The source adds exact Seidel Smith forms, distance at least nine, deletion stability through eight coordinates, and many forced weight-26 words.
Evidence posture · Reported resultStrongly regular graphs · finite geometry · lattices and codes
Conway’s 99-Graph Conjecture
Collaboration betaDoes a strongly regular graph with 99 vertices, degree 14, one common neighbor for adjacent pairs, and two common neighbors for nonadjacent pairs exist?

Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
Decide whether there exists a strongly regular graph on 99 vertices in which every vertex has degree 14, every adjacent pair has exactly one common neighbor, and every nonadjacent pair has exactly two common neighbors:
A complete solution must either construct such a graph or prove that none exists.
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on Conway’s 99-Graph Conjecture stands
The cumulative v12 source keeps Conway's 99-graph conjecture open and the modular and binary lanes separate. In the projective binary branch it eliminates I=17, retains 19 <= I <= 781, and concentrates the equality-endpoint work on 11,945 rank-four and 13,599 transverse necessary-condition parent rows. It reports cubic-residue, higher-coset, quotient-Fourier, exact-kernel, and occupancy reductions, while the full quotient-labelled column realizations and every broader existence or nonexistence step remain open. ProofAtlas did not execute, render, decompress, or independently reproduce the current work attachments.
The exact 36-plus-60 reduction remains active outside the maximally split six-prism case; component partitions and cubic edge-colored multigraphs provide finite entry points.
Route status · Active routeSymbolically eliminated for SRG(99,14,1,2); non-Cayley constructions are untouched.
Route status · Eliminated routeThe current work derives the square-zero residual system, parity of g, residual discriminant type, and the line-lattice upper bound g<=42.
Evidence posture · Reported reductionThe projector/Schur bridge and corrected ten-row exact-symbol audit force g at least 36 in the maximally split six-prism branch.
Evidence posture · Reported special caseThe current work reports a complete rank-16 and rank-17/18 audit, followed by a symbolic contradiction for the sole rank-17 survivor, excluding g=32; the retained archive is reproducible by rerun but not proof-producing.
Evidence posture · Computation reproduced · provisional · dependencies incompleteFor every one of the 11,945 current rank-four parent rows, realize or eliminate all quotient-labelled multiplicity tables m_(beta,gamma) subject to the source's row sums, occupancy, weight-one, weight-two, coset-weight, cubic-residue, and Gram constraints.
Task status · Ready to work onThe v12 source eliminates the projective I=17 layer, reports 25,544 necessary-condition equality-endpoint parent rows, and restores reproducibility for the final occupancy-kernel reduction.
Retained source recordWork mapped so far
Conway’s 99-Graph Conjecture in numbers
- Argument development
- 4,488 · 85%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 188 · 4%
- Computational analysis
- 150 · 3%
- Open obligations
- 211 · 4%
- Definitions and setup
- 258 · 5%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Solve the full rank-four 16 by 8 column table
For every one of the 11,945 current rank-four parent rows, realize or eliminate all quotient-labelled multiplicity tables m_(beta,gamma) subject to the source's row sums, occupancy, weight-one, weight-two, coset-weight, cubic-residue, and Gram constraints.
Suggested move: Start from retained feasible kernel assignments and build the exact quotient-labelled 16 by 8 multiplicity solver with independently checkable realization or exhaustion certificates.
What would count as progress
- Exhaust every kernel, radical, coset, and occupancy witness for all 11,945 parent rows.
- Retain one realized table or an independently checkable rejection certificate for each terminal case.
- Keep every conclusion conditional on the I=19, r=1 equality endpoint.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
The exact 36-plus-60 reduction remains active outside the maximally split six-prism case; component partitions and cubic edge-colored multigraphs provide finite entry points.
Route status · Active routeThis is the primary active route: classify local ranks 16-20, enforce exact outside equations, and glue the seven overlapping blocks in one rank-20 geometry.
Route status · Active routeAttack the top branch independently through its anisotropic 7-primary plane, metabolic 3-primary part, norm-4 frame vectors, theta series, and Seidel Smith lift.
Route status · Active routeUse self-orthogonality, distance, weight enumerators, deletion stability, Smith lifts, line-row weights, and prism PSD constraints across every remaining g.
Route status · Active routeActive cross-cutting route to replace unarchived or reproducible-only computations with compact proof-producing evidence before more conclusions depend on them.
Route status · Active routeExplored alternatives
Other routes
Symbolically eliminated for SRG(99,14,1,2); non-Cayley constructions are untouched.
Route status · Eliminated routeCoarse invariant screening is exhausted, but the exact labeled equations and ten 77-vertex exact-cover systems remain active.
Route status · Narrowed routeThe sharp rank-14 witness puts this route at its natural limit; future lower bounds must use overlaps or global identities.
Route status · Useful but insufficientBrowse 6 more explored routes
The current work treats these branches as eliminated and directs future work to independent certificate packaging instead of rerunning them as discovery searches.
Route status · Eliminated routeThe retained checkpoint proves no elimination and may be used only as implementation context for a clean rebuild.
Route status · Not yet justifiedSuperseded by the explicit rank-five nonsquare class: a class-only zero-survivor rank-at-most-five search is not justified. The valid successor studies each rank-four/five class together with all five outside-extension domains and simultaneous global constraints.
Route status · Not yet justifiedCombine the seven residual arithmetic structures with weight-36 incidence geometry and exact spectral transfer to decide the first open projective layer.
Route status · Eliminated routeThe explicit rank-five nonsquare witness refutes the class-only zero-survivor route. The active six-prism g=36 program classifies rank-four/five classes together with their five outside domains and then imposes simultaneous cross-class and global projector constraints.
Route status · Narrowed routeThe source's current route combines the cubic-residue, higher-coset, quotient-Fourier, exact-kernel, and occupancy constraints, then asks for full quotient-labelled rank-four and transverse column realizations. Eliminating this equality endpoint would not settle higher B4 values or the nonprojective, modular, or bridge lanes.
Route status · Narrowed routeRoute statements and reductions
Statements the next route can inspect and build on
Around a graph-triangle, the graph is equivalent to a cubic 36-vertex boundary K, a connected 8-regular 60-vertex core H, a 36 by 60 incidence matrix U, and the exact block equations (7.4)-(7.6).
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteThe 231-line Gram matrix Z has real rank 44, entries in {4,1,0,-1,-2}, satisfies Z^2=21Z, and has mod-7 rank g; the associated prism graph satisfies 10I-D_Pi positive semidefinite.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteThe Seidel row code is self-orthogonal of length 99 and dimension g, has packet-reported minimum distance at least 9, preserves rank after deleting at most eight coordinates, and contains at least 29,106 weight-26 words.
Computation reproduced · provisional · dependencies incompleteFor general g=34, some local block must have rank at least 16, while local ranks 16-20 and mixed seven-block overlap configurations remain open.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteAt g=42, the 7-primary discriminant form of the even line lattice is a two-dimensional anisotropic quadratic plane over F7.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
Replace the current work's non-proof-producing or unarchived finite layers with portable, independently checkable certificate packages.
Suggested move: Prioritize the rank-14 equality classification and g=28, then rank-at-most-15 and g=30, the g=32 audits, and the six-prism rank-three result.Rebuild and exhaust the local rank-19/20 search with the correct square-discriminant and Schur-coefficient types, exact outside constraints, and independent validation.
Suggested move: Rebuild the 3,580 ordered matching cases and 1,971 star-exchange orbits, cross-check incremental ranks and automorphisms, and replace the relaxed one-label test with exact edge-bijection equations for survivors.Classify the sixty outside quotient domains under block automorphisms for local ranks 16-18 and enforce the exact Schur, discriminant, edge-bijection, and endpoint-correlation constraints.
Suggested move: Canonicalize projective quotient subspaces under each block automorphism group and precompute domain masks before imposing the global residual equations.Insert local survivors into one global rank-20 basis and enforce the pairwise four-label overlaps of the seven opposite-star blocks.
Suggested move: Compare four-label restrictions as soon as a second block is inserted, before completing all sixty outside labels independently.Apply MacWilliams or complete-weight-enumerator constraints for every remaining g and couple them to line-row weights, prism degrees, PSD constraints, and the Smith lift.
Suggested move: Set up Delsarte/MacWilliams linear programs with self-orthogonality, distance at least nine, the forced weight-26 count, deletion stability, and line-row weight restrictions.Classify compatible genera and theta-series constraints for the rank-44 even line lattice with its metabolic 3-primary part and anisotropic 7-primary plane.
Suggested move: Combine possible 3-adic metabolic forms with the anisotropic 7-plane, then impose 231 labeled norm-4 frame vectors and the exact Seidel Smith data.For every one of the 11,945 current rank-four parent rows, realize or eliminate all quotient-labelled multiplicity tables m_(beta,gamma) subject to the source's row sums, occupancy, weight-one, weight-two, coset-weight, cubic-residue, and Gram constraints.
Suggested move: Start from retained feasible kernel assignments and build the exact quotient-labelled 16 by 8 multiplicity solver with independently checkable realization or exhaustion certificates.For the 13,599 transverse parent rows, classify exact five-dimensional radical column multiplicities and solve the common quotient-labelled 32 by 4 table with the stated Reed-Muller, MacWilliams, occupancy, autocorrelation, and quadratic-form constraints.
Suggested move: Use Walsh inversion on the five-dimensional radical before attempting the common four-slice quotient-labelled table.Superseding the class-only rank-at-most-five obligation, enumerate every legal rank-four/five exact-symbol class, compute all five required outside-extension domains with the correct rank and discriminant rules, and impose simultaneous cross-class and global projector compatibility.
Suggested move: Use the Section 65 witness and the eight relaxed border candidates as mandatory regressions, then archive canonical class representatives, pivot minors, all five domain masks, and exact incompatibility witnesses.Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
Peer reviewedPetro and Phillips determined the forced spectrum of the triangle-intersection graph of any putative solution.[7] Computational resultCesarz and Woldar gave computer-free proofs that even automorphism-group order divides 6 and that divisibility by 7 forces a cyclic group of order 7.[8] PreprintDucey and collaborators determined the critical group forced by the parameter set.[2] Computational resultCrnković and Maksimović computationally ruled out automorphism groups of order 6 or 9.[5]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
Conway's triangle-and-quadrilateral wording is equivalent to existence of a strongly regular graph with parameters (99,14,1,2).
[12]The graph can equivalently be viewed as the point graph of this partial quadrangle.
[14]The five feasible sets include known examples at (9,4,1,2) and (243,22,1,2), while (99,14,1,2), (6273,112,1,2), and (494019,994,1,2) remain unresolved.
[14]Formal and computational footholds
Existing statements, libraries, computations, and datasets that can shorten the next serious attempt.
- formal library support · source linked; not reproduced by ProofAtlasLean 4 / Mathlib
Mathlib supplies strongly regular graph definitions, the parameter identity, complement theorem, and adjacency-matrix identity; no dedicated checked formalization of the 99-graph problem was located.
[11] - software · source linked; not reproduced by ProofAtlasExploratory forced-subgraph search code
Public Python and notebook code investigates forced subgraphs of a possible SRG(99,14,1,2); it is exploratory and not a nonexistence certificate.
[10] - computation · source linked; not reproduced by ProofAtlasSAT encodings and experiments
A 2026 preprint provides SAT encodings and experiments but no construction, UNSAT certificate, or exhaustive resolution.
[3]
Later mathematical changes
What changed after the initial research map
Later recorded revisions that changed the mathematics, without inventing a date or an AI attribution.
Changed the research frontierLater mathematical revision
Changed the research frontierLater mathematical revision
The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.
How the route was assembled
Argument structure
These stages follow the mathematical order of the supplied argument.
Browse all 10 mapped stages
- stage 1Global SRG structure fixed
- stage 2Exact point and triangle models
- stage 3Residual and lattice rank framework
- stage 4Sharp rank-14 opposite-star classification
- stage 5g=28 eliminated
- stage 6g=30 eliminated
- stage 7g=32 eliminated and frontier narrowed
- stage 8Global Seidel and code constraints
- stage 9Six-prism g=34 doorway closed
- stage 10General g=34 frontier isolated
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This inventory covers all currently cataloged mathematical statements in the research notes.
- lemma
11 of 32 11 - negative result
7 of 32 7 - equivalence
3 of 32 3 - reduction
8 of 32 8 - computational claim
2 of 32 2 - theorem candidate
1 of 32 1
- Original computation rerun4
Problem and global structureThe exact existence question, SRG identities, local triangles, and the excluded Cayley construction class.5 displayed rows · 1 route included
- retained route statementConway's 99-graph existence question remains open
- retained route statementGlobal SRG identities and triangle partitionintermediate
- retained route statementCayley constructions excludedspecial case
- Useful failureCayley-graph or abelian difference-set construction searchreported failure
- Eliminated routeCayley construction routeSymbolically eliminated for SRG(99,14,1,2); non-Cayley constructions are untouched.
Point-local and triangle-core reductionsThe complementary exact 84-vertex and 36-plus-60 labeled reconstruction systems.5 displayed rows · 2 routes included
- retained route statementExact 84-vertex point-local modelintermediate
- retained route statementExact 36-plus-60 triangle-core modelintermediate
- Useful failureSpectrum, determinant, parity, and low-moment screening of the 84-vertex modelreported failure
- Narrowed routeLabeled 84-vertex and 77-vertex extension routeCoarse invariant screening is exhausted, but the exact labeled equations and ten 77-vertex exact-cover systems remain active.
- Active routeTriangle-core and general q=12 spread routeThe exact 36-plus-60 reduction remains active outside the maximally split six-prism case; component partitions and cubic edge-colored multigraphs provide finite entry points.
F7 residual and opposite-star geometryThe square-zero residual equations, parity, sharp one-pair rank, discriminant type, and seven-block overlap limitation.7 displayed rows · 1 route included
- retained route statementGlobal residual geometry over F7intermediate
- retained route statementEven mod-7 rankintermediate
- retained route statementSharp opposite-star rank minimumcomputational
- retained route statementResidual discriminant typeintermediate
- Useful failureA stronger universal rank bound from a single opposite-star pairreported failure
- ComputationPacket-reported exhaustive opposite-star search for the universal rank minimum and the complete rank-14 equality locus.The source reports no rank-at-most-13 completion, a sharp rank-14 example, one equality orbit, and eight labeled completions. · reported unreproduced
- Useful but insufficientSingle opposite-star universal rank routeThe sharp rank-14 witness puts this route at its natural limit; future lower bounds must use overlaps or global identities.
Packet-reported modular eliminationsThe g=28, g=30, and g=32 eliminations, their distinct reproducibility postures, and the resulting five-value working frontier.11 displayed rows · 2 routes included
- retained route statementg=28 eliminated in the current workcomputational
- retained route statementg=30 eliminated in the current workcomputational
- retained route statementg=32 eliminated in the current workcomputational
- retained route statementFive-value working modular frontierintermediate
- ChallengeThe source reports the equality classification and contradiction, but the original complete search tree was not retained; publication-grade reliance still needs an independent certificate-producing rerun.unsupported step · open
- ChallengeThe retained rank-16 source does not replace the missing rank-at-most-15 defect-distribution archive on which another part of the g=30 elimination depends.unsupported step · open
- ComputationRetained complete rank-at-most-16 opposite-star search and rank-16 outside quotient/Schur test.The retained summary reports 8 rank-14, 165 rank-15, and 5,239 rank-16 completions, with no rank-16 block passing the relaxed all-sixty-type test. · reproduced same implementation
- ComputationRetained star-exchange and automorphism-reduced rank-17/18 audit for total residual rank 18.The source reports 14,078,718,025 partial nodes, 6,204 rank-17 representatives, 68,016 rank-18 representatives, no rank-18 survivor, and one rank-17 survivor B=C=L,T=I, later excluded symbolically. · reproduced same implementation
- Research targetProduce independent finite certificatesopen
- Eliminated routeRepeat searches for g=28,30,32The current work treats these branches as eliminated and directs future work to independent certificate packaging instead of rerunning them as discovery searches.
- Active routeIndependent certificate engineeringActive cross-cutting route to replace unarchived or reproducible-only computations with compact proof-producing evidence before more conclusions depend on them.
Line lattice, Seidel arithmetic, and codesThe upper bound, Gram/prism PSD identities, exact Smith forms, self-orthogonal code constraints, and anisotropic g=42 endpoint.10 displayed rows · 2 routes included
- retained route statementLine-lattice upper boundintermediate
- retained route statementLine Gram and prism PSD constraintsintermediate
- retained route statementExact Seidel Smith formsintermediate
- retained route statementSelf-orthogonal Seidel code constraintscomputational
- retained route statementAnisotropic g=42 line-lattice branchspecial case
- ComputationRetained exhaustive normalized small Seidel-matrix search through order eight for full-support isotropic radical vectors.No normalized Seidel matrix of order at most eight has the required full-support isotropic radical vector, yielding the current work's d(C)>=9 bound. · reproduced same implementation
- Research targetTest the anisotropic g=42 line latticeopen
- Research targetCouple the Seidel code and prism graphopen
- Active routeHigh-end g=42 line-lattice routeAttack the top branch independently through its anisotropic 7-primary plane, metabolic 3-primary part, norm-4 frame vectors, theta series, and Seidel Smith lift.
- Active routeGlobal code and prism-graph routeUse self-orthogonality, distance, weight enumerators, deletion stability, Smith lifts, line-row weights, and prism PSD constraints across every remaining g.
General g=34 frontierThe restorable all-low-rank closure, the invalid preliminary high-rank checkpoint, and the open rank-16-20 quotient-and-overlap program.10 displayed rows · 2 routes included
- retained route statementAll-low-rank g=34 sector closedcomputational
- retained route statementGeneral g=34 mixed-rank frontierintermediate
- ChallengeThe original verifier and completed log are not mounted; the reconstructed source is not hash-identical and had not completed a clean rerun during the v4 audit.unsupported step · open
- Useful failurePreliminary general g=34 rank-19/20 searchreported failure
- ComputationPacket-reported common-projective-plane and Schur/discriminant test for the rank-15 zero-defect E/Q templates at total residual rank 20.The original completed run reportedly finds no extendible E or Q template, but the exact original files are absent and the reconstructed source had not completed a clean rerun. · reported unreproduced
- Research targetComplete the general g=34 rank-19/20 auditopen
- Research targetClassify g=34 local ranks 16-18open
- Research targetEnforce all seven opposite-star overlapsopen
- Active routeGeneral g=34 quotient-and-overlap routeThis is the primary active route: classify local ranks 16-20, enforce exact outside equations, and glue the seven overlapping blocks in one rank-20 geometry.
- Not yet justifiedHistorical preliminary rank-19/20 runThe retained checkpoint proves no elimination and may be used only as implementation context for a clean rebuild.
Current two-ended work programClose g=34 through local quotient and overlap geometry while independently attacking g=42 through the line lattice and global codes, with certificate engineering in parallel.8 displayed rows · 4 routes included
- retained route statementFive-value working modular frontierintermediate
- retained route statementGeneral g=34 mixed-rank frontierintermediate
- retained route statementAnisotropic g=42 line-lattice branchspecial case
- Research targetProduce independent finite certificatesopen
- Active routeGeneral g=34 quotient-and-overlap routeThis is the primary active route: classify local ranks 16-20, enforce exact outside equations, and glue the seven overlapping blocks in one rank-20 geometry.
- Active routeHigh-end g=42 line-lattice routeAttack the top branch independently through its anisotropic 7-primary plane, metabolic 3-primary part, norm-4 frame vectors, theta series, and Seidel Smith lift.
- Active routeGlobal code and prism-graph routeUse self-orthogonality, distance, weight enumerators, deletion stability, Smith lifts, line-row weights, and prism PSD constraints across every remaining g.
- Active routeIndependent certificate engineeringActive cross-cutting route to replace unarchived or reproducible-only computations with compact proof-producing evidence before more conclusions depend on them.
Maximally split six-prism branch — corrected frontierThe g=34 exact-symbol obstruction remains reported. For g=36, rank-five nonsquare classes exist, so the current problem is outside-domain extension and simultaneous cross-class consistency, not a class-only zero-survivor search.7 displayed rows · 1 route included
- retained route statementSix-prism and exceptional-block equivalencespecial case
- retained route statementSix-prism projector rank bridgespecial case
- retained route statementSix-prism doorway closed at g=34special case
- Useful failureClass-only rank-at-most-five zero-survivor search for six-prism g=36witness reproduced
- ComputationCorrected exact-symbol ten-row search for legal six-prism classes with projector rank at most three.The retained archive reports 62 mate orbits, 156,011,143 partial matching-pair nodes, and zero legal rank-at-most-three completions; independent small checkers cover symmetry, the Schur identity, and the rank-six witness. · reproduced same implementation
- Research targetClassify six-prism rank-four/five outside-extension domainsopen
- Narrowed routeSix-prism outside-extension routeThe explicit rank-five nonsquare witness refutes the class-only zero-survivor route. The active six-prism g=36 program classifies rank-four/five classes together with their five outside domains and then imposes simultaneous cross-class and global projector constraints.
v12 projective equality-endpoint programThe exact projective branch boundary, I=17 elimination, I=19 equality endpoint, source-reported analytic and finite reductions, occupancy reconstruction, and the two current common-column work orders, kept separate from the independent modular lane.18 displayed rows · 1 route included
- retained route statementProjective MacWilliams range after eliminating I = 17conditional
- retained route statementThe complete projective I = 17 layer is eliminatedconditional
- retained route statementI = 19, r = 1 equality endpointconditional
- retained route statementSource-reported cubic residual invariantconditional
- retained route statementSource-reported simultaneous higher-coset constraintsconditional
- retained route statementQuotient-Fourier and common-column reductionsconditional
- retained route statementExact kernel realization and occupancy-marginal criterioncomputational
- retained route statementv12 equality-endpoint necessary-condition frontierconditional
- Recorded relationshipEliminating I=17 makes I=19 the first remaining projective layer; the source then isolates its equality endpoint.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThe cubic residue invariant is reported for the two derivative-quadratic types surviving at the I=19 equality endpoint.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThe higher-coset tables enforce simultaneous restrictions on slices of the common cubic residue function.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThe source applies quotient-Fourier and common-column tests after the simultaneous higher-coset filters.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipExact kernel realization and occupancy coupling refine the quotient/common-column survivor set.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThe source's nested necessary-condition chain yields the stated 25,544-row equality-endpoint frontier.supports · reported by source
- ComputationThe v12 source reports a standalone exact classifier for every occurring kernel-histogram/B2 pair and an integrated reconstruction of the occupancy filter inside the retained common-column search. ProofAtlas kept every attachment inert and did not execute, render, compile, decompress, or independently reproduce it.The source reports 26,851 pairs split into 26,796 compatible and 55 incompatible cases, independently checked positive and negative certificates, and byte-for-byte regeneration of the 11,956-to-11,945 parent reduction. · reported unreproduced
- Research targetSolve the full rank-four 16 by 8 column tableopen
- Research targetClassify the transverse radical and solve the 32 by 4 tableopen
- Narrowed routeProjective I=19 equality-endpoint column-realization routeThe source's current route combines the cubic-residue, higher-coset, quotient-Fourier, exact-kernel, and occupancy constraints, then asks for full quotient-labelled rank-four and transverse column realizations. Eliminating this equality endpoint would not settle higher B4 values or the nonprojective, modular, or bridge lanes.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
3 approaches have already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Exhaust every kernel, radical, coset, and occupancy witness for all 11,945 parent rows.
- Retain one realized table or an independently checkable rejection certificate for each terminal case.
- Keep every conclusion conditional on the I=19, r=1 equality endpoint.
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
Conway’s 99-Graph Conjecture · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
Does a strongly regular graph with 99 vertices, degree 14, one common neighbor for adjacent pairs, and two common neighbors for nonadjacent pairs exist?
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references16 cited works · next context review by Nov 2, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Aug 2, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1On the automorphism group of a putative Conway 99-graphauthoritative webpage · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 2Critical group structure from the parameters of a strongly regular graphpreprint · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 3Approaching the Conway-99 problem using SAT solverspreprint · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 4Norman Biggs, Finite Groups of Automorphisms, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 6 (1971), based on 1969 lecturesoriginal source · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 5On automorphisms of a possible strongly regular graph with parameters (99,14,1,2)authoritative webpage · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 6Strongly regular graphs with lambda=1peer reviewed result · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 7Triangle intersection graphs of strongly regular graphspeer reviewed result · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 8On the automorphism group of a putative Conway 99-graphpeer reviewed result · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 9Dedicated English Wikipedia articleencyclopedia · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 10https://github.com/GrayTaylor/conway99software or dataset · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 11https://leanprover-community.github.io/mathlib4_docs/Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/StronglyRegular.htmlformalization · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 12Five $1,000 Problemsoriginal source · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 13On the (99,14,1,2) strongly regular graphsauthoritative webpage · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 14On automorphisms of strongly regular graphs with parameters lambda=1, mu=2authoritative webpage · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 15Strongly regular graphs with no trianglesauthoritative webpage · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 16Conway's 99-Graph Problemmaintained problem list · Epoch AI · accessed Aug 2, 2026
Important qualifications
- The historical USD 1,000 offer is documented, but current claimability or administration after Conway's death was not verified; display it as a historical prize rather than an actively payable award.
- Do not conflate this problem with the missing Moore graph problem or with generalized quadrangles.
- Empty formalization or computation lists mean that none was verified in this scoped search, not that none exists.
- FrontierMath membership is mutable and must be rechecked after source changelog updates; membership is not proof evidence or an importance score.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces