- The maintained Erdős problem list explicitly cautions that its status assessment reflects the maintainer's current knowledge and may be incomplete.
- Pliego's 2024 construction concerns bounded-representation bases of order three and does not settle the exact order-two conjecture.
- No packet attachment, submitted URL, or source-reported computation was used as independent external status authority.
- No statement-aligned formalization or independently reproduced computation was established by this scoped search.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces