The second audit combines singleton-or-wrap with entropy to produce an exhaustive Fejer, Schur, or entropy alternative and parity-telescoping budgets.
Evidence posture · Reported resultHarmonic analysis · additive combinatorics · cosine polynomials
Chowla’s Cosine Conjecture
Collaboration betaFor every finite set of positive integer frequencies, must the corresponding cosine sum have a negative value whose magnitude is at least a constant times the square root of the set size?

Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
For a finite set , let . Chowla’s conjecture asks whether there is one absolute constant such that
the source reports substantial exact internal algebra and a narrowed proof route, but no complete proof or counterexample.
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on Chowla’s Cosine Conjecture stands
This curated overview retains the current work's collision-to-quotient route, the revised-v10 oriented-fiber collapse of every nonempty near-transversal row to h=1, the exact cell-square, Fejer, entropy, prime-factor, and quotient-Haar charges, and the current large-loss arithmetic frontier. The centered-moment period module remains available only as an explicitly superseded consistency tool inside the pair branch. The source reports no complete proof or counterexample, and no claim here has proof, review, acceptance, or publication effect.
Active collision energy is terminalized into teeth, then split between nonprimitive divisor ledgers and a popular primitive quotient row.
Route status · Active routeEliminated as a current pair branch: oriented-fiber divisibility forces h=1 whenever the near-transversal row is nonempty. Nontrivial periods remain only in paid wrap branches.
Route status · Eliminated routeExact boundary holes, filtered sections, spectral slack, and common orbit length give the current arithmetic trichotomy for odd rough rows.
Evidence posture · Reported reductionConstruct a scale-aware Bellman potential that makes local Delta_d payments and strict descendants telescope alongside entropy, Fejer, and Schur charges.
Task status · Prerequisites still openWe corrected the cited passages. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchangedWork mapped so far
Chowla’s Cosine Conjecture in numbers
- Argument development
- 5,146 · 87%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 98 · 2%
- Computational analysis
- 48 · 1%
- Open obligations
- 308 · 5%
- Definitions and setup
- 298 · 5%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Normalize quotient-Haar payments globally
Construct a scale-aware Bellman potential that makes local Delta_d payments and strict descendants telescope alongside entropy, Fejer, and Schur charges.
Suggested move: Test a potential combining log(n/T^2), normalized entropy, scale-weighted quotient defects, and normalized Schur-triple mass.
What would count as progress
- Prove every local Haar payment or retained descendant decreases one common bounded potential at the popular-row scale.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
Active collision energy is terminalized into teeth, then split between nonprimitive divisor ledgers and a popular primitive quotient row.
Route status · Active routeActive current route for exceptional rows where C is much larger than tooth mass W; it must retain aperiodic teeth and missing self-sums.
Route status · Active routeActive exceptional-row route combining signed-residue distinctness, boundary holes, Haar slack, long paths, and complete orbit cosets.
Route status · Active routeActive arithmetic route using filtered 2-3 sections and the exact affine recurrence while preserving signs, carries, and missing self-sums.
Route status · Active routeActive arithmetic route on complete cosets of the signed subgroup generated by two, with common orbit length and affine lifts retained.
Route status · Active routeActive global route intended to combine entropy, density, quotient-Haar, Fejer, Schur, and strict-descendant payments at compatible scales.
Route status · Active routeExplored alternatives
Other routes
Eliminated as a current pair branch: oriented-fiber divisibility forces h=1 whenever the near-transversal row is nonempty. Nontrivial periods remain only in paid wrap branches.
Route status · Eliminated routerecorded as an exact consistency and non-pair external-wrap audit module, but explicitly superseded as the main route inside the near-transversal pair branch.
Route status · Narrowed routeClosed in its stated regime: rows with W comparable to n/T and pair defect O(W) cannot persist while normalized density is unbounded.
Route status · Narrowed routeBrowse 3 more explored routes
Every odd h=1 pair stage with a following filter is assigned to one of three explicit parity-telescoping charges.
Route status · Narrowed routeToo weak as a termination proof; retained only as one exact account inside a larger Bellman argument.
Route status · Useful but insufficientRejected for the square-root target because polynomial losses in E overwhelm the relevant 1/E densities.
Route status · Useful but insufficientRoute statements and reductions
Statements the next route can inspect and build on
Under an unbounded normalized-density counterexample regime, the inherited collision argument supplies on the order of n^2/E terminal teeth d<b with d,b,b+d in A and 2b+d outside A, then concentrates primitive tooth mass W on a quotient row or produces a nonprimitive divisor ledger.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteFor a complete primitive row d=hq, the quotient defect and external wrap satisfy one exact interface identity; substantial active or inactive wrap is assigned to existing telescoping payments, leaving the near-transversal inequality as the locally uncharged branch.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteSmall pair defect converts almost every low-occupancy signed-doubling boundary image into an exact quotient hole attached injectively to a missing self-sum 2b+d.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteA sufficiently long no-wrap signed-doubling path in the odd h=1 branch forces a weighted occupied 3-section, a proper divisor descendant when 3 divides d, or an exact filtered zero.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteLow-occupancy boundary images and short signed-doubling paths are bounded by quotient spectral slack, which in turn is bounded by the ordinary quotient-Haar defect Delta_d.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteEvery directed cycle of perfect signed unit classes has the common length k_d=min{k>=1:2^k congruent to plus or minus 1 mod d} and is a complete coset of the signed subgroup generated by 2.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteAn exceptional h=1 row outside the normal retentive entropy regime must yield a square-root bound, a sharp quotient block, a summably controlled strict descendant, a no-wrap recurrence, a missing-self-sum payment, signed-carry closure, orbit closure, or normalized quotient-Haar payment.
Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
Construct a scale-aware Bellman potential that makes local Delta_d payments and strict descendants telescope alongside entropy, Fejer, and Schur charges.
Suggested move: Test a potential combining log(n/T^2), normalized entropy, scale-weighted quotient defects, and normalized Schur-triple mass.When TW/n is large and pair defect is moderate, combine boundary holes, Haar slack, filtered long paths, complete signed 2-orbits, and exact missing self-sums to obtain a one-row contradiction or strict descendant.
Suggested move: Optimize the path cutoff against spectral slack while keeping all perfect-cell multiplicities and missing values.When C is much larger than W, use the aperiodic lift, terminal teeth, missing self-sums, and quotient positivity to force a sharp quotient block, no-wrap interval, strict descendant, or Bellman-paid module.
Suggested move: Separate occupancy-one signed classes from structurally malformed cells and retain their exact missing self-sums through the quotient argument.Use common orbit length, full orbit cosets, affine lifts, missing values 2b+d, and singleton fringe to force a common divisor, arithmetic spine, short quotient block, or autocorrelation contradiction.
Suggested move: Classify the complete orbit cosets together with their actual lifted missing self-sums and affine carries.Extend the filtered 2-3 section output into a lossless recurrence, arithmetic relation, internal interval, or proper divisor descendant while preserving edge signs, affine carries, multiplicity, and missing self-sums.
Suggested move: Iterate the exact g=3 filter only while no-wrap hypotheses remain valid and record the signed affine state at every stage.Integrate the exact almost-half-retentive and small-prime descendant bounds into a global descent that consumes prime factors, reduces maximum frequency, and preserves a uniform square-root constant.
Suggested move: Track consumed prime factors and maximum-frequency reduction together with entropy, Fejer, and quotient-defect charges.Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
PreprintBedert's v3 improved the lower-bound exponent to 1/5-o(1).[2] PreprintJin, Milojević, Tomon, and Zhang obtained an independent polynomial lower bound through spectral graph theory.[1] Peer reviewedSanders proved structural results for symmetric subsets of discrete abelian groups and a polynomial bound in a restricted dense-frequency regime.[4] Peer reviewedRuzsa proved K(n) >= exp(c sqrt(log n)), the record lower bound until 2025.[6]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
After symmetrizing A to A union -A, the cosine sum is the Fourier transform of the indicator up to normalization and a factor of two.
[3]Lower bounds from Littlewood's L1 problem supplied the early logarithmic progress on Chowla's problem.
[3]Sidon-set difference constructions give the O(sqrt(n)) upper bound and show that the conjectured exponent 1/2 is best possible.
[10]The 2025 Jin-Milojević-Tomon-Zhang route derives a polynomial bound from structural theorems for graphs with constrained least eigenvalue.
[1]Formal and computational footholds
Existing statements, libraries, computations, and datasets that can shorten the next serious attempt.
- formal statement · statement onlyLean 4
Google DeepMind's Formal Conjectures repository contains an Erdős Problem 510 statement and bound variants, but not checked proofs; the recorded progress exponent is older than Bedert v3.
[8] - computation · source linked; not reproduced by ProofAtlasExact Small Cases
Mercer determined the exact extremal values for two and three frequencies; these finite cases do not resolve the asymptotic conjecture.
[9]
Research-record corrections
What changed in the research record
These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.
How the route was assembled
Argument structure
These stages follow the mathematical order of the supplied argument.
Browse all 10 mapped stages
- stage 1Collision forcing reaches a primitive quotient row
- stage 2External-interface split isolates near transversality
- stage 3Oriented fibers eliminate nontrivial near-transversal periods
- stage 4Exact h=1 normal form and prime descent
- stage 5Cell squares yield singleton-or-wrap payments
- stage 6Entropy closes the normal retentive regime
- stage 7Odd rough rows split into Haar, paths, and orbits
- stage 8Centered-moment period work recorded as an archive
- stage 9Two-step ledger assigns every filtered odd pair stage
- stage 10Frontier refined to four exceptional arithmetic mechanisms
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.
- theorem candidate
2 of 22 2 - negative result
3 of 22 3 - reduction
3 of 22 3 - equivalence
1 of 22 1 - lemma
13 of 22 13
Conjecture and public mathematical boundaryThe exact square-root conjecture, the literature gap recorded in the current work, and the explicit statement that no proof or counterexample is claimed.2 displayed rows
- retained route statementChowla cosine conjecture
- retained route statementPublished exponent gap remains open
Collision, teeth, and quotient interfaceThe inherited conditional reduction from sharp collision energy to terminal teeth, primitive quotient rows, and the exact external-interface split.5 displayed rows · 1 route included
- retained route statementCollision forcing to terminal teethconditional
- retained route statementExact quotient interface splitintermediate
- Recorded relationshipThe retained proof program assumes an unbounded normalized-density counterexample regime and applies active-difference collision forcing and terminalization.reduces to · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipTerminal teeth either feed a divisor ledger or concentrate on a popular primitive quotient row where the external-interface split applies.reduces to · reported by source
- Active routeCollision-to-primitive-quotient routeActive collision energy is terminalized into teeth, then split between nonprimitive divisor ledgers and a popular primitive quotient row.
Oriented fibers and period supersessionThe decisive double-root and divisibility chain, the h=1 collapse, and the centered-moment module retained only for its narrowed audit role.9 displayed rows · 2 routes included
- retained route statementOriented-fiber double rootsintermediate
- retained route statementTermwise period divisibilityintermediate
- retained route statementNontrivial near-transversal periods excludedintermediate
- retained route statementCentered-moment period divisibilityintermediate
- DerivationEvaluate each fiber at w=1, identify its mass with h times the reduced occupancy, and use the double-root Dirichlet-kernel divisor to obtain divisibility by h.active reported
- DerivationWhen h>1, every occupied class has occupancy at least h, so its collision contribution is at least (h-1)c_r; summing contradicts the near-transversal upper bound alpha C/h.active reported
- ComputationPacket-level second audit of the oriented-fiber phase and derivative argument, divisor arithmetic, cell-square factors, two-step charges, and the expanded exact-period certificate fields.The source reports the h=1 collapse, strengthened square-divisor consequences, restored centered-moment consistency module, reciprocal-loss ledger, and two-step Fejer-Schur-entropy trichotomy. this page did not independently rerun a checker or formalize those derivations. · reported unreproduced
- Eliminated routeNontrivial-period near-transversal branchEliminated as a current pair branch: oriented-fiber divisibility forces h=1 whenever the near-transversal row is nonempty. Nontrivial periods remain only in paid wrap branches.
- Narrowed routeCentered-moment period modulerecorded as an exact consistency and non-pair external-wrap audit module, but explicitly superseded as the main route inside the near-transversal pair branch.
Trivial-period pair and cell algebraExact pair loss, prime-factor retention, signed cell squares, singleton extraction, and their stated scope restrictions.12 displayed rows · 2 routes included
- retained route statementExact h=1 pair-row normal formintermediate
- retained route statementPrime-factor retained descendantintermediate
- retained route statementSigned cell-square decompositionintermediate
- retained route statementSingleton-or-wrap identityintermediate
- retained route statementTwo-color Fejer-atom budgetintermediate
- DerivationPerfect-cell elements avoid every prime divisor of d; bounding the remaining unpaired elements and applying root filtering modulo p gives the retained-descendant inequality.active reported
- DerivationA second root filter partitions each signed cell by residues: singleton groups give a constant descendant minorant, while nonsingletons contribute pairs that appear in the two-step external wrap.active reported
- Useful failureUncorrected odd signed-cell theorem at even modulusreported failure
- Useful failureCharging Gamma at the first descendantreported failure
- Useful failureReplace external wrap by total multiples-of-d correlationreported failure
- Narrowed routeTwo-step Fejer-Schur-entropy ledgerEvery odd h=1 pair stage with a following filter is assigned to one of three explicit parity-telescoping charges.
- Useful but insufficientCardinality payment aloneToo weak as a termination proof; retained only as one exact account inside a larger Bellman argument.
Entropy, Fejer, Schur, and Haar ledgersThe globally budgeted normal-retentive and two-step payments, together with the still-unfinished scale normalization of quotient-Haar slack.13 displayed rows · 3 routes included
- retained route statementEntropy drop under divisor filteringintermediate
- retained route statementNormal retentive chains cannot persistconditional
- retained route statementTwo-step Fejer-Schur-entropy trichotomyintermediate
- retained route statementQuotient-Haar paymentintermediate
- DerivationThe lower loss bound gives a per-stage entropy charge, the upper loss bound controls logarithmic density descent, and comparison with the entropy upper budget bounds the starting density.active reported
- DerivationIf Gamma is below one half, the singleton-or-wrap inequality leaves at least half the first loss as two-step wrap; a large active share pays Schur triples and a small active share activates the entropy bound.active reported
- Useful failureCardinality-loss ledger as standalone terminationreported failure
- Useful failureEntropy-only closure of arbitrary large-loss rowsreported failure
- Useful failureTreat local quotient-Haar slack as a completed global paymentreported failure
- Research targetNormalize quotient-Haar payments globallyopen
- Narrowed routeNormal retentive entropy chainClosed in its stated regime: rows with W comparable to n/T and pair defect O(W) cannot persist while normalized density is unbounded.
- Narrowed routeTwo-step Fejer-Schur-entropy ledgerEvery odd h=1 pair stage with a following filter is assigned to one of three explicit parity-telescoping charges.
- Active routeNormalized Haar-entropy Bellman potentialActive global route intended to combine entropy, density, quotient-Haar, Fejer, Schur, and strict-descendant payments at compatible scales.
Boundary holes, signed paths, and complete orbitsThe exact quotient-hole, filtered-section, spectral, affine-carry, and common-orbit structure retained for the rough odd branch.10 displayed rows · 2 routes included
- retained route statementGenuine boundary-hole countintermediate
- retained route statementLong paths force a filtered 3-sectionintermediate
- retained route statementQuotient-Haar paymentintermediate
- retained route statementExact signed 2-orbit cyclesintermediate
- DerivationParseval bounds signed-doubling occupancy mismatches by Sigma_d, and the nonnegative quotient root values convert Sigma_d to the ordinary Haar defect Delta_d.active reported
- Useful failureGeneric boundary, path, or cycle counting after discarding arithmetic labelsreported failure
- Research targetClose long signed-carry pathsopen
- Research targetClose complete signed 2-orbitsopen
- Active routeLong signed-carry pathActive arithmetic route using filtered 2-3 sections and the exact affine recurrence while preserving signs, carries, and missing self-sums.
- Active routeComplete signed 2-orbit closureActive arithmetic route on complete cosets of the signed subgroup generated by two, with common orbit length and affine lifts retained.
Current exceptional-row frontierThe four first unresolved mechanisms, even and small-prime termination, the shared large-loss theorem, and source-explicit methods that must not be revived.15 displayed rows · 6 routes included
- retained route statementCurrent local row classificationconditional
- retained route statementLarge-loss trivial-period closureconditional
- Research targetClose the large singleton/interface fringeopen
- Research targetClose superpopular perfect-cell rowsopen
- Research targetClose long signed-carry pathsopen
- Research targetClose complete signed 2-orbitsopen
- Research targetNormalize quotient-Haar payments globallyopen
- Research targetTerminate even and small-prime descentsopen
- Useful failureGeneric polynomial-loss additive combinatoricsreported failure
- Active routeLarge singleton/interface fringeActive current route for exceptional rows where C is much larger than tooth mass W; it must retain aperiodic teeth and missing self-sums.
- Active routeSuperpopular perfect-cell rowActive exceptional-row route combining signed-residue distinctness, boundary holes, Haar slack, long paths, and complete orbit cosets.
- Active routeLong signed-carry pathActive arithmetic route using filtered 2-3 sections and the exact affine recurrence while preserving signs, carries, and missing self-sums.
- Active routeComplete signed 2-orbit closureActive arithmetic route on complete cosets of the signed subgroup generated by two, with common orbit length and affine lifts retained.
- Active routeNormalized Haar-entropy Bellman potentialActive global route intended to combine entropy, density, quotient-Haar, Fejer, Schur, and strict-descendant payments at compatible scales.
- Useful but insufficientGeneric polynomial-loss additive reductionsRejected for the square-root target because polynomial losses in E overwhelm the relevant 1/E densities.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
3 approaches have already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Prove every local Haar payment or retained descendant decreases one common bounded potential at the popular-row scale.
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
Chowla’s Cosine Conjecture · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
For every finite set of positive integer frequencies, must the corresponding cosine sum have a negative value whose magnitude is at least a constant times the square root of the set size?
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references14 cited works · next context review by Nov 2, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Aug 2, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1From small eigenvalues to large cuts, and Chowla's cosine problempreprint · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 2Polynomial bounds for the Chowla Cosine Problempreprint · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 3Polynomial bounds for the Chowla Cosine Problem, historical accountpreprint · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 4Chowla's cosine problempeer reviewed result · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 5Some Applications of a Method of A. Selbergoriginal source · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 6Negative values of cosine sumspeer reviewed result · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 7Sur le minimum d'une somme de cosinusauthoritative webpage · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 8https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/main/FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/510.leanformalization · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 9The Minimum of a Cosine Sumauthoritative webpage · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 10100 Open Problemsauthoritative webpage · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 11Erdős Problems, Problem 510maintained problem list · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 12On the Cosine Problemauthoritative webpage · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 13Open Problem Garden, three-star entrymaintained problem list · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 14Chowla's Cosine Problemmaintained problem list · Epoch AI · accessed Aug 2, 2026
Important qualifications
- The best bound changed on 2026-07-24. Public problem lists and the Formal Conjectures scaffold that still report exponents 1/7, 1/12, or Ruzsa's bound are stale relative to Bedert v3.
- Do not conflate this problem with Chowla's Liouville-correlation conjecture, the Ankeny-Artin-Chowla conjecture, or the Chowla-Selberg formula.
- Empty formalization or computation lists mean that none was verified in this scoped search, not that none exists.
- FrontierMath membership is mutable and must be rechecked after source changelog updates; membership is not proof evidence or an importance score.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces