Finite groups · modular representation theory · block theory · local representation theory

Alperin Weight Conjecture

Collaboration beta

The source reports substantial reusable reductions and projective-algebra tools, but no nontrivial quasi-isolated block has yet been completed with all stabilizer, scalar, and intermediate-block requirements, and full prime-and-cover coverage remains open.

l(B)=w(B)
Known results and sources
Open-research thumbnail with a finite-group block between Brauer-character and weight inventories, followed by an interrupted bridge to the equality l(B)=w(B).
The blockwise equality remains open; the packet's strongest route still needs exact modular block-triple compatibility and full cover coverage.

Research problem

Exact mathematical statement

For every finite group G, prime p, and p-block B, the number l(B) of irreducible Brauer characters in B equals the number w(B) of G-orbits of B-weights:

l(B)=w(B).l(B)=w(B).

The classification route in the source targets a stronger inductive condition: an equivariant bijection between Brauer characters and weights together with the exact block isomorphism of modular character triples. The governing Markdown explicitly does not claim that the covering-group hypotheses needed for the final reduction have been verified.

Problem infographic

Problem at a glance

Source-bound four-stage explainer separating the blockwise equality, the stronger covering-group reduction, the reported finite-group and projective footholds, and the still-open quasi-isolated and coverage bridges.
The source reports reusable reduction and projective-algebra tools; the full block-triple relation and classification-wide coverage remain open.

Current mathematical picture

Where work on Alperin Weight Conjecture stands

Open conjecture

Selected route highlights from the mathematical source. This is not yet a complete mathematical inventory.

Useful failureTransport modular blocks by deforming a Hecke parameter to q=1

Over F_5, the source's rank-one algebra H_q=F_5[T]/((T-q)(T+1)) is local at q=-1 and split semisimple at q=1. A projective global-to-generic construction from stable basic sets, integral pinned Harish-Chandra data, actual graded Clifford algebras, and a strictly Brauer-compatible BDR transport remains viable within the source's stated hypotheses.

Route status · Narrowed route
Main reductionCovering-group reduction

The source reports a checked literature reduction from the exact inductive modular-character-triple condition for all required covering groups to arbitrary finite groups; a numerical count for simple quotients is not enough.

Evidence posture · Source-reported route statement · dependencies incomplete
Priority open bridgeProve the exact Corollary 6.10 global-to-generic block-triple relation for every label of one nontrivial quasi-isolated block.Task status · Ready to work on

Work mapped so far

Alperin Weight Conjecture in numbers

1kretained lines of mathematical investigation1,000 in the current working snapshot
Argument development
745 · 75%
Explored or eliminated routes
32 · 3%
Computational analysis
38 · 4%
Open obligations
43 · 4%
Definitions and setup
142 · 14%
8selected mapped statements1routes investigated4open questions4contribution-ready tasks
How this is measured

This measures retained mathematical investigation, not proximity to a proof. Code, data, logs, repeated text, operational instructions, and generated presentation copy are excluded.

Argument map and routes

How the current approaches connect

Claims, reductions, open questions, active routes, and narrowed alternatives in one mathematical map.

Visible working map

Research route map

13 selected steps

Selected claims, active routes, useful failures, and open questions from the current research map. Arrows appear only for explicitly recorded relationships.

13 selected steps

Scroll horizontally to explore the route

Working route overview for Alperin Weight ConjectureA selected map of recorded claims, active routes, useful failures, open questions, and their explicit relationships. Search, filter, zoom, or pan within this page.Does every block contain as many irreducible Brauer characters as it has conjugacy classes of weights? — Depends on missing premiseDoes every block contain asmany irreducible Brauercharacters…Covering-group reduction — Depends on missing premiseCovering-group reductionCurrent reduction — Depends on missing premiseCurrent reductionAbstract gauge does not settle block transport — Depends on missing premiseAbstract gauge does notsettle block transportClosing target — Depends on missing premiseClosing targetExtension-free projective Clifford labels — Depends on missing premiseExtension-free projectiveClifford labelsNormal-defect block correspondence — Depends on missing premiseNormal-defect blockcorrespondenceNormal-p quotient packet identities — Depends on missing premiseNormal-p quotient packetidentitiesTransport modular blocks by deforming a Hecke parameter to q=1 — stoppedTransport modular blocks bydeforming a Hecke parameterto…Prove the exact Corollary 6.10 global-to-generic block-triple relation for every label of one nontrivial quasi-isolated block. — OpenProve the exact Corollary6.10 global-to-genericblock-triple…Verify a concrete outer-graded BDR equivalence and the exact equivalence-induced versus Brauer-induced Dade maps, including the intermediate-block effect of any H^1 gauge. — OpenVerify a concreteouter-graded BDR equivalenceand…Replace broad family summaries by exact iBAW certificates for every required covering group and every excluded-prime or exceptional-cover sector. — OpenReplace broad familysummaries by exact iBAWcertificates…One complete quasi-isolated block — OpenOne complete quasi-isolatedblock
Working claimActive routeOpen, active, or blocked questionUseful failure

Working overview, not proof. The map shows selected recorded relationships; more nodes or edges do not establish correctness or completion.

Explored alternatives

Other routes

1 recorded
Narrowed routeTransport modular blocks by deforming a Hecke parameter to q=1

Over F_5, the source's rank-one algebra H_q=F_5[T]/((T-q)(T+1)) is local at q=-1 and split semisimple at q=1. A projective global-to-generic construction from stable basic sets, integral pinned Harish-Chandra data, actual graded Clifford algebras, and a strictly Brauer-compatible BDR transport remains viable within the source's stated hypotheses.

Route status · Narrowed route

More ways to contribute

Open questions

Additional prepared tasks for exploring this research frontier.

4 featured tasks
01
Prove the exact Corollary 6.10 global-to-generic block-triple relation for every label of one nontrivial quasi-isolated block.Suggested move: Choose one quasi-isolated block satisfying Condition 6.1 and build a row for every global label recording the generic weight, inertia groups, oriented Clifford algebra, projective label, central scalars, and every intermediate block induction.
Ready to work on
02
Verify a concrete outer-graded BDR equivalence and the exact equivalence-induced versus Brauer-induced Dade maps, including the intermediate-block effect of any H^1 gauge.Suggested move: For one exact BDR reduction, write the actual global and local homogeneous maps on the Dade crossed products and test strict equality; if a gauge appears, prove its effect on every common-centralizer scalar and Harris-Knorr block.
Ready to work on
03
One complete quasi-isolated block

Select one nontrivial quasi-isolated block and prove every clause of the exact Corollary 6.10 input label by label, including all intermediate block inductions.

Suggested move: Resolve the exact source-reported obligation without treating it as an established negative result.
Ready to work on
04
Replace broad family summaries by exact iBAW certificates for every required covering group and every excluded-prime or exceptional-cover sector.Suggested move: Upgrade one claimed family in the coverage matrix to an exact theorem certificate, then enumerate and close every prime, cover, automorphism, and exceptional sector outside Condition 6.1.
Ready to work on

Sourced mathematical context

The known mathematical landscape

Context collected Aug 30, 2026
Current statusOpen conjecture

The full Alperin weight conjecture remains open. A 2026 peer-reviewed article reports inductive-condition verification for alternating groups, sporadic groups, groups of Lie type in defining characteristic, and type A, while stating that types D and E remain largely open. These family-level advances do not establish the conjecture for every finite group and block.

[5]
External progress

What the literature has established

Selected external milestones in reverse chronological order, with their evidence posture.

  1. Peer reviewedFeng, Malle, and Zhang introduced generic weights for finite reductive groups and derived criteria for inductive Alperin weight conditions; the article presents this as progress toward, not a proof of, the…[5]
  2. Peer reviewedAn, Hiss, and Lübeck verified the inductive blockwise Alperin weight condition in odd nondefining characteristic for the finite groups F4(q).[4]
  3. Peer reviewedSpäth established a reduction theorem for the blockwise version, conditional on inductive conditions for every finite nonabelian simple group.[3]
  4. Peer reviewedNavarro and Tiep reduced the non-blockwise Alperin weight conjecture to an inductive condition for finite simple groups and proved several cases.[2]
5 cited sources3 related results or reductionsReferences

Mathematical neighborhood

Related results and reusable starting points

Current focusAlperin Weight Conjecture
Dependency or reductionInductive Alperin weight condition

The non-blockwise conjecture for arbitrary finite groups follows from the stated inductive Alperin weight condition for finite nonabelian simple groups.

[2]
Dependency or reductionInductive blockwise Alperin weight condition

The blockwise conjecture is reduced to a corresponding set of inductive conditions for every finite nonabelian simple group.

[3]
Solved special caseFinite Chevalley groups F4(q) in odd nondefining characteristic

The inductive blockwise condition is verified for F4(q) in odd characteristic not dividing q; this is a family-level case, not the universal conjecture.

[4]

Formalization opportunities

Lean work can make these reusable foundations precise without being presented as a proof of the core problem.

  • Formalization targetA statement-aligned formalization must define finite-group p-blocks, irreducible Brauer characters, radical p-subgroups, block induction, defect-zero characters, and block weights under one fixed convention.
  • Formalization targetA formal reduction must distinguish the numerical blockwise equality from the stronger equivariant inductive conditions and must preserve automorphism and block compatibility.
  • Formalization targetFamily-level certificates must not be promoted to a proof for all finite nonabelian simple groups or all covering groups and primes.

Detailed research inventory

Claims, milestones, and routes in the current map

This view highlights the mathematical statements most useful for following the current route.

6 standing statements2 proposed statements4 open questions1 narrowed routes
Statements by mathematical role8 selected mapped statements
  • theorem candidate1 of 81
  • reduction2 of 82
  • lemma3 of 83
  • special case1 of 81
  • negative result1 of 81
Selected mathematical clusters1 mathematical clusters
Current research mapThe conjecture, retained reductions, explored limitations, and open questions represented in this overview.21 displayed rows · 1 route included
  • retained route statementDoes every block contain as many irreducible Brauer characters as it has conjugacy classes of weights?
  • retained route statementCurrent reductionintermediate
  • retained route statementClosing targetintermediate
  • retained route statementCovering-group reductionintermediate
  • retained route statementNormal-p quotient packet identitiesintermediate
  • retained route statementNormal-defect block correspondenceintermediate
  • retained route statementExtension-free projective Clifford labelsintermediate
  • retained route statementAbstract gauge does not settle block transportintermediate
  • Recorded relationshipThe source reports this as a route toward the conjecture; missing or unaudited premises remain and the reduction does not itself prove the target.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • Recorded relationshipThis source-reported claim supports the retained route only within its stated, unaudited scope.supports · reported by source
  • DerivationThe source reports that completing the closing target would advance the reduction to the main conjecture; this remains an informal route, not a verified derivation.proposed
  • Useful failureTransport modular blocks by deforming a Hecke parameter to q=1reported failure
  • Research targetProve the exact Corollary 6.10 global-to-generic block-triple relation for every label of one nontrivial quasi-isolated block.open
  • Research targetVerify a concrete outer-graded BDR equivalence and the exact equivalence-induced versus Brauer-induced Dade maps, including the intermediate-block effect of any H^1 gauge.open
  • Research targetReplace broad family summaries by exact iBAW certificates for every required covering group and every excluded-prime or exceptional-cover sector.open
  • Research targetOne complete quasi-isolated blockopen
  • Narrowed routeTransport modular blocks by deforming a Hecke parameter to q=1Over F_5, the source's rank-one algebra H_q=F_5[T]/((T-q)(T+1)) is local at q=-1 and split semisimple at q=1. A projective global-to-generic construction from stable basic sets, integral pinned Harish-Chandra data, actual graded Clifford algebras, and a strictly Brauer-compatible BDR transport remains viable within the source's stated hypotheses.
How to interpret these counts

A statement may be a lemma, conditional reduction, special case, documented limitation, or open target. These counts describe the work's structure; they do not estimate distance to a proof.

Research outlook

Conditions that would advance the current route

Priority open bridgeProve the exact Corollary 6.10 global-to-generic block-triple relation for every label of one nontrivial quasi-isolated block.

1 approach has already been tested and narrowed. The task above is the current priority within the larger open route.

Evidence needed nextConcrete conditions for progress

A result can change the outlook by closing the bridge, narrowing its scope, or showing that the route cannot work.

  • Supply a complete argument with every imported premise identified.
  • Survive an independent attempt to falsify the proposed step.

Continue the mathematics

Contribute

ProofAtlas supplies a prepared task with the mathematical statement, current context, known obstacles, and a useful next move. Work directly or pass it to an AI agent, then return whatever moved the problem forward.

Read-only beta · actions unavailable
Prepared starting pointProve the exact Corollary 6.10 global-to-generic block-triple relation for every label of one nontrivial quasi-isolated block.

Alperin Weight Conjecture · ready to start

Mathematical updatesFollow this problem

Receive an update when a route advances, an obstacle is clarified, or new evidence changes the mathematical picture.

Research contextPrepared context for any AI agent

The source reports substantial reusable reductions and projective-algebra tools, but no nontrivial quasi-isolated block has yet been completed with all stabilizer, scalar, and intermediate-block requirements, and full prime-and-cover coverage remains open.

  • Exact question and boundaries
  • Current routes and known obstacles
  • What a useful result should report
Return mathematical workReturn what you or your agent found

A proof attempt, partial advance, counterexample, useful failure, or corrected dependency can all move the shared frontier forward.

Proof attempt or partial resultSupporting notes or data
Hosted agentRun this task with a hosted agent

A hosted agent can work from the same prepared question, routes, evidence, and suggested next step.

Your own AI agentConnect an outside research agent

Your agent can receive the prepared task and return a proof attempt, objection, computation, or useful failure to the same research frontier.

Sources and references5 cited works · next context review by Nov 30, 2026

The mathematical context was checked on Aug 30, 2026. Status can be refreshed sooner after a material result or claim.

  1. 1
    Weights for finite groupsoriginal source · J. L. Alperin · American Mathematical Society · 1987 · DOI 10.1090/pspum/047.1/933373 · MR MR933373 · accessed Aug 30, 2026
  2. 2
    A reduction theorem for the Alperin weight conjecturepeer reviewed result · Gabriel Navarro, Pham Huu Tiep · Inventiones Mathematicae · 2011 · DOI 10.1007/s00222-010-0295-2 · accessed Aug 30, 2026
  3. 3
    A reduction theorem for the blockwise Alperin weight conjecturepeer reviewed result · Britta Späth · Journal of Group Theory · 2013-03-01 · DOI 10.1515/jgt-2012-0032 · accessed Aug 30, 2026
  4. 4
    The Inductive Blockwise Alperin Weight Condition for the Chevalley Groups F4(q)peer reviewed result · Jianbei An, Gerhard Hiss, Frank Lübeck · Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society · 2024-12-10 · DOI 10.1090/memo/1530 · accessed Aug 30, 2026
  5. 5
    Generic weights for finite reductive groupspeer reviewed result · Zhicheng Feng, Gunter Malle, Jiping Zhang · Mathematische Annalen · 2026-03-05 · ARXIV 2505.22064 · DOI 10.1007/s00208-026-03415-7 · accessed Aug 30, 2026

Important qualifications

  • This was a bounded statement-aligned search of original, peer-reviewed, and publisher sources, not an exhaustive literature, priority, rights, authorship, or citation review.
  • Open status is bound to a peer-reviewed article published on 2026-03-05 that explicitly says the conjecture remains open; this does not rule out a later claim after that date.
  • The cited family-level verifications do not establish the conjecture for all finite groups or all blocks.
  • No packet attachment was opened, and no URL was discovered or selected from packet contents; every public source was located through an independent search.
  • The bounded search did not establish a statement-aligned formalization, certificate, dataset, or independently reproduced computation. Empty readiness lists do not prove that none exists.

Continue exploring

Compare another research frontier

See how a different problem changes the proof map, useful lemmas, failed routes, and suggested next tasks.

Explore all research workspaces

Expanded visual

Open original image