Critical deletion forces minimum predecessors and exact reverse spheres.
Evidence posture · Reported resultExtremal graph theory · directed cycles · connectivity
Caccetta–Häggkvist Conjecture
Collaboration betaMust every finite loopless simple digraph with minimum outdegree d contain a directed cycle of length at most the ceiling of n divided by d?

Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
Equivalently, with n = |V(G)| and L = g(G) − 1, the conjecture says n ≥ dL + 1 for every finite loopless simple digraph.
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on Caccetta–Häggkvist Conjecture stands
The current work develops a minimal-counterexample and reverse-geometry program, closes the degree-two case, derives several degree-three normal forms, proves exact rank-one peeling under hereditary smaller-order validity, rules out multiple shortcuts, and isolates four current closing obligations. The conjecture remains open.
Generalize exact one-gate packet width, cut slack, and additive lifting toll to return rank k≥2.
Route status · Active routeRegular counterexamples would have every proper separator larger than d/2, so small-bottleneck arguments cannot handle the core obstruction.
Route status · Eliminated routeA rank-one channel peels with exact size and additive lifting toll.
Evidence posture · Reported reductionThe return-fan dichotomy closes the conjectured bound for d=2.
Evidence posture · Reported special caseFind a k≥2 analogue of width-d packet levels, common cut slack, and composable additive toll.
Task status · Ready to work onWe corrected the cited passages. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchangedWork mapped so far
Caccetta–Häggkvist Conjecture in numbers
- Argument development
- 1,797 · 83%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 145 · 7%
- Computational analysis
- 13 · 1%
- Open obligations
- 76 · 3%
- Definitions and setup
- 142 · 7%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Generalize exact peeling to k gates
Find a k≥2 analogue of width-d packet levels, common cut slack, and composable additive toll.
Suggested move: Generalize the exact rank-one peeling theorem to multiple gates.
What would count as progress
- Establish a correct k-gate composition theorem with exact provenance and additive accounting.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
Generalize exact one-gate packet width, cut slack, and additive lifting toll to return rank k≥2.
Route status · Active routeExplored alternatives
Other routes
A circulation inequality would imply the conjecture, but may be strictly stronger and currently lacks a proof or counterexample.
Route status · Route held in reserveThe exact identity isolates several terms, but no global charge is known.
Route status · Route held in reserveRegular counterexamples would have every proper separator larger than d/2, so small-bottleneck arguments cannot handle the core obstruction.
Route status · Eliminated routeBrowse 5 more explored routes
Minimum in- and outdegree alone does not force an arc with d disjoint return paths.
Route status · Refuted routeEquality examples have missing and multiply hit ordered nonarcs, so any charge must be redistributed globally or fractionally.
Route status · Refuted routeThe degree-three trap is an acyclic-sink statement in disguise and adds no inductive force.
Route status · Eliminated routeOrdinary quotient girth remembers only the largest channel loss; the desired bound needs additive reset costs or packet compensation.
Route status · Useful but insufficientTrimming creates an outregular model, but saturation introduces excess degrees and no theorem regularizes the complete argument.
Route status · Not yet justifiedMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
Find a k≥2 analogue of width-d packet levels, common cut slack, and composable additive toll.
Suggested move: Generalize the exact rank-one peeling theorem to multiple gates.Classify non-path outgoing arcs using root saturation and the exact spanning partition.
Suggested move: Derive a contradiction internal to the equality core, without importing invalid original-edge provenance.Compare all three pair-linkages and their excess/residual budgets; force a third return, a short cycle, or a common dominator.
Suggested move: Seek a sum inequality showing that the three residual/excess budgets cannot coexist.Derive |X|≥3L−q₁−q₂ from the two-root reset law, or close the complementary small-side branch.
Suggested move: Prove the additive reset inequality in the original degree-three branch.Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
Peer reviewedHladký, Král', and Norin proved that minimum outdegree 0.3465n forces a directed triangle, versus the conjectured threshold n/3.[9] PreprintThe conjecture was proved for Cayley graphs and vertex-transitive graphs using additive-number-theoretic methods.[6] Peer reviewedHamidoune proved the original girth-order formulation for minimum outdegree three, extending the minimum-outdegree-two case proved by Caccetta and Häggkvist.[10]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
The 1970 regular-digraph girth problem is a precursor generalized by the minimum-outdegree formulation.
[11][4]Seymour's conjecture would imply the directed-triangle case when both minimum indegree and outdegree are at least n/3.
[8]Aharoni, Holzman, and DeVos formulate a rainbow-cycle generalization that implies the original conjecture.
[5]Formal and computational footholds
Existing statements, libraries, computations, and datasets that can shorten the next serious attempt.
- computation · source linked; not reproduced by ProofAtlasflag-algebra reproducibility example
FlagSOS.jl documents a machine-readable constrained flag-algebra model for the triangle case and computes a basic upper bound; it is an exploratory/computational resource, not a proof of the conjecture.
[14] - certificate · source linked; not reproduced by ProofAtlascomputer-assisted inequality certificate
The 0.3465n theorem uses flag algebras and computer-generated inequalities; the arXiv record retains a CH.mw ancillary file.
[3]
Research-record corrections
What changed in the research record
These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.
How the route was assembled
Argument structure
These stages follow the mathematical order of the supplied argument.
Browse all 11 mapped stages
- stage 1Saturated minimal-counterexample model
- stage 2Critical deletion and reverse spheres
- stage 3One-gate branch excluded
- stage 4Degree-two case completed
- stage 5Degree-three return matroid identified
- stage 6Maximal-defect clone diamond
- stage 7Small two-gate blocks excluded
- stage 8Original bypass sharply constrained
- stage 9Root-saturated clone core
- stage 10Exact rank-one peeling
- stage 11Two terminal degree-three obstructions
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Mapped research milestoneInitial research sequence
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.
- theorem candidate
1 of 28 1 - lemma
14 of 28 14 - equivalence
1 of 28 1 - negative result
5 of 28 5 - reduction
7 of 28 7
Minimal counterexample and reverse geometrySaturation, deletion, reverse spheres, and defect identities.5 displayed rows
- retained route statementExact saturation metricintermediate
- retained route statementCritical deletion lawintermediate
- retained route statementMinimum predecessors and reverse spheresintermediate
- retained route statementLayer-bypass defect boundsintermediate
- retained route statementExact reverse-layer defect identityintermediate
Return fans and gammoid structureOne-gate obstruction, degree-two closure, fan complement, and return matroid.5 displayed rows
- retained route statementOne-gate branch excludedintermediate
- retained route statementDegree-two case completedspecial case
- retained route statementFan-complement degeneracyintermediate
- retained route statementProper-dependency inequalityintermediate
- retained route statementDegree-three return matroidconditional
Degree-three reductionsClone diamonds, return partitions, two-gate exclusions, and gate completeness.6 displayed rows
- retained route statementMaximal-defect clone reductionconditional
- retained route statementDegree-three equality diamondconditional
- retained route statementFull return-fan partitionconditional
- retained route statementTwo paths plus acyclic residueconditional
- retained route statementSmall two-gate blocks excludedconditional
- retained route statementQuantitative gate completenessconditional
Provenance-preserving maximal-defect bypassOriginal full-fan elimination and late-half constraints.2 displayed rows
- retained route statementOriginal-bypass full fan eliminatedconditional
- retained route statementLate-half branches excludedconditional
Root saturation and exact peelingRoot-saturated cores, exact rank-one peeling, and two terminal return types.6 displayed rows
- retained route statementRoot-saturated clone coreconditional
- retained route statementExact rank-one peelingconditional
- retained route statementPacket levels and additive tollconditional
- retained route statementSmall clone cores excludedconditional
- retained route statementTwo terminal degree-three return typesconditional
- retained route statementTerminal U₂,₃ normal formconditional
Secondary structural toolsCorrect packet tools that are not currently load-bearing.3 displayed rows
- retained route statementPeriod compressionconditional
- retained route statementMajority separatorsconditional
- retained route statementClosure rigidityconditional
Open, paused, and eliminated routesThe live multigate program and the approaches whose exact limits are now understood.14 displayed rows · 9 routes included
- Research targetEliminate the terminal U₂,₃ coreopen
- Research targetEliminate the terminal full fanopen
- Research targetProve additive two-reset accountingopen
- Research targetGeneralize exact peeling to k gatesopen
- ComputationAdversarial six-vertex step-{1,2} circulant for the local-window injection method.It satisfies equality in the unweighted return-distance identity but defeats literal local window injection. · reported unreproduced
- Active routeLength-weighted multigate compositionGeneralize exact one-gate packet width, cut slack, and additive lifting toll to return rank k≥2.
- Route held in reserveStationary weighted reverse-distanceA circulation inequality would imply the conjecture, but may be strictly stronger and currently lacks a proof or counterexample.
- Route held in reserveRegular return-distance chargingThe exact identity isolates several terms, but no global charge is known.
- Eliminated routeThin separator strategyRegular counterexamples would have every proper separator larger than d/2, so small-bottleneck arguments cannot handle the core obstruction.
- Refuted routeFull return connectivity from minimum semidegreeMinimum in- and outdegree alone does not force an arc with d disjoint return paths.
- Refuted routeLocal geodesic-window injectionEquality examples have missing and multiply hit ordered nonarcs, so any charge must be redistributed globally or fractionally.
- Eliminated routeThreshold-trap inductionThe degree-three trap is an acyclic-sink statement in disguise and adds no inductive force.
- Useful but insufficientOrdinary torso contractionOrdinary quotient girth remembers only the largest channel loss; the desired bound needs additive reset costs or packet compensation.
- Not yet justifiedAssuming regularityTrimming creates an outregular model, but saturation introduces excess degrees and no theorem regularizes the complete argument.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
The current research map records this as an open mathematical step.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Establish a correct k-gate composition theorem with exact provenance and additive accounting.
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
Caccetta–Häggkvist Conjecture · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
Must every finite loopless simple digraph with minimum outdegree d contain a directed cycle of length at most the ceiling of n divided by d?
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references14 cited works · next context review by Nov 2, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Aug 2, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1The Caccetta-Haggkvist conjecture — AIM workshop reportauthoritative webpage · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 2On cycles through prescribed vertices in oriented graphsoriginal source · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 3Counting flags in triangle-free digraphspreprint · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 4Short cycles in digraphs and the Caccetta-Häggkvist conjecturepreprint · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 5Rainbow triangles and the Caccetta-Häggkvist conjecturepreprint · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 6The Caccetta-Haggkvist conjecture and additive number theorypreprint · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 7A Summary of Problems and Results related to the Caccetta-Haggkvist Conjecturepreprint · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 8On Seymour's and Sullivan's second neighbourhood conjecturespeer reviewed result · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 9Counting flags in triangle-free digraphspeer reviewed result · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 10A note on minimal directed graphs with given girthpeer reviewed result · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 11On minimal regular digraphs with given girthpeer reviewed result · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 12The Caccetta-Haggkvist Conjecture (REGS)authoritative webpage · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 13Formal Conjectures repositoryformalization · accessed Aug 2, 2026
- 14Constrained example: Caccetta Haeggkvist conjectureauthoritative webpage · accessed Aug 2, 2026
Important qualifications
- No authoritative public formalization was located in the scoped Formal Conjectures/Mathlib searches. An empty array is not a claim that none exists.
- Empty formalization or computation lists mean that none was verified in this scoped search, not that none exists.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces