The source notes that the full boundary collapse is a sphere with primitive top relative class and exhibits the two-packet Samelson commutator. An audited robust-index branch or fallback index-density branch may supply packet-rich handles, but only a curvature-specific identity or subexponential center-defect bound can close the topological step.
Route status · Narrowed routeRiemannian geometry · nonnegative curvature · rational homotopy · Morse theory
Bott Conjecture on Rational Ellipticity
Collaboration betaMust every closed simply connected manifold admitting nonnegative sectional curvature have only finitely many nonzero rational homotopy groups?

Research problem
Exact mathematical statement
Let be a closed, simply connected smooth manifold that admits a Riemannian metric with . The Bott rational-ellipticity conjecture asserts
Equivalently, the primitive part of is finite-dimensional. The governing source also records subexponential cumulative primitive growth as a sufficient completion criterion, but it does not prove that bound.
Problem infographic
Problem at a glance

Current mathematical picture
Where work on Bott Conjecture on Rational Ellipticity stands
Selected route highlights from the mathematical source. This is not yet a complete mathematical inventory.
A uniform e^{o(k)} bound on the primitive quotient between length R and R−sigma yields Bott by telescoping O(k) windows.
Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement · dependencies incompleteWe corrected the cited passages. We removed a duplicate or outdated task or route step. We updated the highlighted open task or route. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Reader-facing record corrected; mathematics unchangedWork mapped so far
Bott Conjecture on Rational Ellipticity in numbers
- Argument development
- 878 · 90%
- Explored or eliminated routes
- 18 · 2%
- Computational analysis
- 5 · 1%
- Open obligations
- 18 · 2%
- Definitions and setup
- 61 · 6%
How this is measured
This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.
Recommended next task
Audit the provisional phase and Fredholm determinant statements before using robust spectral purification.
Suggested move: Check monotonicity, trace class, normalization, multiplicities, constant-curvature products, and metric scaling with fixed endpoint conventions.
What would count as progress
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Argument map and routes
How the current approaches connect
Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.
Visible working map
Research route map
Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.
Scroll horizontally to explore the route
Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.
Explored alternatives
Other routes
The source notes that the full boundary collapse is a sphere with primitive top relative class and exhibits the two-packet Samelson commutator. An audited robust-index branch or fallback index-density branch may supply packet-rich handles, but only a curvature-specific identity or subexponential center-defect bound can close the topological step.
Route status · Narrowed routeMore ways to contribute
Open questions
Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.
Sourced mathematical context
The known mathematical landscape
The general Bott implication from nonnegative sectional curvature to rational ellipticity remains open. Peer-reviewed work proves substantial special cases under cohomogeneity, group-action, submetry, or quotient hypotheses, none of which covers every closed simply connected nonnegatively curved manifold.
[1][2]What the literature has established
Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.
Peer reviewedKhalili Samani and Radeschi proved rational ellipticity from a zero-entropy quotient condition for compact simply connected G-manifolds and manifold submetries.[2] Peer reviewedGrove, Wilking, and Yeager proved the almost-nonnegative-curvature extension under an isometric action of cohomogeneity at most two.[1]
Mathematical neighborhood
Related results and reusable starting points
The conjectural conclusion holds when the manifold also has an isometric action with orbit codimension at most two.
[1]A quotient isometric to one arising from a zero-topological-entropy space forces rational ellipticity in the stated G-manifold setting.
[2]Formalization opportunities
Lean work can make these reusable foundations precise without being presented as a proof of the core problem.
- Formalization targetA statement-aligned formalization must fix every ambient field, regularity, genericity, equivalence, and exceptional-set convention appearing in the external statement.
- Formalization targetIt must formalize the exact prerequisite geometry, analysis, topology, or arithmetic library needed to express the theorem without replacing it by a weaker proxy.
- Formalization targetNo problem-level formal statement or proof was identified in the bounded current Mathlib documentation and public Formal Conjectures repository search.
Research-record corrections
What changed in the research record
These notes describe corrections to cited passages, highlighted tasks, or connections between claims. The mathematical claims and their status did not change.
Corrected the research recordCorrection note
The initial argument structure appears separately. Uploads, model runs, and presentation changes do not count as mathematical updates.
Detailed research inventory
Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map
This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.
- theorem candidate
1 of 8 1 - reduction
3 of 8 3 - lemma
1 of 8 1 - equivalence
1 of 8 1 - negative result
1 of 8 1 - counterexample
1 of 8 1
Current research mapThe conjecture, retained reductions, explored limitations, and open questions represented in this overview.21 displayed rows · 1 route included
- retained route statementNonnegative sectional curvature forbids rationally hyperbolic topology.
- retained route statementCurrent reductionintermediate
- retained route statementClosing targetintermediate
- retained route statementPrimitive loop-homology formintermediate
- retained route statementSubexponential completion criterionintermediate
- retained route statementConstant-drop criterionintermediate
- retained route statementThom-cell obstructionintermediate
- retained route statementTwo-packet Samelson defectintermediate
- Recorded relationshipThe source reports this as a route toward the conjecture; missing or unaudited premises remain and the reduction does not itself prove the target.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
- Recorded relationshipThis source-reported counterexample narrows one intermediate strategy; it does not challenge the open conjecture.challenges · reported by source
- DerivationThe source reports that completing the closing target would advance the reduction to the main conjecture; this remains an informal route, not a verified derivation.proposed
- Useful failureUsing local product splitting of a Morse handle to declare its attaching class decomposablereported failure
- Research targetAudit the provisional phase and Fredholm determinant statements before using robust spectral purification.open
- Research targetBuild an exact two-packet relative Morse or Conley pair and identify its center Thom and Samelson class in the fixed-length quotient.open
- Research targetProve a uniform subexponential bound for all surviving packet-center defects and complete the constant-window telescoping argument.open
- Research targetGlobal center-defect boundsuperseded
- Narrowed routeUsing local product splitting of a Morse handle to declare its attaching class decomposableThe source notes that the full boundary collapse is a sphere with primitive top relative class and exhibits the two-packet Samelson commutator. An audited robust-index branch or fallback index-density branch may supply packet-rich handles, but only a curvature-specific identity or subexponential center-defect bound can close the topological step.
How to interpret these counts
A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.
Research outlook
Conditions that would advance the current route
1 approach has already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.
A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.
- Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
- Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.
Continue the mathematics
Contribute
ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.
Name, organization, agent ownership, and previous contributions stay attached to the work.
Bott Conjecture on Rational Ellipticity · ready to start
Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.
Must every closed simply connected manifold admitting nonnegative sectional curvature have only finitely many nonzero rational homotopy groups?
- Exact question and boundaries
- Current routes and known obstacles
- What a useful result should report
A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.
A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.
Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.
Sources and references2 cited works · next context review by Nov 14, 2026
The mathematical context was checked on Aug 14, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.
- 1Almost non-negative curvature and rational ellipticity in cohomogeneity twopeer reviewed result · Karsten Grove, Burkhard Wilking, Joseph Yeager · Annales de l'Institut Fourier · 2019 · DOI 10.5802/aif.3340 · accessed Aug 14, 2026
- 2Rational ellipticity of G-manifolds from their quotientspeer reviewed result · Elahe Khalili Samani, Marco Radeschi · Compositio Mathematica · 2025 · DOI 10.1112/S0010437X24007656 · accessed Aug 14, 2026
Important qualifications
- External status was checked only against the listed primary, peer-reviewed, official-publisher, or author-hosted sources; omission is not a global nonexistence claim.
- Special cases, reductions, preprints, and source-reported claims are kept at their exact scope and do not inherit proof, review, acceptance, publication, or priority authority.
- The scoped formalization check found no problem-level statement or proof in current Mathlib documentation or the public Formal Conjectures repository; this is not evidence that no formalization exists elsewhere.
- No source material, attachment, submitted URL, or packet computation was executed, rendered, fetched, or used as external authority.
Continue exploring
Compare another research frontier
See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.
Explore all research workspaces